> -Original Message-
> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2015 2:48 AM
> To: dev; Rohit Yadav; Edison Su; Will Stevens
> Subject: Re: jenkins jobs
>
> I don't seem to have enough rights to do this work so two ques
haven't have time to work on it since last update.
> -Original Message-
> From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 9:53 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Edison Su
> Subject: Re: CI improvment part 1
>
> Hi Edis
;>
> >> Cheers,
> >>
> >> Will
> >>
> >>
> >> *Will STEVENS*
> >> Lead Developer
> >>
> >> *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
> >>
> >> 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 w cloudops.com *|*
&
qemu-img |head -n 1|awk '{print $3}'
should show the version of qemu-img
From: williamstev...@gmail.com [mailto:williamstev...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
Will Stevens
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2014 2:17 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Leo Simons; Wilder Rodrigues; Rohit Yadav;
Done.
> -Original Message-
> From: David Bierce [mailto:david.bie...@appcore.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2014 9:23 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Pending Reviews
>
> Ello —
>
> I had a few patches that were posted to review board.
>
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25585/#review62381
---
checked into 4.5 and master branch.
- edison su
On Sept. 13
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25585/#review62382
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- edison su
On Sept. 13, 2014, 1:01 a.m
ommit:
5393387bbd4e2d3659fb0c7171e6ff347ad6a07b
- edison su
On Aug. 27, 2014, 3:46 p.m., David Bierce wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.a
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28279/#review62370
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- edison su
On Nov. 20, 2014, 9:35 a.m
Hi Leo,
Our new internal build system are using ubuntu 14.04 or something like
that, which has qemu 1.x installed by default, that's why I added the
"compat" option in the build script, otherwise, the image build by
qemu 1.x, won't work on RHEL 6.x.
The fix would be, in the build script, check the
Sorry, I am not aware of the 4.5 release policy, I'll revert my commits on 4.5.
> -Original Message-
> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2014 12:22 AM
> To: dev; David Nalley
> Subject: commits on 4.5
>
> David,
>
> I keep seeing commits pa
Highlights the improvements on marvin I made in these days on pytest branch:
1. Switch test framework from nose to pytest, while also maintain the
back-compatibility for existing test cases.
pytest is more flexible than nose, more enjoyable to work with.
2. Speed up test speed a LOT: It only
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25796/#review53890
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- edison su
On Sept. 18, 2014, 10:13 p.m
to improve marvin yet.
> -Original Message-
> From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 4:34 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Edison Su; Min Chen
> Subject: Travis failures
>
> Hi folks,
>
> With Travis tests now passing,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22713/#review53583
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- edison su
On Sept. 15, 2014, 11:41 p.m
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25518/#review53446
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- edison su
On Sept. 10, 2014, 10 p.m
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22706/#review51928
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- edison su
On Aug. 28, 2014, 12:56 a.m
x27;s really helpful
to catch up regression bugs in this area(that not so many people know about)
- edison su
On Aug. 28, 2014, 12:56 a.m., sangeetha hariharan wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply,
...@solidfire.com]
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2014 1:38 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Edison Su
Subject: S3/Swift Problem around Virtual Size
Hi,
This was brought up in a different e-mail thread, but I wanted to make it more
clear that it's related to CloudStack's download code around S3/Swi
> -Original Message-
> From: Pierre-Luc Dion [mailto:pd...@cloudops.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2014 11:21 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: Will Stevens
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] CI
>
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 1:32 PM, Edison Su wrote:
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Trippie [mailto:trip...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Hugo Trippaers
> Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2014 5:10 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Integration Tests on TravisCI
>
> Hey guys,
>
> Just to make sure we are all on the same page on this.
>
e easily defined factories (in lines with
> > Ruby's factory_girl) and also demo-ed some code in the branch. Haven't
> > had time to maintain and revamp this honestly. So if anyone wants to
> > pick up from there, I'm happy to help.
> >
> >
> https://cw
> -Original Message-
> From: Erik Weber [mailto:terbol...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2014 3:15 PM
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Adapting git workflow for release branches
>
> >
> >
> > > > There are several proposals from Citrix:
> > > > http://markmail.org/thread/c4pded5
> -Original Message-
> From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2014 3:59 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Adapting git workflow for release branches
>
>
> On 20-Aug-2014, at 10:33 pm, Edison Su
> -Original Message-
> From: Pierre-Luc Dion [mailto:pd...@cloudops.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2014 11:20 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Will Stevens
> Subject: [DISCUSSION] CI
>
> I'd like to move this discussion out of the GIT workflow thread.
