---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12545/#review26131
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Harikrishna Patnala
On Sept. 14, 2013, 7:46
On 09/15/2013 07:32 AM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
Hi guys, I was just pulling in updates from the 4.1 branch and noticed
commit 706e23623c3227d92ae498529166ca73d2a2bf4e, This looks like a new
feature. There's not a bug attached to it. It seems to allow admins to
set the CPU mode for KVM guests,
Marcus and Wido,
Sorry I just saw this Email.
I will create a JIRA ticket for them (both code and docs) later. I regarded it
as an improvement, not a new feature, this is why I cherry-picked it into 4.1
branch. If you guys object it, I will revert it.
Marcus, could you create tickets for the
Filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4679 for the API issue.
-Original Message-
From: Alena Prokharchyk
Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 9:58 PM
To: Sowmya Krishnan; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Venkata SwamyBabu Budumuru
Subject: Re: createVPCOffering (Was:RE:
+1
Tested VM life cycle with VMware in advanced zone and AWSAPI EC2 interface.
Thanks,
Likitha
-Original Message-
From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com]
Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2013 4:43 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Apache CloudStack 4.2.0
+1 (binding)
Started this wiki page:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudMonkey+testing+procedure
On Sep 15, 2013, at 6:52 PM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 (binding)
Downloaded release artifacts, installed in ubuntu devcloud-kvm, tested
various
+1
Download, installed in clean virtualenv. Executed commands against the
cloudstack simulator.
On 16 September 2013 09:24, sebgoa run...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 (binding)
Started this wiki page:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudMonkey+testing+procedure
On Sep
http://markmail.org/message/cido22ky72rfxldm Failed to start instance
VM[DomainRouter by Andreas Huser
http://markmail.org/message/zd75ljjvipvaaq2u cs 4.2 HA by Valery Ciareszka
http://markmail.org/message/cpz2qgg2bdxcehqt stumped on Adv Network,
SNAT by Noel Kendall
On Sep 16, 2013, at 10:36 AM, Ian Duffy i...@ianduffy.ie wrote:
+1
Download, installed in clean virtualenv. Executed commands against the
cloudstack simulator.
Ian, do you mind added that bit on virtualenv in the wiki page I started…thx
On 16 September 2013 09:24, sebgoa
+1 (binding)
Followed testing procedure.
Added Cloudmonkey 5.0.0 basic tests
Ran AWSAPI server and started instance with boto
-sebastien
On Sep 16, 2013, at 10:18 AM, Likitha Shetty likitha.she...@citrix.com wrote:
+1
Tested VM life cycle with VMware in advanced zone and AWSAPI EC2
Ian, do you mind added that bit on virtualenv in the wiki page I
started…thx
Will do, setting up virtualenv is OS specific. Will cover it for CentOS.
On 16 September 2013 09:40, sebgoa run...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sep 16, 2013, at 10:36 AM, Ian Duffy i...@ianduffy.ie wrote:
+1
http://markmail.org/message/yk4y5va2arcun7b6 Error - duplicate entry
for public ip address by Gaurav Aradhye
http://markmail.org/message/7ejdx3dsc5u5hpr4 unable to add host in 4.2
using Devcloud2 environment by Punith s
http://markmail.org/message/winj27dosfesf5gr create ubuntu 12.04
template from
H,
I made a short summary of how I have been working on the weekly reports so far.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Responsiveness+report
any comment is welcome,
Daan
Dave,
As I suspected I used guest type for this offering:
def createPrivateGatewayNetworkOffering(self, conn):
offers = self.listNetworkOfferings(conn,
name=NiciraNvpPrivateGatewayNetwork)
if offers != None:
return offers[0].id
# else create it
cno =
HI all,
That was a bug in CS and is discussed on another mail thread.
This thread can be safely ignored.
Regards,
Gaurav
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Gaurav Aradhye
gaurav.arad...@clogeny.comwrote:
Hi all,
While associating a portable public ip, I'm getting following error:
Hello,
http://markmail.org/message/yk4y5va2arcun7b6 Error - duplicate entry
for public ip address by Gaurav Aradhye
This can be safely ignored. Just sent out a mail.
