On Mon, 23 May 2005, Antoine Levy-Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
we should add a line about in in the table explainning the different
system properties used by Ant.
Keep in mind that it is our wrapper script that sets the property. If
you launch ant any other way (IDE, script of your own,
Hello,
I propose to release Ant 1.6.5 on Thursday, June 2nd.
This will be a pure bug fix release.
[] Yes
[] No
Let's begin with my +1
Cheers,
Antoine
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
On Mon, 23 May 2005, Antoine Levy-Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I propose to release Ant 1.6.5 on Thursday, June 2nd.
+1
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
it's my strong belief that part of the reason the javah and move bugs
made it into 1.6.3 is that our branches are living too long. The same
happened to 1.5.2 (which required 1.5.3 quickly) because the 1.5
branch lived to long (IMHO).
In my day-to-day Ant usage I use CVS HEAD, all the time,
This leads me to the subject of this vote. Let's get rid of the
branch, stabelize CVS HEAD and release 1.7.0-beta in a reasonable
time-frame.
Cheers
Stefan
+1
Antoine
PS: I also intend to start a vote that branches shouldn't live as long
as the 1.5 and 1.6 branches did but we
+1
Jan
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet am: Montag, 23. Mai 2005 09:24
An: dev@ant.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.6.5 release
On Mon, 23 May 2005, Antoine Levy-Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I propose to release Ant 1.6.5
+1
Jan
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Antoine Levy-Lambert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet am: Montag, 23. Mai 2005 09:50
An: Ant Developers List
Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Shut down the 1.6 branch after 1.6.5
This leads me to the subject of this vote. Let's get rid of the
branch,
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Hi,
it's my strong belief that part of the reason the javah and move bugs
made it into 1.6.3 is that our branches are living too long. The same
happened to 1.5.2 (which required 1.5.3 quickly) because the 1.5
branch lived to long (IMHO).
In my day-to-day Ant usage I use
On Mon, 23 May 2005, Kev Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I read this correctly, you're saying that the number of bugs
increases when there's a long period of time between branches,
mainly because it's difficult to test the branch properly as most
(if not all) of the committers use HEAD.
Yes. In particular the number of bugs that are only present in the
branch but not on CVS head.
Both the javah and move bugs have been fixed in HEAD for many
weeks before we released 1.6.3.
process issue then. The complexity of keeping the curent branch in a
predictable state when the
On Mon, 23 May 2005, Kev Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
process issue then.
process is one of the most difficult things to enforce in an
all-volunteer organization. 8-)
Unfortunately there's no simple fix.
Sure. Kill branches as soon as possible so we don't need a process
for dealing with
Unfortunately there's no simple fix.
Sure. Kill branches as soon as possible so we don't need a process
for dealing with them.
ok, so then maintaining the branch becomes a trivial exercise after 2*
months it's dead and new code is always in HEAD and you don't have to
migrate it to
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
This leads me to the subject of this vote. Let's get rid of the
branch, stabelize CVS HEAD and release 1.7.0-beta in a reasonable
time-frame.
You did not vote, Stefan.
+1 for me.
-
To unsubscribe,
On Mon, 23 May 2005, Stephane Bailliez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You did not vote, Stefan.
Thanks 8-)
I like to call for a vote and vote myself in two separate mails - and
forgot to send the second.
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe,
On Mon, 23 May 2005, Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This leads me to the subject of this vote. Let's get rid of the
branch, stabelize CVS HEAD and release 1.7.0-beta in a reasonable
time-frame.
+1
Stefan
-
To
Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
Steve Cohen wrote:
Alexey Solofnenko wrote:
Please use ${ant.home} property.
- Alexey.
On 5/22/05, Steve Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am trying to write a simple build.xml for debugging Ant setups. One
of the things I would like to know is what ANT_HOME
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Mon, 23 May 2005, Antoine Levy-Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
we should add a line about in in the table explainning the different
system properties used by Ant.
Keep in mind that it is our wrapper script that sets the property. If
you launch ant any other way
Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
Hello,
I propose to release Ant 1.6.5 on Thursday, June 2nd.
This will be a pure bug fix release.
[] Yes
[] No
Let's begin with my +1
Cheers,
Antoine
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Hi,
it's my strong belief that part of the reason the javah and move bugs
made it into 1.6.3 is that our branches are living too long. The same
happened to 1.5.2 (which required 1.5.3 quickly) because the 1.5
branch lived to long (IMHO).
In my day-to-day Ant usage I use
+1 Yes
Peter
Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
Hello,
I propose to release Ant 1.6.5 on Thursday, June 2nd.
This will be a pure bug fix release.
[] Yes
[] No
Let's begin with my +1
Cheers,
Antoine
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
+1
Martijn
Hello,
I propose to release Ant 1.6.5 on Thursday, June 2nd.
This will be a pure bug fix release.
[] Yes
[] No
Let's begin with my +1
Cheers,
Antoine
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
+1
Martijn
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
Hello,
I propose to release Ant 1.6.5 on Thursday, June 2nd.
This will be a pure bug fix release.
