Hi Abhi,
Can we also add findbugs check in travis?
~Rajani
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 10:32 AM, Abhinandan Prateek
abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com wrote:
There are more than 10 additional suites that can still be included to
the travis-CI.
Since the current set runs comfortably I will go
That's what I'm thinking.
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 1:04 AM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote:
So it could be a systemvm template change, perhaps?
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 11:13 PM, Mike Tutkowski
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
I logged into the VR, noticed the IP addresses weren't
Hi all,
There is a typo found in a repo: http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/
http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/ubuntu/dists/trusty/4.5/
http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/ubuntu/dists/trusty/4.6/
Both folders contain a subfolder: “binary-i385” and that breaks repo is trying
to get update for a 32bit version.
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/195
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Hi Raja,
Thanks for sharing. We’ll fix it.
On 30-Apr-2015, at 6:12 am, Raja Pullela raja.pull...@citrix.com wrote:
Hi,
I saw couple of issue in travis.yml -
- 3rd line: smoke/smoke/test_reset_vm_on_reboot - it should be
smoke/test_reset_vm_on_reboot
- 7th line:
GitHub user karuturi opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/215
Fixed a few findbugs issues after the merge 0b83559
HttpUploadServerHandler.java:142, DM_BOXED_PRIMITIVE_FOR_PARSING
NfsSecondaryStorageResource.java:2630, DM_BOXED_PRIMITIVE_FOR_PARSING
On Apr 29, 2015, at 9:49 PM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote:
After reviewing the history as mentioned by Daan, unless we propose
and vote on a newer workflow model I think the best we can do is to
simply be more strict about commits to master. They all need to be
merges that have been
On a second look I did not find the issues you shared on 4.5 or master? Did not
find the first issue, the second one has two tests:
component/test_acl_isolatednetwork_delete component/test_acl_isolatednetwork
(both are different with the same prefix).
On 30-Apr-2015, at 6:12 am, Raja Pullela
On Apr 30, 2015, at 8:35 AM, Rajani Karuturi raj...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Abhi,
Can we also add findbugs check in travis?
note that there are other SaaS services like Travis that we could use…like
coveralls, tools to create packages etc…
literally any CI/CD can be outsourced...
~Rajani
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/213
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/201
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/198
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/200
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/196
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-4.5-singlerun/changes
On 30-Apr-2015, at 12:05 pm, Rajani Karuturi raj...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Abhi,
Can we also add findbugs check in travis?
Let me check the status of findbug, if all the issues are resolved then we can
make it part of CI.
If not we can make it part of build, and generate and publish the
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/194
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user sanju1010 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/213
Skipping change service offering test for LXC since this is not applicable
to containers
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
GitHub user anshul1886 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/214
CLOUDSTACK-8431: [Hyper-V] Fixed VM deployment failing when the stale vhd
already exists
Now generating guid when the template copy from secondary to primary
storage requested instead of
So it could be a systemvm template change, perhaps?
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 11:13 PM, Mike Tutkowski
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
I logged into the VR, noticed the IP addresses weren't showing up as
expected when I ran ifconfig, then I restarted networking services, which
set the IP
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/204
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/197
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/202
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
It is possible, I will check.
On 30-Apr-2015, at 3:43 pm, Rajani Karuturi raj...@apache.org wrote:
Hey Abhi,
In the recent travis runs, its not printing the test case in output (
https://travis-ci.org/apache/cloudstack/jobs/60634577#L5443)
It used to print the test case name and status (
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/30/2015 10:17 AM, Ilia Shakitko wrote:
Hi all,
There is a typo found in a repo: http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/
http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/ubuntu/dists/trusty/4.5/
http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/ubuntu/dists/trusty/4.6/
Both
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/214
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Hi Mike,
I’m actually using the same VHD as you and it is just working fine.
Have you checked the /var/log/SMlog on your xen host?
