On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 08:29:26AM +0200, Ove Ewerlid wrote:
> On 06/06/2013 07:10 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
> >On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 05:39:16PM +, Edison Su wrote:
> >>I think we miss a VOTE from Jenkins, the vote from Jenkins should
> >>be taken as highest priority in each release. Thi
On 06/06/2013 07:10 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 05:39:16PM +, Edison Su wrote:
I think we miss a VOTE from Jenkins, the vote from Jenkins should
be taken as highest priority in each release. This kind of
regression should be easily identified in Jenkins(If we have
On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 03:13:21PM +0900, Takaaki Suzuki wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I want to download the system VM template from
> "jenkins.cloudstack.org" (URL:
> http://jenkins.cloudstack.org/job/build-systemvm-master/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/tools/appliance/dist/systemvmtemplate-2013-06-04-maste
What is the value in cloud.configuration table with name='host'?
-Wei
2013/6/6, Soheil Eizadi :
> For now I patched this by editing the file /var/cache/cloud/cmdline and
> fixing the IP Address and restarting the Cloud Service on Storage VM. Now it
> is communicating with MS:
>
> INFO [storage.s
Hi all
I want to download the system VM template from "jenkins.cloudstack.org"
(URL:
http://jenkins.cloudstack.org/job/build-systemvm-master/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/tools/appliance/dist/systemvmtemplate-2013-06-04-master-kvm.qcow2.bz2)
but, the connection is extremely slow. Does anyone kno
For now I patched this by editing the file /var/cache/cloud/cmdline and fixing
the IP Address and restarting the Cloud Service on Storage VM. Now it is
communicating with MS:
INFO [storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageListener] (AgentConnectTaskPool-1:)
Received a host startup notification
com.c
Hi Alina,
I posted a patch for it.
Please re-test it.
vmEntity made things complicated.
-Wei
2013/6/6 Wei ZHOU
> Sorry my bad.
> I will fix it soon.
>
> -Wei
>
> 2013/6/6, Srikanteswararao Talluri :
> > Filed a bug for this
> > onehttps://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2865
> >
> >
I am bringing up a Storage VM on my XenServer that is running on My MAC. I
noticed that the Management Server IP Address is incorrect 192.168.56.1 versus
172.16.197.1. Checking if this is something others have seen? This address is
in the last boot record for the Storage VM. The IP Address 192.1
systemvm.iso doesn't update on the packages even now after following fixes.
Anyone know why this happens despite a clean build?
CLOUDSTACK-2398 is posted.
commit 55db2fe6d12338bcd5b486052e37a9cad174
Date: Mon Jun 3 14:05:15 2013 +0530
mvn clean does not do a complete clean
Ret
On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 08:01:10AM +0900, Hiroaki KAWAI wrote:
> It took time to investigate what's happening on Ubuntu.
Thanks for taking the time to investigate!
>
> On Ubuntu, we don't have apparent problem with current setup.
> We don't have to touch catalina.out simply because it is
> not u
Hi,
I would like to get everyone's opinions on the timeline and policies
for bringing in automated tests into the repo. Integration tests are
written in marvin by various people today within and without Citrix.
Similar to docs I'd like to propose that tests can be committed to the
repository beyon
On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 05:39:16PM +, Edison Su wrote:
> I think we miss a VOTE from Jenkins, the vote from Jenkins should
> be taken as highest priority in each release. This kind of
> regression should be easily identified in Jenkins(If we have a
> regression test for each environment).
>
Sorry my bad.
I will fix it soon.
