When all instances in a VPC are deleted, I find the VPC router isn't stopped
unlike normal isolated networks. Is this expected?
I think it is, since initially when we create a VPC, when no VMs are created
yet, we still start up the VPC VR.
But we have a test (test_vpc_network.
On Mon, 16 Sep 2013, Sheng Yang wrote:
The reason for no HA as I said before, due to the complexity. E.g, if there
can be 3 routers in the network(which control network is down but not the
guest network), and it would cause two of them with the same priority(at
certain time). The doc is mainly
so hijackit, are we on for wednesday morning/afternoon/evening/night?
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 11:52 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 7:12 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
I do
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14167/#review26169
---
api/src/com/cloud/network/Networks.java
let me change my vote to +1,
we still have some monitor scripts that are based on the xenserver
tools, but migrations of system vms works indeed. sorry for kicking
trouble on this thread.
Daan
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 3:31 AM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com wrote:
Some people might be
Vpc router is not stopped even all the instances in a VPC are deleted. Router
will remain in running state until we explicitly stops/destroys it.
-Original Message-
From: Sowmya Krishnan [mailto:sowmya.krish...@citrix.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 11:51 AM
To:
So seems like this test is invalid: test_vpc_network. test_01_wait_network_gc
and rest of the 2 in that suite needs to be re done as well without the
network.gc
-Original Message-
From: Sanjeev Neelarapu [mailto:sanjeev.neelar...@citrix.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 2:36 PM
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14167/#review26170
---
api/src/com/cloud/network/Networks.java
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13934/
---
(Updated Sept. 17, 2013, 9:32 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Chiradeep
On Sept. 17, 2013, 8:24 a.m., tuna wrote:
Do you have any (unit-)tests or #!human test scenarios to validate your
code?
I haven't made unit tests yet. Will do asap. Just try with my own scenarios.
- tuna
---
This is an
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14167/
---
(Updated Sept. 17, 2013, 10:03 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Sebastien
Hi guys, I made an update patch, which aim to remove commented code and old
files. Please review it
2013/9/17 tuna ng.t...@gmail.com
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14167/
On September 17th, 2013, 8:24 a.m. UTC, *daan Hoogland*
Hi all,
I am trying to run test cases, in which I am creating snapshots of root
disk volumes of vms belonging to an account. The jobs (commands) to create
snapshots are supposed to run asynchronously.
Marvin code For this I am executing submitCmdsAndWait in
cloudstackTestClient which in turn
Hello,
is there a way to resize the ROOT disk of a vm?
API reply is: *Can only resize DATA volumes*
Does anyone know a method to bypass that control?
Thanks a lot.
Regards.
smime.p7s
Description: Firma crittografica S/MIME
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14171/
---
Review request for cloudstack, venkata swamy babu budumuru and Prasanna
Daan,
Do you know what all packages we need to add to get the tools working. I
see that current scripts are installing xenstore-utils.
On 17/09/13 1:58 pm, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
H,
In the present template for systemvms on xen the xenserver tools are
not installed due
Hi,
I am looking at
http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/api/apidocs-4.1/root_admin/authorizeSecurityGroupIngress.html
you can pass a cidrlist and a securitygroupname (exclusive with
securitygroupid).
Are those exclusive ?
Say I want to open port 22 for 1.1.1.1/0 and all VMs in securitygroup
You'd need to make minor code changes to remove the check in the code and
recompile. It should otherwise work, its just that traditionally root disk
size is based on template size, while data disks are based on disk
offerings. Not everyone wants root resize, e.g. if they are billing based
on disk
Hi Abhinandan,
What we have seen so far is that two files in the xe-guest-utilities
package are missing, where CS assumes that they are there.
/usr/bin/xenstore = used in script /usr/sbin/xe-update-guest-attrs
(this script is also included in the package but overwritten by the CS
systemvm.iso
Thanks a lot for reply.
Do you know how change the code?
Il 17/09/2013 14:22, Marcus Sorensen ha scritto:
You'd need to make minor code changes to remove the check in the code and
recompile. It should otherwise work, its just that traditionally root disk
size is based on template size, while
Since this is dependent on specific versions, I'm not clear on whether
there was any difference between persistent and non persistent pools. It
was framed as though it was the cloudstack change that broke things, but
perhaps it was the libvirt update. If an NFS mount point is in use when a
Hi there,
I was wondering if anyone can help us with this issue? There seems to be a
situation where the CleanupSnapshotBackup process deletes vhd files belonging
to an active BackupSnapshot process. I've created CLOUDSTACK-692 for it and
logged as much info as possible, including the steps I
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14060/#review26173
---
Commit 51da534cce7bd07dcbf1e828a32e27a716b5b0f8 in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14171/#review26174
---
New tag test added, it is required ?
