Hi,
Cloudstack with Riak-CS works fine. If we register template more than 5GB we
use multipart upload to push the files to Riak. But this does not work for
snapshots and volumes. This will be fixed in CS4.2.1 . But for template
registration it should work fine.
Thanks,
Sanjeev
-Original
On Oct. 30, 2013, 1:59 p.m., Santhosh Edukulla wrote:
test/integration/component/test_base_image_updation.py, line 411
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14459/diff/4/?file=373887#file373887line411
I mean why not we assert at 407? Does self.fail is same as test case
failure or product
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14459/
---
(Updated Oct. 31, 2013, 6:39 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Girish
Thanks for the reminder, I've closed the issue
From: Abhinandan Prateek [mailto:abhinandan.prat...@citrix.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2013 6:27 AM
To: CloudStack Dev; Hugo Trippaers
Subject: [ACS4.2.1] CLOUDSTACK-2804
Hi Hugo,
There are some commits in
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15108/#review27875
---
I haven't had a chance to test it yet, but I prefer this solution
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15115/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Santhosh Edukulla and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14426/#review27877
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Santhosh Edukulla
On Oct. 28, 2013, 7:03
On Oct. 16, 2013, 4:43 p.m., Santhosh Edukulla wrote:
Sowmya,
Is it ok if we do a code walkthrough? Let me know i can create a gtm.
Also,please add the path to test plan for this feature along with feature
owner information, i will invite him\her as well.
santhosh
Sowmya
On Oct 29, 2013, at 7:56 PM, Nitin Mehta nitin.me...@citrix.com wrote:
Yeah, that should have cleaned the workspace. Did you see what Prachi
recommended below ?
Yes and it's there. I do a fresh 4.2 checkout
it compiles fine with:
mvn -Pdeveloper -Dsimulator -DskipTests clean install
But
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14459/#review27880
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Santhosh Edukulla
On Oct. 31, 2013, 6:39
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14459/#review27881
---
Commit c53d4e9e141d5048a4ed2ea040fbef545c7ae9d1 in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14459/#review27882
---
Commit e47dfb673cc71a0014fc320a0a14cb8942145e8f in branch
On 31 okt. 2013, at 04:34, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com wrote:
Here's a scenario... Lets say we currently have a zone deployed with Vlan
isolation. There's nothing stopping us from running a vxlan isolation on
the same hosts, even on the same physical interface. This is actually done
On 31 okt. 2013, at 03:48, Darren Shepherd darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com wrote:
Its important to remember that the definition of a Network in
CloudStack is quite purposefully very loose. A network in the
simplest terms is just a group of VMs. A guru creates and manages
that network. A
Thanks Darren. I'll start working on getting it merged into the master. I hope
to finish it by Friday.
Regards,
Devdeep
-Original Message-
From: Darren Shepherd [mailto:darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2013 10:45 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Donal
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15018/
---
(Updated Oct. 31, 2013, 10:14 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Kishan
On Oct. 30, 2013, 10:22 a.m., Santhosh Edukulla wrote:
tools/marvin/marvin/configGenerator.py, line 337
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15021/diff/1/?file=373114#file373114line337
Nopes, its right, user by default no need to mention any path while
creating the object instead
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15021/
---
(Updated Oct. 31, 2013, 11:57 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Girish
Hi guys,
I trust all is well.
I was actually referring to getting to assist you guys with the UI work you
have.
I was hoping to offer a helping hand in this.
I will still make a branch of my own.
Kind Regards,
Thanks for the response Brain.
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 8:07 PM, Brian Federle
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15115/#review27888
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Santhosh Edukulla
On Oct. 31, 2013, 8:32
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15127/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Girish Shilamkar.
Repository: cloudstack-git
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15115/#review27891
---
Commit 58179d28840a37e6b098d731d4fe6e6e5ea8ecf9 in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15115/#review27893
---
Commit 733c355eaa364e5402876b1347b206454b3bec66 in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15127/#review27894
---
test/integration/component/test_reset_ssh_keypair.py
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15128/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Prateek and Ian Duffy.