>
> Do we have any CI strate
> -Original Message-
> From: Erik Weber [mailto:terbol...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2014 12:25 PM
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Using continuous integration to maintain our code
> quality...
>
> On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 2:03 AM, Alex Huang
> wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> -Original Message-
> From: Sebastien Goasguen [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2014 1:47 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Adapting git workflow for release branches
>
>
> On Aug 20, 2014, at 4
, at 4:33 PM, Edison Su wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2014 1:17 PM
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Adapting git workflow for release branche
> -Original Message-
> From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2014 1:17 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Adapting git workflow for release branches
>
>
> On 20-Aug-2014, at 9:55 pm, Edison Su
> -Original Message-
> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2014 11:42 AM
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Adapting git workflow for release branches
>
> Rohit,
>
> I don't see your count. At least Wido and I have voted +1 so that would be
>
There is another apache project using github model, I said in another mail
thread: https://wiki.apache.org/cordova/GitWorkflow.
Please, let's take action, and move forward, to solve the long time issue
around Apache CloudStack: no code review, no CI.
Should we start another around of discussion
> -Original Message-
> From: Nate Gordon [mailto:nate.gor...@appcore.com]
> Sent: Monday, August 18, 2014 7:36 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Adapting git workflow for release branches
>
> +1 This is at least is a step in the right direction. I don't think this
> -Original Message-
> From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
> Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2014 2:32 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: Edison Su
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Adapting git workflow for release branches
>
> Hi Edison,
>
> Thank
I agree with what Min said on thread:
http://markmail.org/message/dqdlqu7phgijfelc, and not satisfied with your
answer:
Currently we don't have a CI running continuously, no code review, it's too
risky to let developer check in whatever commit they want into release branch.
RM needs to have to
> -Original Message-
> From: Alena Prokharchyk [mailto:alena.prokharc...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2014 12:59 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] git workflow
>
>
>
> On 8/6/14, 12:52 PM, "Erik Weber" wrote:
>
> >On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 9:21 PM, Al
> -Original Message-
> From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
> Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2014 5:12 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: How to speed up testing using BVT/smoke tests with Simulator
>
> Hi,
>
> Santosh put together a good wiki page on how to validat
+1, include simulator in the default build, exclude explicitly in the
production build.
> -Original Message-
> From: Anthony Xu [mailto:xuefei...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2014 10:28 AM
> To: Koushik Das; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Simulator on master is not bu
t;Plug
> -Original Message-
> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 4:43 AM
> To: dev; Edison Su; Santhosh Edukulla
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS]CLOUDSTACK-6191
>
> Edison,
>
> You reverted a600d8408ea86782318139c17
st in KVM
> >
> > KVM automation blocked more than 7 days due to this defect
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7051
> >
> > Regards,
> > Rayees
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Edison Su [mailto:
Move the discussion to the list about CloudStack-6191:
Automation test is blocked by this bug, we need to find a solution. My
suggestion is sort-of-revert-the-patch, but still give admin the opportunity to
specify the way to optimize KVM volume creation. The reasons:
1. End user shouldn't
Which devcloud ova are you using?
> -Original Message-
> From: Seif Eddine Jemli [mailto:seifeddineje...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2014 1:39 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: DevCloud installation
>
> Hi all,
>
> I am trying to install "DevCloud". I donwloaded th
Need to cherry pick it into 4.3.1 also.
> -Original Message-
> From: Edison Su [mailto:edison...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2014 1:37 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: [ACS44]cherry-pick: dfb59cd6cc0292a88cb619e53f34cdb713879ffd
>
> CLOUDS
CLOUDSTACK-6464:
The root cause is that, in 3.0.x, if guest network is "vlan://untagged", then
kvm agent will use whatever value in "private.network.device", while in 4.x,
kvm agent will use "guest.network.device". So if both value are not the same in
the agent.properties, then kvm agent will us
If Vpc public network with snat enabled, mgt server will send down "vlan-id"
instead of "vlan://vlan-id" in ipassoccommand, which will cause issue on the
hypervisor resource to program VR.
