Hi Prasanna,
Thank you for setting up jenkins job and adding config file.
It seems I forgot to include it in the patch, sorry.
Everything looks good, Thank you!
Noji
2013/10/22 Prasanna Santhanam t...@apache.org:
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 06:39:45PM -0600, Yoshikazu Nojima wrote:
Hi,
Is
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14867/#review27362
---
How is the import behaviour when OUs contain other OUs?
- Prasanna
On 10/23/2013 07:32 AM, Abhinandan Prateek wrote:
We are planning to make 64-bit system vm templates as default offering in
4.2.1.
This is an initial email to have thoughts from the community on this.
I'd say -1.
Since it is going to be a minor upgrade and although this seems like a
On Oct. 23, 2013, 6:22 a.m., Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
How is the import behaviour when OUs contain other OUs?
That is still not done. (Its the second part of TODO:1, nested hierarchy)
- Rajani
---
This is an automatically generated
On Oct. 23, 2013, 6:22 a.m., Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
How is the import behaviour when OUs contain other OUs?
Rajani Karuturi wrote:
That is still not done. (Its the second part of TODO:1, nested hierarchy)
Ah, didn't notice the TODO. Is there a spec file on how this is planned to
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14869/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Prasanna Santhanam.
Repository:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14868/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Alena Prokharchyk, Chiradeep Vittal, Murali
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14868/
---
(Updated Oct. 23, 2013, 6:38 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Alena
Hi Darren,
Thanks for getting back to me. I will set the networking config up again
and run the commands you sent me over the next couple of days.
Thanks,
Marty
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 11:39 PM, Darren Shepherd
darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com wrote:
Well that wasn't very useful message. If you
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14869/#review27366
---
tools/marvin/marvin/cloudstackConnection.py
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14871/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Kishan Kavala.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-4927
Hi Punith,
I encountered the same issue with latest master and this happens because the
agent is not able to talk to the management server.
To resolve it, you need to set the value of global config parameter host to
your management server IP.
Also, destroy the existing systemVMs to get the
On Oct. 23, 2013, 7:25 a.m., Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
tools/marvin/marvin/cloudstackConnection.py, line 169
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14869/diff/1/?file=369602#file369602line169
can we please use # for inline comments in code and quoted
doc-string comments under methods,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14869/
---
(Updated Oct. 23, 2013, 8:19 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Prasanna
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14872/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Rayees Namathponnan.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-4934
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14873/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Rayees Namathponnan.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-4934
On Oct. 23, 2013, 6:22 a.m., Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
How is the import behaviour when OUs contain other OUs?
Rajani Karuturi wrote:
That is still not done. (Its the second part of TODO:1, nested hierarchy)
Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
Ah, didn't notice the TODO. Is there a spec
On Oct. 22, 2013, 6:37 a.m., Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
This looks fine except pep8 is broken in a few places. Can you please run
pep8 *.py in tools/marvin/marvin to ensure the formatting is maintained?
Please upload the patch that corrects these issues.
The changes for this went in
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14199/#review27371
---
Patch will require few changes before applying to master. Can you
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14319/
---
(Updated Oct. 23, 2013, 9:01 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, bharat kumar
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14319/#review27372
---
test/integration/component/test_non_contiguous_vlan.py
On Oct. 23, 2013, 2:38 p.m., Gaurav Aradhye wrote:
The naming of the tests should be improved. test_01/02/03 doesn't tell much
about the test. Also is the ordering strictly required? Can I reorder the
tests and still expect the tests to pass? If not, we should remove the 01 ,
02 , 03
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 1:32 AM, Abhinandan Prateek
abhinandan.prat...@citrix.com wrote:
We are planning to make 64-bit system vm templates as default offering in
4.2.1.
This is an initial email to have thoughts from the community on this.
-abhi
-1
Who is this we?
I agree with Wido We
On Oct. 23, 2013, 9:08 a.m., Gaurav Aradhye wrote:
The naming of the tests should be improved. test_01/02/03 doesn't tell much
about the test. Also is the ordering strictly required? Can I reorder the
tests and still expect the tests to pass? If not, we should remove the 01 ,
02 , 03
On Oct. 23, 2013, 9:08 a.m., Gaurav Aradhye wrote:
The naming of the tests should be improved. test_01/02/03 doesn't tell much
about the test. Also is the ordering strictly required? Can I reorder the
tests and still expect the tests to pass? If not, we should remove the 01 ,
02 , 03
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14319/#review27377
---
test/integration/component/test_non_contiguous_vlan.py
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked
Srikanteswara
Talluri to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that they have
accepted.
Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute more autonomously. For
developers, it makes it easier to submit
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Girish
Shilamkar to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that they have
accepted.
Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute more autonomously. For
developers, it makes it easier to submit changes
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Sowmya
Krishnan to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that they have
accepted.
Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute more autonomously. For
developers, it makes it easier to submit changes and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14319/#review27374
---
test/integration/component/test_non_contiguous_vlan.py
Hello CloudStack community,
Could you please help found source of following issue and how to fix it.
I am tring to configure CloudStack 4.2 (installed from cloudstack repo
baseurl=http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/rhel/4.2/) with VMware 5.1. During
adding new zone into UI I have got following error:
Congrats Talluri !!
-Original Message-
From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 4:08 PM
To: CloudStack Dev
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Talluri, Srikanteswara
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Sowmya
Krishnan to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that they have
accepted.
Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute more autonomously. For
developers, it makes it easier to submit changes and
Party time, Sowmya :-)
Welcome aboard...
-Original Message-
From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 4:08 PM
To: CloudStack Dev
Subject: New Committer: Krishnan, Sowmya
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked
Congratz, Talluri.
-Original Message-
From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 4:08 PM
To: CloudStack Dev
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Talluri, Srikanteswara
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked
Links to attached files:
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/594/7oi1.png/
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/841/w1i7.png/
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/856/e31y.png/
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/201/x45.png/
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/17/avd4.png/
On 10/23/2013 01:40
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14871/#review27378
---
Commit 2a6905a9ce5c6499a5632afb3d8b7e8af71ef7fa in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14871/#review27379
---
Ship it!
commit 2a6905a9ce5c6499a5632afb3d8b7e8af71ef7fa
Author:
Congrats Sowmya !!!
-Original Message-
From: Radhika Puthiyetath [mailto:radhika.puthiyet...@citrix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 4:19 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: New Committer: Krishnan, Sowmya
Party time, Sowmya :-)
Welcome aboard...
-Original
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14738/
---
(Updated Oct. 23, 2013, 10:57 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack,
Congratz, Girish
-Original Message-
From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 4:08 PM
To: CloudStack Dev
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Shilamkar, Girish
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Girish
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14827/
---
(Updated Oct. 23, 2013, 11:05 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Chiradeep
Congrats Talluri
-Original Message-
From: Sanjeev Neelarapu [mailto:sanjeev.neelar...@citrix.com]
Sent: 23 October 2013 16:13
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Talluri, Srikanteswara
Congrats Talluri !!
-Original Message-
From: Prasanna
Congrats Sowmya!!
-Original Message-
From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org]
Sent: 23 October 2013 16:08
To: CloudStack Dev
Subject: New Committer: Krishnan, Sowmya
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Sowmya
Krishnan to become a committer
Congrats Sowmya.
-Original Message-
From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 4:08 PM
To: CloudStack Dev
Subject: New Committer: Krishnan, Sowmya
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Sowmya
Krishnan to become a
Congrats Talluri.
-Original Message-
From: Suresh Sadhu [mailto:suresh.sa...@citrix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 4:46 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Talluri, Srikanteswara
Congrats Talluri
-Original Message-
From: Sanjeev
Also links to screenshots of our networking configuration:
http://imageshack.us/f/855/zbtu.png/
http://imageshack.us/f/708/840z.png/
On 10/23/2013 01:51 PM, Denis Finko wrote:
Links to attached files:
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/594/7oi1.png/
Hearty Congratulations :)
-Original Message-
From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 4:08 PM
To: CloudStack Dev
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Talluri, Srikanteswara
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked
Hearty Congratulations :)
-Original Message-
From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 4:17 PM
To: CloudStack Dev
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Krishnan, Sowmya
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Sowmya
On 23/10/13 3:48 pm, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 1:32 AM, Abhinandan Prateek
abhinandan.prat...@citrix.com wrote:
We are planning to make 64-bit system vm templates as default
offering in 4.2.1.
This is an initial email to have thoughts from the community on
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14874/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Prasanna Santhanam.
Repository:
Spec for this feature is available at [1]. For 4.3, as mentioned in the spec,
enough flexibility is provided but the communication with older version
systemVms will be limited.
Please provide your feedback.
[1]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Improve+SystemVm+upgrades
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14874/
---
(Updated Oct. 23, 2013, 1:22 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Prasanna
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14459/
---
(Updated Oct. 23, 2013, 1:33 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Girish
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14875/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Prasanna Santhanam.
Repository:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14874/
---
(Updated Oct. 23, 2013, 1:53 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Prasanna
Hi Donal,
I had mounted the cifs with rw permission. I was able to touch and write data
to file and read it.
But when used vhd-util to query/read the the vhd files present on cifs am
getting error.
root@rajesh-HVM-domU:~/testvhd# /root/vhd-util read -p -n
What would be the main reasoning behind this change? Surely the
minimalistic specifications that SystemVMs are assigned suit 32-bit better
in terms of Memory?