Regards,
Gaurav
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 2:18 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.comwrote:
H Sheng,
From your doc I don't read the reasons for disabling HA for RVR.
I do see some possible glitches though. One is that a newly installed
router should always have higher prio if the master cannot be reached.
Something similar should happen on rule programming.
To deal with the 255 limit
What is the ticket for this issue? More details?
2013/9/16 Gaurav Aradhye gaurav.arad...@clogeny.com
HI all,
That was a bug in CS and is discussed on another mail thread.
This thread can be safely ignored.
Regards,
Gaurav
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Gaurav Aradhye
HI Wei,
Here's the ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4596
The issue is that CS is allowing two public or portable ip ranges to
overlap, with different vlan IDs. This is not a valid behavior.
Regards,
Gaurav
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Wei ZHOU ustcweiz...@gmail.com
+1 (binding)
I verified what I could:
- Build DEB packages
- Installed DEB packages
- Tested RBD/Ceph functionality
CloudStack is a big project, so I only tested the portion of CloudStack
I'm most familiar with and my vote is based on that.
Wido
On 09/16/2013 10:41 AM, sebgoa wrote:
+1
Hi,
I worked with the RedHat guys last week to get libvirt-java 0.5.0
released which has some nice new features for us:
- Supports different XML on destination host during migration
- Supports resizing volumes
- Supports more snapshot functionalities
I took the liberty to depend on 0.5.0 in
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14063/#review26132
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- sailaja mada
On Sept. 11, 2013, 6:22 a.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14147/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Likitha Shetty, sailaja mada, and Prasanna
On Sept. 16, 2013, 10:15 a.m., sailaja mada wrote:
Ship It!
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=f1f5f2eec1ff08b539bd113fd016c4dab5deefd4
- sailaja
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To
+1 (binding)
The test infra has deployed advanced zone with kvm and xenserver 6.2
since Saturday and I dont see any new failures [1]. So no regressions.
Also ran the simulator against 4.2 [2]
[1]
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/cloudstack-qa/job/test-regression-matrix/
[2]
got it, thanks
Murali is working on it.
2013/9/16 Gaurav Aradhye gaurav.arad...@clogeny.com
HI Wei,
Here's the ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4596
The issue is that CS is allowing two public or portable ip ranges to
overlap, with different vlan IDs. This is not a
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14061/#review26134
---
Ship it!
Thanks Wido, for resize volume we can call libvirt api instead of script right.
http://libvirt.org/git/?p=libvirt-java.git;a=commit;h=cd00a4b8f25944f6fe2ce3ecb2ac00cbcad8db8d
Thanks
Rajesh Battala
-Original Message-
From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl]
Sent: Monday,
+1
Ran against simulator.
On 16 September 2013 11:25, Prasanna Santhanam t...@apache.org wrote:
+1 (binding)
The test infra has deployed advanced zone with kvm and xenserver 6.2
since Saturday and I dont see any new failures [1]. So no regressions.
Also ran the simulator against 4.2 [2]
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11626/#review26136
---
Ship it!
Thanks Wido.
Do you know the minimal requirement of libvirt if we use libvirt-java 0.5.0
?
2013/9/16 Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl
Hi,
I worked with the RedHat guys last week to get libvirt-java 0.5.0 released
which has some nice new features for us:
- Supports different XML on
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14079/
---
(Updated Sept. 16, 2013, 11:11 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Saksham
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14079/#review26137
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- abhinav roy
On Sept. 16, 2013, 11:11 a.m.,
Currently the way Cloudstack deals with PS failure is to reboot all hosts
associated with the cluster. Selectively cleaning up the affected VMs would
have been the best option, but since issues were seen with stopping VMs on the
hypervisors (at least in Xenserver 5.6 [1]) reboot was the next
Great work Wido!