I checked in a commit: 5e80e5d33d9a295b91cdba9377f52d9d963d802a, which will fix
some of the mess of vlan id.
> -Original Message-
> From: Marcus [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2014 9:57 AM
> To: Daan Hoogland
> Cc: dev
> Subject: Re: VPC's VR missing public NIC eth
I already marked this issue as "resolved" last week. Anything else I need to do?
> -Original Message-
> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2014 4:09 AM
> To: Edison Su
> Cc: dev
> Subject: https://issues.apache.org
+1(binding) After fixed the serious bugs in security group in the last round.
> -Original Message-
> From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2014 12:06 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (ninth rou
> -Original Message-
> From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro]
> Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2014 11:51 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [RFC]Bypass Libvirt storage pool for NFS
>
> On 20.03.2014 18:48, Wido den Hollander wrote:
> >
> > And it just went upstream! How great is t
Which version of CloudStack are you using? Seems in 4.2, Wido enhanced RBD a
lot, qemu-img itself can copy volume from NFS to RBD without temporary copying
to /tmp folder.
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrei Mikhailovsky [mailto:and...@arhont.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2014 5:00
> -Original Message-
> From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2014 3:34 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [RFC]Bypass Libvirt storage pool for NFS
>
> On 19.03.2014 22:28, Edison Su wrote:
> >> Edison, if - with the
> -Original Message-
> From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2014 3:07 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [RFC]Bypass Libvirt storage pool for NFS
>
> On 19.03.2014 20:29, Edison Su wrote:
> > It’s hard to find root
March 19, 2014 12:35 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [RFC]Bypass Libvirt storage pool for NFS
>
> On 19.03.2014 19:01, Wido den Hollander wrote:
> > On 03/19/2014 07:54 PM, Edison Su wrote:
> >> I found many times in QA's testing environment, the li
I found many times in QA's testing environment, the libvirt storage
pool(created on NFS) is missing on the kvm host frequently, for no reason. It
may relate to bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977706.
In order to fix this issue, and bug CLOUDSTACK-2729, we added a lot of
workaroun
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19021/#review37582
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- edison su
On March 13, 2014, 9:16 a.m
I checked the patch into master branch already, if no objection, I'll merge it
into 4.4 at the end of today.
> -Original Message-
> From: Edison Su [mailto:edison...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2014 11:08 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: F
[mailto:punit...@cloudbyte.com]
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2014 10:41 PM
To: Mike Tutkowski; Edison Su
Subject: cloudbyte storage plugin for cloudstack 4.4 and above.
hi guys,
thanks for accepting my patch before 4.4 feature freeze, and i was just curious
to know when my plugin will be pushed to 4.4 and
I added another commit: d4fdc184fe9c6717d2ed4e4fe4c39d9759a90608, which will
fix a race condition during security group programming.
It's sort of a timing issue, the behavior will look like this:
1. add a security group rule, but the rule is not send to hypervisor
2. add a new rule, only the 1st r
> -Original Message-
> From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro]
> Sent: Friday, March 14, 2014 4:15 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (eighth round)
>
> On 14.03.2014 21:57, Edison Su wrote:
> > Add a fix: e5c391fcf3852
FORWARD -i cloudbr0 -j DROP
Animesh, could you cherry-pick it into 4.3?
> -Original Message-
> From: Edison Su [mailto:edison...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Friday, March 14, 2014 1:59 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (eighth round)
>
t;") ;print $3}'""" % (brfw, brfw)).strip()
> -Original Message-
> From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro]
> Sent: Friday, March 14, 2014 1:13 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (eighth round)
>
> On 14.
[mailto:williamstev...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
Will Stevens
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2014 7:16 PM
To: Edison Su
Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; David Nalley (da...@gnsa.us)
Subject: Re: [REVIEW] OpenStack Swift as Object Storage Service
Lets say that we have the following setup to help clarify how
> -Original Message-
> From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro]
> Sent: Friday, March 14, 2014 12:19 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (eighth round)
>
> On 14.03.2014 19:14, Edison Su wrote:
> > Hi Nux,
> >
Hi Nux,
Could you post security group log file on your 4.3 kvm host? The file is
@/var/log/cloudstack/agent/security_group.log
> -Original Message-
> From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro]
> Sent: Friday, March 14, 2014 5:06 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache
13, 2014 5:52 PM
To: Edison Su
Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; David Nalley (da...@gnsa.us)
Subject: Re: [REVIEW] OpenStack Swift as Object Storage Service
What are you referring to as the 'v1.0 url hack'? Bypassing the cloudstack
management server is an intentional design decision to
One comment on the "/v1.0" url hack, seems changing mgt server is unavoidable,
would it be easier to add a new api in cloudstack, which can get the endpoint
of swift server and the auth?
