Re: Can't compile cloudstack 4.2 rpms from source

On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 11:21:57AM +0200, benoit lair wrote: > A precision, the linux centos 6.3 i used is a ghost of the centos 6.3 > environment i use for compiling apache cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating, which > works very well, but not with cs 4.2.0 Are you able to build using maven (don't use the

Re: [DISCUSS] Breaking out Marvin from CloudStack

On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 05:55:14AM +, Santhosh Edukulla wrote: > I believe both can exist independently. The framework should have more > flexibility and facilitation to run features\test cases based upon a given > release and version on a given test bed. It should be intelligent enough to

Re: [MERGE] spring-modularization to master - Spring Modularization

On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 8:59 PM, Darren Shepherd wrote: > It's actually really easy to turn this off. If you look at the last > commit of the branch you'll see what changes to turn it on. So you can > just reverse that one commit to disable it. > > I'd rather merge this and then do the BVTs on

Re: Wiki access

Not all committers were easy to find, but those that I did should be all set. So committers / contributors = provide your confluence ID's if you can't add / edit pages. PMC folks - help add them please. On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > There were major iss

Re: Wiki access

There were major issues with Spam on the wiki, so infra changed the permissions. I've just gone and added all PMC members to the space as space admins. That means all PMC members can help deal with this issue (or at least those that I could find in the wiki user list). I'm going to deal with com

Re: [DISCUSS] Breaking out Marvin from CloudStack

On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 07:38:33PM +, Alex Huang wrote: > I don't really understand what purpose would this serve. Would we ever use > newer marvin against older CloudStack or vice versa? What's the benefit? > > I can understand it for cloudmonkey because cloudmonkey is an admin cli tool

Re: [MERGE] marvin-refactor to master

On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 10:12:40PM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > I've also tried to disconnect marvin from depending on CloudStack's > build and repo. This will help split marvin from CloudStack which I > will discuss in a seperate thread. Should we just use this branch as the source for a ne

Re: Removal of cloud-plugin-netapp

> > Once a bare metal host / vm has booted up, you need to determine its ISCSI > initiator iqn and then use the > AssociateLUN > <http://download.cloud.com/releases/3.0.6/api_3.0.6/user/associateLun.html> > API set the LUN mask on the filer for that LUN. Then the ISCSI

Re: Hi

Welcome Steve! On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 12:38 AM, Steve Wilson wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > I just wanted to take a second and introduce myself. I recently joined > Citrix as the VP of Cloud Engineering, and I'm responsible for the Citrix > CloudPlatofrm (powered by Apache CloudStack). I just joine

Re: [PROPOSAL] Service monitoring tool in virtual router

On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 05:27:57AM +, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: > The proposal does > not talk about modifying monit, just using it. That wouldn't trigger the > AGPL. The proposal talks about using it, and that's enough to trigger the AGPL. This is a *very bad* thing IMO. For example, $dayjob

[RESULTS][VOTE] Accept the donation of a Contrail plugin into Apache CloudStack

With 13 +1 votes, and no other votes, this passes. I'll work with Pedro and Juniper to complete the donation. -chip On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 01:13:07PM -0400, Chip Childers wrote: > Hi all! > > As stated in other threads, Juniper is proposing the donation of a > Contrail

[ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Daan Hoogland

The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Daan Hoogland to join the PMC and we are pleased to announce that they have accepted. Join me in congratulating Daan! -The CloudStack PMC

Re: [RESULTS] [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (sixth round)

On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 10:26:11AM -0400, Francois Gaudreault wrote: > Did you guys tagged the release yet? I don't see the tag on git... > > Francois Thanks for the reminder. I've tagged the release and pushed. https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/4.2.0

Announcement emails...

Animesh, I've not moderated the emails through, hoping that I can get you to re-send them to include URLs for our site and the download page. -chip

Re: [RESULTS] [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (sixth round)

On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 06:48:00PM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > [Animesh>] Chip so should I go ahead and publish the website? For the > announcement tomorrow, I have to send an email to dev, user, marketing > mailing list at 7 AM PST (10 AM EST) right? Let me know if I missed anything Plea

Re: [PROPOSAL] Support OVA files with multiple disks for templates and uploaded volumes in VMWare

On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 03:26:54PM +, Likitha Shetty wrote: > Chip, > > In Cloudstack, for Xen and KVM hypervisors since the files used for templates > and volumes are virtual disks (VHD, QCOW2) the current CS assumption of > template and volumes containing a single virtual disk seems fine.