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Wei ZHOU ustcweiz...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Wido.
Do you know the minimal requirement of libvirt if we use libvirt-java 0.5.0
?
2013/9/16 Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl
Hi,
I worked with the RedHat guys last week to get
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14147/
---
(Updated Sept. 16, 2013, 11:26 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Likitha
On Sep 15, 2013, at 8:24 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
Sebastien,
Are you thinking november in Amsterdam, or before?
I was thinking about a conference call - way before Amsterdam-
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 9:06 AM, sebgoa run...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sep 11, 2013, at
On 09/16/2013 12:51 PM, Wei ZHOU wrote:
Thanks Wido.
Do you know the minimal requirement of libvirt if we use libvirt-java 0.5.0
?
There shouldn't be a difference in the required libvirt version. I
implemented a couple of methods in the bindings which were already in
libvirt for a long
Animesh, I am passing till next time, I am willing though if really no
one can be found.
Daan
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 7:57 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi
animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote:
Folks
Now that 4.2.0 VOTE has passed I want to call out for any committers who are
interested in taking over
shoot a time, you will miss some of us. how about wednesday 19:00 cet
this is the time the irc meeting used to be.
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 1:27 PM, sebgoa run...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sep 15, 2013, at 8:24 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
Sebastien,
Are you thinking november
On 09/16/2013 01:21 PM, Koushik Das wrote:
Currently the way Cloudstack deals with PS failure is to reboot all hosts
associated with the cluster. Selectively cleaning up the affected VMs would
have been the best option, but since issues were seen with stopping VMs on the
hypervisors (at least
All,
I'm trying to download the DevCloud image from the following URL :
http://people.apache.org/~bhaisaab/cloudstack/devcloud/devcloud2.ova
http://people.apache.org/%7Ebhaisaab/cloudstack/devcloud/devcloud2.ova
Everytime I attempt the download it fails. I got this location from the
Wiki,
H Dave,
I noticed some mails on this but did not find a workaround; I am
trying to build master and it looks for midonet-client 1.1.0. I have
removed it from the plugins pom file. Next I do want to test with
midonet however as it touches networks what I am doing. Do you have
some advice on how to
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Alexander Hitchins
cloudst...@alexhitchins.com wrote:
I'm trying to download the DevCloud image from the following URL :
http://people.apache.org/~bhaisaab/cloudstack/devcloud/devcloud2.ova
Alexander,
I am downloading from this location as we write. It seems
Copying part of the IM conversation just now in case anyone else has the
same question.
As Prasanna mentioned in this thread [1]:
If you are using a nexus proxy in the way of your build, you'll have
to add a 3rd party repo and the jars will be automatically indexed and
downloaded.
Thanks,
Dave.
That looks perfectly fine.
I was just saying it would be nice if it were also possible to create
network offerings for traffic types other than Guest - it would, for
example, provide a mechanism for network plugins to handle other traffic
types.
Thanks,
Dave.
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 6:07 PM,
http://cs-maven.midokura.com/releases/ is the right location, right? I
get a blank page there (no pom or jar) or is it somewhere else?
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Dave Cahill dcah...@midokura.com wrote:
Copying part of the IM conversation just now in case anyone else has the
same question.
Yes Dave,
And maybe more generic: plugin installation procedures would be yet
another level of api permission. They would be allowed to do even more
then admins.
Like add our system network offerings.
regards,
Daan
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 3:19 PM, Dave Cahill dcah...@midokura.com wrote:
That
At Schuberg Philis, we did some tests and noted that the xe-deamon on
router vms is not started and that xenstore no longer exist under that
name.
The xenstore binary is copied to xenstore-write, --ls etc so this
could be solved.
I am sure how to formulate this as to convince you all this is a
All,
Could someone provide the documented upgrade procedure for those upgrading from
4.1.x to 4.2? It's quite possible I'm just not looking in the correct place,
but I've been unable to locate it thus far.
