Re: [VOTE] Naming of the transfer operators/Hooks

2020-06-02 Thread Jarek Potiuk
The vote has now passed with the option [1] winning: [1] XToYOperator -> for example S3ToHiveOperator We have 9 '+1' binding votes : - Jarek Potiuk - Ash Berlin Taylor - Bas Harenslak - Tomasz Urbaszek - Kaxil Naik - Felix Uellendall - Maxime Beauchemin - Arthur

Re: [VOTE] Naming of the transfer operators/Hooks

2020-06-01 Thread Kamil BreguĊ‚a
+1 for [1] XToYOperator On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 9:56 AM Arthur Wiedmer wrote: > > +1 for option 1 as well > > On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 2:03 AM Jarek Potiuk > wrote: > > > Seems this one will be easier to settle, there is not much controversy :) > > Following the discussion > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Naming of the transfer operators/Hooks

2020-06-01 Thread Arthur Wiedmer
+1 for option 1 as well On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 2:03 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > Seems this one will be easier to settle, there is not much controversy :) > Following the discussion > >

Re: [VOTE] Naming of the transfer operators/Hooks

2020-05-30 Thread Maxime Beauchemin
+1 for [1] XToYOperator On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 7:33 AM Felix Uellendall wrote: > +1 for [1] XToYOperator > > Best Regards, > Felix > > Sent from ProtonMail Mobile > > On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 13:58, Kaxil Naik wrote: > > > +1 for [1] XToYOperator > > > > On Sat, May 30, 2020, 12:56 Tomasz

Re: [VOTE] Naming of the transfer operators/Hooks

2020-05-30 Thread Felix Uellendall
+1 for [1] XToYOperator Best Regards, Felix Sent from ProtonMail Mobile On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 13:58, Kaxil Naik wrote: > +1 for [1] XToYOperator > > On Sat, May 30, 2020, 12:56 Tomasz Urbaszek wrote: > >> +1 for XToYOperator >> >> On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 1:30 PM Bas Harenslak >> wrote: >>

Re: [VOTE] Naming of the transfer operators/Hooks

2020-05-30 Thread Kaxil Naik
+1 for [1] XToYOperator On Sat, May 30, 2020, 12:56 Tomasz Urbaszek wrote: > +1 for XToYOperator > > On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 1:30 PM Bas Harenslak > wrote: > > > #1 -> XToYOperator > > > > > On 30 May 2020, at 12:09, Ash Berlin-Taylor wrote: > > > > > > +1 for [1] XToYOperator > > > > > > On

Re: [VOTE] Naming of the transfer operators/Hooks

2020-05-30 Thread Tomasz Urbaszek
+1 for XToYOperator On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 1:30 PM Bas Harenslak wrote: > #1 -> XToYOperator > > > On 30 May 2020, at 12:09, Ash Berlin-Taylor wrote: > > > > +1 for [1] XToYOperator > > > > On May 30 2020, at 10:03 am, Jarek Potiuk > wrote: > > > >> Seems this one will be easier to settle,

Re: [VOTE] Naming of the transfer operators/Hooks

2020-05-30 Thread Bas Harenslak
#1 -> XToYOperator > On 30 May 2020, at 12:09, Ash Berlin-Taylor wrote: > > +1 for [1] XToYOperator > > On May 30 2020, at 10:03 am, Jarek Potiuk wrote: > >> Seems this one will be easier to settle, there is not much controversy :) >> Following the discussion >>

Re: [VOTE] Naming of the transfer operators/Hooks

2020-05-30 Thread Ash Berlin-Taylor
+1 for [1] XToYOperator On May 30 2020, at 10:03 am, Jarek Potiuk wrote: > Seems this one will be easier to settle, there is not much controversy :) > Following the discussion >

[VOTE] Naming of the transfer operators/Hooks

2020-05-30 Thread Jarek Potiuk
Seems this one will be easier to settle, there is not much controversy :) Following the discussion https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r456565d372dcd7199d5ca34881d43911bf2c6ce623e515252a3aec73%40%3Cdev.airflow.apache.org%3E I would like to cast a vote on the standard of naming the transfer