Re: http://jenkins.cloudstack.org/ is down ?

jenkins.buildacloud.org On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 1:03 PM, Rayees Namathponnan wrote: >

Re: VmWare SDK to vijava

> Do you know if legally we can add the vmware wsdl to git? If I recall correctly when we discussed it before it seems we were instructed to ask legal@ for blessing. That said - shipping or not shipping in a binary isn't really an issue as a project our official releases are always source. --Davi

Re: [PROPOSAL] move away from time-based releases and/or revamp release process

On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 10:00:32AM -0600, Marcus Sorensen wrote: >> I guess I'm in the minority though, since we're the >> only ones discussing it. > > No you are not. Personally, I'm thinking about this problem a bit > before adding my 2 c

Re: [RESULTS] [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (sixth round)

> > 1 - Finish the docs (release notes especially) and publish them to > cloudstack.apache.org/docs > > *We need someone to own this* I can do this, but it may be tomorrow before it gets done. > > 2 - Build the DEB packages > > Wido has this one > > 3 - Build the RPM packages > > *We need s

Re: [RESULTS] [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (sixth round)

On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 9:31 AM, David Nalley wrote: >> >> 1 - Finish the docs (release notes especially) and publish them to >> cloudstack.apache.org/docs >> >> *We need someone to own this* > > I can do this, but it may be tomorrow before it gets done

Re: [VOTE] Accept the donation of a Contrail plugin into Apache CloudStack

+1 On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 10:13 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > Hi all! > > As stated in other threads, Juniper is proposing the donation of a > Contrail plugin to Apache CloudStack. The code itself has been posted > to reviewboard [1]. The design has been documented by Pedro [2]. > > [1] https://r

Re: 4.2 rpm nonoss

On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Larry Hernandez wrote: > Does the http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/rhel/4.2/ repo have nonoss built is > like 4.1? > > -Larry Yes it does. --David

Re: [PROPOSAL] move away from time-based releases and/or revamp release process

On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 11:26 AM, Musayev, Ilya wrote: > We can still use scheduled release as we do now and yet have some agility. > > An idea was passed around before if we can modularize ACS in future releases > VS being it monolithic. > > We can still have a core as is, but additional compone

Re: VmWare SDK to vijava

On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 8:01 PM, Alex Huang wrote: > Wow good guess...Hugo had me scratching my head on that oneIs Prussian > some code name for Apache legalShould I askWould it make me look > stupid if I askedall sorts of doubts going through my mind. > > --Alex > I think Prasa

Re: [PROPOSAL] Service monitoring tool in virtual router

On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 9:30 AM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi wrote: > Hi, > > Currently in virtual router there is no way to recover and notify if some > service goes down unexpectedly. > > This feature is about monitoring all the services rendered by the virtual > router, ensure that the services are r

Re: [PROPOSAL] Service monitoring tool in virtual router

roposal does >>> not talk about modifying monit, just using it. That wouldn't trigger >>>the AGPL. >>> I think the idea is to have a tight monitoring loop that scales: so >>>executing the >>> monitoring loop in-situ makes sense. >>> &g

Re: ovirt/RHEV-M support

I don't think that anyone is currently working on it, but we'd love to see it if you are interested in working on it. --David On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 6:14 AM, Jithin Raju wrote: > Hi, > > Is there any plan to support ovirt/RHEV-M ? > > Thanks, > Jithin

Re: CS4.2 KVM VM Snapshot not implement yet?