Bugs:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15127/
---
(Updated Oct. 31, 2013, 7:18 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Girish
Heya,
With commit 1460196496d73e0db25c7beb2392cfaf9d591ed7 Darren improved the
loading of the db.properties file, however this also affected the
DatabaseCreator used by the deploydb procedure to refresh the database.
Effectively the db.properies.override is ignored at the moment and the
On Oct 25, 2013, at 7:57 AM, Gavin Lee gavin@gmail.com wrote:
Unlike the CS4.2 release notes say, I could not find cloud-bugtool in
source tree or installed/upgrade CS4.2 platform.
This script can only be found in CloudPlatform 4.2.
I think the support tool like this is very helpful,
not that i know, the workaround involves dumping your machines to
templates and installing them after assigning the cluster to
cloudstack. not something you want to do with a big cluster. So it
will be nteresting to see other solutions.
regards,
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 4:52 AM, 王健
Edison, Min,
When creating a Zone and there is no SSVM so it sends to
LocalHostEndPoint. I always get the below error. Is there some fix
for this?
ERROR [o.a.c.s.r.NfsSecondaryStorageResource]
(pool-4-thread-1:ctx-fb095de0) Unable to create local folder for:
I'll fix that. Gimme ten mintues. I specifically looked at that code
and thought I didn't change the behavior, but I guess I screwed it up.
Just a general comment. There's too many ways to do the same thing in
CloudStack. Especially the database. The way databases are setup for
developers
Please check if you can
create /var/cloudstack/mnt/secStorage/64d6e26f-e656-3ba3-908f-ce6610ede011,
and mount nfs point.
Ugh, I see what I did now. When I tested that code I changed the code
I didn't do a mvn install before running mvn ... deploydb. That's
annoying, now I want to figure out why maven doesn't pickup changes
unless I do an install. So I effectively tested with the old code.
Darren
On Thu, Oct 31,
This is fixed now. Sorry about that. I really do go through extra
length to test my changes. I'm finding it difficult to ensure quality
because there is so much variation. You have to test everything in so
many contexts. It shouldn't be like that I hope to help reduced the
amount of variation
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15132/
---
Review request for cloudstack and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri.
Bugs:
All,
While I'm waiting for the permissions, I'd like to bring up a discussion on
the overall architecture to support this feature.
There can be 2 different approaches as below.
1. master - slave architecture : the manual changes are allowed only in one
master management server, and those in
It's happening when I first create the zone. I'll debug it further to tell
you exactly what its happening. But I don't understand how the following
code in DefaultEndpointSelector could be correct. If I have a zone, and I
delete/stop/crash the SSVM, and at the same time register a new template,
My template is less than 5gb and it still uses multipart. I actually don't
think this is a CloudStack issue but more of an issue with Riak-CS. I was
just wondering if anybody has specifically ran the setup or knows more
about Riak-CS and can tell me whats up. I've been trying off and on for
the
Yes, that is true, it is a bug in that case. The logic of choosing
endpoint to send Command will not work properly for destroying/Stopping VM
case. Our assumption is that registering template is done when ssvm is up
and running. Otherwise, it will send to LocalHost to execute command. In
your
Darren,
Since S3/Riak CS can receive the contents of a file out of order and
re-assemble upon completion of transfer of all parts, the underlying driver
uses the TransferManager which automatically breaks files up into multi-part
uploads to increase parallelism to decrease the time required to
Yes, indeed, this is how i am trying to create the template. I do get the same
error as I get while trying to snapshot.
Is there a workaround or do i need to wait for the 4.2.1 to come out?
Thanks
Andrei
- Original Message -
From: Min Chen min.c...@citrix.com
To:
The behaviour should be to delay until there is a SSVM available. I don't
know if that is even possible in CloudStack, I don't want you to sleep().
Is there any way to delay? Something else in the system should be ensuring
that a SSVM is running and available (what I don't know...). If you
Uploading without multipart works with s3cmd. The s3cmd I was using didn't
have multipart support, so I'll download a newer one and try it tonight.
Would you happen to know what the below means? I get a 200 response for
parts 1,2,3,4,etc and then randomly one part will fail with the below.
Why do we have the configuration system.vm.use.local.storage? Why would
somebody care if they systemvm is on local storage? I'm guessing the idea
here is if it's on local storage we can't bring it back in a host failure
situation? But don't we just recreate the systemvm?
Darren
Delaying them until ssvm is up may not that easy to handle in current
CloudStack. We may be able to send an error in this case by distinguishing
S3 register template case from other scenarios. Would you mind filing a
JIRA bug on this? Your issue seems different from the issue filed by Daan
Darren,
Your are receiving a 403 which indicates that the ACLs/user is not properly
configured. Which version of Riak CS are you using? Can you send your
app.config and vm.args for Riak and Riak CS? Personally, I use the
vagrant-riak-cs-cluster [1] project to build local instances for
Hi John,
I have a related question on this issue for you regarding RiakCS. In 4.2.0
release, backup snapshot to S3 is done through your s3xen plugin, where S3
single part upload API is used. If customer is using RiakCS as their S3 object
store, can they still backup snapshot larger than 5GB?
you might not have shared local storage in your cloud. so having to add
shared storage for the sole purpose of supporting system vm's would be
painful.
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 10:47 AM, Darren Shepherd
darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com wrote:
Why do we have the configuration
That's a good point. I know the system VMs are auto created if the system is
aware of their state being either 'Destroyed', 'Expunged'. If the state is
'Starting', or 'Started'/'Running' then no actions are taken.
In your scenario, the system VM would still be 'Started' in the database even
'shared local storage' should be read as shared storage :)
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Ahmad Emneina aemne...@gmail.com wrote:
you might not have shared local storage in your cloud. so having to add
shared storage for the sole purpose of supporting system vm's would be
painful.
On
Does this issue exist in 4.2/4.2.1? I'm going to put the bug as blocker,
if you disagree we can lower it. I really think it is quite a bad scenario
to mount NFS to the mgmt server.
Darren
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 10:48 AM, Min Chen min.c...@citrix.com wrote:
Delaying them until ssvm is up
Min,
I apologize for the confusions. Files greater than 5 GB must uploaded using
multipart and no part can exceed 5 GB in size. The original S3 implementation
in 4.1.0 didn't support multi-part uploads for templates. Therefore, I didn't
implement it in the s3xen plugin. Now that we support
Yes, this issue exist in 4.2/4.2.1 since DefaultEndpointSelector was
introduced in 4.2.
Thanks
-min
On 10/31/13 10:56 AM, Darren Shepherd darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com
wrote:
Does this issue exist in 4.2/4.2.1? I'm going to put the bug as blocker,
if you disagree we can lower it. I really think
Thanks for your clarification, John. Yes, we have fixed in 4.2.1.
-min
On 10/31/13 10:58 AM, John Burwell jburw...@basho.com wrote:
Min,
I apologize for the confusions. Files greater than 5 GB must uploaded
using multipart and no part can exceed 5 GB in size. The original S3
implementation
Sorry, but you may have to wait for 4.2.1 to come out.
Thanks
-min
On 10/31/13 10:37 AM, Andrei Mikhailovsky and...@arhont.com wrote:
Yes, indeed, this is how i am trying to create the template. I do get the
same error as I get while trying to snapshot.
Is there a workaround or do i need to
This is actually running in docker and I followed the quickstart [1] to set
it up. I'll send the config tonight, I don't have access to the machine at
the moment. I know the 403 seems to indicate the setup is wrong, but all
parts prior to part 18 got a 200 (as you can see in the access log). So
Darren,
One silly question, how much disk space is free in the container?
