Hi Vadim,
My first question is why would you want to?
The concept of a VPC is to isolate the VMs on the different Tiers and use ACLs
to pass only the traffic which needs to pass between the Tiers.
However, I have just tested this on 4.4.2 (never tried it before) by taking a
VPC with two tiers
+1
Regards
Geoff Higginbottom
D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
-Original Message-
From: Erik Weber [mailto:terbol...@gmail.com]
Sent: 06 May 2015 10:44
To: dev
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
On Wed, May 6, 2015
I'm troubleshooting an issue where the guest vms does not receive default
gateway nor dns servers.
And it seems to be due to the following lines in /etc/dhcpopts.txt:
10_125_2_150,3
10_125_2_150,6
Does anyone know why we insert those lines, and/or where it comes from?
--
Erik
Geoff,
Thank you for explaination. Basically the idea behind that was to have
(for instance) database tier and web-app tier. Web-apps-tier servers have to
communicate with databases, but databases are closed for outside world. The
easiest way is to have 2 NICs at web-tier VMs and
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 10:20 AM, Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm troubleshooting an issue where the guest vms does not receive default
gateway nor dns servers.
And it seems to be due to the following lines in
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi
jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com wrote:
These settings get added from the edithosts.sh when a new vm got deployed
or new nic is plugged.
For non-default nic there will be entries in dhcpopts.txt.
10_125_2_150,3
10_125_2_150,6
For default
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 10:20 AM, Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm troubleshooting an issue where the guest vms does not receive default
gateway nor dns servers.
And it seems to be due to the following lines in /etc/dhcpopts.txt:
10_125_2_150,3
10_125_2_150,6
Does anyone know why
I can have a look at the merge of 4.5.1 and am willing to be one of the
RMs, not to be the RM!
Op wo 6 mei 2015 om 09:47 schreef sebgoa run...@gmail.com:
So no -1 on this.
Do we have volunteers to RM 4.6 on the master branch ?
I propose to set a date asap, tag master and tell everyone that
anyone :)
On 3 May 2015 at 13:49, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys,
I was wondering if someone experienced would be kind to share their
opinion on folowing subject - since I'm 95% clear with design/ho stuff
works, but again missing some info - after I have done my RTFM
Github user runseb commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/216#issuecomment-99402058
Maybe do it after Daan merges 4.5.1â¦.?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
GitHub user gauravaradhye opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/231
CLOUDSTACK-8394: Skip test cases through setUp() instead of setUpClass()
Doing the changes for regression test cases. This has already been done for
BVTs.
Reason: When raise
Hi Daan,
Private gateway is not for this purpose, but let's not confuse this thread, we
can discuss it in more detail over a beer at the next User Group (far more fun)
Regards
Geoff Higginbottom
D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
Great, thanks Sebastien!
On 06-May-2015, at 10:13 am, sebgoa run...@gmail.com wrote:
Folks,
Git repos have been created and the github mirrors are in place.
ec2stack and gcestack are now official CloudStack subproject
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-ec2stack
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/216#issuecomment-99400796
@runseb is this good to go now that ec2stack is an apache cloudstack
sub-project? I'll rebase and do some tests again if it's okay merge this PR.
---
If your
Github user runseb commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/216#issuecomment-99401968
let's go for it, there has been enough warning. So if you can rebase, make
Travis happyâ¦.and squash everything that would be good.
---
If your project is set up
These settings get added from the edithosts.sh when a new vm got deployed or
new nic is plugged.
For non-default nic there will be entries in dhcpopts.txt.
10_125_2_150,3
10_125_2_150,6
For default nic there won't any entries in dhcpopts.txt for this nic.
Thanks,
Jayapal
On 06-May-2015, at
Yes. For default nic those entries should be cleared.
-Jayapal
On 06-May-2015, at 2:16 PM, Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi
jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com wrote:
These settings get added from the edithosts.sh when a new vm got
Geoff, Vadim, I think the concept of a vpc private gateway is for this
purpose. Of course more then one road leads to Rome (sorry for the Dutchism)
Op wo 6 mei 2015 om 11:01 schreef Geoff Higginbottom
geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com:
Hi Vadim,
My first question is why would you want to?
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 11:18 AM, Vadim Kimlaychuk vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee
wrote:
Geoff,
Thank you for explaination. Basically the idea behind that was to
have (for instance) database tier and web-app tier. Web-apps-tier servers
have to communicate with databases, but databases
So no -1 on this.
Do we have volunteers to RM 4.6 on the master branch ?
I propose to set a date asap, tag master and tell everyone that starting from
that tag all commits to master except from RM will be reverted.
will need to make sure that all of 4.5.1 is in master
-sebastien
On May 1,
On May 6, 2015, at 9:38 AM, Vadim Kimlaychuk vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee wrote:
Hi,
I am sorry for not being authorized to vote for release,
Everyone can VOTE on a release, you don't need to be a committer.