There's a global setting that enables it IIRC. --David On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 9:23 PM, Jijun wrote: > hi all, > > i install CS4.2 from the url : http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/ubuntu/ , > then create Basic Zone with KVM host added,then create some vms ,everything > work fine. > > create vm snapsh

Re: Release Criteria

On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 8:46 PM, David Nalley wrote: > Hi folks, > > One of the things I've been pondering of late is a set of release > criteria. E.g. here is what CloudStack MUST do to be considered for > release. > I've spent a lot of time thinking about this -

Re: [PROPOSAL] Service monitoring tool in virtual router

On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 1:27 AM, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: > SNMP wouldn't restart a failed process nor would it generate alerts. It is > simply too generic for the requirements outlined here. The proposal does > not talk about modifying monit, just using it. That wouldn't trigger the > AGPL. Let m

Post-release work

As previously discussed, now that 4.2 is released, I moving docs to their own repo. https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/cloudstack-docs.git For present, I am pushing the 4.2 docs into a 4.2 branch, and will deal with master in a bit. We also need to merge anything in 4.2-forward into 4.2 and pu

Re: [DISCUSS] Breaking out Marvin from CloudStack

> After separating marvin > 0. we will have a separate release cycle for marvin > 1. we will have a new home for marvin's docs using Sphinx > 2. if possible, a different criteria for providing commit access to > marvin's repos. > 3. all tests of cloudstack will also move to marvin's repository > I

Docs have moved

Per our earlier discussion, now that 4.2 has released, I moved the docs for 4.2 to their own repo, and will be doing the same for master in the next day or so as I clean things up. The new repo is: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack-docs.git The master branch is pretty desolate u

Re: Wiki access

You should be able to edit/add pages now. --David On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Syed Mushtaq wrote: > my confluence id is sahmed . > > Thanks, > -Syed > > > On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 5:01 PM, Chip Childers > wrote: > >> Not all committers were easy to find, but those that I did should be all >>

Re: HA is broken on master

Why is the work happening in master? On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 7:09 PM, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: > Perhaps as a result of this work: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/tYvlAQ > I think Kelven is trying to separate the job state (starting, stopping) > from the actual VM state. > > On 10/2/13 3:3

Re: System VM

On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 7:34 PM, Travis Graham wrote: > Hey Marcus, > > The docs were split out today to make them easier to work on. I'll be going > through them later tonight to fix things like this and sending out a diff > to get them corrected as soon as possible. > > Travis Hi Travis: Lets t

Re: VmWare SDK to vijava

On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 4:23 PM, Darren Shepherd wrote: > No update on this. I mentally got blocked on the emailing legal@ > about it. Should I go ahead and email them? Whats the full email > address? From a technical perspective I know this will work, I did > some bytecode analysis and we can

Re: Docs have moved

I'll annoy some of the root@ folks about that tomorrow. --David On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > > On Oct 2, 2013, at 3:15 PM, David Nalley wrote: > >> Per our earlier discussion, now that 4.2 has released, I moved the >> docs for 4.2 to t

Re: 2 questions regarding building docs

On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 9:15 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > H, > > I started building the docs of the 4.2 tree, using the cfg publican-all.cfg > I fails. Is there a defined set of targets that must/should build in the > docs? > I personally don't like the -all target. I generally consider the minimum

Re: 2 questions regarding building docs

Bah - I hit send without dealing with the second question. On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 9:15 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > H, > > I started building the docs of the 4.2 tree, using the cfg publican-all.cfg > I fails. Is there a defined set of targets that must/should build in the > docs? > > > Pro

Re: docs split of only to 4.2

On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 8:30 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > H, > > Is there a reason the split of docs repo does not have anything in master > but only in 4.2? Should I cherrypick the entire tree or do we want to wait > with that for some reason? > There are two reasons that it's that way. First, some

Re: [jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-4799) Update Deployment Architecture Overview section

Travis: Why are we using linkend on some, and urls on others? I am reticent to put version specific urls in documents as that becomes a maintenance nightmare. --David On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Travis Graham (JIRA) wrote: > > [ > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-479

Re: JIRA - release 4.3 required in Affected and Fix version list

Done. On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Rayees Namathponnan wrote: > Hi Jira Admins, > > I am want to create defect against master, but there is no option to select > 4.3 "Affected and Fix Version", someone with admin access please add this ? > > Regards, > Rayees

