THx Rohit.
On 7 May 2015 at 15:42, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > On 07-May-2015, at 3:30 pm, Andrija Panic
> wrote:
> >
> > Dont want to hijack thread - can you point me to some VR template
> building
> > guide or something - where we could possibly alter VR template...or I
> guess
> > this is
Hi,
> On 07-May-2015, at 3:30 pm, Andrija Panic wrote:
>
> Dont want to hijack thread - can you point me to some VR template building
> guide or something - where we could possibly alter VR template...or I guess
> this is possibly on MGMT code side...?
This is a very old wiki:
https://cwiki.apa
atic NAT
> >> Adding / Removing Load Balancing
> >> Adding / Removing Global Server Load Balancing
> >> Adding / Removing AutoScaling
> >>
> >>
> >> Regards
> >>
> >> Geoff Higginbottom
> >>
> >> D: +44 20 360
Hi Rohit
On 07.05.2015 15:09, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> Hi Rene,
>
> The issue you had reported is reproducible when you have a 4.2.1 or 4.3.2
> cloud database but a 4.5.1 or 4.5.0 cloud_usage database, and you try to
> upgrade to ACS 4.5.1 that fails for cloud_usage database (since it’s already
>
/ Removing Global Server Load Balancing
>> Adding / Removing AutoScaling
>>
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Geoff Higginbottom
>>
>> D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
>>
>> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
>>
>> -Origi
Hi Rene,
The issue you had reported is reproducible when you have a 4.2.1 or 4.3.2 cloud
database but a 4.5.1 or 4.5.0 cloud_usage database, and you try to upgrade to
ACS 4.5.1 that fails for cloud_usage database (since it’s already 4.5.1). This
could probably be the case in your environment as
gt; >>> For all those of you have voted +1 based on a clean install, if
> >>> possible please test upgrade scenarios including deploying new
> >>> Isolated networks and new VPCs as I have performed three upgrades
> >>> and all pass the initial upgrade, but then fail
: Abhinandan Prateek [mailto:abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: 07 May 2015 08:56
To: CloudStack Dev
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
+1 with following testing:
Manual Testing:
Zone with a cluster of Xenserver 6.5
VM lifecycle, Recovering a destroyed VM, Reinstall VM
VM Migration
ave performed three upgrades and all pass the initial
>>> upgrade, but then fail to add new VRs or new SSVM/CPVMs post upgrade etc
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> Geoff Higginbottom
>>>
>>> D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161
t;>
>> Geoff Higginbottom
>>
>> D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
>>
>> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
>>
>> -Original Message-----
>> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: 06 May 2015 13:25
>&
Message-
From: Marcus [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
Sent: 06 May 2015 16:09
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
There are reasons to want to have nics on two VPC networks. One big one is
simply to migrate a VM from one network to the other. Another is for
gt;
> D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
>
> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: Vadim Kimlaychuk [mailto:vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee]
> Sent: 06 May 2015 09:09
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apa
inbottom"
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Wednesday, 6 May, 2015 13:28:55
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
> For all those of you have voted +1 based on a clean install, if possible
> please
> test upgrade scenarios including deploying new Isolated ne
| M: +447968161581
>
> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 06 May 2015 13:25
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
>
> based on Wilder's testin
Regards
Geoff Higginbottom
D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
Sent: 06 May 2015 13:25
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
om: Geoff Higginbottom [mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com]
> Sent: 06 May 2015 10:59
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
>
> +1
>
> Regards
>
> Geoff Higginbottom
>
> D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447
peblue.com
-Original Message-
From: Geoff Higginbottom [mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: 06 May 2015 10:59
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
+1
Regards
Geoff Higginbottom
D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
geoff
Hi all,
I'm glad to let you know that ACS 4.5.1 has my +1.