Re: [PROPOSAL] Support OVA files with multiple disks for templates and uploaded volumes in VMWare

On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 05:54:55AM +, Likitha Shetty wrote: > Hi, > > Currently, Cloudstack only supports Template creation based on OVA files > containing a single disk. If a user creates a template from a OVA file > containing more than 1 disk and launches an instance using this template,

[ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Darren Shepherd

The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Darren Shepherd to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that he has accepted. Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute more autonomously. For developers, it makes it easier to submit changes and eli

Re: [DISCUSS] UI: New look and feel

On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 06:31:10PM +, Brian Federle wrote: > Hey Chip, the BG is basically a layered background with a gradient and > overlay pattern on top. I can send along the PNGs I used for those and a > snippet of CSS, and you can apply them to the site. > > I'm also using Noto Sans fo

Re: [DISCUSS] UI: New look and feel

Looks great Brian! One request actually. I'm working on a proposed cloudstack.apache.org site redesign right now, and I'd actually love to get the relevant CSS you used for the header area (faded blue). It might be nice to have some relationship between the cs.a.o branding and the product itself

Re: [RESULTS] [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (sixth round)

On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 11:24:24PM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > [Animesh>] David, Chip Mathias has incorporated the comments received so far. > What is pending here? The feature description is brief should we add more > details? I think (IMO) we are fine as is. However, folks can chime in

Re: Lines of contributed code

This is a good tool: http://www.ohloh.net/p/CloudStack On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 12:38 PM, La Motta, David wrote: > Hey everybody, as an advocate of CloudStack for NetApp and our customers, > I am often times asked to compare and contrast ACS with OpenStack. One > interesting metric that I am lo

Re: [VOTE] Accept the donation of a Contrail plugin into Apache CloudStack

On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 10:04:26PM +0200, Daan Hoogland wrote: > I like, but let's add a lot of unit tests before merging in master. It has > some tests, but in comparison to the amount of code it does not suffice. I actually agree, but my proposal is to sort out things like that after the hurdle

Re: [RESULTS] [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (sixth round)

On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 08:59:49PM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > > [Animesh>] I don't have publican installed. Will give it a try and let > > you know if I run into issues. > [Animesh>] Chip couple of questions. > > 1. The referenced instructions call out to install Apache Cloudstack branding

Re: instance metadata

/me learns to use google. http://lmgtfy.com/?q=cloudstack+instance+metadata leads to http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.1.1/html/Admin_Guide/user-data-and-meta-data.html On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Mar

Re: instance metadata

On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > Yes > then I'm wrong! hey marcus - do you know if it's documented somewhere?

Re: instance metadata

On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 03:19:51PM -0400, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > Hi, > > In EC2 every instance has metadata that it can retrieve from: > http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/ > > Do we have something like this ? maybe via the vrouter ? > > -Sebastien > IIRC, we only do the userdata

Re: [RESULTS] [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (sixth round)

On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 07:12:15PM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > > I can do this, but it may be tomorrow before it gets done. > [Animesh>] I updated the RN yesterday. David what needs to be done to publish > to cloudstack.apache.org/docs https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK

[VOTE] Accept the donation of a Contrail plugin into Apache CloudStack

Hi all! As stated in other threads, Juniper is proposing the donation of a Contrail plugin to Apache CloudStack. The code itself has been posted to reviewboard [1]. The design has been documented by Pedro [2]. [1] https://reviews.apache.org/r/14325/ [2] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/disp

Re: Review Request 14325: Contrail network virtualization plugin.

Pedro, Thanks for posting this! Here's the process that we'll need to follow: I'm going to call a vote to accept this donation to the project on this list. Concurrent with that, we need the appropriate legal representatives from Juniper to complete the Software Grant contract for the donation [

Re: Review Request 14325: Contrail network virtualization plugin.

clearance process. - Chip Childers On Sept. 24, 2013, 11:38 p.m., Pedro Marques wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache

Re: [PROPOSAL] Service monitoring tool in virtual router

On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 04:30:33PM +, Jayapal Reddy Uradi wrote: > Hi, > > Currently in virtual router there is no way to recover and notify if some > service goes down unexpectedly. > > This feature is about monitoring all the services rendered by the virtual > router, ensure that the serv

Re: 4.2 rpm nonoss

On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Larry Hernandez wrote: > Does the http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/rhel/4.2/ repo have nonoss built is > like 4.1? > > -Larry > David typically includes nonoss in the RPMs, and he's the one that loaded them up there. I would expect that they do.