Re: Latest automation result on master

Thanks Rayees - this is helpful. --David On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 5:41 PM, Rayees Namathponnan wrote: > Here the BVT automation result on KVM, You can see the result @ > http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/cloudstack-qa/job/test-smoke-matrix/ > > We had 100% pass rate in 4.2, but in latest mas

Re: Docs have moved

to resolve them. >> >> On 10 October 2013 13:47, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: >>> On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 05:57:58PM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: >>>> On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 03:15:23PM -0400, David Nalley wrote: >>>>> Per our earlier discuss

Re: Docs have moved

On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Ian Duffy wrote: >> Actually I think the jobs are broken now. I'm not too clear on the >> publican changes. Can someone take a look and fix the publican >> arguments? > > Current looking at this. > midonet, niciranvp and release notes are back building. > > Should

Re: Docs have moved

On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 2:09 PM, Ian Duffy wrote: > Response inline... > > On 10 Oct 2013 18:27, "David Nalley" wrote: >> >> On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Ian Duffy wrote: >> >> Actually I think the jobs are broken now. I'm not too clear o

Re: Review Request 14628: AutoScaling without NetScaler

THRILLED to see this. --David On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 9:21 PM, tuna wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/14628/ > ---

Re: Incomplete API docs?

Yes - it's really a bug in ApiXmlDocWriter. Please file it. --David On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Demetrius Tsitrelis wrote: > Do you still think there needs to be a bug filed for the missing APIs? > > -Original Message- > From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:[email protected]

Re: Incomplete API docs?

On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 6:24 AM, Radhika Puthiyetath wrote: > Hi All, > > Our API documentation requires a serious refurbishment. > Hi Radhika: What do you see as lacking in our current API docs (aside from them not working ;) ) > How about creating a doc sprint for enhancing API documentati

Re: Incomplete API docs?

hey are simple one liners that do not convey anything about the API. > > -Original Message- > From: David Nalley [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, October 21, 2013 2:54 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Incomplete API docs? > > On Wed, Oct 16

Re: [Merge]pluggable_vm_snapshot branch

Has any testing been run against this? --David On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 6:26 PM, Edison Su wrote: > Hi All, > Per discussion on the thread: > http://markmail.org/message/ybw2yy5snkvkuc57, we decide to use coarse-graind > interface to make taking vm snapshot pluggable. On pluggable_vm_snapsh

Re: [ASF4.2.1] default to 64-bit system VM template

On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 1:32 AM, Abhinandan Prateek wrote: > > We are planning to make 64-bit system vm templates as default offering in > 4.2.1. > This is an initial email to have thoughts from the community on this. > > -abhi -1 Who is this we? I agree with Wido We adhere to semver, and acc

Re: Review Request 14843: CLOUDSTACK-1049 : git commit by using command cloudstack-sccs from installed setup

Rayees: While it doesn't technically break things, it isn't very refined: Here's the output from a machine using a release tarball on a machine without git: ++ git rev-parse HEAD /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.JvKJtB: line 33: git: command not found + echo E.g. when you actually go to release software, the file

Re: how to use hashes on c.a.o?

On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 5:43 PM, Darren Shepherd wrote: > Chip, > > Do you care if we switch to GNU coreutils format for the hashes? The > hash value is the same it will just be in the format like > > file.tbz2 *12b12341b1234b1234b1b2341b234b > > And then you just run "sha512sum -c " > > Darren >

Re: how to use hashes on c.a.o?

On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Darren Shepherd wrote: > I ran into the issue while trying to write scripts to get CloudStack > in docker. Here's my hack-tastic work around > > HASH=$(echo $(wget -O - -q > http://www.apache.org/dist/cloudstack/releases/4.2.0/apache-cloudstack-4.2.0-src.tar.bz2.s

Re: Review Request 14843: CLOUDSTACK-1049 : git commit by using command cloudstack-sccs from installed setup

mmand "cloud-sccs" before 4.1 release. > > Regards, > Rayees > > -Original Message- > From: David Nalley [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2013 3:12 PM > To: [email protected]; Rayees Namathponnan > Cc: Chip Childers; Frank Zhan