And the UI change should be put under ui plugin:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/UI+P
ndors can
implement whatever functionalities they want. My criteria to check in the code
is very simple: the plugin should not modify common code.
From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2014 3:25 PM
To: Edison Su; Mike Tutkowski
Cc: punith s; cloud
can check it
into master. Thanks for your patches.
- edison su
On March 13, 2014, 9:16 a.m., punith s wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache
ranch, git complains
that some files are not indexed.
- edison su
On March 12, 2014, 4:09 p.m., punith s wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.a
Won't this work for you?
http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/dev/users/reviews/reviewing-diffs/
Click "view diffs", then click on the left side of changes of code, then add
your comments. Remember to click publish, after finishing review.
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Tutkowski [
As we discussed[1][2] before, in ACS release, by default, there is no live
volume snapshot for KVM, due to starting from 6.5, qemu-img can't recognize
"-s", which used by CloudStack to backup snapshot.
One possible solution, to bring the function back, is to build a separate
qemu-img rpm from 6.
That's why I move to Scala, == means what it should be:)
Thanks for the sharing.
> -Original Message-
> From: Trippie [mailto:trip...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Hugo Trippaers
> Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2014 5:41 AM
> To:
> Subject: Anti-patterns
>
> Anti-pattern:
> An anti-pattern (or a
+1(binding), passed the test on devcloud.
> -Original Message-
> From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2014 10:25 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fifth round)
>
>
>
>
> Hi All,
>
>
pci devices on the host, should
agent report all of them to user/admin? If not, based on what kind of criteria
to filter pci devices?
> imagine it will be available in the Ubuntu 14.04 release as well, assuming
> they're targeting current versions.
>
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 1:21 P
Cc: malini.k.bhand...@intel.com; Edison Su; Dugger, Donald D;
yunhong.ji...@intel.com; Meshkin, Omid; Manan Shah; Bob Ball; Hoban, Adrian
Subject: RE: Exposing PCIe capabilities to the Cloud Scheduler
Dear Edison Su and Malini Bhandaru,
I am the mentor of Pawit, who has submitted PCI passthrough
The "details" mess should be easily fixed by using POST + JSON object, such as:
POST addimagestore with json content:
{
Key1:value1,
Key2: value2
}
It really takes you a while to understand what hell is "
details[0].key=accesskey&details[0].value=s389ddssaa&details[1].key=secretkey&details[1]
Welcome, my dear Intel friends:)
Last year, community has contributed code regarding to add PCI passthrough into
CloudStack, see the patch: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12098/, but
unfortunately, this patch doesn't get checked in, due to lack of support from
committer: http://markmail.org/messag
+1(binding). Following the test procedure, and test it on devcloud, it works as
it is.
> -Original Message-
> From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 07, 2014 4:52 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0
Devcloud reboot issue is fixed by commit bd335d0.
> -Original Message-
> From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2014 11:02 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (third round)
>
> I encountered
Maybe before calling out another release manager, we better sit down and talk
about is there anything we can improve for the release process. Seems it's huge
mount of work to do as a release manager.
> -Original Message-
> From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
> Sent: Thursday, Janua
Sorry, I can not work today:)
you restart mgt server, after set host equal to "192.168.56.31"?
If not, restart your mgt server, and stop/start ssvm
If yes, then the issue will be ssvm can't connect to 192.168.56.31:8250, do you
open port 8250 on the VM where your mgt server running?
>
> Thanks
> P
ading the system vm template)?
>
> Also, how do I launch the VM without 'data disk'. If I go through the UI,
> it
> always asks me to select a DiskOffering and I'm not able to create a 0GB
> custom offering also.
>
> Thanks
> Prabhakar
>
> On 1/
ponse. Yes, I'm trying to launch my own iso, with
> 'small'
> data disk offering.
>
> I tried registering the ttylinux VM ISO. What should I select for OS type?