Re: [RESULTS] [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (sixth round)

On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 07:12:15PM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > > > 6 - Publish the website and announce the release (using the finished > > > announcement) after 1 through 5 are done. > > > > > > This can be any committer, but Animesh you'd probably want the > > honors! > [Animesh>] Chip f

CloudMonkey Release Process now documented

FWIW - I created this page: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudMonkey+Release+Procedure To document the process of releasing a new cloudmonkey version.

Re: [RESULTS] [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (sixth round)

On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 12:21:36PM -0400, Chip Childers wrote: > 4 - Move the source artifacts from dist/dev to dist/release and stage > the download page changes > > A PMC member needs to do this. I'll take this one. Done: http://cloudstack.staging.apache.org/downloads.html

Re: [RESULTS] [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (sixth round)

On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 04:21:19AM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > > > This vote has passed with no -1 votes. > > +1 votes were from (with * binding): > Chiradeep*, Hugo*, Chip*, Milamber, Amogh > > +0: Marcus* > > Marcus agreed to change his VOTE to +1 with a Release Note change

Re: [PROPOSAL] move away from time-based releases and/or revamp release process

On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 10:00:32AM -0600, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > I guess I'm in the minority though, since we're the > only ones discussing it. No you are not. Personally, I'm thinking about this problem a bit before adding my 2 cents. Don't take that silence as thinking we are "ok". Short ve

Re: A question on vm migrations when hosts are set into a maintenance mode.

Hey Kelven - This topic was discussed briefly in the past [1]. Are you able to provide any thoughts on Alex's ideas below? -chip [1] http://markmail.org/message/fznrszaswruvlmuy On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 10:53:04AM -0500, Alex Ough wrote: > For a resolution without breaking possible flows, I'd

[ANNOUNCE] New committer: Rajesh Battala

The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Rajesh Battala to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that they have accepted. Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute more autonomously. For developers, it makes it easier to submit changes and e

Re: Review Request 14299: fix rpm/deb build error caused by moving systemvm to its own maven project

91aee8bc98ca2fa7ae62ab70fc2f30c69e321ddb Author: ynojima Date: Mon Sep 23 17:47:14 2013 -0600 fix rpm/deb build error caused by moving systemvm to its own maven project - Chip Childers On Sept. 24, 2013, 2:21 a.m., Yoshikazu Nojima wrote

[ANNOUNCE] Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.0.0

The Apache CloudStack project is pleased to announce the immediate availability of the Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.0.0 release. Apache CloudStack's CloudMonkey is a Python-based command line utility for interacting with Apache CloudStack IaaS clouds. The software provides an interactive shell

[ANNOUNCE] Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.0.0

The Apache CloudStack project is pleased to announce the immediate availability of the Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.0.0 release. Apache CloudStack's CloudMonkey is a Python-based command line utility for interacting with Apache CloudStack IaaS clouds. The software provides an interactive shell

Re: [RESULTS] [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (sixth round)

Animesh, I'm going to publish the current download page to include CloudMonkey now. I'll then stage a new version for the 4.2 release, which can be published after you move the artifacts (today?) and we wait 24 hours for the mirrors to sync. -chip On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 04:21:19AM +, Anime

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-rat-master #3302

Fixed (hopefully) with 87dde7024bddb6d27b5002f47b3549b097d9a14b. On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 11:15:58PM +, Apache Jenkins Server wrote: > See > > Changes: > > [alex.huang] Committing review 13891. > > [jessicawang] CLOUDSTACK-46

Re: Removal of cloud-plugin-netapp

On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 05:42:03PM +, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: > If you remove it, it will break the following APIs: Alex had suggested that it's not maintained. Anybody want to try to maintain it / update it?

Re: whoa! our official upgrade procedures require 8096?

Or make it a cloudmonkey script. On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 1:47 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > I don't think one example of abuse means we shouldn't have it > altogether. I do agree that we can't have any customer procedures > requiring it. I'm not really sure why this script even exists, it > looks

Re: Removal of cloud-plugin-netapp

On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 04:44:51PM +, SuichII, Christopher wrote: > I'd like to get a final word on this - is it OK to be removed? Is there > someone who is knowledgable with what it will take to remove it and/or is > comfortable removing it? I don't know how tied into the rest of the codebas

Re: [RESULTS][VOTE] Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.0.0 (first round)

5.0.0 version on Pypi with the sdist archive from the official tagged version. Going forward, we should only publish to pypi after a release is official (since it's easy to do this now). -chip On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 10:37:40AM -0400, Chip Childers wrote: > > This vote has passed with

