Hi John, Mike
I hope Mike's aswer helps you. I am trying to adding more.
(1) I think billing should depend on IO statistics rather than IOPS
limitation. Please review disk_io_stat if you have time. disk_io_stat can
get the IO statistics including bytes/iops read/write for an individual
virtual
The build of latest master branch spent much more time on
ConfigurationServerImplTest.java, which includes test getBase64Keystore
10 times.
Is it neccesary?
[root@weizhou-centos incubator-cloudstack]# git diff
2f29185943ac0412aa501b59493837b4055642e0
4894187991d581b72807b4282b7a29a48a8031e5
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 08:19:41AM +0200, Wei ZHOU wrote:
The build of latest master branch spent much more time on
ConfigurationServerImplTest.java, which includes test getBase64Keystore
10 times.
Is it neccesary?
[root@weizhou-centos incubator-cloudstack]# git diff
hi,
Any idea?
2013/5/31 Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl
On 05/31/2013 11:02 AM, Nguyen Anh Tu wrote:
Hi forks,
I'm looking for a Disaster Recovery solution on CS. Looking around I found
an article showing some great informations but not enought. Personally I
think:
+ Host: CS
-1
Extending the release will mean even more features will be packed into the 4.2,
which already has quite a lot of changes. The delays with 4.1 shows that
testing is a big job already and more features will make it worse. I'm
convinced that allowing for more time in 4.2 would not improve the
I don't want to see NORMAL users getting failed with running
cloudstack and sending email for asking the workaround.
# Even if you're thinking we're not wrong.
If you're going to release a5214bee99f6c5582d755c9499f7d99fd7b5b701
as 4.1.0, I'd like to suggest releasing 4.1.1 asap.
# I know the
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11437/
---
(Updated June 3, 2013, 10:01 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11437/#review21309
---
server/src/com/cloud/configuration/ConfigurationManagerImpl.java
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11437/
---
(Updated June 3, 2013, 10:10 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan
On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 01:35:06PM -0400, Chip Childers wrote:
The vote has *passed* with the following results (binding PMC votes
indicated with a * next to their name:
+1 : Edison*, Hugo*, Marcus*, David*, Wido*, Ilya, Animesh, Milamber,
Joe*, Simon, Prasanna*
-0 : John
-1 : Ove
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11435/
---
(Updated June 3, 2013, 10:27 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11436/
---
(Updated June 3, 2013, 11:10 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan
Hi,
we try to upgrade from 2.2.14 to 4.1
And we failed on this logs :
2013-06-03 13:15:24,367 DEBUG [utils.db.ScriptRunner] (Timer-1:null)
UPDATE `cloud`.`user` SET PASSWORD=RAND() WHERE id=1
2013-06-03 13:15:24,367 DEBUG [utils.db.ScriptRunner] (Timer-1:null)
ALTER TABLE
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11436/
---
(Updated June 3, 2013, 12:07 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11437/#review21311
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Koushik Das
On June 3, 2013, 10:10 a.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11436/
---
(Updated June 3, 2013, 1:08 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11436/#review21314
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Koushik Das
On June 3, 2013, 1:08 p.m.,
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 03:40:04PM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 01:35:06PM -0400, Chip Childers wrote:
The vote has *passed* with the following results (binding PMC votes
indicated with a * next to their name:
+1 : Edison*, Hugo*, Marcus*, David*, Wido*, Ilya,
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 06:40:55PM +0900, Hiroaki KAWAI wrote:
I don't want to see NORMAL users getting failed with running
cloudstack and sending email for asking the workaround.
# Even if you're thinking we're not wrong.
If you're going to release a5214bee99f6c5582d755c9499f7d99fd7b5b701
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11436/#review21317
---
Commit 0a69b828993088487876ce859e6c00e96e4b545c in branch
I create an issue : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2822
--
Nicolas Lamirault
_
Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations
Reminder to please VOTE here. This vote will close tomorrow, and your
opinion counts.
-chip
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 11:00:21AM -0400, Chip Childers wrote:
Following our discussion on the proposal to push back the feature freeze
date for 4.2.0 [1], we have not yet achieved a clear consensus.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11600/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Prateek and Koushik Das.
Description
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11437/#review21318
---
Commit 48913679e80e50228b1bd4b3d17fe5245461626a in branch
Hi,
The Apache licensed netscaler jars are now hosted in maven central.
It is possible to make the netscaler plug-in as part of the OSS.
Please check the details below.
Nitro jar entry
***
groupIdcom.citrix.netscaler.nitro/groupId
artifactIdnitro/artifactId
version10.0.e/version
SDX
Wonderful news Vijay. Glad to see this accomplished.