@attr(tags = [advanced,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13934/
---
(Updated Sept. 17, 2013, 2:59 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Chiradeep
Chip,
A couple of questions...
On Sep 17, 2013, at 9:54 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
I think the best way for this to happen, is for the code to be published
in a couple of logical patches to reviews.apache.org as a way to get
community agreement that we should bring it into the codebase.
See:
I think the best way for this to happen, is for the code to be published
in a couple of logical patches to reviews.apache.org as a way to get
community agreement that we should bring it into the codebase.
See:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Review+Board+Guidelines
You
Just checking on something.
If you spin up a VM based on an ISO, the ROOT disk size is based on the
selected disk offering, right?
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 6:33 AM, Antonio Petrocelli
a.petroce...@netsons.com wrote:
Thanks a lot for reply.
Do you know how change the code?
Il 17/09/2013
Yes
On Sep 17, 2013 11:01 AM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
wrote:
Just checking on something.
If you spin up a VM based on an ISO, the ROOT disk size is based on the
selected disk offering, right?
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 6:33 AM, Antonio Petrocelli
a.petroce...@netsons.com
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 10:18:29AM -0700, Pedro Roque Marques wrote:
Chip,
A couple of questions...
On Sep 17, 2013, at 9:54 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
I think the best way for this to happen, is for the code to be published
in a couple of logical patches to reviews.apache.org as a way to
I made the last commit, but I know it wasn't that. My change was a
simple string change, it wouldn't affect compilation. I'm looking at
it to see if I can determine the source.
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Mike Tutkowski
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
Just updated and ran mvn -P
See email thread 'Libvirt-java 0.5.0 has been released', it's due to that.
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com wrote:
I made the last commit, but I know it wasn't that. My change was a
simple string change, it wouldn't affect compilation. I'm looking at
it to
Got that e-mail lying around somewhere.
Thanks
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.comwrote:
See email thread 'Libvirt-java 0.5.0 has been released', it's due to that.
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com
wrote:
I made the
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 9:23 AM, Chip Childers
chip.child...@sungard.com wrote:
I've created a 5.0.0 release of cloudmonkey, with the following artifacts
up for a
vote:
Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack-cloudmonkey.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/5.0
I'm not familiar with how we package these binding classes in CloudStack.
Is there a new JAR I need to download or source code?
Thanks!
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl wrote:
On 09/16/2013 07:46 PM, Min Chen wrote:
I got the following test failure in
OK, thanks! I can try that.
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 12:34 PM, Wei ZHOU ustcweiz...@gmail.com wrote:
build successfully after install java-1.7.0-openjdk.x86_64 and
java-1.7.0-openjdk-devel.x86_64, and set the JAVA_HOME
2013/9/17 Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
Got that e-mail
Just updated and ran mvn -P developer,systemvm clean install (twice - with
the same results)
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - Host Allocator Random .. SUCCESS [2.299s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - Dedicated Resources SUCCESS [6.294s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - Hypervisor
Currently all logging in ACS is done using log4j APIs. slf4j is already
packaged as a transitive dependency in ACS. I propose that going
forward we starting using slf4j APIs as opposed to log4j APIs.
For those who don't know, slf4j is a logging abstraction API. In the
world of java logging
Sure. Like you said, it's already pulled in as a dependency from other third
parties so there's no real penalties in using it.
--Alex
-Original Message-
From: Darren Shepherd [mailto:darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 11:56 AM
To:
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Edison Su edison...@citrix.com wrote:
We should be cautious to advance java version, as most of our code run/tested
on java 6.
Is it a must to upgrade to Libvirt 0.5.0?
We've discussed this before:
http://cloudstack.markmail.org/thread/ucos7mpgfu5juskb
Currently ACS code is fairly modular in that you can add plug-ins to ACS to
extend most functionality. Unfortunately ACS is not packaged in a modular
way. It is still delivered essentially as one large unit. There are many
reason for this but one large barrier to modularizing ACS is that the
+1
Tested using the release procedure.
Thanks,
Amogh
On 9/16/13 5:54 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com
wrote:
72 hours for this VOTE has passed, I had kept this VOTE open until
Wednesday because of weekend, but many community members tested this
over weekend and we have 12
+1
Built nonoss RPMS and deployed fresh installation on RHEL 6.3.