[+1] Yes
[] No
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
Kev Jackson wrote:
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Hi,
it's my strong belief that part of the reason the javah and move bugs
made it into 1.6.3 is that our branches are living too long. The same
happened to 1.5.2 (which required 1.5.3 quickly) because the 1.5
branch lived to long (IMHO).
In my
This is just something I have in my archive from long ago, discussion on
what was needed for Ant 1.3 and up.
I note that some of them, like XML docs, are still on the todo list :(
Original Message
Subject: Some Thoughts on Ant 1.3 and 2.0
Date: 27 Oct 2000 14:29:07 +0200
On Mon, 23 May 2005, Steve Loughran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is just something I have in my archive from long ago,
discussion on what was needed for Ant 1.3 and up.
Someday I'll go and dig out a five year old mail to hold against you
;-)
Stefan
+1
Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
Hello,
I propose to release Ant 1.6.5 on Thursday, June 2nd.
This will be a pure bug fix release.
[] Yes
[] No
Let's begin with my +1
Cheers,
Antoine
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Hi,
This leads me to the subject of this vote. Let's get rid of the
branch, stabelize CVS HEAD and release 1.7.0-beta in a reasonable
time-frame.
+1
Conor
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 23 May 2005, Steve Loughran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Was it Ant1.2 that evaluated properties in the order they were
encountered at parse time, not execution time?
No, everything before Ant 1.2 did.
Ant1.5 probably marked the change,
Agreed.
Question is, what was better: early
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Mon, 23 May 2005, Steve Loughran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is just something I have in my archive from long ago,
discussion on what was needed for Ant 1.3 and up.
Someday I'll go and dig out a five year old mail to hold against you
;-)
pick one where I dont
+1
On 5/23/05, Antoine Levy-Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I propose to release Ant 1.6.5 on Thursday, June 2nd.
This will be a pure bug fix release.
[] Yes
[] No
Let's begin with my +1
Cheers,
Antoine
I am also using CVS HEAD and it seems pretty stable for me.
- Alexey.
On 5/23/05, Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
it's my strong belief that part of the reason the javah and move bugs
made it into 1.6.3 is that our branches are living too long. The same
happened to 1.5.2
I would also add parallel executor.
- Alexey.
--
Alexey N. Solofnenko trelony at gmail.com http://gmail.com
home: http://trelony.cjb.net/
Pleasant Hill, CA (GMT-8 hours usually)
We need an echo task that takes well formed XML and spits it out. Is
this really the best we have? escaped cdata in an echo task?
echo file=${target.pom}![CDATA[project
modelVersion4.0.0/modelVersion
groupId${m2.groupID}/groupId
artifactId${artifact.name}/artifactId
jkf 2005/05/23 12:14:36
Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant ProjectHelper.java
Log:
Catching Throwable while calling new on a no statement constructor (all
fields / base classes only have no statement constructors as well) seems
overdone. Removing catch clause.
Here we go...
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
mbenson 2005/05/23 12:27:30
Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant ComponentHelper.java
Log:
add brief version of getElementName()
Revision ChangesPath
1.55 +24 -6 ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/ComponentHelper.java
Index: ComponentHelper.java
mbenson 2005/05/23 12:28:09
Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/types DataType.java
Added: src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/util IdentityStack.java
Log:
new methods for reference checking and logging
Revision ChangesPath
1.1
mbenson 2005/05/23 12:30:38
Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/types Mapper.java
RedirectorElement.java PatternSet.java
RegularExpression.java Substitution.java
XMLCatalog.java
Log:
use DataType's (new)
mbenson 2005/05/23 12:31:14
Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant DirectoryScanner.java
src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/types/selectors
SelectorUtils.java
src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant DirectoryScannerTest.java
mbenson 2005/05/23 12:31:49
Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/types/selectors
DateSelector.java
Added: src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/types TimeComparison.java
Log:
add TimeComparison ExtendedAttribute; retrofit DateSelector
Revision Changes
mbenson 2005/05/23 12:32:54
ant/src/resources - New directory
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mbenson 2005/05/23 12:33:04
ant/src/resources/org - New directory
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mbenson 2005/05/23 12:33:10
ant/src/resources/org/apache - New directory
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mbenson 2005/05/23 12:33:20
ant/src/resources/org/apache/tools - New directory
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mbenson 2005/05/23 12:33:35
ant/src/resources/org/apache/tools/ant/types - New directory
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mbenson 2005/05/23 12:33:46
ant/src/resources/org/apache/tools/ant/types/resources - New directory
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mbenson 2005/05/23 12:34:00
ant/src/resources/org/apache/tools/ant/types/resources/selectors - New
directory
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mbenson 2005/05/23 12:33:54
ant/src/resources/org/apache/tools/ant/types/resources/comparators - New
directory
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mbenson 2005/05/23 12:36:05
ant/src/etc/testcases/types/resources - New directory
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mbenson 2005/05/23 12:36:38
ant/src/etc/testcases/types/resources/comparators - New directory
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mbenson 2005/05/23 12:37:24
ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/types/resources - New directory
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mbenson 2005/05/23 12:37:48
ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/types/resources/comparators - New directory
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mbenson 2005/05/23 12:37:59
ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/types/resources/selectors - New directory
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mbenson 2005/05/23 12:46:14
Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/types AbstractFileSet.java
Log:
use DataType's convenience method
Revision ChangesPath
1.51 +1 -32
ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/types/AbstractFileSet.java
Index: AbstractFileSet.java
mbenson 2005/05/23 12:51:58
Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Concat.java
Length.java PathConvert.java defaults.properties
src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/types DirSet.java
FileList.java FileSet.java Path.java
Whew!
