Agree. The message should indicate the root cause of the problem and the
solution.
-Koushik
-Original Message-
From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com]
Sent: Friday, August 16, 2013 2:58 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] git commit messages
+1
Also refer
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/How+to+build+CloudStack
for the list of nonoss jars that needs to be installed before doing the build.
-Koushik
-Original Message-
From: La Motta, David [mailto:david.lamo...@netapp.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 14,
I noticed that the upgrade sql script (earlier used to be schema-410to420.sql)
has been renamed and in the process all the change history is lost. Can we
ensure as a process to do a proper git file rename instead of creating a new
file so that the changes history is not lost? In this case is
d158da51f7b945d16e4749a83512ab5
Regards,
Devdeep
-Original Message-
From: Koushik Das [mailto:koushik@citrix.com]
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 2:50 PM
To: cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Change history lost for upgrade sql script
schema-412to420.sql
I noticed that the upgrade sql
: 0.884 sec
FAILURE!
Results :
Failed tests:
testScaleVMF3(com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.CitrixResourceBaseTest): (..)
Tests run: 3, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
- Koushik Das
On Aug. 10, 2013, 7:08 p.m., Harikrishna Patnala wrote
.
Also what is logic for multiplying the speed with 0.99?
- Koushik Das
On Aug. 9, 2013, 1 p.m., Harikrishna Patnala wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13441
Congrats Vijay!
-Original Message-
From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org]
Sent: Saturday, August 10, 2013 10:31 AM
To: CloudStack Dev
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Vijay Bhamidipati
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has
asked Vijay
The increase in deployVM time is due to the dedicated resources feature. I have
updated the issue with my analysis. Need some inputs from the original devs.
-Koushik
-Original Message-
From: Koushik Das (JIRA) [mailto:j...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2013 6:37 PM
+1. Provided git allows to make a specific file as read-only.
-Original Message-
From: Nitin Mehta [mailto:nitin.me...@citrix.com]
Sent: Monday, August 05, 2013 12:01 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Saksham Srivastava
Subject: Re: Reverting 17267794adb2bab923fb20515a7b943780d61921
+1
-Original Message-
From: Ram Ganesh [mailto:ram.gan...@citrix.com]
Sent: Friday, August 02, 2013 4:38 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [DISCUSS] [jira] make affectedVersion field mandatory.
Hi,
While triaging bugs I noticed that many bugs had affectedVersion
I see this in the review request
Review 13189 failed the build test : FAILURE
The url of build cloudstack-master-with-patch #99 is :
http://jenkins.cloudstack.org/job/cloudstack-master-with-patch/99/
Can you address this?
-Koushik
-Original Message-
From: Sanjay Tripathi
of correlation would be much more useful.
- Koushik Das
On July 30, 2013, 5:37 p.m., Marcus Sorensen wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13072
:{isProxy:false,executeInSequence:false,vmName:i-2-45-VM,wait:0}}]
}
The changes you have made would definitely improve the readability.
-Koushik
From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2013 7:26 PM
To: Koushik Das
Cc: cloudstack
Subject: Re: Review Request 13072
Rajesh,
You can look at the check-in history for schema-410to420.sql for the changes
-Original Message-
From: Rajesh Battala [mailto:rajesh.batt...@citrix.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2013 5:03 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Request to inform which DB command to run on
I raised this in a separate thread. Daan created a new patch
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12849/ to address backward compat.
-Original Message-
From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org]
Sent: Saturday, July 27, 2013 11:12 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12808/#review23823
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Koushik Das
On July 25, 2013, 7:19 a.m
For now I think cloud-utils is the best option.
-Original Message-
From: Amogh Vasekar [mailto:amogh.vase...@citrix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 10:48 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
Hi Alex,
Thanks! I had looked
that upgraded setups work fine as well.
- Koushik Das
On July 23, 2013, 10:02 a.m., daan Hoogland wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12849
Commit id: 2d4464d2badc9aff842fd180bafc4c384a83a91d
-return new URI(scheme + :// + value);
+// do we need to check that value does not contain a scheme
+// part?
+if (value.toString().contains(:))
+return new
not coming up due to https://reviews.apache.org/r/12685/
Where are you getting your system VM from?
DL
-Original Message-
From: Koushik Das [mailto:koushik@citrix.com]
Sent: 22 July 2013 11:09 AM
To: cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org
Subject: System VMs not coming up due
the code and the databse
schema. I will test this as soon as possible.
regards,
Daan
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 5:18 PM, Koushik Das koushik@citrix.com wrote:
Standard system VMs with systemvm.iso from latest master. But that
shouldn't matter as the issue is in the deploy VM code
The code needs to handle the case when the db. entry is not present. It should
fall back on some default value.