-Wei
2013/6/6, Srikanteswararao Talluri :
> Filed a bug for this
> onehttps://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2865
>
>
> On 06/06/13 1:15 AM, "Alena Prokharchyk"
> wrote:
>
>>Hi Wei,
>>
>>In the latest DestroyVirtualMachine call fails due to ClassCastEx
Filed a bug for this
onehttps://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2865
On 06/06/13 1:15 AM, "Alena Prokharchyk"
wrote:
>Hi Wei,
>
>In the latest DestroyVirtualMachine call fails due to ClassCastException
>at
>com.cloud.vm.UserVmManagerImpl.prepareStop(UserVmManagerImpl.java:4712):
>
>E
On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 05:43:31PM +, Kishan Kavala wrote:
> Agree that it is redundant. They should be create/list/delete
> NetworkACL. But these API names are already used for rules (ACL
> items) within the ACL List.
> This cannot be fixed without breaking backward compatibility.
I was talk
Hey Marcus,
To me, it seems like it should be async, as well.
As far as I know (at least in pre 4.2), unless you are deleting a volume
that has never been attached to a VM, the CS MS would have to have the
hypervisor perform some operation upon the deletion of a CloudStack
volume...and that could
Hi,
I'd be happy to do a video on primary storage in CloudStack (and/or I could
point you to an existing video where I presented on this topic).
Thanks
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Jessica Tomechak wrote:
> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 6:00 AM, Chip Childers >wrote:
>
> > On Fri, May 31, 2013
Oh, I should add that I traced it through the system, and it actually
sends a DeleteVolumeCommand to the agent. That has to finish before
the sync call completes.
This is on 4.1, if it changes significantly with the storage refactor,
that's fine, but I'd like to know if there was a reason for it i
Just wondering why deleteVolume is a sync call. It doesn't seem to
adhere to the 'mark it removed, let a worker expunge it later after X
seconds' paradigm. I only noticed this when a storage system was
taking a bit to do the work and thus blocking the API call.
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 6:00 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 12:05:56AM -0700, Jessica Tomechak wrote:
> > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Chip Childers <
> chip.child...@sungard.com>wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 01:12:40PM -0700, Jessica Tomechak wrote:
> > > > Now
Thanks, I have one follow-up:
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 12:10 AM, Nitin Mehta wrote:
> All the public templates will be replicated to all the secondary storage
> for redundancy but private templates and uploaded volumes should be kept
> in one of the randomly chosen secondary storage. Snapshots will
> -Original Message-
> From: John Burwell [mailto:jburw...@basho.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2013 1:06 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] NFS cache storage issue on object_store
>
> Edison,
>
> One thing I forgot to say is that reference counting be an unne
It took time to investigate what's happening on Ubuntu.
On Ubuntu, we don't have apparent problem with current setup.
We don't have to touch catalina.out simply because it is
not used.
# Cloudstack java stdout is sent to /dev/null.
In tomcat6, java stdout,stderr is redirected to catalina.out
(in
> -Original Message-
> From: John Burwell [mailto:jburw...@basho.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2013 1:04 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] NFS cache storage issue on object_store
>
> Edison,
>
> You have provided some great information below which helps grea
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11657/#review21497
---
Ship it!
Applied - thanks for the patch!
- David Nalley
On June
Clarification: As per my conversation with Joe/David, we are using the same 4.1
branch in ASF git and once 4.1.1 release is ready, we vote and if passed, will
tag it as 4.1.1.
If there are patches you need to commit to 4.1.1 and have commiters rights,
please do so on 4.1, if not, I will do it o
I found GUI to add devices under the Physical Network> Configure "Network
Service Providers"
The GUI is for a subset of all the devices (Virtual Router, Security Groups,
NetScaler, Nicira and BigSwitch.)
-Soheil
From: Soheil Eizadi
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 201
Edison,
One thing I forgot to say is that reference counting be an unnecessary
complexity in the event that sharing of the same resource by multiple process
concurrently is rare.
Thanks,
-John
On Jun 5, 2013, at 4:04 PM, John Burwell wrote:
> Edison,
>
> You have provided some great informa
Edison,
You have provided some great information below which helps greatly to
understand the role of the "NFS cache" mechanism. To summarize, this mechanism
is only currently required for Xen snapshot operations driven by Xen's
coalescing operations. Is my understanding correct? Just out of
Hi Wei,
In the latest DestroyVirtualMachine call fails due to ClassCastException
at com.cloud.vm.UserVmManagerImpl.prepareStop(UserVmManagerImpl.java:4712):
ERROR [cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-2:job-55) Unexpected
exception while executing
org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user
Hi,
I have posted Supported Vs Tested Compatibility matrix for ACS 4.2 [1]. Pl do
review and provide feedback.