On Jun 3, 2013 10:13 AM, Vijay Venkatachalam
vijay.venkatacha...@citrix.com wrote:
Hi,
The Apache licensed netscaler jars are now hosted in maven central.
It is possible to make the netscaler plug-in as part of the OSS.
Please check the
Edison/Chip,
Please see my comments in-line.
Thanks,
-John
On May 31, 2013, at 4:04 PM, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.com wrote:
Comments inline:
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 09:42:29PM +, Edison Su wrote:
-Original Message-
From: John Burwell [mailto:jburw...@basho.com]
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013, at 08:39 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
2) Someone (not me, due to vacation starting Wed) needs to spin a 4.1.1
release
ASAP to include the fix for this.
I'm happy to help get this together if Ilya needs any assistance. I'm
flying today but will be around tomorrow and Wednesday.
Wei,
On Jun 3, 2013, at 2:13 AM, Wei ZHOU ustcweiz...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi John, Mike
I hope Mike's aswer helps you. I am trying to adding more.
(1) I think billing should depend on IO statistics rather than IOPS
limitation. Please review disk_io_stat if you have time. disk_io_stat can
John,
For the billing, as no one works on billing now, users need to calculate
the billing by themselves. They can get the service_offering and
disk_offering of a VMs and volumes for calculation. Of course it is better
to tell user the exact limitation value of individual volume, and network
rate
What is the difference between these interfaces? I see that StaticNat is used
in network elements. And StaticNatRule used elsewhere including APIs. Given
that PF and FW rules uses a single interface everywhere, should a similar thing
be there for static nat rules as well?
-Koushik
## The Program Has Been Announced!
There’s a stellar line-up of talks from various Apache
CloudStack committers such as, How to Run from a Zombie: CloudStack
Distributed Process Management by John Burwell, SDN in
CloudStack by Hugo Trippaers, CloudStack University” by Sebastian
Goasguen and High
Hi all,
You may have seen Giles send out a note about a user survey that we
are conducting for the community. I'd love if everyone could take a
moment (it's short, I promise) to fill out the survey form to share
some information about your use of CloudStack (or commercial
derivatives) with us.
Hi all,
Since I'm going to be on vacation until next Monday (starting Tuesday
evening), I'd like to ask for help in creating the board report for
this month.
I've created the template here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/2013-06+Board+Report+for+Apache+CloudStack
I'll
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Prasanna Santhanam t...@apache.org wrote:
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 04:58:45AM -0400, David Nalley wrote:
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 2:59 AM, Prasanna Santhanam t...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 10:51:12AM -0400, David Nalley wrote:
Hi folks:
I
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 12:22 PM, Chip Childers
chip.child...@sungard.com wrote:
Hi all,
Since I'm going to be on vacation until next Monday (starting Tuesday
evening), I'd like to ask for help in creating the board report for
this month.
I've created the template here:
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 04:58:45AM -0400, David Nalley wrote:
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 2:59 AM, Prasanna Santhanam t...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 10:51:12AM -0400, David Nalley wrote:
Hi folks:
I came across an interesting problem today, and think it's one that
deserves
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Chip Childers
chip.child...@sungard.com wrote:
Hi,
I've edited downloads.mdtext, and committed to staging. I'll be
building the DEB's and RPM's today.
We have that new tomcat issue to address, which I'll do in the RPM
build. I think we have a decision to
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013, at 11:41 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
I've edited downloads.mdtext, and committed to staging. I'll be
building the DEB's and RPM's today.
We have that new tomcat issue to address, which I'll do in the RPM
build. I think we have a decision to make... announce 4.1 release
I have fixed this in a patch I submitted last week.
I'm not sure when it began, but I noticed it a long time ago and had just
sent out an e-mail then and corrected it in my sandbox.
Let me see if I can find what I did to fix it.
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Will Stevens
Surprisingly this has been like this for a long time.
It kind of makes me wonder if anyone uses DevCloud. I use it all the time.
If others were using it, I would have expected this to be corrected like a
month or two ago.
I am alone in using DevCloud?
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Mike
On 6/3/13 8:33 AM, Koushik Das koushik@citrix.com wrote:
What is the difference between these interfaces? I see that StaticNat is
used in network elements.
StaticNat maps user VM to the Public IP address.
And StaticNatRule used elsewhere including APIs.
Legacy code. In 2.1.x version of
Chip/John,
This thread has become very hard to follow due to several technical
debates mixed together. Chip earlier made a good suggestion that we should
start separate threads for several important architectural issues raised
by John so that community can get clear grasp on the debating
I will look into it.