Additionally, how much RAM have allocated? I recommend a minimum of 2 GB for
testing (memory is consumed largely by the bitcask backend holding keys in
memory). When disk space or memory runs out, odd errors can
Instead of going through these many steps, I believe the other quick solution
would be to change sdist argument to install wherever its referencing
python setup.py, under cs/tools/marvin/pom.xml and run maven command with clean
install and other arguments. I am assuming it should fix the
The following code results in a NPE in bad situations
templatePoolRef =
_tmpltPoolDao.acquireInLockTable(templatePoolRefId,
storagePoolMaxWaitSeconds);
if (templatePoolRef == null) {
if (s_logger.isDebugEnabled()) {
s_logger.info(Unable to acquire lock
I just find it annoying setting up a zone with local storage that I have to
turn this setting on. If I have no shared storage, then system VMs won't
deploy with out this parameter. It's just seems like a useless setting that
might have been added because there is something else in the system
Well perhaps it should be a checkbox on the first zone wizard page, have it
show up when the user selects 'use local storage'. it could say 'allow system
VMs on local storage'.
- Original Message -
From: Darren Shepherd darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc:
Memory is 4gb and disk is about 1gb free (kinda low on disk space). But the
system is overtaxed and slow and swapping a bit. I'll give the vagrant setup a
try.
Darren
On Oct 31, 2013, at 11:29 AM, John Burwell jburw...@basho.com wrote:
Darren,
One silly question, how much disk space
On Oct. 31, 2013, 8:29 a.m., Laszlo Hornyak wrote:
I haven't had a chance to test it yet, but I prefer this solution over my
own patchset, since I was only trying to fix some broken functionality
without radically changing the behavior.
One minor problem I see in there is that still
Permission added.
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 12:19:23PM -0500, Alex Ough wrote:
And I'd like to write the design document in the wiki page, but I don't
seem to have a permission to create pages.
So can anyone give me the permission?
My account in the wiki is alex.o...@sungard.com
Thanks in
(dropping users@ - try not to cross post please)
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 12:13:18PM -0500, Alex Ough wrote:
All,
While I'm waiting for the permissions, I'd like to bring up a discussion on
the overall architecture to support this feature.
There can be 2 different approaches as below.
1.
I agree, it was probably an afterthought. I was just justifying the desired
effect not the flag/workaround.
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Darren Shepherd
darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com wrote:
I just find it annoying setting up a zone with local storage that I have
to turn this setting on.
Well, certainly you don't want system vms using local storage by
default. How would you live migrate them for host maintenance? I
assume you mean that when you set up a zone and check 'local storage',
and it pops up the big long thing stating make sure you set the
system vms to local as well in
Thanks Chip, and can you also give a permission in Jira so that I can
assign myself in its jira?
Alex Ough
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Chip Childers chipchild...@apache.orgwrote:
Permission added.
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 12:19:23PM -0500, Alex Ough wrote:
And I'd like to write the
I too faced this issue today. Is there any resolution for this?
Thanks,
~Talluri
On 31/10/13 2:35 pm, sebgoa run...@gmail.com wrote:
On Oct 29, 2013, at 7:56 PM, Nitin Mehta nitin.me...@citrix.com wrote:
Yeah, that should have cleaned the workspace. Did you see what Prachi
recommended below
basic networks dont really require that level of flexibility. Sure you
suffer a small dns/dhcp outage... So it definitely depends on the purpose
of the cloud, and services its going to provide. We cant negate the
flexibility local storage system vm's provides.
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 12:24 PM,
one note on testing guys,
I see that the analysis site give lines-coverage and branch-coverage.
I don't see anything on distinct paths. What I mean is that the
program
if(a)
A
else
B
if(b)
C
else
D
if(c)
E
else
F
has eight (2^3) distict paths. It is not enough to show that
A,B,C,D,E,F are
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15050/
---
(Updated Oct. 31, 2013, 8:45 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Sheng
On Oct. 30, 2013, 5:34 p.m., Sheng Yang wrote:
Ship It!
Sheng Yang wrote:
No shipping for now.
Sorry, press the wrong one. I meant to ship the other patch.
Will, since it's a big change, could you send out a notice to the
community about this merge?
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14549/
---
(Updated Oct. 31, 2013, 8:46 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Hugo
Hi,
I would like to merge support for Palo Alto Network's firewall appliances
to the master branch. Development for this has been done by Will Stevens
at CloudOps on branch [1].