Areas that you can focus
- Base versions for Upgrades
- Xen versions
- OVM support - I would remove this but just kept it for review for
time being
-
Yes.. that would be one way for me to parse through JIRA and know what to
backport.
But if there is something we definitely don't want to miss or someone omitted
the 4.1.1 tag , drop it in this thread.
Thanks
ilya
> -Original Message-
> From: John Burwell [mailto:jburw...@basho.com]
>
Ilya,
If the bugs are captured in JIRA tickets, can we add a tag to those tickets?
Thanks,
-John
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Musayev, Ilya wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Sorry I was a bit disconnected from the community - as my $dayjob kept me
> very busy.
>
> I would like to start of this thread t
On 6/5/13 10:50 AM, "Kishan Kavala" wrote:
>In the mentioned example, when new template for 4.3 is introduced, we
>should remove template upgrade code in Upgrade41to42. This will make
>upgrade succeed even when systemvm-kvm-4.2 is not in database.
>On the other hand, if we allow 'systemvm-kvm-%',
Hi All,
Sorry I was a bit disconnected from the community - as my $dayjob kept me very
busy.
I would like to start of this thread to keep track of bugfixes we need to back
port from 4.1 to 4.1.1 release.
Please use this thread and reference bug fixes we need to add into 4.1.1, I
will be creat
In the mentioned example, when new template for 4.3 is introduced, we should
remove template upgrade code in Upgrade41to42. This will make upgrade succeed
even when systemvm-kvm-4.2 is not in database.
On the other hand, if we allow 'systemvm-kvm-%', upgrade to 4.3 will succeed
even though the r
Agree that it is redundant. They should be create/list/delete NetworkACL. But
these API names are already used for rules (ACL items) within the ACL List.
This cannot be fixed without breaking backward compatibility.
From: Pranav Saxena [pranav.sax...@citri
Members present: digitalsanctum, kdamage, sebgoa, ke4qqq, sudhap, animeshc,
Humbedooh, jzb
Meeting summary:
1. Preface
2. Active Feature Release: Overall Status
3. Active Feature Release: Feature Status
4. Active Feature Release: Docs Status
a. jzb open dis
Members present: digitalsanctum, kdamage, sebgoa, ke4qqq, sudhap, animeshc,
Humbedooh, jzb
Meeting summary:
1. Preface
2. Active Feature Release: Overall Status
3. Active Feature Release: Feature Status
4. Active Feature Release: Docs Status
a. jzb open dis
I think we miss a VOTE from Jenkins, the vote from Jenkins should be taken as
highest priority in each release. This kind of regression should be easily
identified in Jenkins(If we have a regression test for each environment).
> -Original Message-
> From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow.
I mean upgrade libvirt.
-Wei
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11657/#review21488
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Rajesh Battala
On June 5, 2013, 4:46 p.m., S
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11657/
---
Review request for cloudstack.
Description
---
This patch replaces the inc
I am sorry I have met this issue but ignored it as it worked after upgrade.
I agree with that we should test on each OS. For the new feature, we
should check the minimal software version at first.
For the issue,is it ok to tell users the upgrade process in the
installation guide on website?
-Wei
Sorry for the duplicate emails, my Outlook Client crashed so there are two
emails. -Soheil
From: Soheil Eizadi [seiz...@infoblox.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2013 9:36 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Add Device for Plugins
Has there been any di
Has there been any discussion of common GUI and abstraction for adding network
devices to CloudStack.
They all need some common facilities:
- Physical Network that is served by Device
- Device IP Address/Name
- UserName / Password
- Certificate Import facility for Device if using secure connecti
Has there been any discussion of common GUI and abstraction for adding Network
Devices for various Plugins?