On 6/3/13 6:47 AM, nicolas.lamira...@orange.com
nicolas.lamira...@orange.com wrote:
I create an issue : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2822
--
Nicolas Lamirault
__
Thanks Mike. Ya, I also did the same change locally and then did the
following to not track the hack in my branch.
git update-index --assume-unchanged
tools/marvin/marvin/cloudstackConnection.py
Thanks for submitting a patch for that.
Cheers,
Will
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 1:05 PM, Mike
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 05:09:24PM +, Min Chen wrote:
Chip/John,
This thread has become very hard to follow due to several technical
debates mixed together. Chip earlier made a good suggestion that we should
start separate threads for several important architectural issues raised
I agree on merging Wei's feature first, then mine.
If his feature is for KVM only, then it is a non issue as I don't support
KVM in 4.2.
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 8:55 AM, Wei ZHOU ustcweiz...@gmail.com wrote:
John,
For the billing, as no one works on billing now, users need to calculate
the
Is there any plan on supporting KVM in the patch cycle post 4.2?
- Original Message -
From: Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Monday, June 3, 2013 10:12:32 AM
Subject: Re: [MERGE] disk_io_throttling to MASTER
I agree on merging Wei's feature
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Musayev, Ilya imusa...@webmd.net wrote:
How would this vote work? Is it consensus that wins?
Consensus would win if we had it. However, we don't, thus we have a vote.
Nicolas, in order to upgrade to 4.0, you need to have systemvm-vmware-4.0
template pre-installed. Apache CS release notes mention it (section 3.2):
http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.0.2/html/Releas
e_Notes/upgrade-instructions.html#upgrade-from-2.2.x-to-4.0
What pdf
Yes, ultimately I would like to support all hypervisors that CloudStack
supports. I think I'm just out of time for 4.2 to get KVM in.
Right now this plug-in supports XenServer. Depending on what we do with
regards to 4.2 feature freeze, I have it working for VMware in my sandbox,
as well.
Also,
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Chip Childers
chip.child...@sungard.com wrote:
Following our discussion on the proposal to push back the feature freeze
date for 4.2.0 [1], we have not yet achieved a clear consensus. Well...
we have already defined the project rules for figuring out what to
Wido,
I have the access, and I have the results of building from the release
source, but I don't have the knowledge to specifically know what to put
where and what to run to get the non-OSS DEB's I just built into the
repo.
Can you share some instructions please?
-chip
Ah, OK. I tend to re-deploy daily. :)
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Will Stevens wstev...@cloudops.com wrote:
I think a lot of people use DevCloud but they don't redeploy very often so
bugs like this don't get noticed. I use DevCloud all the time.
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Mike
+1 (not sure if my vote counts for anything since I'm not a committer)
To me it seems that many people spent a lot more time on 4.1 than expected,
so I think an extra 2 - 4 weeks for 4.2 would make sense.
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 11:21 AM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
On Fri, May 31, 2013
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 05:21:40PM +, Alena Prokharchyk wrote:
Nicolas, in order to upgrade to 4.0, you need to have systemvm-vmware-4.0
template pre-installed. Apache CS release notes mention it (section 3.2):
http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.0.2/html/Releas
+1 to move feature freeze date to 6/28 to get in the features proposed earlier
for 4.2 and have a longer bug fix cycle.
After moving 103 open 4.1 targeted defects to 4.2 we will have total of 367
open defects for 4.2. I hope with this change we are able to resolve lot more
defects before RC
Chip/Min,
For thread 1, I would like to see an expanded discussion regarding the need for
the staging area. In particular, what features on which hypervisors created
the need for it. With the wider expertise of the list, we may be able to find
solutions to these issues that either reduce or
-Original Message-
From: Hugo Trippaers [mailto:htrippa...@schubergphilis.com]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2013 2:24 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Pushback 4.2.0 Feature Freeze
-1
Extending the release will mean even more features will be packed into
the
On 6/3/13 10:30 AM, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 05:21:40PM +, Alena Prokharchyk wrote:
Nicolas, in order to upgrade to 4.0, you need to have
systemvm-vmware-4.0
template pre-installed. Apache CS release notes mention it (section
3.2):
On Fri, May 31, 2013, at 10:00 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
Please respond with one of the following:
+1 : change the plan as listed above
+/-0 : no strong opinion, but leaning + or -
-1 : do not change the plan
This vote will remain open until Tuesday morning US eastern time.
-1 do not
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013, at 12:46 PM, Alena Prokharchyk wrote:
Yes, looks like a doc bug to me. Have to replace systemvm-vmware-3.0.5
with systemvm-vmware-4.0
I can update this in the docs if it's not correct before I upload them
tonight.