The entire community can vote and chime in on the VOTE threads and help test
Folks,
Git repos have been created and the github mirrors are in place.
ec2stack and gcestack are now official CloudStack subproject
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-ec2stack
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-gcestack
We just need to create two releases for these.
Note that while
Can anyone comment what state this feature is in ?
On 05-May-2015, at 11:58 am, Abhinandan Prateek
agneya2...@yahoo.com.INVALID wrote:
The work on support for ova with multiple disk was started last year.
Can someone update in what state it is in as the ticket shows that this is
still in
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 9:38 AM, Vadim Kimlaychuk vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee
wrote:
Hi,
I am sorry for not being authorized to vote for release, but it
seems VPC is not working at 4.5.1. I have 4.5-RC20150407T1726 at
production and using VPC is very limited. I am not able to use 2
I didn't report a bug yet. I don't know if it works at 4.5.0, but I know that
it worked at 4.0 -- last stable relase I was able to test. I wish to
troubleshoot VR to get more information about why its happening, but don't know
where to start.
Vadim.
-Original Message-
From: sebgoa
I¹m a -0 for now (testing still on going)
I have upgraded a 4.3.1 Adv XenServer build, and a 4.4.2 Adv XenServer
build. In both cases the upgrade was successful, all System VMs and VRs
upgraded OK, however I was not able to create any new VRs or System VMs.
We are still analysing the logs and
is it just me or is github very very slow this morning ?
Hi,
I am sorry for not being authorized to vote for release, but it seems
VPC is not working at 4.5.1. I have 4.5-RC20150407T1726 at production and
using VPC is very limited. I am not able to use 2 NICs from different tiers at
the same VM. Look for detatiled problem desctiption at
Marcus shadowsor@... writes:
What is your default OVS bridge name? Are your traffic labels matching the
OVS bridge cloudbr0?
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Aleksandr Ivanov admin@... wrote:
Sure
[root at node2 /]# cat /etc/cloudstack/agent/agent.properties
#Storage
#Mon May 04
Sorry for confusing the voting thread, I was backing Eriks statements with a
'+1' but was not voting for the release - highlights the problem of mixing the
threads
Regards
Geoff Higginbottom
D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/231
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
based on Wilder's testing and my own bringing up a 4.5.1 server in a test
env i will +1(binding)
Op wo 6 mei 2015 om 14:23 schreef Geoff Higginbottom
geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com:
Sorry for confusing the voting thread, I was backing Eriks statements with
a '+1' but was not voting for the
Ping - anybody have some insight here?
--
Erik
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a good reason for why you can't see allocated IP addresses under
'Network' for a Shared Network?
This is on ACS 4.5.1 RC2 in case it has worked earlier.
--
I just did a test merge:
~/cloudstack/cloudstack (master) git merge --no-ff --edit -s ours 4.5
gives a clean merge of the last bits from 4.5 and merges without conflicts
I will rerun a merge and push if the RC passes
Op wo 6 mei 2015 om 10:59 schreef Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com:
I
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/216#issuecomment-99421168
merging 4.5.1 looks like will cause a lot of conflicts; I'm merging it
after rebasing and pushing to master and if travis and packaging works
---
If your project
Fcourse
On Wed, 6 May 2015 15:02 Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com wrote:
Can you sync with Rohit, who is merging the noawsapi stuff as well..
On May 6, 2015, at 10:59 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com
wrote:
I can have a look at the merge of 4.5.1 and am willing to be one of
Geoff,
I always test upgrades (from whatever versions we have in prod) and no
problems, but I only run Adv+SG zone..
I can destroy/create system VMs without problem.
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
From: Geoff Higginbottom
GitHub user gauravaradhye opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/232
CLOUDSTACK-8445: Keep only dvs tag for test case which tests the VCenter
port groups
The test cases is tested only for DVS. This will prevent it to run on
normal configuration.
You can
Can you sync with Rohit, who is merging the noawsapi stuff as well..
On May 6, 2015, at 10:59 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
I can have a look at the merge of 4.5.1 and am willing to be one of the
RMs, not to be the RM!
Op wo 6 mei 2015 om 09:47 schreef sebgoa
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/232
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Hi all,
I'm glad to let you know that ACS 4.5.1 has my +1.
Environment:
XenServer 6.2
MySQL/MariaDB 5.5.41
Management Server running CentOS 7
Component: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack (test/integration/component and
smoke)
Test Create Account and user for that account ... === TestName:
Thanks for the heads-up, Geoff.
I will start testing an upgrade scenario now.