They all need some common facilities:
- Physical Network that is served by Device
- Device IP Address/FQDN
- User
- Password
- Certificate Import facility, if using secure connection
In ad
Never mind, I have resolved this issue.
Thanks
-min
On 6/4/13 4:35 PM, "Min Chen" wrote:
>John,
>
>I am trying to fix issue #2 mentioned here to handle multi-part upload
>using TransferManager, but ran into the following issue
>"2013-06-04 23:06:52,626 INFO [amazonaws.http.AmazonHttpClient]
>(s
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11656/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Abhinandan Prateek.
Description
---
[Mul
Welcome Tom. You can check out this FS
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Storage+Backup+Objec
t+Store+Plugin+Framework for secondary storage architectural work done in
object_store branch.You may also check out the following recent threads
regarding 3 major technical questions
While we are tracking typos related to this, there is another one
getNetworkServiceProvder() in ExternalNetworkDeviceManager.java
-Soheil
From: Hiroaki KAWAI [ka...@stratosphere.co.jp]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2013 12:17 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Su
It looks like a bug was probably introduced into 4.1, where stock
Ubuntu 12.04 doesn't support part of the libvirt xml format for system
vms. I feel bad that it got in there, but I think it highlights an
issue that needs to be addressed within our development. Libvirt
versioning is somewhat of
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013, at 10:27 AM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
> Ah, yes, I see on my test system that a version inadvertently got
> sucked in from a different repo. Sorry about that, I suppose we should
> pull that commit from 4.1.1?
Have we verified that it's definitely the problem? (It sounds like it
Ah, yes, I see on my test system that a version inadvertently got
sucked in from a different repo. Sorry about that, I suppose we should
pull that commit from 4.1.1?
I develop primarily on CentOS, and have this one system that I *was*
using to sanity check ubuntu. It troubles me that we either don
I've opened an issue for this:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2859
Thanks,
Shane
On Tuesday, June 4, 2013 at 1:15 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 01:51:26PM -0400, Shane Witbeck wrote:
> > I was troubleshooting my ssvm the other day and found '4.4.4.
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
> Joe,
>I don't normally follow the cloudstack-users list, but I tested
> with ubuntu 12.04, and don't get that error. It would be a real shame
> if nobody caught that during voting/testing, it would mean that nobody
> used standard OSes
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11651/#review21483
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Prasanna Santhanam
On June 5, 2013, 11:33 a.
Joe,
I don't normally follow the cloudstack-users list, but I tested
with ubuntu 12.04, and don't get that error. It would be a real shame
if nobody caught that during voting/testing, it would mean that nobody
used standard OSes to test the release. However, the user says he's
running 0.9.8, and
Hi guys,
Thanks for the introduction. Looks like you all are set with wiki and jira
access and privileges.
I now would like to have you do two "house keeping" things to get you on your
way to your respective projects:
1-Use your newly acquired JIRA privileges to create sub-tasks for your main
Hi John,
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013, at 09:42 PM, John Burwell wrote:
> I would like to get clock drift fixed for 4.1.1 as well. What needs
> to be done to test the 4.2 system VMs? How can folks assist with the
> testing process?
I'd like to get it fixed as well. However, I think that updating system
+1 to this .
Sounds more logical and easy to differentiate from an end user perspective as
we are actually creating a container/group of acl rules there.
-Original Message-
From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2013 7:14 PM
To: CloudStack Dev
Su
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11655/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Prateek, Sheng Yang, Murali Reddy,
and
Isn't it redundant to call the API create/list/delete (NetworkACLList)
That expands to create/list/delete-NetworkAccessControlListList?
Should that be a Group/Container instead?
Thanks,
--
Prasanna.,
Powered by BigRock.com
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11653/#review21479
---
Ship it!
2c84866
- Prasanna Santhanam
On June 5, 2013, 12:39 p.m
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11653/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Prasanna Santhanam.
Description
---
copy
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10005/
---
(Updated June 5, 2013, 11:39 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Murali Reddy
On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 03:38:17PM +0900, Hiroaki KAWAI wrote:
> Hum... interesting. In Ubuntu tomcat6, the catalina.out
> is handled in init script.
>
> 1. Download tomcat6_6.0.35-6.debian.tar.gz from
> http://packages.ubuntu.com/raring/tomcat6
> 2. untar it and look into the init script
> --
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11651/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Prasanna Santhanam.
Description
---
fix
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11620/#review21478
---
Commit 78196384ae905ddf01b1b2f76b9d397aa4117482 in branch refs/heads
On 06/05/2013 07:17 AM, Jörgen Maas wrote:
Is this a non-oss build ??
I assume they are OSS builds.
Wido
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 10:33 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
On 06/04/2013 10:24 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 10:19:19AM +0200, Wido den Hollander wrote:
Hi C
Kishan,
I know.
If we upgrade from 4.1 to 4.3 ( assume the systemvm template is
systemvm-kvm-4.3). We need to add systemvm-kvm-4.3 instead of
systemvm-kvm-4.2. Maybe systemvm-kvm-4.2 is not in database.
The upgrade includes Upgrade41to42 and Upgrade42to43. It will fail in the
Upgrade41to42.
-Wei
Wei,
If we use other templates, system Vms may not work. Only 4.2 templates should
be used when upgrading to 4.2.
> -Original Message-
> From: Wei ZHOU [mailto:ustcweiz...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, 5 June 2013 3:26 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: git commit: updated
In 4.1 during encryption the category was made 'Secure'.
So this will check if encryption is actually needed and will prevent encrypting
twice. Unencrypted value will have category as 'Hidden'.
I will wait for 4.1.1 upgrade path and add the fix then.
Thanks,
Saksham
-Original Message-
Kishan,
What do you think about change some codes to "name like
'systemvm-xenserver-%' " ?
If we use other templates, the upgrade maybe fail.
-Wei
2013/6/5
> Updated Branches:
> refs/heads/master 91b15711b -> 9fe7846d7
>
>
> CLOUDSTACK-2728: 41-42 DB upgrade: add step to upgrade system temp
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11618/#review21476
---
Ship it!
commit 9fe7846d72e401720e1dcbce52d021e2646429f1
- Kishan
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11618/#review21475
---
Commit 9fe7846d72e401720e1dcbce52d021e2646429f1 in branch refs/heads
Hi all,
I'm new here. I'm interested in Cloudstack Secondary storage using S3
object stores. I checked out and built cloudstack today and found the
object_store branch (not built it yet). I haven't done Java since 2004
(mostly erlang/C++/python) so I'm rusty but I know the finer parts of
S3 :-)
A
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11623/#review21474
---
Ship it!
Changes look fine. Committed to master.
- Devdeep Singh
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11623/#review21473
---
Commit 52a901099c9cb56ae197fe026d159dde3240e390 in branch refs/heads
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11650/#review21472
---
Can someone familiar with localization look at it?
- Devdeep Singh
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11564/#review21470
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Devdeep Singh
On May 31, 2013, 9:05 a.m., Sr
> On June 5, 2013, 8:34 a.m., Devdeep Singh wrote:
> > Ship It!
Committed the changes. Commit id: 4da995238b0f4b9d4109afaa505e9213e07486f5.
Kindly close the review request
- Devdeep
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To rep
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11564/#review21469
---
Commit 4da995238b0f4b9d4109afaa505e9213e07486f5 in branch refs/heads
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11650/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep Singh and Fang Wang.
Description
---
And I'm +1 for fix (remove confusing naming)
(2013/06/05 14:13), Chiradeep Vittal wrote:
The typo is there because the same typo exists when creating the search
builder in the constructor. In the constructor, the string
"serviceProvderType" is associated with the VO field 'providerName'. If
you
85 matches
Mail list logo