Best,
jzb
--
Joe Brockmeier
j...@zonker.net
Twitter:
I was troubleshooting my ssvm the other day and found '4.4.4.4' defined as the
secondary dns server in /tools/devcloud/devcloud.cfg and in some other
scripts.
Should this be '8.8.4.4' instead since '8.8.8.8' is the one of the google dns
[1]?
Thanks,
Shane
[1]
+1
We have spent the past one and half month working on object_store feature,
it is very close to merge, just need some time to address review feedback
and resolve any technical concerns.
Thanks
-min
On 6/3/13 10:35 AM, Sudha Ponnaganti sudha.ponnaga...@citrix.com wrote:
+1 [binding]
Given
+1[binding] on pushing back feature freeze date.
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2013 8:00 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Pushback 4.2.0 Feature Freeze
Following our discussion on the proposal to
I just built the latest source code, and deployed on devcloud , everything
is ok.
-Wei
2013/6/3 Will Stevens wstev...@cloudops.com
Has anyone else experience this? I just pulled in the master code into my
branch and now I am getting this in my dev environment.
[DEBUG] Executing command
Sure. Edison will start one soon with this context information.
Thanks
-min
On 6/3/13 10:33 AM, John Burwell jburw...@basho.com wrote:
Chip/Min,
For thread 1, I would like to see an expanded discussion regarding the
need for the staging area. In particular, what features on which
hypervisors
Hi there,
This thread is to address John's comments about missing error handling in S3 as
secondary storage in object_store branch implementation. From previous merge
email thread, I realize that we may not explain clearly in FS how S3 should
work in new object_store branch, so causing several
+1 [Binding]
It looks like there are a couple of last minute features that would make 4.1 a
superb release. I would say that we should not allow any new features that
haven't already been proposed and that the extension does not go beyond 4
weeks. If beyond that, I'm a -1.
Will
+1 [binding]
-Original Message-
From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2013 10:32 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Pushback 4.2.0 Feature Freeze
+1 to move feature freeze date to 6/28 to get in the features
+1 [binding]
--Alex
-Original Message-
From: Will Chan [mailto:will.c...@citrix.com]
Sent: Monday, June 3, 2013 11:08 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Pushback 4.2.0 Feature Freeze
+1 [Binding]
It looks like there are a couple of last minute features that
Mike,
Can you explain why the the storage driver is hypervisor specific?
Thanks,
-John
On Jun 3, 2013, at 1:21 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
Yes, ultimately I would like to support all hypervisors that CloudStack
supports. I think I'm just out of time for 4.2 to get
Hi John,
The storage plug-in - by itself - is hypervisor agnostic.
The issue is with the volume-attach logic (in the agent code). The storage
framework calls into the plug-in to have it create a volume as needed, but
when the time comes to attach the volume to a hypervisor, the attach logic
has
To delve into this in a bit more detail:
Prior to 4.2 and aside from one setup method for XenServer, the admin had
to first create a volume on the storage system, then go into the hypervisor
to set up a data structure to make use of the volume (ex. a storage
repository on XenServer or a datastore
Hi there,
This thread is to address John's review comments on S3TemplateDownloader
implementation. From previous thread, there are two major concerns for this
class implementation.
1. We have used HttpClient library in this class. For this comment, I can
explain why I need that HttpClient
Oh, sorry to imply the XenServer code is SolidFire specific. It is not.
The XenServer attach logic is now aware of dynamic, zone-wide storage (and
SolidFire is an implementation of this kind of storage). This kind of
storage is new to 4.2 with Edison's storage framework changes.
Edison created a
For example, let's say another storage company wants to implement a plug-in
to leverage its Quality of Service feature. It would be dynamic, zone-wide
storage, as well. They would need only implement a storage plug-in as I've
made the necessary changes to the hypervisor-attach logic to support
I have spent some time looking at the usage data in the database and
looking over the code.
When 'bytes_in' and 'bytes_out' are reported, they are reported for a
specific network. Is this only for traffic between the public and the
private network? Does private traffic affect these numbers if
Mike,
Reading through the code, what is the difference between the ISCSI and Dynamic
types? Why isn't RBD considered Dynamic?
Thanks,
-John
On Jun 3, 2013, at 3:46 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
This new type of storage is defined in the Storage.StoragePoolType class
This new type of storage is defined in the Storage.StoragePoolType class
(called Dynamic):
public static enum StoragePoolType {
Filesystem(false), // local directory
NetworkFilesystem(true), // NFS or CIFS
IscsiLUN(true), // shared LUN, with a clusterfs overlay
Hi Will,
Commencts inline:
Is this only for traffic between the public and the private network?
yes.