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (sixth round)

On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 03:36:11AM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > > I've created a 4.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: > > Git Branch and Commit SH: > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.2 > Commit: 69c459342c568e2400d57ee8

[RESULTS][VOTE] Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.0.0 (first round)

This vote has passed with no 0 or -1 votes. +1 votes were from (with * binding): Marcus*, Rohit, Sebastien*, Ian, David*, Sateesh I'll start the process of staging the artifacts and edit the website to support the new distribution! -chip On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 09:23:52AM -0400,

2013 CloudStack Collaboration Conference Europe - Calling for dev talks!

Hey folks, In case you haven't seen this, the 2013 CloudStack Collaboration Conference Europe has been scheduled for November 20 to 22 in Amsterdam. It's looking to be another really great event, and what makes events like this even better is a strong showing from the developer community. The co

Re: Call for 4.3 and 4.2.1 Release Managers!

> On Sep 20, 2013, at 1:27 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi > wrote: > > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Friday, September 20, 2013 12:51 AM >> To: dev >> Subject: Re: Call for 4.3 and 4.2.1 Release Managers! >> >> H Animesh and the rest, >>

Re: [DISCUSS] CSS framework for CloudStack UI

On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 11:53:18AM +0530, Amit Das wrote: > Hi Brian, > > I agree with Edison on usage of grunt & using maven-exec to call grunt. > > Will wait for your repository that has your experiments. > I believe setting up the Maven tasks will be a one-time setting & should > work without

Re: contrail virtual network controller

On Sep 17, 2013, at 7:05 PM, Pedro Roque Marques wrote: On Sep 17, 2013, at 10:30 AM, Chip Childers wrote: Ideally, we would have a design document on the wiki that would help everyone understand the implementation. We're not looking for a design doc for Contrail / OpenContrail...

Re: contrail virtual network controller

On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 10:18:29AM -0700, Pedro Roque Marques wrote: > Chip, > A couple of questions... > > On Sep 17, 2013, at 9:54 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > > > I think the best way for this to happen, is for the code to be published > > in a couple of logical patch

Re: contrail virtual network controller

I think the best way for this to happen, is for the code to be published in a couple of logical patches to reviews.apache.org as a way to get community agreement that we should bring it into the codebase. See: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Review+Board+Guidelines You shou

Re: Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round)

+1 (binding) Tested with simulator. On Sep 14, 2013, at 5:59 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Tested CentOS 6.4 and Ubuntu 12.04.3: > create advanced zone > create VPC > register template > create VPC tier > create VM on tier w/NFS > create VM on tier w/CLM > create VM on tier w/

[VOTE] Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.0.0 (first round)

I've created a 5.0.0 release of cloudmonkey, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack-cloudmonkey.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/5.0 Commit: 767bfbe084e24d441f1ad73ace183c09f26a276b List of changes: https://git-wip-us.

Re: Build server was down?

Use Jenkins.buildacloud.org Sent from my iPhone On Sep 13, 2013, at 12:08 PM, Gavin Lee wrote: > Seems http://jenkins.cloudstack.org/ could not be accessed all day. > Will someone look on this? > > -- > Gavin

Re: [DISCUSS] Gearing up for an official CloudMonkey independent release

On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 01:42:04PM +0530, Rohit Yadav wrote: > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 10:57 PM, Chip Childers > wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I'm looking at what it's going to take to get CloudMonkey out as an > > official release. > > Thanks Chip

Re: [DISCUSS] Gearing up for an official CloudMonkey independent release

On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 01:27:43PM -0400, Chip Childers wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm looking at what it's going to take to get CloudMonkey out as an > official release. Here's what I believe needs to be done: > > 1) Legal doc check (I think we're good here

Re: 4.2 release available in repo?

Not yet. We have a newly found upgrade issue that will cause a re-spin of the RC and a new vote. On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Jason Pavao wrote: > Just checking on the current status of 4.2 release and if it's been made > available on the repo site. > Thanks. > -jason > >

Re: There is no upgrade path from 4.1.1 to 4.2.0

Animesh, I have not checked on this myself. I believe that you have not yet promoted the bits from dist/dev to dist/release. If that's the case, we CAN fix this with a re-spin. Not being able to upgrade from the 4.1.1 release is a MAJOR ISSUE, since we had a security vulnerability announcement

Re: [bo...@apache.org: ASF Board Report for Sep 2013 is now due]

