On May 23, 2013, 6:14 a.m., Likitha Shetty wrote:
Ashutosh, are you referring to TP 8 in the Test-Plan? If yes, then the TP is
still valid because in the TP the sub-domains (SubDomain1 and SubDomain2) that
we are trying to move the VM’s between are under the same domain(Doamin1).
But from
Thanks! I'm ready for the beginning. Will try my best :-)
Sent from my GT-N7000
On 28 May 2013 02:24, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am pleased to report that the following projects have been accepted by
the 2013 Google Summer of Code:
CloudStack: LDAP user provisioning,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11067/
---
(Updated May 28, 2013, 6:28 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Prachi Damle,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11437/#review21078
---
Congrats all!
On 28/05/13 12:53 AM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am pleased to report that the following projects have been accepted by
the 2013 Google Summer of Code:
CloudStack: LDAP user provisioning, Ian Duffy
Improving CloudStack support in Apache Whirr and Apache
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11458/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Prateek and Murali Reddy.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11461/
---
Review request for cloudstack.
Description
---
use executeBatch instead
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11461/#review21080
---
Commit 2e8d1264a247772b5dfda5bcab26fa5ed384a6d9 in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11307/#review21081
---
First two comments have been repeated, please ignore the
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11307/
---
(Updated May 28, 2013, 8:28 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Likitha
On May 28, 2013, 8:22 a.m., Likitha Shetty wrote:
test/integration/component/test_assign_vm.py, line 360
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11307/diff/4/?file=297101#file297101line360
create_vm with pf=true has been implemented?
Yes, VirtualMachine.create() checks for mode if mode is
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11462/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Prasanna Santhanam and Sateesh Chodapuneedi.
When I createFirewallRule I recieve a FirewallResponse but when I
deleteFirewallRule I am expected to pass in an id I recieved as a
FirewallRuleResponse?
What are these two response types? They look very similar. Is this
legacy? Can we clean it up and standardize to a single
FirewallRuleResponse?
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10970/
---
(Updated May 28, 2013, 9:29 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Murali Reddy
But, this will break backward compatibility no ?
Maybe change it in the next big release.
On 28/05/13 2:50 PM, Prasanna Santhanam prasanna.santha...@citrix.com
wrote:
When I createFirewallRule I recieve a FirewallResponse but when I
deleteFirewallRule I am expected to pass in an id I recieved as
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10970/
---
(Updated May 28, 2013, 9:43 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Murali Reddy,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11307/
---
(Updated May 28, 2013, 9:45 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Likitha
Sure, I'm looking for the rationale behind the two classes. That'll
help to determine how much of compatibility (if any) is broken because most of
them are similar. Also there are specific response types for the LoadBalancer
(ApplicationLoadBalancerResponse), GlobalLoadBalancerResponse which are
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11307/#review21084
---
test/integration/component/test_assign_vm.py
There is a ControlledEntity named NicSecondaryIp that is representing
a nic on the VM. The APIs that this entity is acted upon by are :
addIpToNic and removeIpFromNic.
Should this entity be more appropriately be renamed to just Nic? There
is also a NicIpAlias entity that seems to fit this too.
On May 28, 2013, 9:58 a.m., Likitha Shetty wrote:
test/integration/component/test_assign_vm.py, line 382
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11307/diff/4/?file=297101#file297101line382
Even the root disk snapshots are deleted.
And since the VM will be successfully moved if both the
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11307/
---
(Updated May 28, 2013, 10:22 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Likitha
Awesome, looking forward to seeing some good work done this summer.
The students should register on Jira and review board.
A good resource to kick start has been but up by Sebastian and can be
accessed here :
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudStack+Universit
y
-abhi
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11379/
---
(Updated May 28, 2013, 1:05 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep Singh
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11369/#review21092
---
Ship it!
committed to 4.1 as
Cancelling this vote officially.
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 10:54:02AM -0400, Chip Childers wrote:
Hi All,
I've created a 4.1.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a
vote.
The changes from round 3 are two commits related to DEB packaging.