Does private traffic affect these numbers if the traffic does not go
through the public?
No.
So if two VMs on the same network send traffic between them selves on
their vlan without it being
Hey Rohit,
Do you think that we should remove the 4.1.0-SNAPSHOT artifacts from
PyPi? It's actually a higher version than 4.1.0-0 I think.
-chip
I need to customize the CS to our environment needs.
Since ACS at present moment does not support management network with VLAN
tagging, I need to use another unused network as management vlan.
We are enterprise customer and at the moment have no need for public network.
All the natting is
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 04:52:38PM -0400, Han,Meng wrote:
Hi all,
My name is Meng Han. I am a Computer Engineering student at
University of Florida. I am interested in distributed computing,
autonomic computing, Hadoop framework and virtualization
techonologies.
I will be working on the
+1 [ binding ]
I've been concerned that releases every four months were too aggressive for
people to absorb given the complexity of some deployments and upgrades. With
the current 4.1 delay and 4.2 plan we would expect two major releases within
two months of each other. I'd prefer a bigger
As far as I know, the iSCSI type is uniquely used by XenServer when you
want to set up Primary Storage that is directly based on an iSCSI target.
This allows you to skip the step of going to the hypervisor and creating a
storage repository based on that iSCSI target as CloudStack does that part
Alternatively, you can use the PreSetup type for XenServer. In this case,
you must go to XenServer and set up the storage repository (which can be
based on an iSCSI target). Then you must go into CloudStack and select the
PreSetup type for Primary Storage. This is like selecting the vmfs type for
Mike,
The current implementation of the Dynamic type attach behavior works in terms
of Xen ISCSI which why I ask about the difference. Another way to ask the
question -- what is the definition of a Dynamic storage pool type?
Thanks,
-John
On Jun 3, 2013, at 5:10 PM, Mike Tutkowski
These are new terms, so I should probably have defined them up front for
you. :)
Static storage: Storage that is pre-allocated (ex. an admin creates a
volume on a SAN), then a hypervisor data structure is created to consume
the storage (ex. XenServer SR), then that hypervisor data structure is
Wei,
I apologize for conflating usage with billing. It seems that we need to
enhance the usage information being captured to reflect that an operation was
provisioned. It would be interesting to know if/how our users would like track
usage of volumes with provisioned IOPS.
Thanks,
-John
On
Here is the difference between the current iSCSI type and the Dynamic type:
iSCSI type: The admin has to go in and create a Primary Storage based on
the iSCSI type. At this point in time, the iSCSI volume must exist on the
storage system (it is pre-allocated). Future CloudStack volumes are
Anyone?
We are also noticing that if we register a template, that template is
registered and ready, but becomes unusable if the URL for the template
stops working at any time. Seems like we attempt to red download it every
so often. So no one-time registration. Is this by design?
On May 31, 2013
-0 [binding]
I am torn between sticking to the schedule and delay to make sure we can merge
things cleanly.
Would rather not merge and release on-time, but it would be a pitty.
On Jun 3, 2013, at 5:09 PM, Kevin Kluge kevin.kl...@citrix.com wrote:
+1 [ binding ]
I've been concerned that
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11611/
---
Review request for cloudstack, edison su and Min Chen.
Description
---
Let's start a new thread about NFS cache storage issues on object_store.
First, I'll go through how NFS storage works on master branch, then how it
works on object_store branch, then let's talk about the issues.
0. Why we need NFS secondary storage? Nfs secondary storage is used as a
http://tagolpc.com.ua/cxsu/ghymvyzpzeaw.xighaiuptq
Hi All,
Following features are done by development and marked as resolved. Each of
these stories have QA/Docs/Automation sub-tasks. Calling on community to take
action on marking sub tasks as completed if done already, so these can be
closed. Also some may need coverage esp docs and
Vijay thanks for sharing this good news
-Original Message-
From: Vijay Venkatachalam [mailto:vijay.venkatacha...@citrix.com]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2013 7:13 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: netscaler jars hosted in maven central
Hi,
The Apache licensed netscaler jars
+1 because 4.2 will be delayed because 4.1 have been delayed
makes sense to me.
Basically, time based release focuses on time only, not quality or
feature. That's the nature of time based release, IMHO.
I'm not voting +1 for new feature, and at the same time, I
feel unfair to vote -1 for
HI,
I looked into tomcat6.spec file, the catalina.out
stuff seems to be handled in rpm installation process.
%install
:
/bin/touch ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{logdir}/catalina.out
:
%files
:
%attr(0644,tomcat,tomcat) %{logdir}/catalina.out
:
So I'd like
1 - 100 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