Tested CLVM on KVM, adding users, adding projects, adding templates/isos and
deploying VMs.
I have not tested an upgrade as of yet.
- Original Message -
From: Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com
To:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14185/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Alex Huang.
Repository: cloudstack-git
No, it's not intentional.
the HAproxy is a part of services that redundant router would
enable/disabled according to the MASTER/BACKUP status. All the services
related to redundant router are controlled by services.sh.
What's the failure of HAproxy exactly in your case? And what's the root
On Sep 17, 2013, at 10:30 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
Ideally, we would have a design document on the wiki that would help
everyone understand the implementation. We're not looking for a design
doc for Contrail / OpenContrail... we're looking for information about
the integration itself.
Following up with this thread I started last month.
For the first step (hopefully ready by 4.3), I'm planning on getting the
SCSS/SASS compiler working with the UI build -
https://github.com/Jasig/sass-maven-plugin. I've experimented with it using the
existing CSS in our UI, and it will be
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14187/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Alex Huang and Kelven Yang.
Repository:
I think monit is installed currently in the system vm image. Sounds like it
might make more sense to manage haproxy via monit, and allow it to recover the
service should it fail.
- Original Message -
From: Sheng Yang sh...@yasker.org
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14189/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Alex Huang and Kelven Yang.
Repository:
Just after doing a installation of Cloudstack 4.1.1
apilog.log was created with the following permissions:
-rw-rw-r--. 1 cloud cloud 95449 Sep 18 01:05 apilog.log
Owner..rw
Group..rw
Nobody/everybodyr
Considering what was discussed above this is not
On Sep 17, 2013, at 7:05 PM, Pedro Roque Marques pedro.r.marq...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sep 17, 2013, at 10:30 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
Ideally, we would have a design document on the wiki that would help
everyone understand the implementation. We're not looking for a design
doc for Contrail /
How about use maven-exec-call grunt-compile CSS?
http://addyosmani.com/blog/making-maven-grunt/
This is more flexible than sass-maven-plugin, as we can do lot of stuff in
grunt, such unit test.
-Original Message-
From: Brian Federle [mailto:brian.fede...@citrix.com]
Sent: Tuesday,
On Sep 17, 2013, at 5:17 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
On Sep 17, 2013, at 7:05 PM, Pedro Roque Marques pedro.r.marq...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sep 17, 2013, at 10:30 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
Ideally, we would have a design document on the wiki that would help
everyone understand the
Hey Marcus,
I'm reviewing your e-mails as I implement the necessary methods in new
classes.
So, referencing StorageAdaptor.java, createStoragePool accepts all of
the pool data (host, port, name, path) which would be used to log the
host into the initiator.
Can you tell me, in my case, since a
What do you do with Xen? I imagine the user enter the SAN details when
registering the pool? A the pool details are basically just instructions on
how to log into a target, correct?
You can choose to log in a KVM host to the target during createStoragePool
and save the pool in a map, or just save
Hi Marcus,
I never need to respond to a CreateStoragePool call for either XenServer or
VMware.
What happens is I respond only to the Attach- and Detach-volume commands.
Let's say an attach comes in:
In this case, I check to see if the storage is managed. Talking XenServer
here, if it is, I log
I imagine the user enter the SAN details when
registering the pool?
When primary storage is added to CS that is based on the SolidFire plug-in,
these details (host, port, etc.) are provided. The primary storage then
represents the SAN and not a preallocated volume (i.e. not a particular
LUN).
Plus, when you log in to a LUN, you need the CHAP info and this info is
required for each LUN (as opposed to being for the SAN).
This is how my createStoragePool currently looks, so I think we're on the
same page.
public KVMStoragePool createStoragePool(String name, String host, int port,
Woops...I named this incorrectly:
_mapUuidToAdaptor.put(name, storagePool);
should be
_mapUuidToPool.put(name, storagePool);
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 8:01 PM, Mike Tutkowski
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
Plus, when you log in to a LUN, you need the CHAP info and this info is
required
Dear all,
I am adding an API to CloudStack which utilizes Whirr to launch various
clusters on CloudStack. Now I am facing a dependency conflicting issue.
Whirr 0.8.2 requires gson 2.2.2 while CloudStack API requires gson
1.7.1. If I use gson 1.7.1 for Whirr, the following error will happen:
OK, if you log in per lun, then just saving the info for future reference
is fine.
Does CS provide storage stats at all, then, for other platforms?
On Sep 17, 2013 8:01 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
wrote:
Plus, when you log in to a LUN, you need the CHAP info and this info is
You respond to more than attach and detach, right? Don't you create luns as
well? Or are you just referring to the hypervisor stuff?