Also, if you can check the logs of the SSVM under /var/log/cloud.log and see
what it says concerning the communication between the SSVM and the agent would
be
On 30-Apr-2015, at 2:46 pm, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote:
On a second look I did not find the issues you shared on 4.5 or master? Did
not find the first issue, the second one has two tests:
component/test_acl_isolatednetwork_delete component/test_acl_isolatednetwork
(both
Hey Abhi,
In the recent travis runs, its not printing the test case in output (
https://travis-ci.org/apache/cloudstack/jobs/60634577#L5443)
It used to print the test case name and status (
https://travis-ci.org/apache/cloudstack/jobs/59958134#L4205)
Do you think it can be due to any recent
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
BTW, looks like Abhi updated the file about 6hrs ago.
This was the file - I looked at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/7843a092f51569ba003132bc80f87350b66aa5bf/.travis.yml
-Original Message-
From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2015
Just as an FYI, we've dramatically increased Travis capacity.
https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/apache_gains_additional_travis_ci
On Thursday, April 30, 2015, Abhinandan Prateek
abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com wrote:
Yes, lot of sanity testing can be accomplished by the automated test
I think its due to this commit
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/b941480e0df0bfa3377e797126b96cf9b3fbee77
Here, test file name is changed from testname to [smoke,component]/testname
But, while running each test file in the for loop, it prepends the name
with smoke and hence, it cant
HI
New to cloud stack struggled searching for configuring KVM HA unable to
find any document .
Pls any help to configure KVM HA in cloud stack ,really helps a lot.
Thanks,
Nagaraju
Yes, thanks for checking. I was worried that now some of them may start timing
out.
I have another 10 suites tested, will add them once everything seems fine.
-abhi
On 30-Apr-2015, at 5:32 pm, Rajani Karuturi raj...@apache.org wrote:
after correcting the test file path, its working fine
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/215
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/215#issuecomment-97754239
Thanks Daan
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/215#issuecomment-97749108
LGTM. I will have a pull and build at it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-4.5-singlerun/changes
after correcting the test file path, its working fine
https://travis-ci.org/karuturi/cloudstack/jobs/60681263
~Rajani
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Rajani Karuturi raj...@apache.org wrote:
I think its due to this commit
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-4.5-singlerun/changes
Hi guys,
just wodering, if the Global Config setting
pool.storage.capacity.disablethreshold also applies to Secondary Storage
- since I dont see any dedicated settings for this for Secondary Storage...
Thx
--
Andrija Panić
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
One of the run did timeout. Will balance the runs.
On 30-Apr-2015, at 5:59 pm, Abhinandan Prateek
abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com wrote:
Yes, thanks for checking. I was worried that now some of them may start
timing out.
I have another 10 suites tested, will add them once everything
Do we need to ask for an increase in run time?
50 minutes is the OSS default, but the ASF is a paying customer and we
can ask for longer timeouts.
--David
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 10:06 AM, Abhinandan Prateek
abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com wrote:
One of the run did timeout. Will balance the
Do we need to ask for an increase in run time?
From my experience I wouldn't say its required however *it would be very nice*.
At the moment what we do is create new parallel jobs and balance the
tests across them so each job is under 50mins.
Anywho, just my 2c, see what others say/think.
On
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/216#issuecomment-97891883
Copy that.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 1:23 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote:
Hi all,
I was testing awsapi with 4.5 today and it just did not work for me, after
few hours I gave up and used ec2stack which worked out of the box and
certainly felt more friendly to work with. I remembered we
-Sebastien
On 30 Apr 2015, at 19:23, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote:
Hi all,
I was testing awsapi with 4.5 today and it just did not work for me, after
few hours I gave up and used ec2stack which worked out of the box and
certainly felt more friendly to work with. I
We will have to provide a migration path if anybody is actually using it.
Biligual auto correct use. Read at your own risico
On 30 Apr 2015 19:36, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 1:23 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
wrote:
Hi all,
I was testing awsapi
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
Github user runseb commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/216#issuecomment-97891196
-Sebastien
On 30 Apr 2015, at 18:12, Rohit Yadav notificati...@github.com wrote:
@runseb - Sure. I was testing 4.5 today and the awsapi
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
Hi all,
I was testing awsapi with 4.5 today and it just did not work for me, after few
hours I gave up and used ec2stack which worked out of the box and certainly
felt more friendly to work with. I remembered we discussed removing awsapi but
then the momentum never precipitated into action, so
GitHub user K0zka opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/217
CLOUDSTACK-8335: removed ceph repository
artifact resolved from maven central
https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/com/ceph/rados/0.1.4/
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Hornyak
Hi Marcus,
Apologies for taking so much time to reply to your email, but was, and still
am, quite busy. :)
I would only use reflection if that was the only way to do it. The use of
reflection usually makes the code more complex, which is not good when we have
java developers in all different
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
Ok. I wish I could share some code, because it isn't really as big of
a deal as it sounds from your reasoning. It is literally just 3 lines
on startup that fetch anything with the '@AgentExecutor' annotation
and stores it in a hash whose key is the value from @AgentExecutor's
'handles' property.