Git Branch and Commit SH:
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:53:47AM +0530, Rohit Yadav wrote:
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 12:53 AM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
I am pleased to report that the following projects have been accepted by
the 2013 Google Summer of Code:
CloudStack: LDAP user provisioning,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11088/#review21091
---
Commit a65c36a39138308f95049a815fa99f4da0bbde1a in branch
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 12:02:27PM +0900, Hiroaki KAWAI wrote:
Chip, please cherry-pick to 4.1.
# This was my bug, sorry.
Branch: master
commit e9a6d47316d8de90eb662e9938ea7fcbe0ee0596
Author: Hiroaki KAWAI ka...@stratosphere.co.jp
Date: Tue May 28 11:55:21 2013 +0900
agent: fix
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9876/#review21089
---
Testing svngit2jira via python 2, please ignore
- ASF Subversion
On 28/05/13 4:23 PM, Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl wrote:
On 05/23/2013 06:35 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 09:25:10PM +, Edison Su wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 1:26 PM
On Mon, May 27, 2013, at 02:23 PM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
Abhi, Kelcey, Hugo and Myself will be their mentors but if you see
questions from any of these five students feel free to jump in and help
them out.
Congrats to all! Glad we're participating.
Best,
jzb
--
Joe Brockmeier
On Sat, May 25, 2013, at 09:52 AM, Outback Dingo wrote:
In my opinion, an RM should have some autonomy in management.
Is there some instance you've noticed the release manager not having
sufficient autonomy? I'd be curious to know where the RM needs more
autonomy than we've had so far.
Best,
Hi All,
I've created a 4.1.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a
vote.
The changes from round 4 are related to DEB packaging, some
translation strings, and a functional patch to make bridge type
optional during the agent setup (for backward compatibility).
Git Branch and Commit SH:
On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 09:28:20AM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 10:31:46AM -0700, Prachi Damle wrote:
Hi Prasanna,
The API is to update a VirtualMachine's affinity group associations
- it's not really an update operation on an affinity group - hence
the odd
In CloudStack, currently there are four distinct operations available with
public IP's at network service and manager layers.
1. Acquiring a public IP from zone level public IP pool
2. Associate acquired public IP with a guest network/VPC
3. Disassociate an associated public IP with a
Agree with Wido. This would be a great feature to have in 4.2. Yes, its a
lot of change and probably needs more education from Edison and Min maybe
through code walkthroughs, documentation, IRC meetings but I am +1 for
this to make it to 4.2 and would go as far to say that I would even
volunteer
Abhi,
I looked again at the query this morning, and you are right, the filter
was incorrect. There was a weird char in it. Fixing the filter
corrected the issue.
Sorry for the spam :)
Francois
On 2013-05-28 12:46 AM, Abhinandan Prateek wrote:
Check if the query filter is going to get the
Yes, congrats all and welcome onboard.
While working on these projects please do not hesitate to ask questions.
Please add/correct documentation, ask questions on coding practices and
logic, fix/file bugs if you see any.
Hope you guys have a lot of fun :)
On 28/05/13 12:53 PM, Venkata SwamyBabu
On Thu, May 23, 2013, at 04:21 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
Please join me in congratulating Venkata!
Congrats and welcome aboard!
Best,
jzb
--
Joe Brockmeier
j...@zonker.net
Twitter: @jzb
http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
On Thu, May 23, 2013, at 04:20 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
Please join me in congratulating Sailaja!
Congrats! Welcome aboard!
Best,
jzb
--
Joe Brockmeier
j...@zonker.net
Twitter: @jzb
http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11435/#review21095
---
server/src/com/cloud/configuration/ConfigurationManagerImpl.java
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 09:44:10AM -0500, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
Hey all,
The regular scheduled time for the weekly IRC meeting is 17:00 UTC
tomorrow. We've had really low turnouts for the last month or so.