I'd like to test this in our lab environment today for the voting round. I do
have
The PS behaviour of NFS hits an install with predominant local storage
for production badly. Why use NFS primary storage at all in such an
install? The SSVM will not start in a zone with only local storage,
additional types of primary storage needs to be added and a dummy
primary NFS share is
I'm not sure I understand... my impression from your message is the
stock 4.2 image works. This is for Xen, right? Does this mean that
there's a step missing in building a custom system vm to make it match
the stock image?
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 9:30 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com
My impression is that once we freeze for release, we only apply fixes
to bugs. Even if something works better, if the current implementation
works it doesn't change.
I don't have any objections to it being in 4.2 or master, just for
clarification, as it went in so long ago.
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com wrote:
I think this discussion should be linked with the discussion about minimum
requirements for a release (release criteria). It seems this discussion is
already being had to some degree.
Agreed. I think release criteria
There are some minimum requirements in Libvirt for volblockresize if I
recall, but I think all of our platforms include it.
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 5:28 AM, Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl wrote:
On 09/16/2013 12:51 PM, Wei ZHOU wrote:
Thanks Wido.
Do you know the minimal requirement of
A worthy cause, and we should all strive for it. It does put extra
constraints on things like db upgrade scripts however. If ACS is
releasable at all times, can users make their own release and expect
all upgrade paths to work?
I disagreed with you on documentation as a commit criteria in
This is for xen.
the stock image works and it is build in february 2012.
We did some further investigation. It turns out that due to license
issues the xen server tools where removed the 6th of september 2012.
any template newer should not work unless you install
xe-guest-utilities yourself. bug
It will still register the pool. You still have a primary storage
pool that you registered, whether it's local, cluster or zone wide.
NFS is optionally zone wide as well (I'm assuming customers can launch
your storage only cluster-wide if they choose for resource
partitioning), but it registers
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 7:11 PM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com wrote:
Xenserver
http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.2/systemvmtemplate-2013-07-12-master-xen.vhd.bz2
I know, it does not have the xenstore binary on board that is called
by xe-update-guest-attrs
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 7:12 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
I do favor (extensive) unit tests as criteria.
Disagreeing is fine - no one (least of all me) says that my opinion is
right all of the time. :)
Over time I've become less concerned about a feature working, and more
concerned
Ok, so you mean even the stock one does not work for Xen. Can anyone
else who as been testing Xen comment?
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 7:11 PM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com wrote:
Xenserver
I agree, it makes things more complicated. However, updating libvirt
should be a maintenance mode thing; I've seen it lose track of VMs
between major libvirt upgrades and have to kill/restart all vms to
reregister them with libvirt, best to be in maintenance.
If I remember right, the issues with
Sorry, july.
Xenserver
http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.2/systemvmtemplate-2013-07-12-master-xen.vhd.bz2
KVM
http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.2/systemvmtemplate-2013-06-12-master-kvm.qcow2.bz2
VMware (generic)
http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.2/systemvmtemplate-4.2-vh7.ova
H,
The problem is when creating a newer image for the system template as
we did on our installations. It will not work with the 4.2 scripts. I
am not making hard my thread of this being a blocker but it is a
serious impediment for people wanting to harden their cloudstack
environment.
I am
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14148/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Abhinandan Prateek.
Repository:
If it is fine with community I am willing to take up 4.2.1 maintenance
release.
-abhi
On 16/09/13 5:05 pm, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
Animesh, I am passing till next time, I am willing though if really no
one can be found.
Daan
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 7:57 AM, Animesh
I think this discussion should be linked with the discussion about minimum
requirements for a release (release criteria). It seems this discussion is
already being had to some degree.
On Sep 16, 2013 5:27 AM, sebgoa run...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sep 15, 2013, at 8:24 PM, Daan Hoogland
It does not not work completely. It has no xe-daemon running when
instantiated so migration would fail is the theory, also some of our
monitoring scripts fail.