Environment:
XenServer 6.2
MySQL/MariaDB 5.5.41
Management Server running CentOS 7
Component: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack (test/integration/component and
smoke)
Test Create Account and user for that account ... === TestName:
+1
Regards
Geoff Higginbottom
D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
-Original Message-
From: Erik Weber [mailto:terbol...@gmail.com]
Sent: 06 May 2015 10:44
To: dev
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
On Wed, May 6, 2015
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 11:18 AM, Vadim Kimlaychuk wrote:
> Geoff,
>
> Thank you for explaination. Basically the idea behind that was to
> have (for instance) database tier and web-app tier. Web-apps-tier servers
> have to communicate with databases, but databases are closed for outside
e.com
-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
Sent: 06 May 2015 10:04
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
Geoff, Vadim, I think the concept of a vpc private gateway is for this purpose.
Of course more then one road leads to
l Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2015 12:04 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
Geoff, Vadim, I think the concept of a vpc private gateway is for this purpose.
Of course more then one road leads to Rom
2 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
>
> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
>
> -Original Message-----
> From: Vadim Kimlaychuk [mailto:vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee]
> Sent: 06 May 2015 09:09
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
>
&g
rom: Vadim Kimlaychuk [mailto:vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee]
Sent: 06 May 2015 09:09
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
I didn't report a bug yet. I don't know if it works at 4.5.0, but I know that
it worked at 4.0 -- last stable relase I was able
--
From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2015 10:49 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
On May 6, 2015, at 9:38 AM, Vadim Kimlaychuk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am sorry for not being authorized to vote for release,
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 9:38 AM, Vadim Kimlaychuk
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am sorry for not being authorized to vote for release, but it
> seems VPC is not working at 4.5.1. I have 4.5-RC20150407T1726 at
> production and using VPC is very limited. I am not able to use 2 NICs from
> different ti
VPC usage scenario"
>
Did you report bugs ?
> Regards,
>
> Vadim.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Geoff Higginbottom [mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2015 10:21 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE
user list under subject
"VPC usage scenario"
Regards,
Vadim.
-Original Message-
From: Geoff Higginbottom [mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2015 10:21 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
I¹m a -0 for no
I¹m a -0 for now (testing still on going)
I have upgraded a 4.3.1 Adv XenServer build, and a 4.4.2 Adv XenServer
build. In both cases the upgrade was successful, all System VMs and VRs
upgraded OK, however I was not able to create any new VRs or System VMs.
We are still analysing the logs and t
+1 (binding)
On May 5, 2015 10:26 AM, "David Nalley" wrote:
> Thanks for running with this Rohit.
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 7:20 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I've created a 4.5.1 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
> >
> > Git Branch and Commit SH
Thanks for running with this Rohit.
+1 (binding)
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 7:20 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I've created a 4.5.1 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
>
> Git Branch and Commit SH:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/h
Somesh,
> On 05-May-2015, at 5:39 pm, Somesh Naidu wrote:
>
>> CCP 4.2.x or 4.3.x and upgrading to 4.4.x
>
> There is no such upgrade path.
You’re missing the context :)
Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue
M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitt
: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
Oh, I didn't see a vote from you yet. I just wanted to get my opinion out.
There are some pretty critical fixes shipping in this build (clustered mgmt
server is broken in 4.5.0, for example), and I think we need to be more
generous with shipping fixes in small
> CCP 4.2.x or 4.3.x and upgrading to 4.4.x
There is no such upgrade path.
Regards,
Somesh
-Original Message-
From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2015 10:35 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
Hi R
Hi
I am not able to reproduce anymore.
vote 0 from me!
Yours
René
Am 5. Mai 2015 17:02:47 MESZ, schrieb Marcus :
>This is the sort of thing that I'd personally not -1, unless we can
>prove
>that it's a regression. If the files were released in 4.5.0 and haven't
>been modified, I'd prefer to shi
+1 (binding)
Tested following vm lifecycle operations and other events;
- DB upgrade testing from ACS 4.2.1, 4.3.2, 4.5.0 to ACS 4.5.1 candiate
- Deploy zone, register primary/secondary storage pools, add/remove hosts
- Register iso and template
- Take snapshot, convert snapshot to volume/templat
Hey, no body casted a -1!