The main disadvantage of 64-bit architectures is that, relative to 32-bit
architectures, the same data occupies more space in memory (due
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14876/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Girish Shilamkar and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri.
On Oct. 22, 2013, 9:56 p.m., Darren Shepherd wrote:
api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/command/user/loadbalancer/UploadSslCertCmd.java,
lines 34-35
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14855/diff/1/?file=369298#file369298line34
I don't understand why a password is needed?
Password is
I have seen problems with an out of date vhd-util, e.g.
http://dlafferty.blogspot.co.uk/2013/08/using-cloudstacks-log-files-xenserver.html
You could check that you are using the version of vhd-util you downloaded
using which vhd-util.
However, why don't you first rule out CIFS as the problem?
Congrats Talluri!
On 23-Oct-2013, at 4:07 PM, Prasanna Santhanam t...@apache.org wrote:
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked
Srikanteswara
Talluri to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that they have
accepted.
Being a committer allows many
Congrats Sowmya!
On 23-Oct-2013, at 4:16 PM, Prasanna Santhanam t...@apache.org wrote:
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Sowmya
Krishnan to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that they have
accepted.
Being a committer allows many
Just throwing this out there. We all know the maven build is slow.
It never donned on me until now that maybe maven would have a parallel
build option and it does [1]. I wouldn't recommend this for official
builds or jenkins jobs, but for developers use the parallel build
option. Basically add
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14855/
---
(Updated Oct. 23, 2013, 4:17 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Darren
On Oct. 22, 2013, 9:56 p.m., Darren Shepherd wrote:
engine/schema/src/com/cloud/network/dao/LoadBalancerCertMapVO.java, line 31
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14855/diff/1/?file=369304#file369304line31
Their really should be a state field, not just a simple boolean flag
for revoke.
It appears that the deployment of systemvms was broken by commit
e33ae74067d5d7ff165098028c0bd6897f14bbd2, specifically, the change
Adding the commit author.
--
Chris Suich
chris.su...@netapp.com
NetApp Software Engineer
Data Center Platforms – Cloud Solutions
Citrix, Cisco Red Hat
On Oct 23, 2013, at 12:39 PM, SuichII, Christopher chris.su...@netapp.com
wrote:
It appears that the deployment of systemvms was broken by
+1. That's the way to do it with no downtime. Tighter control needs to be
formed on the VR to VR version compatibility though. It's one reason I always
support that we break VR into smaller pieces. Redundant VRs work great as
routing but then if you have to handle DHCP, DNS, Load Balancing,
Little problem that I wanted to get your take on, Marcus.
When a VM is being started, we call createVdb before calling
connectPhysicalDisksViaVmSpec.
The problem is that createVdb calls getPhysicalDisk and my volume has not
yet been connected because connectPhysicalDisksViaVmSpec has not yet
Congrats Sowmya!
-Original Message-
From: Koushik Das [mailto:koushik@citrix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 8:43 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Krishnan, Sowmya
Congrats Sowmya!
On 23-Oct-2013, at 4:16 PM, Prasanna Santhanam
Congrats Girish!!
-Original Message-
From: Radhika Puthiyetath [mailto:radhika.puthiyet...@citrix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 3:59 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Shilamkar, Girish
Congratz, Girish
-Original Message-
From:
Congrats Talluri!!
-Original Message-
From: Suresh Sadhu [mailto:suresh.sa...@citrix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 4:16 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Talluri, Srikanteswara
Congrats Talluri
-Original Message-
From: Sanjeev
I think we could flip-flop these two lines if necessary:
createVbd(conn, vmSpec, vmName, vm);
_storagePoolMgr.connectPhysicalDisksViaVmSpec(vmSpec);
I haven't actually tried it though. But in general I don't see the
Libvirt DiskDef using size at all, which is what
Nice work Girish!
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Sangeetha Hariharan
sangeetha.hariha...@citrix.com wrote:
Congrats Girish!!
-Original Message-
From: Radhika Puthiyetath [mailto:radhika.puthiyet...@citrix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 3:59 AM
To:
Woohooo!!! Congrats Sowmya!
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 9:54 AM, Sangeetha Hariharan
sangeetha.hariha...@citrix.com wrote:
Congrats Sowmya!
-Original Message-
From: Koushik Das [mailto:koushik@citrix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 8:43 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Hello,
Since I'm not a programmer reading the code doesn't make too much sense
to me.
Can anyone explain to me how HA works (for VMs expecially)?
Who monitors these HA VMs? Can I run multiple monitors, for HA? Any
recommendations, best practices, gotchas?
Thanks,
Lucian
--
Sent from the
I can tell you it uses 'Storage-Heartbeat method for HA, unless that's
changed. That means the heartbeat ring is via the primary storage.