--- Matt Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here we go...
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
-
mbenson 2005/05/23 13:00:21
Modified:.WHATSNEW
Log:
ResourceCollections
Revision ChangesPath
1.829 +2 -0 ant/WHATSNEW
Index: WHATSNEW
===
RCS file: /home/cvs/ant/WHATSNEW,v
mbenson 2005/05/23 13:03:14
Modified:.WHATSNEW
docs/manual coretasklist.html
Removed: docs/manual/CoreTasks clone.html
src/etc/testcases/taskdefs clone.xml
src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs CloneTest.java
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32631.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5035.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11990.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13615.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13615.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Now that ResourceCollections have been added to CVS, I
(and anyone who wants to help) need to add support for
ResourceCollections anywhere that it makes sense to do
so. As I have mentioned in some bugreps tasks that
operate on paths and should only get
real-filesystem-files should work by adding
mbenson 2005/05/23 13:39:01
Modified:.build.xml
Log:
Oops, must build in the contents of src/resources
Revision ChangesPath
1.473 +2 -0 ant/build.xml
Index: build.xml
===
RCS file:
Can it be - copy+delete in that case?
- Alexey.
Matt Benson wrote:
... Regarding the Move task, I don't see that we could
move non-file resources in a predictable way so I
would recommend failing on ResourceCollections that do
not return true from isFilesystemOnly().
Thoughts?
-Matt
--
mbenson 2005/05/23 13:47:41
Modified:docs/manual/CoreTasks concat.html
Log:
Update concat documentation for ResourceCollections.
Revision ChangesPath
1.16 +14 -32ant/docs/manual/CoreTasks/concat.html
Index: concat.html
--- Alexey N. Solofnenko [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Can it be - copy+delete in that case?
Okay... here's what I did for preserving timestamps in
FileUtils copy methods. I added a Touchable interface
to the resources package. FileResource is (so far)
the only Resource that uses it, but I was
Sounds great. Do you have also Movable interface?
- Alexey.
On 5/23/05, Matt Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Alexey N. Solofnenko [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Can it be - copy+delete in that case?
Okay... here's what I did for preserving timestamps in
FileUtils copy methods. I added a
--- Alexey Solofnenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sounds great. Do you have also Movable interface?
Not yet. Let's see if anyone else has anything to say
about these concepts too.
-Matt
- Alexey.
On 5/23/05, Matt Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- Alexey N. Solofnenko [EMAIL
mbenson 2005/05/23 14:12:59
Modified:docs/manual/CoreTasks pathconvert.html
Log:
Document pathconvert changes.
Revision ChangesPath
1.19 +11 -11ant/docs/manual/CoreTasks/pathconvert.html
Index: pathconvert.html
mbenson 2005/05/23 14:22:12
Modified:docs/manual/CoreTasks length.html
Log:
Document length task changes.
Revision ChangesPath
1.5 +11 -8 ant/docs/manual/CoreTasks/length.html
Index: length.html
mbenson 2005/05/23 14:35:45
Modified:docs/manual coretasklist.html
Added: docs/manual/CoreTasks resourcecount.html
Log:
Document the resourcecount task.
Revision ChangesPath
1.1 ant/docs/manual/CoreTasks/resourcecount.html
Index:
mbenson 2005/05/23 14:36:42
Modified:.WHATSNEW
Log:
add resourcecount to Resource Collections blurb
Revision ChangesPath
1.831 +2 -1 ant/WHATSNEW
Index: WHATSNEW
===
RCS file:
--- Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[SNIP]
In my day-to-day Ant usage I use CVS HEAD, all the
time, exclusively.
Sometimes I merge changes into the 1.6 branch
without merging the unit
tests as well. Sometimes I don't merge changes at
all. Sometimes I
forget to pull a change from
jkf 2005/05/23 14:52:35
Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/email EmailTask.java
src/main/org/apache/tools/ant Main.java
src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/javah
JavahAdapterFactory.java
scohen 2005/05/23 15:34:05
Modified:.WHATSNEW
Log:
document recent changes to FTP task
Revision ChangesPath
1.832 +22 -0 ant/WHATSNEW
Index: WHATSNEW
===
RCS file:
http://www.oopsconsultancy.com/software/xmltask/index.html :-)
Ok, you mean a core task. I dont think that we have something else.
property echoproperties
xmlproperty ???
ATM that´s only a kind of templating the output. Works - but hasnt much
to do with xml. Some ideas ... (but from this early
79 matches
Mail list logo
