On 3/29/2011 7:46 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote:
> just the minute done a fresh build - at same link:
> http://people.apache.org/~fuankg/mingw/build_w32_cross.txt.gz
Apparently, still --silent
On 3/29/2011 7:54 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote:
> Am 30.03.2011 01:56, schrieb William A. Rowe Jr.:
>> This bit looks more important;
>>
>> checking if libtool supports shared libraries... yes
>> checking whether to build shared libraries... yes
>> checking whether to build static libraries... yes
>> gr
On 3/29/2011 7:46 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote:
>
> well, there's a huge scope for enhancement as it seems ...
> also our configure is at best 'unusual'; f.e. I have already compiled a
> couple of things
> successfully on MinGW/MSYS, f.e. such things like bintuils, libcurl, ...; and
> I did never
Am 30.03.2011 01:56, schrieb William A. Rowe Jr.:
This bit looks more important;
checking if libtool supports shared libraries... yes
checking whether to build shared libraries... yes
checking whether to build static libraries... yes
grep: /home/Administrator/apr/bldapr-1.4.x/libtool: No such fi
Bill,
Am 30.03.2011 02:19, schrieb Guenter Knauf:
Am 30.03.2011 01:59, schrieb William A. Rowe Jr.:
One more thought, I am very curious how your results differ if
./buildconf
is done on unix rather than in the wild west universe of mingw.
pretty much same ...
http://people.apache.org/~fuankg/m
Am 30.03.2011 01:59, schrieb William A. Rowe Jr.:
On 3/29/2011 6:56 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 3/29/2011 6:24 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote:
Am 30.03.2011 01:20, schrieb Guenter Knauf:
Hi,
Am 30.03.2011 01:14, schrieb William A. Rowe Jr.:
1 error generated.
What is *that* about? :)
un-imp
On 3/29/2011 6:56 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> On 3/29/2011 6:24 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote:
>> Am 30.03.2011 01:20, schrieb Guenter Knauf:
>>> Hi,
>>> Am 30.03.2011 01:14, schrieb William A. Rowe Jr.:
1 error generated.
What is *that* about? :)
>>> un-important;
>> with un-imp
On 3/29/2011 6:24 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote:
> Am 30.03.2011 01:20, schrieb Guenter Knauf:
>> Hi,
>> Am 30.03.2011 01:14, schrieb William A. Rowe Jr.:
>>> 1 error generated.
>>>
>>> What is *that* about? :)
>>>
>> un-important;
> with un-important I mean here that also with gcc where the includes are
Am 30.03.2011 01:20, schrieb Guenter Knauf:
Hi,
Am 30.03.2011 01:14, schrieb William A. Rowe Jr.:
1 error generated.
What is *that* about? :)
un-important;
with un-important I mean here that also with gcc where the includes are
fine and pre-preocessing and compile of export*.c work still no
Hi,
Am 30.03.2011 01:14, schrieb William A. Rowe Jr.:
1 error generated.
What is *that* about? :)
On the wargs, I believe we are replacing that code; I'm creating a
VC10environment for
validation right now so I can better understand if the proposed fix forenviron
allocs
is going to be the so
On 3/29/2011 11:40 AM, Guenter Knauf wrote:
> Am 28.03.2011 20:24, schrieb Guenter Knauf:
>> and that seems to work - it skips the useless testing for *mingw* and
>> sets the right typedef in apr.h, and the warning is then also gone;
>> but not sure if its the right patch ...
> with this one and al
On 3/29/2011 11:40 AM, Guenter Knauf wrote:
> Am 28.03.2011 20:24, schrieb Guenter Knauf:
>> and that seems to work - it skips the useless testing for *mingw* and
>> sets the right typedef in apr.h, and the warning is then also gone;
>> but not sure if its the right patch ...
> with this one and al
Am 28.03.2011 20:24, schrieb Guenter Knauf:
and that seems to work - it skips the useless testing for *mingw* and
sets the right typedef in apr.h, and the warning is then also gone;
but not sure if its the right patch ...
with this one and all the other recent fixes apr-1.4.x looks now pretty
go
Jeff,
I found another serious prob with MinGW APR
checking build system type... i686-pc-mingw32
checking host system type... i686-pc-mingw32
checking target system type... i686-pc-mingw32
Configuring APR library
Platform: i686-pc-mingw32
checking for working mkdir -p... yes
APR Version: 1.4.
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote:
> Jeff,
> Am 21.03.2011 14:58, schrieb Jeff Trawick:
>>
>> * ensure it is viable to use the MinGW toolchain to build APR on
>> 1.4.x-trunk for the purpose of (at least) me testing simple fixes and
>> running the test suite and using gcc as anot
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 5:23 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote:
> Am 21.03.2011 20:51, schrieb Jeff Trawick:
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 3:12 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 3/21/2011 12:56 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
apr 1.4 doesn't link for me (undefined reference to CreateHardLinkW
Am 21.03.2011 20:51, schrieb Jeff Trawick:
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 3:12 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wrote:
On 3/21/2011 12:56 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
apr 1.4 doesn't link for me (undefined reference to CreateHardLinkW),
That's odd, it's in kernel32.dll. A broken kernel32.dll.a/kernel32.lib fi
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 3:12 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wrote:
> On 3/21/2011 12:56 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>>
>> apr 1.4 doesn't link for me (undefined reference to CreateHardLinkW),
>
> That's odd, it's in kernel32.dll. A broken kernel32.dll.a/kernel32.lib file,
> perhaps?
>
part of it was a miss
On 3/21/2011 12:56 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>
> apr 1.4 doesn't link for me (undefined reference to CreateHardLinkW),
That's odd, it's in kernel32.dll. A broken kernel32.dll.a/kernel32.lib file,
perhaps?
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote:
> Jeff,
> Am 21.03.2011 14:58, schrieb Jeff Trawick:
>>
>> * ensure it is viable to use the MinGW toolchain to build APR on
>> 1.4.x-trunk for the purpose of (at least) me testing simple fixes and
>> running the test suite and using gcc as anot
Jeff,
Am 21.03.2011 14:58, schrieb Jeff Trawick:
* ensure it is viable to use the MinGW toolchain to build APR on
1.4.x-trunk for the purpose of (at least) me testing simple fixes and
running the test suite and using gcc as another perspective on the
Windows code
* provide at least some help in t
* ensure it is viable to use the MinGW toolchain to build APR on
1.4.x-trunk for the purpose of (at least) me testing simple fixes and
running the test suite and using gcc as another perspective on the
Windows code
* provide at least some help in the area of reviewing/testing to those
willing to do
22 matches
Mail list logo