>
> Thanks
> Prabhakaran
>
> On 1/15/14 3:23 PM, "Edison Su" wrote:
>
>
ng [INTERNAL_ERROR, Xb.noent]. Here is some more
> >>information on my environment.
> >>
> >>Host: VirtualBox 4.2 in Centos (192.168.56.1) runs NFS, DNS and
> >>WebServer Mgmt Server: Centos 6.4 VM (192.168.56.31), built from 4.3
> >>source (2G RAM, 20
Hi Mike,
Just found there are few new methods are added on PrimaryDataStoreDriver:
public boolean connectVolumeToHost(VolumeInfo volumeInfo, Host host,
DataStore dataStore);
public void disconnectVolumeFromHost(VolumeInfo volumeInfo, Host host,
DataStore dataStore);
public long
ening), but finally It seemed to recover and I started an instance.
> >
> > Here are the logs, if someone cares to look at them:
> >
> > http://pastebin.com/yR5RTJsj
> >
> > -sebastien
> >
> > On Jan 15, 2014, at 10:30 AM, Sebastien Goasguen
> wr
After several fixes, devcloud is working on 4.3 branch now.
Manually create a new devcloud image(the only change to the image is to put 4.3
system vm template into /opt/storage/secondary/**/1/1/), and put it under:
http://pan.baidu.com/s/1dDkmM5r (Can't find a free place to hold 1.3G data, so
pu
We can move it to storage driver's capabilities method.
Each storage driver can report its capabilities in DataStoreDriver->
getCapabilities(), which returns a map[String, String], we can change the
signature to map[String, Object]
In CloudStackPrimaryDataStoreDriverImpl(the default storage drive
Oh, a minor upgrade should be enough:
https://code.google.com/p/google-gson/issues/detail?id=354
Just need to bump up to 1.7.2.
> -Original Message-
> From: Edison Su [mailto:edison...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Friday, January 03, 2014 5:48 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>
Hit a bug in gson:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/google-gson/3OdgAAUOi3c/UMTmNt1XnG0J
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5573
It's fixed since gson-2.0. Should we upgrade to gson-2.x?
> -Original Message-
> From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro]
> Sent: Friday, January 03, 2014 10:45 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC
>
> On 03.01.2014 18:31, Edison Su wrote:
> > Regarding to KVM binari
> -Original Message-
> From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro]
> Sent: Friday, January 03, 2014 8:37 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC
>
> On 03.01.2014 15:17, Daan Hoogland wrote:
> > I know Hugo made something to include it in the
> -Original Message-
> From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro]
> Sent: Monday, December 23, 2013 6:35 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC
>
> On 23.12.2013 05:42, Abhinandan Prateek wrote:
> > It gives me immense pleasure to inform that
Hi Mike,
I looked at your commit: 858ce766659101eb731c83c806892dd5d9baa976, seems it
will try to delete primary storage every time when stopping a VM ,which maybe
the root cause a kvm blocker bug: CLOUDSTACK-5432, KVM guest vms are crashed
during the automation test. From the agent log, I fi
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15521/#review29679
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- edison su
On Dec. 3, 2013, 6:58 p.m., Chris
Won't the architecture used by Mesos/Omega solve the resource
management/locking issue:
http://mesos.apache.org/documentation/latest/mesos-architecture/
http://eurosys2013.tudos.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/paper/Schwarzkopf.pdf
Basically, one server holds all the resource information in memory
(c
> -Original Message-
> From: Arnaud Gaillard [mailto:arnaud.gaill...@xtendsys.net]
> Sent: Monday, November 18, 2013 6:56 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Windows support for KVM
>
> Hello,
>
> A few days ago I created a new Jira ticket for the support of topology in
> netw
Certain Windows server hard code on how many sockets it supports:
http://www.openwebit.com/c/how-to-run-windows-vm-on-more-than-2-cores-under-kvm/
> -Original Message-
> From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Monday, November 18, 2013 1:53 PM
> To: dev@cloudst
+1(binding)
Tested on my local machine with one KVM host, basic marvin vm test passed.
> -Original Message-
> From: Abhinandan Prateek [mailto:abhinandan.prat...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 7:53 AM
> To: CloudStack Dev
> Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.1
>
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15309/#review28458
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- edison su
On Nov. 7, 2013, 9:30 p.m., Chris
1 - 100 of 369 matches
Mail list logo