With no comments, I'll post this to the board today. On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Chip Childers > wrote: > >> I'll be working up a draft over the next couple of days. If folks have >> issues th

Re: [bo...@apache.org: ASF Board Report for Sep 2013 is now due]

On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > I'll be working up a draft over the next couple of days. If folks have > issues that you want raised to the board, please let me know. > > -chip > Draft board report here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/displa

[bo...@apache.org: ASF Board Report for Sep 2013 is now due]

I'll be working up a draft over the next couple of days. If folks have issues that you want raised to the board, please let me know. -chip - Forwarded message from ASF Board - Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 14:20:58 + From: ASF Board To: Chip Childers Subject: ASF Board Report fo

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fourth round)

On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 12:58:52PM +, Mathias Mullins wrote: > Was trying to help a non-bias party. :-) Yup, and we appreciate it Matt.

Re: Free template repository or marketplace

On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 11:26:12AM +0200, France wrote: > Hi all, > > during recent problems creating my own Ubuntu 12.04 LTS PV template > to work on CS 4.1.1. with XS 6.0.2, i got the idea, that it would be > nice, if i could share my templates with the world. I would also > like to get new ones

Re: Question: Supported API calls in the Simulator

On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Edison Su wrote: > The current implementation of simulator has its own limitation: the > simulator itself is a separate hypervisor type, thus a lot of condition > checks against hypervisor type in mgt server will fail if simulator is used. > For example, currently,

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fourth round)

On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 5:40 PM, Mathias Mullins wrote: > Technically I don't see any binding -1 vetoes being declared. Animesh is > correct on this. > > I don't have to write "Binding" next to my vote. Votes are technically "binding" when the person voting is considered to have binding vote. Also

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fourth round)

On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > > On Sep 9, 2013, at 5:08 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi < > animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com> wrote: > > > > >> > >> On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Sebastien Goasguen > >> wrote: > >>> Maybe before we get to carried away talking about future rel

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fourth round)

On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 10:42:48AM -0400, Simon Weller wrote: > -1 from me as well. > > > I know we're trying to hit timed releases, but I think it's very important to > preserve key underlying functionality across releases. If a supported and > documented feature is known to be broken, we nee

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fourth round)

On Sun, Sep 08, 2013 at 12:40:30AM -0600, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > -1 ... sorry guys, especially with Simon chiming in. > > I'd request f2c5b5fbfe45196dfad2821fca513ddd6efa25c9 be cherry-picked. Agreed. I'm -1, given simon's perspective as well. Since we have the fix, let's get it into the rele

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fourth round)

On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 08:18:35PM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > > Sent: Friday, September 06, 2013 10:21 AM > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > > Subject

Re: Questions about 4.2 RC - listVmwareDcs API

On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 08:21:38PM +, Jessica Wang wrote: > > [Chip] Perhaps a future enhancement would be to use the discovery service > > to figure out what API's are being exposed by the specific management > > server, and adjust the UI accordingly. > > [Jessica] +1 > It will be great if

Re: Questions about 4.2 RC - listVmwareDcs API

On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 06:30:52PM +, Jessica Wang wrote: > > This API is called by UI to implement toggle effect for icon "Add/Remove > > VMware Datacenter". > > [Jesisca] No, listVmwareDcs API was called by UI to get VMware DataCenter > info to display in zone detail page (which has 3 fiel

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fourth round)

On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 04:43:16AM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > > > I've created a 4.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a > vote: > > Git Branch and Commit SH: > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.2 > Commit: e39a7d8e0d3f2fd3e32

Re: Questions about 4.2 RC

On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 03:21:24PM +, Sateesh Chodapuneedi wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Edison Su [mailto:edison...@citrix.com] > > Sent: 06 September 2013 02:08 > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Animesh Chaturvedi > > Subject: RE: Questions about 4.2 RC > > > > > > > > >

Re: [DOCS] feedback

On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 12:26:36AM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > [Animesh>] Any change should be done post 4.2 > Actually, now's the time IMO. Master is the 4.3 target at this point, so shouldn't we make larger changes now? (moving docs to their own repo and re-designing any tooling choice

Re: job cancelled because of management server restart

On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 10:53:14PM +, Kelven Yang wrote: > This is a design issue that we need to improve in general. However, a > simple roll back logic does not solve the problem, since abnormal > terminate can happen at any time, which means it can happen in the middle > of job cancellation

Re: [DISCUSS] rename nonoss to noredist

On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 12:25:58PM +, Hugo Trippaers wrote: > Hey, > > Does anybody mind if I rename all mentions (that I can find) of "nonoss" to > "noredist". This will actually reflect what is in the "nonoss" build, it has > nothing to do with opensource, but all with redistribution of bi

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (third round)

Does this mean that the current RC doesn't work with XCP? On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 06:49:19PM +, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: > DevCloud2 works with fix 1a333f36 for CLOUDSTACK-4559 > > On 8/29/13 10:08 AM, "Chiradeep Vittal" > wrote: > > >I have not had success on DevCloud2, there seems to be a

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Kirk Kosinski

On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 07:44:35PM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Kirk > Kosinski to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that he has > accepted. Congrats Kirk!