- Original Message -
From: Nux! n...@li.nux.ro
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013
On Oct. 22, 2013, 1:19 p.m., Chris Suich wrote:
Darren, the design of all of this has already changed here:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14522/. Take a look at the newer revisions
which haven't made it in yet (still waiting on a final review from John
Burwell). Could you take a look
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14549/
---
(Updated Oct. 23, 2013, 6:26 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack.
Changes
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Donal Lafferty
donal.laffe...@citrix.com wrote:
As stated in a previous thread [1], Citrix is proposing the donation of
source for an RDP client. After donation, the client would be integrated
with the console system VM in order to provide access to Hyper-V
OK, whatever way you prefer then, Marcus (createVdb first or second).
If I leave createVdb first and return 0, it does seem to work.
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.comwrote:
I think we could flip-flop these two lines if necessary:
Congrats Talluri
-Original Message-
From: Ahmad Emneina [mailto:aemne...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 10:33 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Talluri, Srikanteswara
Congratulations Talluri!
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 9:59 AM,
Congrats Sowmya
-Original Message-
From: Ahmad Emneina [mailto:aemne...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 10:34 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Krishnan, Sowmya
Woohooo!!! Congrats Sowmya!
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 9:54 AM, Sangeetha
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master-noredist/1584/changes
Changes:
[jessicawang] CLOUDSTACK-4024: UI (1) detailView widget - add action handler
for prepareObjectStoreMigration.
[laszlo.hornyak] Integer instantation removed
[laszlo.hornyak] Safe properties loader
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14522/
---
(Updated Oct. 23, 2013, 7:19 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Brian
+1
-Original Message-
From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com]
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2013 3:36 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Accept the donation of RDP client code into Apache
CloudStack
+1
-Original Message-
From: Donal
I see one problem for us now, Marcus.
* You have a running VM that you attach a volume to.
* You stop the VM.
* You detach the volume.
* You start up the VM.
The VM will not be connected to the volume (which is good), but the
hypervisor will still be connected to the volume.
It would be great
Are we not disconnecting when we stop the vm? There's a method for it, we
should be. disconnectPhysicalDiskViaVmSpec
On Oct 23, 2013 1:28 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
wrote:
I see one problem for us now, Marcus.
* You have a running VM that you attach a volume to.
* You
Chris, Edison,
You guys just committed 'Support Revert VM Disk from Snapshot.' At
the same time I was merging both my txn-refactor and
spring-modularization branches. They are really tricky merges and
each time I have to rebase it takes awhile to figure out. Anyhow,
your change + my changes
It looks like the changes from us didn’t make it through your merge at all. I
should have been more clear in my review - there are logic changes that needed
to be carried from my changes into yours, not simply a rebase. I will work on
those changes and try to get a patch up shortly.
--
Chris
I can fix it, let me see what I broke.
Darren
On Oct 23, 2013, at 1:03 PM, SuichII, Christopher chris.su...@netapp.com
wrote:
It looks like the changes from us didn’t make it through your merge at all. I
should have been more clear in my review - there are logic changes that
needed
And it looks like some of your changes may have not merged correctly. I’m
getting compile errors like:
The method close() is undefined for the type Transaction
This shouldn’t have come from our merge.
--
Chris Suich
chris.su...@netapp.com
NetApp Software Engineer
Data Center Platforms – Cloud
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master-noredist/1585/changes
The transaction API was changed in the merge. I could have maybe
missed updating a class. Let me check. When you said It looks like
the changes from us didn’t make it through your merge at all, can you
point to something specific that got lost?
Darren
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 1:05 PM,
Er, sorry. That was poorly worded on my part. Some classes, like
SnapshotTest.java and all the storage providers, did not get updated references
to your refactoring. They still reference StrategyPriority.pickStrategy(), etc.
Additionally, I changed the pickStrategy() logic from using a
Okay let me look at that. Are you 100% sure your looking at a clean version of
master?
Darren
On Oct 23, 2013, at 1:17 PM, SuichII, Christopher chris.su...@netapp.com
wrote:
Er, sorry. That was poorly worded on my part. Some classes, like
SnapshotTest.java and all the storage
I came across a potential bug in the way allocators do volumes placement on
storage, based on storage tags. Prachi, can you please confirm if the bug is
real.
The tags are passed to the createStoragePool API in form of tags='tag1,tag2,..':
?command=createStoragePool...tags=alena
and stored
I agree - this is a bug.
We should not assume because a value is true that the name is a storage tag.
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Alena Prokharchyk
alena.prokharc...@citrix.com wrote:
I came across a potential bug in the way allocators do volumes placement
on storage, based on storage
If someone logs a JIRA ticket on this, please note that the
updateStoragePool command would need to be corrected, as well, because it
has special knowledge of a true value meaning that the name is a storage
tag.
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 2:45 PM, Mike Tutkowski
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
1 - 100 of 132 matches
Mail list logo