Instead of sending a reminder, I wanted to ping the list and see whether
we had
All,
I have gone a through a large chunk of this patch, and published my review thus
far (https://reviews.apache.org/r/11277/). TL;DR is that this patch has a
number of significant issues which can be summarized as follows:
1. While it appeas that the requirement of NFS for secondary storage
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 01:52:20PM +, Dean Kamali (JIRA) wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13668307#comment-13668307
]
Dean Kamali commented on CLOUDSTACK-2702:
Hi,
I would like to merge the storage migration support to VMware into master. This
is incremental piece of work to extend storage migration support to VMware.
Earlier storage migration feature work was done merged into master as part of
JIRA ticket CLOUDSTACK-659. This work just extends
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 04:23:20PM +, Daan Hoogland wrote:
And if not how do I manipulate the order of tests?
IMO, tests should *never* require that they execute in a specific order.
That's what the setup and teardown phases of test execution are for.
If you find this is the issue, let's
I didn't hear any objection , I'll merge this today.
Thanks,
Anthony
From: Anthony Xu
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 4:25 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Alena Prokharchyk; Wei Zhou (w.z...@leaseweb.com); Anthony Xu
Subject: [MERGE] security group advanced zone branch into master
Hi all,
+1
-Original Message-
From: Sebastien Goasguen [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, May 27, 2013 1:27 AM
To: market...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] List CloudStack related books on the website
Hi,
After a relatively long discussion on the marketing@ list about the Packt
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 04:44:59PM +, Anthony Xu wrote:
I didn't hear any objection , I'll merge this today.
+1
Joe,
Swamped with $dayjob, I will try to attend, but I have nothing to report.
Thanks
Ilya
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 10:52 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: IRC Meeting Tomorrow? (Wednesday,
+1
Wei
2013/5/28 Anthony Xu xuefei...@citrix.com
I didn't hear any objection , I'll merge this today.
Thanks,
Anthony
From: Anthony Xu
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 4:25 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Alena Prokharchyk; Wei Zhou (w.z...@leaseweb.com); Anthony Xu
Subject: [MERGE]
Chip,
It is ok. Hope 4.1 will be released soon.
2013/5/23 Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.com
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 08:25:37AM +0200, Wei ZHOU wrote:
Guys,
Is it possible to merge this branch to 4.1?
Wei
Wei - IMO we need to wait for 4.2 for that feature to come back into
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 07:10:47PM +0200, Wei ZHOU wrote:
Chip,
It is ok. Hope 4.1 will be released soon.
Feel free to test the RC and vote!
-chip
+1
While I appreciate the don't-play-favorites sentiments, I do feel that we
are over thinking this issue. If favoritism becomes an issue, we can
revisit. At that point, I'd imagine that there would be half-a-dozen books
on CloudStack and listing/not listing them won't make much difference --
so
Hey All,
I am getting close to finishing up this integration, so I want to make sure
I understand the process and what is required for submitting my code for
review.
I have read this and am comfortable with its content:
http://cloudstack.apache.org/develop/non-committer.html
You can check out
Agree with the we don't have to get this perfect right away approach.
On 28 May 2013 18:17, Chiradeep Vittal chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com wrote:
+1
While I appreciate the don't-play-favorites sentiments, I do feel that we
are over thinking this issue. If favoritism becomes an issue, we can
+1 binding.
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 9:48 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (fifth round)
Hi All,
I've created a 4.1.0 release, with the following
Mike - the problem is that you have two patches (2 commits) in the same
patch file.
Here's what to do (choose 1):
1) Squash down to 1 commit / patch and submit it.
OR
2) Create a review for the first patch, and then a follow up review for
the second patch.
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 07:27:13PM
Thanks, Chip!
I didn't know that would be a problem.
If you know off hand, can you tell me how to do a squash?
Thanks again!
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Chip Childers
chip.child...@sungard.comwrote:
Mike - the problem is that you have two patches (2 commits) in the same
patch file.
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 01:32:48PM -0400, Will Stevens wrote:
Hey All,
I am getting close to finishing up this integration, so I want to make sure
I understand the process and what is required for submitting my code for
review.
I have read this and am comfortable with its content:
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 01:56:21PM +, Murali Reddy wrote:
In CloudStack, currently there are four distinct operations available with
public IP's at network service and manager layers.