We failed to see it at first as well as it starts up and networking works
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 7:17 PM, Marcus Sorensen
The stock image is actually from June 2013, I believe. There is a
requirement for a new system vm in 4.2 to support some of the newer
features. It's absolutely necessary to use this image (or one with the
same capabilities) in KVM, maybe less so with Xen.
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Daan
Thanks, Marcus
About this:
When the agent connects to the
management server, it registers all pools in the cluster with the
agent.
So, my plug-in allows you to create zone-wide primary storage. This just
means that any cluster can use the SAN (the SAN was registered as primary
storage as
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 1:05 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
A worthy cause, and we should all strive for it. It does put extra
constraints on things like db upgrade scripts however. If ACS is
releasable at all times, can users make their own release and expect
all upgrade
I think it seems easy to rename the mount when registering the pool, either
the old one (if that works) or the new one. Yes, HA has a bad habit of
remounting primary nfs in certain circumstances too.
On Sep 16, 2013 11:47 AM, Wei Zhou (JIRA) j...@apache.org wrote:
[
Xe-daemon is used to collect cpu/memory usage info inside VM, the VM cannot
migrate without installing xe-daemon in XenServer,
But CloudStack has a script scripts/vm/hypervisor/xenserver/make_migratable.sh
to make VM migratable without xe-daemon, because user might forget to install
xe-daemon
In general we are maintaining tested stock images of system vm templates
and they have been now tested by the community for couple of months.
The cloudstack migration and HA is not dependant on the xe-daemon running
on the VM, that is the reason nobody noticed it.
-abhi
On 16/09/13 10:53 pm,
Hey Marcus,
Thanks for that clarification.
Sorry if this is a redundant question:
When the AttachVolumeCommand comes in, it sounds like we thought the best
approach would be for me to discover and log in to the iSCSI target using
iscsiadm.
This will create a new device: /dev/sdX.
We would
I can't find any reference to com.cloud.network.ExternalIpAddressAllocator
or com.cloud.network.IpAddrAllocator. What are these classes for?
Darren
+1 for meeting, I was not aware that Marcus had a similar thread.
I'm good for 17CET on Wednesday or if I'm reading this right, 11AM EST.
http://www.worldtimebuddy.com/cet-to-est-converter
-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday,
Abhi thanks for offering taking up 4.2.1 anyone else willing to take up 4.2.1
or 4.3.0?
-Original Message-
From: Abhinandan Prateek [mailto:abhinandan.prat...@citrix.com]
Sent: Monday, September 16, 2013 10:18 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Call for 4.3 and 4.2.1
Daan,
It will be interesting to know the monitoring use cases, if the
community likes these in general we can include these in the maintenance
release.
The templates can be modified and generated independently as working
copies are maintained separately from the artefacts put for vote here.
We
-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, September 16, 2013 4:35 AM
To: dev
Subject: Re: Call for 4.3 and 4.2.1 Release Managers!
Animesh, I am passing till next time, I am willing though if really no
one can be found.
Dann
I believe there was an issue with AWS API integration and 4.1.2 has to be
released.
Since I'm the Release Manager for 4.1.x, I plan to begin the work on it next
week - and it may take a time for me to get the publican docs right.
Marcus, do you believe we need to revert the commit below? I
It's Dave Nalley's thread :-)
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 1:05 PM, Musayev, Ilya imusa...@webmd.net wrote:
+1 for meeting, I was not aware that Marcus had a similar thread.
I'm good for 17CET on Wednesday or if I'm reading this right, 11AM EST.
http://www.worldtimebuddy.com/cet-to-est-converter
On 09/16/2013 07:16 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
I agree, it makes things more complicated. However, updating libvirt
should be a maintenance mode thing; I've seen it lose track of VMs
between major libvirt upgrades and have to kill/restart all vms to
reregister them with libvirt, best to be in
I understand what you're saying now, Marcus.
I wasn't sure if the Libvirt iSCSI Storage Pool was still an option
(looking into that still), but I see what you mean: If it is, we don't need
a new adaptor; otherwise, we do.