Re: jira permissions check

Daan: I just added you to the PMC role in Jira which should let you add/change folks roles. If someone asks for access, don't hesitate to add them to the contributor role. (or committer role if appropriate) --David On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 5:12 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > H, > > I was going over

CloudStack Planet

Hi folks: There is now a planet (blog aggregation) for CloudStack at http://planet.apache.org/cloudstack If you want to add your blog, please edit this file: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/planet/cloudstack.ini If you aren't a committer, but have a lot of CloudStack blog content, feel free to c

Re: [Merge] hyperv branch to master

On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 7:41 AM, Devdeep Singh wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to merge the support for Hyperv to the master branch. > Development for this has been done by Donal, Rajesh, Anshul and I on branch > [1]. The feature was proposed for merge earlier [3] but unit tests for hyperv > agen

Re: [Merge] hyperv branch to master

or now. > The signing will come up during the build right? How do other OSS C# > projects deal with it? > Perhaps they release binaries in addition to source? > > On 10/29/13 9:35 AM, "David Nalley" wrote: > >>On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 7:41 AM, Devdeep Singh &g

Re: [Merge] hyperv branch to master

easier to create a Master than to merge with Master :) > > > DL > > >> -----Original Message- >> From: David Nalley [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: 29 October 2013 17:37 >> To: [email protected] >> Cc: Donal Lafferty; Rajesh Battala; Anshul Gan

createrepo on rpmbuilder for jenkins

I don't know where rpmbuilder is, but can someone install createrepo on it? --David

Re: Docker?

On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 9:16 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote: > > > On 10/30/2013 02:18 PM, Nguyen Anh Tu wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I'm starting look into docker's architecture and figure out how it plays >> with lxc and openstack at that moment. Will try to figure some of key >> points before the CCC13

Re: [Merge] Palo Alto Networks firewall integration to master

On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 7:32 PM, Will Stevens wrote: > Sheng, I will rebuild the patch for the latest master. The latest master > has depreciated the 'nonoss' flag in favour of 'noredist'. I was building > in nonoss previously. I am guessing I should use the noredist flag now? > Will - what is ca

Re: [Merge] Palo Alto Networks firewall integration to master

ce on a third party API and appliance, similar to the srx and > netscaler. I am not convinced it should be in noredist, but I was following > the same model as other similar plugins. Feedback on this would be > helpful. > > Ws > > On Tuesday, November 5, 2013, David Nalley wrot

Re: [PROPOSAL] Liaison with ETSI NFV ISG

> > One way to improve visibility and collaborate actively with this community > is to have a liaison with the ISG. > The liaison can contribute to the activities of the various working groups > (e.g., Management and Orchestration MANO WG) and convey the activities > and requirements of the NFV ISG

Re: Is there a site show cloudstack source code contribution by companies like openstack community heartbeat

On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Donal Lafferty wrote: > Cross post from StackOverflow: > > "Is there a site show cloudstack source code contribution by companies like > openstack community heartbeat http://www.stackalytics.com/"; [1] > > > Any recommendations besides Sebastien Goasguen's "Update

Re: 4.2.1 BVT automation results

Thats less than ideal, but better than no testing. Did bugs get filed for the failing tests in 4.2.1? --David On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Rayees Namathponnan wrote: > 4.2.1 automation not executed from jenkins.buildacloud.org, > > Automation executed in side my company including vmware, > >

Re: [ACS 421] Upgrade testing

On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Nux! wrote: > On 31.10.2013 02:51, Sudha Ponnaganti wrote: >> >> Hi All, >> >> Want to check if anyone is testing upgrades from prior versions to >> 4.2.1. As Release date is getting close, If there are gaps, would like >> to cover some scenarios in our lab. >> >>

Re: 4.3 Not Building (Test Failure)

That's still concerning. The deps should be handled automagically by maven, and new dependencies should be discussed on list. Especially because this potentially triggers legal compliance issues. --David On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 5:55 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > Ah, you are correct - thanks! > >