I will probably not be testing in time and won't stop this release for that
reason. if it works for anyone it should go out. If it doesn't work for me
I'll call for a fix. The CCP issue, I didn't know about. I don't think we
should abandon CCP users so a repair script sho
Hi,
In case anyone did not see my previous reply - I’m unable to reproduce the
shared issue using ACS 4.2.1 and upgrading it to 4.5.1. So, kindly test for any
issues before voting.
> On 05-May-2015, at 5:13 pm, Daan Hoogland wrote:
>
> sure, hence the -0
>
> Op di 5 mei 2015 om 17:03 schreef M
+44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
-Original Message-
From: Marcus [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
Sent: 05 May 2015 16:23
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
Oh, I didn't see a vote from you yet. I just wanted to
Oh, I didn't see a vote from you yet. I just wanted to get my opinion out.
There are some pretty critical fixes shipping in this build (clustered mgmt
server is broken in 4.5.0, for example), and I think we need to be more
generous with shipping fixes in small doses rather than blocking on known
or
sure, hence the -0
Op di 5 mei 2015 om 17:03 schreef Marcus :
> This is the sort of thing that I'd personally not -1, unless we can prove
> that it's a regression. If the files were released in 4.5.0 and haven't
> been modified, I'd prefer to ship some bugfixes rather than trying to fix
> all kno
This is the sort of thing that I'd personally not -1, unless we can prove
that it's a regression. If the files were released in 4.5.0 and haven't
been modified, I'd prefer to ship some bugfixes rather than trying to fix
all known bugs before shipping.
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 6:47 AM, Daan Hoogland
Hi Rene,
Thanks for reporting. I’ve just deployed a ACS 4.2.1 DB and upgraded to ACS
4.5.1, and found no exceptions.
Did you try this on a fresh installation of ACS 4.2.1 or was it CCP 4.2.1? (in
production we have seen db upgrade issues if customers were using CCP 4.2.x or
4.3.x and upgrading
Rene, but it is a problem in the release. It sound very strange that it
would not have been caught in any of the 4.4 releases or in 4.5.0. I am
hesitant but a -1 is on the surface of my keyboard.
Op di 5 mei 2015 om 13:03 schreef Rene Moser :
> Hi
>
> Tested an update from 4.2.1 to 4.5.1 which fa
Hi
Tested an update from 4.2.1 to 4.5.1 which failed because of 2 identical
ALTER TABLE statements for cloud_usage in schema-421to430.sql and
schema-430to440.sql
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/4.5-RC20150504T1217/setup/db/db/schema-421to430.sql#L787
https://github.com/apache/cloudstac
+1 (binding) from me based on testing upgrades from 4.4.1/4.4.3 and basic
operations in Adv+SG zones.
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
> From: "Rohit Yadav"
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Monday, 4 May, 2015 12:20:31
>
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
> From: "Nux!"
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Friday, 10 April, 2015 18:32:22
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2
> Rohit,
>
> Here's the table you requested:
>
> http://fpaste.org/2
om: "Rohit Yadav"
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Thursday, 9 April, 2015 16:51:34
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2
> Hi Lucian,
>
> Thanks for sharing, I’ll try to re-create an environment like yours tomorrow
> and
> see if I can repr
nagement-server.log
> http://tmp.nux.ro/dwes-agent.log
>
>
> Any ideas?
>
> --
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>
> Nux!
> www.nux.ro
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Nux!"
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>
dwes-agent.log
Any ideas?
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
> From: "Nux!"