On Sep 17, 2013 7:51 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
wrote:
Hi Marcus,
I never need to respond to a CreateStoragePool call for either XenServer
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12545/#review26202
---
Commit dd4b1cbf449b63cd2b34197c7c9b19ec1cc4822e in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12545/#review26203
---
Commit 8cc37c24705dfcc2ddb973673522fa39bf246ef5 in branch
I think the way people bill for this kind of storage is simply by seeing
how many volumes are in use for a given CS account and tracing a volume
back to the Disk Offering it was created from, which contains info about
guaranteed IOPS.
I am not aware of what stats may be collected for this for
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12545/#review26204
---
Ship it!
master, 4.2-forward
- Prasanna Santhanam
On Sept. 14,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13682/#review26205
---
Commit 62b0ad03c871c7100433b39593a82d393879124e in branch
Yeah, I should have clarified what I was referring to.
As you mentioned in your last sentence, I was just talking about on the
hypervisor side (responding to attach and detach commands).
On the storage side, the storage framework invokes my plug-in when it needs
a volume created, deleted, etc.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13682/#review26206
---
Commit a9218f341186dcc5914dc23b283636652f83416a in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13682/#review26207
---
Ship it!
master, 4.2-forward
- Prasanna Santhanam
On Aug. 20,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13991/#review26208
---
patch fails to apply on master
- Prasanna Santhanam
On Sept. 5,
Ok, on most storage pools it shows how many GB free/used when listing
the pool both via API and in the UI. I'm guessing those are empty then
for the solid fire storage, but it seems like the user should have to
define some sort of pool that the luns get carved out of, and you
should be able to get
I guess whether or not a solidfire device is capable of hosting
multiple disk pools is irrelevant, we'd hope that we could get the
stats (maybe 30TB availabie, and 15TB allocated in LUNs). But if these
stats aren't collected, I can't as an admin define multiple pools and
expect cloudstack to
This should answer your question, I believe:
* When you add primary storage that is based on the SolidFire plug-in, you
specify info like host, port, number of bytes from the SAN that CS can use,
number of IOPS from the SAN that CS can use, among other info.
* When a volume is attached for the
What you're saying here is definitely something we should talk about.
Hopefully my previous e-mail has clarified how this works a bit.
It mainly comes down to this:
For the first time in CS history, primary storage is no longer required to
be preallocated by the admin and then handed to CS. CS
OK. Most other storage types interrogate the storage for the
capacitywhethwr directly or through the hypervisor. This makes it dynamic
(user could add capacity and cloudstack notices), and provides accurate
accounting things like thin provisioning. I would be surprised if edison
didn't allow for
-Original Message-
From: Abhinandan Prateek [mailto:abhinandan.prat...@citrix.com]
Sent: Monday, September 16, 2013 10:18 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Call for 4.3 and 4.2.1 Release Managers!
If it is fine with community I am willing to take up 4.2.1 maintenance
-Original Message-
From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com]
Sent: Monday, September 16, 2013 10:30 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: Call for 4.3 and 4.2.1 Release Managers!
-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland
I see where you're coming from.
John Burwell and I took a different approach for this kind of storage.
If you want to add capacity and/or IOPS to primary storage that's based on
my plug-in, you invoke the updateStoragePool API command and pass in the
new capacity and/or IOPS.
Your existing
I'm surprised there's no mention of pool on the SAN in your description of
the framework. I had assumed this was specific to your implementation,
because normally SANs host multiple disk pools, maybe multiple RAID 50s and
10s, or however the SAN admin wants to split it up. Maybe a pool intended
+1 (binding)
Tested over VMware going through VM life cycle.
Regards,
Sateesh
-Original Message-
From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
Sent: 17 September 2013 23:23
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.0.0 (first round)
On Fri,
Did you build the source code in Windows?
2013/9/18, Paul Edwards (JIRA) j...@apache.org:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4690?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13770450#comment-13770450
]
Paul Edwards commented on
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14148/#review26209
---
In client/tomcatconf/applicationContext.xml.in we are referring
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14148/
---
(Updated Sept. 18, 2013, 5:38 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14148/
---
(Updated Sept. 18, 2013, 5:39 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan
If anybody got access to the api.log using the session details we can do
execute api's and cause harm.
But the api.log is present in the mgmt server and if anybody got access to it,
he can corrupt anything.
Not just accessing api.log, any other services logs and get the data. I feel
it's up to
87 matches
Mail list logo