There was an introduction [2], a proposal [3], and a discussion [4] on the
mailing list regarding this feature.
On Oct. 30, 2013, 5:34 p.m., Sheng Yang wrote:
Ship It!
Sheng Yang wrote:
No shipping for now.
Sorry, press the wrong one. I meant to ship the other patch.
Will, since it's a big change, could you send out a notice to the
community about this merge?
So far I haven't heard back from them. I will check next morning
making [Rr] but last week they where still at incubator in the
markmail indeces. I don't know if that means the markmail subscription
is also on the incubator list
Daan
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 11:37 PM, Chip Childers
Hi All,
I have been seeing an issue with the Simulator that I was hoping someone
could provide some insight into.
Some background. I'm running from the 4.2.0 tag on rhel 6.3, building from
source/enabling the simulator.
Overall, most operations seem to work fine, however, I noticed that when
On 31.10.2013 19:32, motty cruz wrote:
Hello,
I'm having issues with snapshot, when trying to take a snapshot I get
the
following error: VM snapshot is not enabled for hypervisor type: VKM
but I do have it enable in Global settings, am I missing a step?
kvm.snapshot.enabled = true,
Thanks,
H Sudha,
We will at Schuberg Philis but probably not before next friday. We
will be upgrading from 4.1.1. I hope we can free up some people to
test that scenario soon.
Daan
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 3:51 AM, Sudha Ponnaganti
sudha.ponnaga...@citrix.com wrote:
Hi All,
Want to check if anyone is
you are added to jira, Alex
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 8:31 PM, Alex Ough alex.o...@sungard.com wrote:
Thanks Chip, and can you also give a permission in Jira so that I can
assign myself in its jira?
Alex Ough
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Chip Childers chipchild...@apache.orgwrote:
On 31.10.2013 02:51, Sudha Ponnaganti wrote:
Hi All,
Want to check if anyone is testing upgrades from prior versions to
4.2.1. As Release date is getting close, If there are gaps, would like
to cover some scenarios in our lab.
Thanks
/sudha
I'd love to test it, anyone got an RPM repo with
I've been tinkering with adding -T to builds on my laptop - e.g. mvn -T 2C
install (Means run two build threads on each CPU core the system has)
I'm seeing a 20-30% improvement in build time vs a single-thread build, and
things seem to work so far, but I do get this warning a few times during
Thanks Daan
-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2013 2:33 PM
To: dev
Subject: Re: [ACS 421] Upgrade testing
H Sudha,
We will at Schuberg Philis but probably not before next friday. We will be
upgrading from 4.1.1. I hope
Great! Thanks a lot, Daan.
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.comwrote:
you are added to jira, Alex
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 8:31 PM, Alex Ough alex.o...@sungard.com wrote:
Thanks Chip, and can you also give a permission in Jira so that I can
assign myself
I use it all the time with -T 1.5C and it makes my build twice as fast.
But I do it with the assumption that it may void your warranty.
Sometimes things blow up, and then I go back to single threaded. So it
kinda works, but it does blow up.
I wouldn't recommend most people use it. For people
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14549/
---
(Updated Nov. 1, 2013, 12:19 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Hugo
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15068/#review27992
---
I suppose this should be reviewed by UI devs too.
Could you add UI
Makes sense, and now documented in the mailing list. :)
On Oct 31, 2013, at 5:00 PM, Darren Shepherd
darren.s.sheph...@gmail.commailto:darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com wrote:
I use it all the time with -T 1.5C and it makes my build twice as fast.
But I do it with the assumption that it may void your
On Nov. 1, 2013, 1:28 a.m., Toshiaki Hatano wrote:
I suppose this should be reviewed by UI devs too.
Could you add UI devs in reviewers?
Other than that, this patch looks OK for me.
But this patch makes changes in UI, so I suppose it's better to check with UI
ppl.
- Toshiaki
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15173/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Kishan Kavala and Koushik Das.
Bugs:
91 matches
Mail list logo