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Thursday, 9 April, 2015 14:09:20
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2
> Rohit,
gt; From: "Rohit Yadav"
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Thursday, 9 April, 2015 13:35:55
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2
> Hi Lucian,
>
> 2 out 3 is still bad, when you upgrade do you use fresh hosts? Was it a basic
> zone/advance zone? I
ology!
>
> Nux!
> www.nux.ro
>
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Rohit Yadav"
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Sent: Thursday, 9 April, 2015 12:47:46
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2
>
>> Hi Lucian,
>>
>> Can
different code from what David
cut ...
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
> From: "Rohit Yadav"
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Thursday, 9 April, 2015 12:47:46
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache C
Original Message -
>> From: "Mike Tutkowski"
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Sent: Wednesday, 8 April, 2015 15:43:31
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2
>
>> I see the following GUI error when I delete a volume (although the dele
#x27;s the same
>> server, the same local storage, listed 2 times, with different IDs.
>>
>> --
>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>>
>> Nux!
>> www.nux.ro
>>
>> - Original Message -
>> > From: "Mike Tut
> www.nux.ro
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Mike Tutkowski"
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Sent: Wednesday, 8 April, 2015 15:43:31
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2
>
> > I see the following GUI error when
> Check the screenshot http://i.imgur.com/24Z2MXY.png that's the same
>> server, the same local storage, listed 2 times, with different IDs.
>>
>> --
>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>>
>> Nux!
>> www.nux.ro
>>
>> -
uadrant using Borg technology!
>
> Nux!
> www.nux.ro
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Mike Tutkowski"
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Sent: Wednesday, 8 April, 2015 15:43:31
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2
>
> >
Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
> From: "Mike Tutkowski"
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Wednesday, 8 April, 2015 15:43:31
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2
> I see the following GUI error when I delete a volume (althou
I see the following GUI error when I delete a volume (although the delete
actually works):
Unable to execute API command queryasyncjobresult due to invalid value.
Invalid parameter jobid value=undefined due to incorrect long value format,
or entity does not exist or due to incorrect parameter anno
Awesome, will test shortly.
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
> From: "Rohit Yadav"
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Wednesday, 8 April, 2015 10:26:37
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc
Hi all,
I've the 4.5.1 RC2 repo built here:
http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/testing
SystemVM templates:
http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.5
I've found and fixed an issue where 'key' column of keystore table was
not getting encrypted, this was also reported to me by Erik:
;>>>>>> Unable to start instance due to can't find mapping in
>>>>>>>> ObjectInDataStore
>>>>>>>> table for: org.apache.cloudstack.storage.image.store.TemplateObject
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>&
Angus
paul.an...@shapeblue.com
-Original Message-
From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro]
Sent: 20 March 2015 14:12
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1
+1 from me as well based on upgrade from 4.4.1 and ADV+SG zone tests.
Thanks Rohit for the packages.
3 0540 | M: +447968161581
>>
>> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
>> Sent: 26 March 2015 12:56
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4
: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
>
> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
> Sent: 26 March 2015 12:56
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloud
| S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
>
> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
> Sent: 26 March 2015 07:25
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1
>
0540 | M: +447968161581
>
> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
> Sent: 26 March 2015 07:25
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1
>
> Hi Geoff,
>
e.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1
Hi Geoff,
I tried with latest 4.5 branch and was able to add/remove VMs from LB rules in
an advance zone with KVM. I did not find any issues. The API can take both list
of VM ids and the vmidipmap. This is the trace from Chrome dev
nbottom
D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
-Original Message-
From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: 24 March 2015 06:36
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1
Hi Ilya - Ye
ect
>>>>>
>>>>> When trying to deploy system VM templates.
>>>>>
>>>>> Template gets copied to primary storage but no entries appear to be
>>>>> added to the db Systemvm.iso not copied to secondary storage.
>>>>> SSVM a
inbot...@shapeblue.com
-Original Message-
From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: 24 March 2015 06:36
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1
Hi Ilya - Yes, I think we’ll need a RC2 but I don’t want another RC3 so let’s
wait at least for today t
March 2015 14:12
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1
+1 from me as well based on upgrade from 4.4.1 and ADV+SG zone tests.
Thanks Rohit for the packages.
Lucian
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Me
>> Causes:
>>>>>> Unable to start instance due to can't find mapping in ObjectInDataStore
>>>>>> table for: org.apache.cloudstack.storage.image.store.TemplateObject
>>>>>>
>>>>>> When trying to deploy system VM templa
itect
D: +44 20 3468 5163 |S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +44 7711 418 784 | T:
@CloudyAngus
paul.an...@shapeblue.com
-Original Message-
From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro]
Sent: 20 March 2015 14:12
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1
+1 from me as well b
ll spotted,
release attempt of the 4.5.0 and I was hoping to see the 4.5.1 with fixes
shortly.
Cheers
Andrei
- Original Message -
From: "Rohit Yadav"
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Friday, 20 March, 2015 7:29:18 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache
-
> From: "Rohit Yadav"
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Friday, 20 March, 2015 7:29:18 AM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1
> (+ users)
> Hi all,
> I've built signed centos63/centos7/debian repository
emplate gets copied to primary storage but no entries appear to be added
>>>> to the db
>>>> Systemvm.iso not copied to secondary storage.
>>>> SSVM and CPVM do not get created
>>>>
>>>> Rohit has created a fix for RC2 - testing on that now.
>>
stemvm.iso not copied to secondary storage.
>>>> SSVM and CPVM do not get created
>>>>
>>>> Rohit has created a fix for RC2 - testing on that now.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Paul Angus
>>>> Cloud Archite
i.nux.ro]
>>> Sent: 20 March 2015 14:12
>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1
>>>
>>> +1 from me as well based on upgrade from 4.4.1 and ADV+SG zone tests.
>>>
>>> Thanks Rohit for the packages.
>>>
apache.org
Sent: Friday, 20 March, 2015 11:38:42
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1
+1 (with one centos6 rpm build fix required, read below)
Advance zone testing with/without local storage, KVM:
- VM lifecycle with and without local storage and vm's volume
migrations (after vm was sto
8 784 | T:
> @CloudyAngus
> paul.an...@shapeblue.com
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro]
> Sent: 20 March 2015 14:12
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1
>
> +1 from me as well based on upgra
4 | T: @CloudyAngus
paul.an...@shapeblue.com
-Original Message-
From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro]
Sent: 20 March 2015 14:12
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1
+1 from me as well based on upgrade from 4.4.1 and ADV+SG zone tests.
Thanks Rohit fo
day, 20 March, 2015 11:38:42
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1
> +1 (with one centos6 rpm build fix required, read below)
>
> Advance zone testing with/without local storage, KVM:
>
> - VM lifecycle with and without local storage and vm's volume migratio
+1 (with one centos6 rpm build fix required, read below)
Advance zone testing with/without local storage, KVM:
- VM lifecycle with and without local storage and vm's volume migrations
(after vm was stopped) across 2 hosts
- Password server, reset password. Stress tested password server, served
1
(+ users)
Hi all,
I've built signed centos63/centos7/debian repository out of this RC for
your convenience: http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/testing/
4.5 systemvm templates: http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.5/
(If you're on 4.5.0. There is no need to upgrade your System
I did indeed - it's 4.5.1 RC - my apologies for not checking the
template closely enough to eliminate all of the fill in the blank
spots.
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 11:01 AM, Geoff Higginbottom
wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> You appear to have left x.x.x.x in the e-mail, I think you meant to put
> 4.5.1 her
Hi David,
You appear to have left x.x.x.x in the e-mail, I think you meant to put
4.5.1 here instead.
Regards
Geoff Higginbottom
CTO / Cloud Architect
D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540
| M: +447968161581
geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com
| Twitter:@cloudstackguru
88 matches
Mail list logo