-Koushik
On 21-Jul-2013, at 12:38 AM, Min Chen min.c...@citrix.com wrote:
Thanks Vijay. I just figured out that trick myself:) I will check in a fix
to 4.2, seems that he forgot to
everywhere based on over provisioning factor. Please
open a new bug for future to store used/total capacity values in db. based on
same scale factor.
- Koushik Das
On July 19, 2013, 10:14 a.m., Harikrishna Patnala wrote
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12427/#review23577
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Koushik Das
On July 19, 2013, 10:14 a.m
. updateCluster needs to
be fixed as updateConfiguration is a generic approach and shouldn't be broken
for handling a special scenario.
- Koushik Das
On July 17, 2013, 7:37 a.m., Harikrishna Patnala wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e
I am also seeing it.
-Koushik
-Original Message-
From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2013 9:22 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Template Question
Hi,
I've noticed recently on XenServer when SSVM and CPVM are deployed
This is fixed as part of CLOUDSTACK-3445 in master and 4.2. The issue was with
local storage pool used bytes getting wrongly stored as you noted.
-Koushik
-Original Message-
From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 6:46 AM
To:
Should it fall back on the compute offering tags if disk offering tags cannot
be satisfied? This will make the behavior compatible with that of deploying VM
from template.
-Koushik
-Original Message-
From: Prachi Damle [mailto:prachi.da...@citrix.com]
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2013
That's correct. Currently all messages are hard-coded in the Java code. First
all these strings needs to be moved out to something like a 'resource file' and
only then they can be localized.
-Original Message-
From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
Sent: Thursday,
Hi Nicolas,
This issue got fixed as part of CLOUDSTACK-595. The fix is present in 4.0 and
onwards. I will resolve 531 as a duplicate of 595.
-Koushik
-Original Message-
From: nicolas.lamira...@orange.com [mailto:nicolas.lamira...@orange.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 5:59 PM
To:
This looks like a serious issue. Cloudstack goes into a bad state due to this.
From the UI the host first needs to be put into maintenance and only after that
the host can be deleted. But if deleteHost API is directly invoked there is no
such restriction (there is no check to see the
That's right. Cloudstack relies on native HA capabilities provided by vSphere.
-Original Message-
From: Kirk Kosinski [mailto:kirkkosin...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 6:30 AM
To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Chip Childers; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: HA
Congrats Mike!
-Original Message-
From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2013 7:10 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: FW: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Mike Tutkowski
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has
asked
Congrats Jayapal
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Monday, June 17, 2013 9:02 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Jayapal Reddy Uradi
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has
-Original Message-
From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com]
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2013 6:32 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Using In Progress status in JIRA
Folks
It seems that we do not use In Progress status in JIRA as often as we
should.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11435/#review21791
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Koushik Das
On June 12, 2013, 10:59 a.m
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11435/#comment44863
why not pass the 'caller' parameter to handleIpAliasDelete?
server/src/com/cloud/configuration/ConfigurationManagerImpl.java
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11435/#comment44862
why is both rollback and commit done?
- Koushik Das
On June
commit = 1
bug fix
- Koushik Das
On June 4, 2013, 2:51 p.m., bharat kumar wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11600
there was a return So the remaining code should only be executed if
(result == true).
- Koushik Das
On June 3, 2013, 10:27 a.m., bharat kumar wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https
+0
If proposed features are completed earlier then we shouldn't wait for 4 weeks.
-Koushik
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2013 8:30 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Pushback 4.2.0 Feature Freeze
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11437/#review21311
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Koushik Das
On June 3, 2013, 10:10 a.m
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11436/#review21314
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Koushik Das
On June 3, 2013, 1:08 p.m
What is the difference between these interfaces? I see that StaticNat is used
in network elements. And StaticNatRule used elsewhere including APIs. Given
that PF and FW rules uses a single interface everywhere, should a similar thing
be there for static nat rules as well?
-Koushik
-Original Message-
From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 12:36 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Pushback 4.2.0 Feature Freeze
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 3:02 AM, murali reddy
muralimmre...@gmail.com wrote:
We should do a
/VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl.java
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11437/#comment43593
The message says apply, should be revoke.
- Koushik Das
On May 27, 2013, 3:23 p.m., bharat kumar wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit
/#comment43575
message says apply but this for revoke. right? also dhcp has become dhco
server/src/com/cloud/network/router/VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl.java
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11435/#comment43576
dhco - dhcp
- Koushik Das
On May 27, 2013, 2:50 p.m., bharat kumar wrote
Congrats Sangeetha!
-Original Message-
From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2013 11:50 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Sangeetha Hariharan
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has
asked
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9779/#review20991
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Koushik Das
On May 24, 2013, 10:19 a.m
Congrats Wei!