Cheers,
Wilder
On 06 May 2015, at 14:28, Geoff Higginbottom
geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com wrote:
For all those of you have voted +1 based on a clean install, if possible
please test upgrade scenarios
I also would like to know, i was under impression this was slated with
CCP 4.5 release..
On 5/5/15 11:57 PM, Abhinandan Prateek wrote:
Can anyone comment what state this feature is in ?
On 05-May-2015, at 11:58 am, Abhinandan Prateek agneya2...@yahoo.com.INVALID
wrote:
The work on support
Github user mlsorensen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/233#issuecomment-99635718
Yeah, I think this is a big enough change that we should give all KVM
stakeholders an opportunity to review and test before merge. At least the
committers, but
GitHub user wilderrodrigues opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/233
Refactor/libvirt resource
This PR contains the refactor of the LibvirtComputingResource. The
motivation behind this effort is to increase maintainability and testability of
the code.
OVS sintaxys is pretty much the same ( as brctl ) but it was a pain to write
all the configs for mine situation - actualy its default case when you
creating advanced zone with GRE isolation in cloudstack ( but ovs and
cloudstack manuals are realy poor)
About fake bridges :
For compatibility
Will do tomorrow
On Wed, 6 May 2015 17:27 Rohit Yadav bhais...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Daan,
I've merged awsapi after it passed travisCI tests and packaging worked
(Here's a test repo without awsapi package:
http://packages.bhaisaab.org/cloudstack/nukeawsapi/).
Please go ahead with merging
Github had a severe service degradation this morning
https://status.github.com/messages
--David
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 3:26 AM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com wrote:
is it just me or is github very very slow this morning ?
Good news, we have found the cause of the problem I was experiencing with
upgrade testing. It appears that when you register the new system vm template
in 4.3 or 4.4 using the UI, it sets the HVM flag to true. As I was testing on
a system using Nested Virtualisation which does not support HVM
Github user wilderrodrigues commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/233#issuecomment-99553213
Please, do not merge it before I test it with a KVM hypervisor.
Cheers,
Wilder
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Hi all,
I tested upgrading XS 6.2 from 4.4.2 to 4.5.1 to try to reproduce and test the
issue Geoff reported.
The issue Geoff found had to do with systemvmtemplate's requireshvm flag. When
we register template for the next ACS version we want to upgrade, if done from
UI would add
The feature is code complete and is present in feature branch
(https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/multiple-disk-ova
).
But since it has been a while I don’t think it will be an easy merge into
master. In any case, I will soon start working on the
Hi everyone,
As many of you are aware, CloudStack Day Seattle is going to be held the day
after LinuxCon/CloudOpen North America 2015 on August 20th.
The deadline for submitting a proposal for CloudStack Day Seattle is Friday,
June 12. To submit a proposal visit:
Hi Daan,
I've merged awsapi after it passed travisCI tests and packaging worked
(Here's a test repo without awsapi package:
http://packages.bhaisaab.org/cloudstack/nukeawsapi/).
Please go ahead with merging 4.5 on master. Let me know you've time
and bandwidth to do it otherwise I can help with
Hi Erik,
It could be an issue, when I reach that page in a shared network the API
(listPublicIpAddresses with listall=true) returns empty list so we don’t see
any ip addresses. I’m not sure if it worked before.
On 29-Apr-2015, at 11:58 am, Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a
I did everything according to manual
http://cloudstack-installation.readthedocs.org/en/latest/hypervisor/kvm.html
Default service offering is working good ( every vnet is made in bridge
where it should be and etc )
So should I open a bug ? Because I dont see that something is even trying to
There are reasons to want to have nics on two VPC networks. One big one is
simply to migrate a VM from one network to the other. Another is for
performance, if there's a situation where you have a db tier and a backup
tier, for example, you may want some backup traffic to route through the
vpc and
Yeah, so cloudstack will take those labels to the KVM hypervisor and try to
resolve them to bridges, and then to the physical devices that host those
bridges, so it knows where to create new bridges. I was just wondering if
your labels were matching your bridge names. By 'default', I was asking if
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/216#issuecomment-99506844
All green, merging now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/216
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Likitha,
Thanks for updating, I think it is a very useful feature and will ease the
work of migrating from VMWare setup to a cloudstack setup.
-abhi
On 07-May-2015, at 9:11 am, Likitha Shetty likitha.she...@citrix.com wrote:
The feature is code complete and is present in feature branch
Yeah, I'm really familiar with the standard linux bridge methods, but not
so much on OVS. It seems a bit strange to me that you only have a bridge
'cloudbr' and the traffic labels refer to ports rather than bridges, but
what do I know.
There are lots of ways to configure networking. If you want
62 matches
Mail list logo