If Libivirt's iSCSI Storage Pool does work, I could update the current
On 09/16/2013 07:46 PM, Min Chen wrote:
I got the following test failure in building master:
Running com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResourceTest
Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 2, Skipped: 1, Time elapsed: 0.059 sec
FAILURE!
That's right
On Sep 16, 2013 12:31 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
wrote:
I understand what you're saying now, Marcus.
I wasn't sure if the Libvirt iSCSI Storage Pool was still an option
(looking into that still), but I see what you mean: If it is, we don't need
a new
Is there anyone on the development community involved in the OpenDayLight
Project?
(http://www.opendaylight.org/)
-Soheil
Good point, we'd have to modify the destination xml, which is kind of hairy.
I actually cant reproduce this on ubuntu 12.04 and the 4.2 RC. I mean,
'virsh pool-list' is blank as the bug reports, but so what? Is there a
separate bug we're discussing now?
I created nfs primary storage, launched a
Myself and a few others in the Contrail team have been working on a cloudstack
network plugin that interfaces with the contrail VNC
(http://www.opencontrail.org). At the moment the plugin provides isolated guest
networks (and a virtualized Public network) as an overlay that is capable of
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 7:12 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
I do favor (extensive) unit tests as criteria.
Disagreeing is fine - no one (least of all me) says that my opinion is
right all of the time. :)
I am following it from a distance :). I will be on a panel discussing it
on Wednesday:
http://sched.co/1dvmNgt
If anybody has any comments / wishes from OpenDayLight for CloudStack, let
me know.
On 9/16/13 1:46 PM, Soheil Eizadi seiz...@infoblox.com wrote:
Is there anyone on the development
I got the following test failure in building master:
Running com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResourceTest
Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 2, Skipped: 1, Time elapsed: 0.059 sec
FAILURE!
testCreateVMFromSpecLegacy(com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputi
The reason for no HA as I said before, due to the complexity. E.g, if there
can be 3 routers in the network(which control network is down but not the
guest network), and it would cause two of them with the same priority(at
certain time). The doc is mainly for describing the current policy and
I enabled cloudfront on this so that folks in
S.America/Africa/Europe/Asia/Oceania can have better speeds.
Just substitute d21ifhcun6b1t2.cloudfront.net for download.cloud.com
On 9/10/13 10:23 PM, Yoshikazu Nojima m...@ynojima.net wrote:
Thank you! That's my looking for.
Yoshikazu Nojima
That's the good reason to have explicitly remove the old dhcp entries.
Patches are welcome!
--Sheng
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Soheil Eizadi seiz...@infoblox.com wrote:
Thanks for highlighting why remove entry is not implemented. The interface
works for internal implementation where
You need to use command line like
mvn -Dnonoss -pl client jetty:run
Kelven
On 9/13/13 1:56 PM, Min Chen min.c...@citrix.com wrote:
Hi there,
Did anybody experience any issues in starting MS in latest master? I ran
into the following issue:
Well, you'd use neither of the two pool types, because you are not letting
libvirt handle the pool, you are doing it with your own pool and adaptor
class. Libvirt will be unaware of everything but the disk XML you attach to
a vm. You'd only use those if libvirts functions were advantageous, I.e.
I'm setting up devcloud on mac os x and am running into this problem when
bringing up the mgmt server (following the instructions on
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/DevCloud, this is in
step 7.3)
INFO [utils.component.ComponentContext] (Timer-2:) Configuring
It's not the keystore who prompted the password again. The log shows:
INFO [cloud.server.ConfigurationServerImpl] (Timer-2:) Going to update
systemvm iso with generated keypairs if needed
It's newly generated ssh key. See:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1389
--Sheng
On Mon,
72 hours for this VOTE has passed, I had kept this VOTE open until Wednesday
because of weekend, but many community members tested this over weekend and we
have 12 (+1) Votes and one (+0). Should I keep the VOTE open until Wednesday or
is the community OK to close it out.
Thanks
Animesh
1 - 100 of 109 matches
Mail list logo