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2013 2:53 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Wei Zhou
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has
asked Wei Zhou to
Congrats Sailaja!
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2013 2:52 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Sailaja Mada
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has
asked
It is better to add constraints in the db for all uuid fields. That way uuid
field will never get missed out. I see that for some tables there is a NOT NULL
constraint.
-Koushik
-Original Message-
From: Min Chen [mailto:min.c...@citrix.com]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2013 4:09 AM
To:
://reviews.apache.org/r/11221/#comment42836
For other entries I see different target paths. What should be the correct
one in these cases?
- Koushik Das
On May 20, 2013, 6:44 a.m., sanjeev n wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail
/xenserver/xcposs. This also
needs to be fixed for devcloud to work
- Koushik Das
On May 17, 2013, 1:56 p.m., sanjeev n wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11221
The problem is that there is no default ctor in XcpServerResource.java. Now the
default ctor was changed to a non-default one by this commit. Adding a default
ctor should fix the issue but need to check if there will be any other side
effects due to the version field introduced.
commit
Nice explanation Prasanna.
+1 to Kishan's fix.
-Original Message-
From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2013 9:50 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Kishan Kavala
Subject: Re: Review Request: Added PlainTextAuthenticator
On Thu, May 16, 2013
-Original Message-
From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 12:25 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Firewall rule question
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 06:43:44AM +, Koushik Das wrote:
Prasanna,
Interesting point. On one
-Original Message-
From: Jayapal Reddy Uradi [mailto:jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 10:29 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; aemne...@gmail.com
Subject: RE: Firewall rule question
For the createFirewallRule and createEgressFirewallRule APIs the port
-Original Message-
From: williamstev...@gmail.com [mailto:williamstev...@gmail.com] On
Behalf Of Will Stevens
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 12:19 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; aemne...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Firewall rule question
Ya, I am not sure. I am working off a
Congrats Devdeep!
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2013 8:48 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Devdeep Singh
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has
asked
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11027/#review20481
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Koushik Das
On May 13, 2013, 9:34 a.m
configDhcp, change it to correct name.
- Koushik Das
On May 10, 2013, 6:54 a.m., bharat kumar wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11027
, April 19, 2013 5:09 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Koushik Das; Sailaja Mada
Subject: [ACS42][QA]Review Request : CISCO ASA 1000v Firewall Integration Test
Plan
Hi,
CISCO ASA 1000v Firewall Integration Test Plan :
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CISCO+ASA+Firewall
for SRX + F5 big ip is already in.
--Sheng
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Chiradeep Vittal
chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com wrote:
Isn't this discussed here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/ggjVAQ
On 4/15/13 6:51 AM, Koushik Das koushik@citrix.com wrote:
The network
A fixed naming pattern with verb followed by noun looks good. If required the
verbs can be categorized further like lifecycle verbs - create, delete etc.
-Original Message-
From: prasanna [mailto:srivatsav.prasa...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
Prasanna Santhanam
Sent: Tuesday, April 16,
The network orchestration component currently supports elements in a
side-by-side mode. Compatible network elements can be used in this mode to
offer various network services. There are also scenarios where an inline mode
would be desirable. For e.g. firewall followed by LB. Wanted to check out
@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [MERGE] ASA 1000v as external firewall in isolated guest
networks
On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 01:08:42PM +, Koushik Das wrote:
I would like to merge the feature ASA 1000v as external firewall in
isolated
guest networks to master. Please find the details here:
Proposal
:20:39AM -0400, Chip Childers wrote:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 06:39:29AM +, Koushik Das wrote:
Currently there are no functional tests, did e2e tests manually.
There are some external setup that is required which then needs to be
added to Cloudstack like Nexus 1000v, VNMC, ASA 1000v
Santhanam wrote:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 09:20:39AM -0400, Chip Childers wrote:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 06:39:29AM +, Koushik Das wrote:
Currently there are no functional tests, did e2e tests manually.
There are some external setup that is required which then needs to be
added
I would like to merge the feature ASA 1000v as external firewall in isolated
guest networks to master. Please find the details here:
Proposal:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-cloudstack-users/201301.mbox/%3ccd0b6bea.167bb%25manan.s...@citrix.com%3E
FS:
What happens when same alias gets used for different commands? I think even
with the current mechanism for command name the problem exists i.e. two
different commands can have the same name. And in that case how is it handled?
-Original Message-
From: Kishan Kavala
in the
newTemplateId parameter?
- Koushik Das
On March 6, 2013, 12:23 p.m., Harikrishna Patnala wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9779
Congratulations Ahmad.
-Original Message-
From: Joe Brockmeier [mailto:j...@zonker.net]
Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 5:05 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: New committer: Ahmad Emneina
Hi all,
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has
asked Ahmad
801 - 872 of 872 matches
Mail list logo