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (third round)

On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 01:57:51PM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > I've created a 4.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a > vote: > > Git Branch and Commit SH: > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.2 > Commit: 75dff7cc78eafac9a7723f3e9

[CANCELLED][VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (second round)

Formally closing this vote thread out... see Animesh's "third round" vote thread for the right place to respond. On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 05:58:08AM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > > > Hi All, > > I've created a 4.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a > vote: > > Git Branch and

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (second round)

On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 01:59:10PM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > [Animesh>] Yes it is, I sent the same email with the correct subject title. > Sorry for creating confusion. Not a problem! I just wanted to be sure my time was spent on the right thing...

New Committer: Daan Hoogland

The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Daan Hoogland to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that he has accepted! Daan's been quite active on the dev list, working on not just the code but also helping us keep tabs on our responsiveness to questions (s

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (second round)

On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 05:58:08AM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > > > Hi All, > > I've created a 4.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a > vote: > > Git Branch and Commit SH: > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.2 > Commit: 75dff7

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (second round)

On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 05:46:24PM +0200, Wido den Hollander wrote: > > > On 08/27/2013 05:20 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > >On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 02:29:51PM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > >> > >> > >>>>Git Branch and Commit SH: > >>>

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (second round)

On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 02:29:51PM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > > > > > Git Branch and Commit SH: > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h= > > > refs/heads/4.2 > > > Commit: 9103984d349927a87b0683048dda2d8004e6854f > > > > > > > I notice Edison's fix is

Re: [DISCUSS] Gearing up for an official CloudMonkey independent release

On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 08:31:33PM +, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: > Does the release require voting? Absolutely. If it's a release from the project, it's just like any other release. > > On 8/26/13 10:27 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote: > > >Hi all, > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0

On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 08:13:34PM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > [Animesh>] I will create a new RC and start a new VOTE. If this is the only > change (mostly textual) does the VOTE has to be open for still 72 hours? Yes. It's important to note that voting is a method of community engagement

[DISCUSS] Gearing up for an official CloudMonkey independent release

Hi all, I'm looking at what it's going to take to get CloudMonkey out as an official release. Here's what I believe needs to be done: 1) Legal doc check (I think we're good here, since I just added the NOTICE file) 2) Release process document 3) Add an initial pre-cache file to the repo itself

Re: CloudMonkey 5.0 (was Re: CloudMonkey's new home)

On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 01:06:37PM +0200, Daan Hoogland wrote: > ok, the down side will be that the semantics of the versioning are > confusing when cloudstack 5 comes and the version numbers don't match. > still a +1 from me though. I find it confusing as well, but am OK with a stable 5.x line be

Re: why 2 spaces for xml?

On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 10:12:30AM -0700, Darren Shepherd wrote: > On 08/26/2013 09:22 AM, Marty Sweet wrote: > >All the XML documentation I have seen has been 4 spaces for indent, what > >XML files are you talking about? > > > > I couldn't find documented on the ACS web page or website that the >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0

On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 12:02:32PM -0400, Chip Childers wrote: > On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 06:55:03PM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > > > > > > Hi All, > > > > I've created a 4.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a > > vote: > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0

On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 06:55:03PM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > > > Hi All, > > I've created a 4.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a > vote: > > Git Branch and Commit SH: > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.2 > Commit: 06f287

Re: [GSoC] Branch Merge Request LdapPlugin and Master

Ilya, Can you handle doing his merge request into master? -chip On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 03:23:30PM +, Musayev, Ilya wrote: > Ian > > I want to leave you with 1 last thought, this plugin will be used on daily > basis by hundreds (if not thousands) in the near future - all thanks to you >

VPG only in VPC VRs?

Can someone explain the history / reasoning around why VPG's are only available for VPC VRs? And while we're at it... how about the same question around Site-to-site VPN's (and client VPN's in reverse)? Thanks! -chip

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >