Re: Hoped for advantages of migrating to git

Yeah. You can get emails from GitHub for PRs, and the email always gives the commands to pull it into your local repo and push it back to origin. On 7 May 2014 22:55, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On 2014-05-07, Matt Sicker wrote: > > > The Camel project takes PRs from GH, though, so they may have so

AW: Hoped for advantages of migrating to git

) Jan > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Antoine Levy Lambert [mailto:anto...@gmx.de] > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 7. Mai 2014 02:18 > An: Ant Developers List > Betreff: Re: Hoped for advantages of migrating to git > > Matt, Jesse, > > I think that both of you are b

Re: Hoped for advantages of migrating to git

On 2014-05-07, Matt Sicker wrote: > The Camel project takes PRs from GH, though, so they may have some useful > info about that. http://camel.apache.org/contributing.html#Contributing-PullrequestatGithub sounds like manually merging the PR to the ASF git repo. Stefan --

Re: Hoped for advantages of migrating to git

ot; repo in the ASF I could trust. >> Additional repos somewhere else (like on Github) could "just help". >> >> (If working with Git - would Gerrit a good candidate?) >> >> >> Jan >> >> >> > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- >&

Re: Hoped for advantages of migrating to git

t;> Additional repos somewhere else (like on Github) could "just help". >>> >>> (If working with Git - would Gerrit a good candidate?) >>> >>> >>> Jan >>> >>> >>> > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- >>>

Re: Hoped for advantages of migrating to git

gt; Jan > > > > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > > Von: Antoine Levy Lambert [mailto:anto...@gmx.de] > > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 7. Mai 2014 02:18 > > An: Ant Developers List > > Betreff: Re: Hoped for advantages of migrating to git > > > > Matt, Jesse, > &

Re: Hoped for advantages of migrating to git

On 2014-05-07, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote: > I don’t know whether an option of using only github and not the ASF > hosted git is acceptable for the ASF ? for the Ant committers ? For the ASF the only thing that matters is that the ASF git instance is the source of truth. Tags are there and the s

Re: Hoped for advantages of migrating to git

I added my GH account info a while ago, but it only added my account to the ASF organization on GH. It's kinda buggy with linking histories even, and INFRA isn't too interested in resolving those issues since it's outside ASF. The Camel project takes PRs from GH, though, so they may have some usef

Re: Hoped for advantages of migrating to git

Matt, Jesse, I think that both of you are basically saying that accepting pull requests entered in github is going to be more manual work, including more command line work, in the case of a migration to git-wip-us.apache.org as opposed to migrating to use only github. I don’t know whether an op

Re: Hoped for advantages of migrating to git

I mean how do you accept pull requests? You wouldn't be able to do it through GitHub. You'd have to manually pull the branch from GitHub like the name "pull request" implies. If you could commit to GitHub, then you could add a remote besides origin for GitHub, then pull from the GitHub remote, then

Re: Hoped for advantages of migrating to git

On 2014-05-06, Matt Sicker wrote: > Git allows you to do both. You can auto-merge from GH, but I'm not > sure how you can even get write access to ASF GH repos. You don't, you commit to the ASF repo and it gets mirrored. IIRC some projects have their own forks of the ASF mirror and accept pull r

Re: Hoped for advantages of migrating to git

Git allows you to do both. You can auto-merge from GH, but I'm not sure how you can even get write access to ASF GH repos. On Monday, 5 May 2014, Jesse Glick wrote: > On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 8:22 AM, Nicolas Lalevée > > wrote: > > once a committer is satisfied with the result, the work is being >

Re: Hoped for advantages of migrating to git

On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 8:22 AM, Nicolas Lalevée wrote: > once a committer is satisfied with the result, the work is being imported > into the git repo with a script A much more straightforward workflow is just to do all work in the GitHub repo, accepting pull requests simply by pressing the Merg

Re: Hoped for advantages of migrating to git

> not as integrated as in github. >>>>> >>>>> Nicolas >>>>> >>>>>> Le 30 avr. 2014 à 16:01, Josh Suereth a >>>> écrit : >>>>>> >>>>>> If you don't mind some recommendations from the

Re: Hoped for advantages of migrating to git

like git in github. Pull request, code review and so > on is > >> not as integrated as in github. > >>> > >>> Nicolas > >>> > >>>> Le 30 avr. 2014 à 16:01, Josh Suereth a > >> écrit : > >>>> > >>>

Re: Hoped for advantages of migrating to git

icolas >>> >>>> Le 30 avr. 2014 à 16:01, Josh Suereth a >> écrit : >>>> >>>> If you don't mind some recommendations from the peanut gallery (been >> using >>>> git for 5 years now) >>>> >>>> &

Re: Hoped for advantages of migrating to git

rs now) > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 9:53 AM, Antoine Levy-Lambert >wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> Hello Maarten, > >>> > >>> I do not know a lot about git either. > >>> > >>> Here are the

Re: Hoped for advantages of migrating to git

a écrit : >> >> If you don't mind some recommendations from the peanut gallery (been using >> git for 5 years now) >> >> >> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 9:53 AM, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: >> >>> >>> Hello Maarten, >>> >>&g

Re: Hoped for advantages of migrating to git

ns from the peanut gallery (been using > git for 5 years now) > > > On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 9:53 AM, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: > >> >> Hello Maarten, >> >> I do not know a lot about git either. >> >> Here are the advantages I see in migr

Re: Hoped for advantages of migrating to git

for 5 years now) > > > On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 9:53 AM, Antoine Levy-Lambert >wrote: > > > > > Hello Maarten, > > > > I do not know a lot about git either. > > > > Here are the advantages I see in migrating to git : > > > > - git allows

Re: Hoped for advantages of migrating to git

If you don't mind some recommendations from the peanut gallery (been using git for 5 years now) On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 9:53 AM, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: > > Hello Maarten, > > I do not know a lot about git either. > > Here are the advantages I see in migrating to

Hoped for advantages of migrating to git

Hello Maarten, I do not know a lot about git either. Here are the advantages I see in migrating to git : - git allows third-parties to clone an original repository and in fact to create a fork while keeping the possibility of contributing back what they have created if they want to, and also

Re: Migrating to Git

Le 20 avr. 2014 à 17:34, Antoine Levy Lambert a écrit : > Hi, > > like Michael one of my hopes in migrating to git is that it will allow non > ASF committers > to create their own forks of projects and be able to keep them (or not) up to > date with the > master bra

Re: Migrating to Git

Hi, like Michael one of my hopes in migrating to git is that it will allow non ASF committers to create their own forks of projects and be able to keep them (or not) up to date with the master branch. I have also done a little bit of investigation to see how other projects have migrated to

Re: AW: Migrating to Git

ense. >You may obtain a copy of the License at > >http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 > >Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software >distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, >WITHOUT WARR

Re: Migrating to Git

I'm happy with Subversion, so for me there is no need to switch to git. Maarten Van: Jean-Louis Boudart Aan: Ant Developers List Verzonden: maandag 14 april 8:24 2014 Onderwerp: Migrating to Git HI there, Since write git repository are accessible

RE: AW: Migrating to Git

OR pull http://gitref.org/remotes/#fetch (you can then resync with remote repo when WIFI access is restored) HTH Martin __ > From: apa...@materne.de > To: dev@ant.apache.org > Subject: AW: Migrating to Git > Date: Mon, 14 Ap

AW: Migrating to Git

> > And I have not searched in the ASF docs, but do you have any pointer > > on some guidelines about handling IP ? Can we merge any pull request > > > Don't have any pointer about handling IP but i'm sure people invested > in other Apache project present in this ML could give us their > guidelines

Re: Migrating to Git

2014-04-14 11:59 GMT+02:00 Nicolas Lalevée : > I like git, so I like the idea. > > But what about the publication of the doc on the website ? Today we rely > on svn:externals for the doc of each release. How would it be managed if > it's migrated to git ? > I think this could be solved with git su

Re: Migrating to Git

On Apr 14, 2014, at 7:17 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On 2014-04-14, Nicolas Lalevée wrote: > >> But what about the publication of the doc on the website ? Today we >> rely on svn:externals for the doc of each release. How would it be >> managed if it's migrated to git ? > > We'd likely need to

Re: Migrating to Git

On 2014-04-14, Nicolas Lalevée wrote: > But what about the publication of the doc on the website ? Today we > rely on svn:externals for the doc of each release. How would it be > managed if it's migrated to git ? We'd likely need to copy stuff around. TBH I'm not too sure we're still using exter

Re: Migrating to Git

I like git, so I like the idea. But what about the publication of the doc on the website ? Today we rely on svn:externals for the doc of each release. How would it be managed if it's migrated to git ? And I have not searched in the ASF docs, but do you have any pointer on some guidelines about

Migrating to Git

HI there, Since write git repository are accessible for a while, i suggest (as many of you) to switch projects to git. I know this has been discussed many times [1] but never in a dedicated thread. So what do you think about this ? Are you ok to migrate : * ant * ivy / ivyde * easyant * rest