1. Acquiring a public IP from zone level public IP pool
2. Associate acquired public IP with a
Unit tests are ran in random order because each unit test should be
self-sufficient. I'm saying I've seen cases where unit tests aren't written to
be self-sufficient and that's why an unit test fails sometimes and passes
sometimes.
In those cases, we should fix the unit test and not the
Sebastien,
Nope, we don't do votes on the users@ list. That list is just for user
support.
Decision making happens on dev@*, and if users want to take part in that,
they can subscribe.
* Or marketing@, private@, and security@
On 27 May 2013 08:53, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com wrote:
I guess the question would be why do you want xs-tools on the system vm?
Other than xs tools, Debian wheezy should work just fine on XS 6.1
As a point of reference, Debian squeeze wasn't supported on XS 5.6 (the
first release on which the old system vm was deployed) either and worked
just fine.
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 6:49 PM, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.comwrote:
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:53:47AM +0530, Rohit Yadav wrote:
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 12:53 AM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
I am pleased to report that the following projects have been
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 12:58:07AM +0530, Rohit Yadav wrote:
Hey Chip, we had created tickets on infra and now we've a new github mirror
which is up to date: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack
They somehow did not get rid of the incubator-cloudstack/ repo on github
which is very behind.
Just my view: Lobbying is something we should avoid from what I understand
from the Apache culture. This is not to flame anybody or anything, I've
recognized may be the issue is in me; sorry but I've very strong sentiments
and emotions around opensource software development, I've decreased my
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 04:38:23PM +, Donal Lafferty wrote:
Hi Chip,
Thanks for clarifying the IP info required. I'll take a closer look ASAP.
Awesome, thanks!
Citrix have provided some effort for a suitable console proxy, which needs to
be integrated into the System VM.
Hi,
I would like to merge support for zone wide primary storage for VMware
resources in CloudStack deployment. This is incremental piece of work to extend
zone wide primary storage pool support to VMware.
Earlier zone wide primary storage support was merged into master as part of
JIRA ticket
Hey everybody, I downloaded a 4.2 snapshot today and have been trying to get it
going without much luck. I got an error about systemvm.iso not being found, so
I manually copied it to the problem spot from a 4.1 tree I have laying around.
However, vhd-util is not found, and I am getting a
Thanks for the reply Chip. Are there any docs / guides for the test
functionality?
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.comwrote:
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 01:32:48PM -0400, Will Stevens wrote:
Hey All,
I am getting close to finishing up this integration, so
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 04:31:27PM -0400, Will Stevens wrote:
Thanks for the reply Chip. Are there any docs / guides for the test
functionality?
Yup:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Marvin+-+Testing+with+Python
As suggested on the user@ forum, i'm posting here.
Hi, I built 4.0.2 on centos 6.4, and worked my way through the issues.
I think I have correctly created the rpms required to integrate with
netscaler and vsphere. However when I try to connect to vsphere I get an
error '431 Could not find
Thank you...
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 4:33 PM, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.comwrote:
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 04:31:27PM -0400, Will Stevens wrote:
Thanks for the reply Chip. Are there any docs / guides for the test
functionality?
Yup:
Here is the stack trace:
WARN [xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase] (DirectAgent-1:) We cannot locate
/home/dlamotta/Dev/cloudstack-4.2-cfd8056/client/target/cloud-client-ui-4.2.0-SNAPSHOT/WEB-INF/classes/scripts/vm/hypervisor/xenserver/xenserver60/../vhd-util
INFO
On May 28, 2013, at 2:36 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
Sebastien,
Nope, we don't do votes on the users@ list. That list is just for user
support.
Decision making happens on dev@*, and if users want to take part in that,
they can subscribe.
This needs to be made clearer
Kishan,
Git blame shows the file is checked in by you. Can you take a look at why it's
failing?
Thanks.
--Alex
-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:dhoogl...@schubergphilis.com]
Sent: Monday, May 27, 2013 9:39 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: PLEASE: master
I am not a commiter and did not know there where things at all that I could
vote on. Nice to hear. What things? How to recognise them?
regards,
Daan
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:14 PM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.comwrote:
On May 28, 2013, at 2:36 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
Users are *by definition* people who do not vote. The minute a user votes
they become a developer. ;)
I agree with you that interaction with the user@ list should use inclusive
language, and should call for participation in the decision-making process
that happens on dev@.
Daan, monitor this
On May 28, 2013, 1:13 p.m., Chip Childers wrote:
committed to 4.1 with 7f8b4773e5bb98c23f1a024a2a2a832c69c2ba0d
Please be sure to put this in master.
Hello chip,
Thanks for your commit.
CloudStack's Transifex project manage translations for 4.1 and translations for
new master release
Yep! Welcome!
On 28 May 2013 22:56, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
wow,
I obtained voting right by subscribing. Beats Verhoeven's view on the
matter, the starship troopers way ;)
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:43 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
Users are *by
Thanks a lot, Chip! That did the trick.
I've definitely been picking up quite a bit about Git these past few days.
:)
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.comwrote:
In master: git fetch origin; git reset --hard origin/master
Then git am filename
Then do the
Nic already exists ( com.cloud.vm.Nic)
NicSecondaryIp is trying to model the optional additional ips available on
the Nic in addition to the primary Ip.
On 5/28/13 3:11 AM, Prasanna Santhanam t...@apache.org wrote:
There is a ControlledEntity named NicSecondaryIp that is representing
a nic on
+1
Regards,
Tariq Iqbal
S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447909911600
tariq.iq...@shapeblue.com
Apache CloudStack Bootcamp training courses
19/20 June, London
22/23 June, Santa Clara CA
10/11 July, Bangalore, India
21/22 August, London
-Original Message-
From: Sebastien Goasguen
Thanks. I'll wait for the i386 bits to land as well.
On 5/28/13 3:07 PM, Milamber milam...@apache.org wrote:
Hello Chiradeep,
Please note, haproxy has been backported in Debian Wheezy (7.0):
http://lists.debian.org/debian-backports-changes/2013/05/msg00050.html
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11479/
---
Review request for cloudstack and edison su.
Description
---
This patch
-Original Message-
From: John Burwell [mailto:jburw...@basho.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 8:43 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [MERGE]object_store branch into master
All,
I have gone a through a large chunk of this patch, and published my review
thus far
This Wiki below might be of interst for unit tests and integrating into the
build. The wiki does not go into the detail of how to setup a Maven project for
unit test but you can get the recipe from one of the other projects.I have been
running the JUnit tests from the Eclipse IDE, without
+1
Tested with Management Sever on CentOS 6.4 and Xen
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 6:48 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (fifth round)
Hi All,
I've created
+1, tested on the same environment and at the same time.
-Original Message-
From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 6:08 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (fifth round)
+1
May I also ask what versions of CSP should I install for XCP 1.1 and XCP
1.5 beta?
Current documentation points to sources for 3 XenServer versions:
For XenServer 6.0.2:
http://download.cloud.com/releases/3.0.1/XS-6.0.2/xenserver-cloud-supp.tgz
For XenServer 6.0:
As I just tested, I was unable to install any of these support packages for
XCP 1.1.
# xe-install-supplemental-pack xenserver-cloud-supp.iso
Error: Repository is not compatible with installed product (XenServer
expected)
Do you want to continue? (Y/N) y
Error: unsatisfied dependency xs:main eq
I will attend
-Original Message-
From: Joe Brockmeier [mailto:j...@zonker.net]
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 7:44 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: IRC Meeting Tomorrow? (Wednesday, May 29)
Hey all,
The regular scheduled time for the weekly IRC meeting is 17:00 UTC
Can it be shifted to somewhere between 2:00 - 16:00 UTC ?
On 29/05/13 10:58 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com
wrote:
I will attend
-Original Message-
From: Joe Brockmeier [mailto:j...@zonker.net]
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 7:44 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
95 matches
Mail list logo