Hi,
On 30-Apr-2015, at 7:43 pm, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
We will have to provide a migration path if anybody is actually using it.
The migration path would be documenting the change as part of the release notes
to simply switch from using the consumer URL
At the moment we are creating 10 parallel jobs and in each job we do
1. mvn clean install
2. deploydb, deploy datacenter
3. run tests
if we change step 1 to mvn clean install -DskipTests=true and run junit
tests only in one job, that would save time.
Also, with earlier 5 jobs setup, it used to
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/217#issuecomment-98048948
some of the travis jobs timedout. changes look good to me. merging.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Hi Marcus,
Thanks for the email… I’m always in for improvements. But why can’t you share
the code?
Few points below:
1. I added an subclassing example of LibvirtComputingResource because you
mentioned it in a previous email:
On 23 Apr 2015, at 17:26, Marcus
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 3:58 AM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com wrote:
On Apr 29, 2015, at 9:49 PM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote:
After reviewing the history as mentioned by Daan, unless we propose
and vote on a newer workflow model I think the best we can do is to
simply be more
Guys,
Do I see a QACloud in works, something in line with devcloud but with a
bigger collection of Hypervisors + marvin ?
If we can bundle these Hypervisors and QA automation then effectively we can
have many more people join our QA effort.
On 29-Apr-2015, at 9:24 pm, Rohit Yadav
+1 for increased timeouts.
At the moment we get less than 24 commits per day on master. Only a couple on
other branches per day.
We can increase the timeout to upto 70 minutes or more. Will try to ensure that
in general a single run does not take more than an hour.
A timeout window slightly
That won't fix it.. if the java-1.8.0-openjdk that will just install
java-1.7.0-openjdk next to it.. alternatives will probably still be
configured to run with 1.8.0.
If you actually want to be sure that it will run on java 7 you also need to
add a Conflicts: java-1.8.0-openjdk to the spec file so
Hi,
In my mind it was kind of making more sense to start by keeping 4.6 into a
separate branch, enforce pull-requests and deploy the CI. smaller step but
faster result, and from there, once we get stable with the CI and git flow;
move into master, do fastest releases cycle. If we consider we can
Well, I seem to be able to reproduce this every time I start up the VR in
my environment.
I'm not sure, though, if this is only my environment or if other people who
are making brand new CS clouds with 4.6 also see this issue.
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 11:50 PM, Daan Hoogland
GitHub user bhaisaab opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/216
CLOUDSTACK-8433: Remove awsapi
Following actions from discussions on dev ML regarding removing awsapi and
preferring ec2stack. Reference from last PR:
Rohit, give me couple days :
1-to get the ec2stack donation finished and the code imported.
2-we should merge this once we agree on a 4.6 release management method.
On Apr 30, 2015, at 5:49 PM, bhaisaab g...@git.apache.org wrote:
GitHub user bhaisaab opened a pull request:
Logged into the router?
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 10:58 PM, Mike Tutkowski
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
Well, I seem to be able to reproduce this every time I start up the VR in
my environment.
I'm not sure, though, if this is only my environment or if other people who
are making brand
I logged into the VR, noticed the IP addresses weren't showing up as
expected when I ran ifconfig, then I restarted networking services, which
set the IP addresses up properly.
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 12:08 AM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote:
Logged into the router?
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/216#issuecomment-97861338
@runseb - Sure. I was testing 4.5 today and the awsapi service did not
work for me, after wasting almost 2 hours to make it work, I tried ec2stack
which worked out
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-4.5-singlerun/changes
78 matches
Mail list logo