Re: CloudStack.next

On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 6:41 PM, Steve Wilson wrote: > Hi All, > > As we ramp towards freeze on 4.3 and start talking about 4.4, I thought it > would be fun to queue up a discussion here on the list before Collab next > week. > > What do you envision in the next MAJOR release of CloudStack? Cal

Re: access to jenkins.buildacloud.org

On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 11:59 PM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 06:45:41PM +, Srikanteswararao Talluri > wrote: >> Please provide me access to jenkins.buildacloud.org. I would like to >> explore jenkins jobs for smoke and regression testing. > > Talluri, > > Could you gi

Re: [ASF4.2.1] Release Notes

I agree - announcing a release prior to docs availability hurts the project because users fail in installation and upgrades. The gate in my mind is docs readiness - thats an integral part of the release process, even if the repo is separate. Animesh, whats your reason to want to push this out earl

Re: [ASF4.2.1] Release Notes

release without docs, >> not that we should. My idea was that we release on wednesday with the docs >> in rc state. Even that is, admitted, dubious. >> >> mobile biligual spell checker used >> Op 14 nov. 2013 22:50 schreef "David Nalley" : >> &g

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.1

Marcus: Is this is a -1? I don't have any legal concerns, and the release builds and tests for me (though I haven't tried VPC). I am somewhat concerned about what appears to be drifting away from adhering to semver. (features appear to have made it into the 4.2.1 release that weren't in 4.2.0) a

Re: [ASF4.2.1] Release Notes

Yes - it's hard to maintain, and it's yet another place to point people to. Let's deprecate it in favor of decent RN. --David On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > IMO, we should kill the CHAGES file and just get the release notes > document under control. I'm fine if "Changes

Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for CloudStack

Hi folks: If you happen to have some graphical design talent (I have none) I have a great opportunity for you :) CloudStack needs a 'powered by' logo that is easy to consume, and is also attractive. A couple examples of powered by logos: http://tomcat.apache.org/images/tomcat-power.gif https://

Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for CloudStack

or is this a new request? > > > > > > On 11/15/13, 12:56 PM, "David Nalley" wrote: > >>Hi folks: >> >>If you happen to have some graphical design talent (I have none) I >>have a great opportunity for you :) >> >>CloudStack needs a &#

Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for CloudStack

> Are there any deadlines? > > On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 6:56 PM, David Nalley wrote: > >> Hi folks: >> >> If you happen to have some graphical design talent (I have none) I >> have a great opportunity for you :) >> >> CloudStack needs a 'powered

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.1

> > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate > "(binding)" with their vote? > > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) +1 (binding) (with the assumption that we won't announce until after docs are finished) Verified sigs and

Re: SDN compat matrix

Big switch? On Nov 17, 2013 5:41 AM, "Hugo Trippaers" wrote: > Hey guys, > > I’m building the compatibility matrix for our SDN plugins to use in my > presentation for CCCEU13. I think i got everything in there, but would like > to check it against your combined knowledge: > > GRE isolation >

Re: SDN compat matrix

Bah autocorrect Bigswitch On Nov 17, 2013 9:50 AM, "David Nalley" wrote: > Big switch? > On Nov 17, 2013 5:41 AM, "Hugo Trippaers" wrote: > >> Hey guys, >> >> I’m building the compatibility matrix for our SDN plugins to use in my >> presen

Re: [MERGE]object_store branch into master

On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 4:11 AM, Edison Su wrote: > Hi all, > Min and I worked on object_store branch during the last one and half > month. We made a lot of refactor on the storage code, mostly related to > secondary storage, but also on the general storage framework. The following > goals

Re: [PROPOSAL] [CLOUDSTACK-2328] Linux native VXLAN support on KVM hypervisor

> > I'd like to assign Jira ticket to me but it looks I don't have permission to > do so. > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2328 > Could anyone kindly assign the ticket to me? > I've granted you enough karma so you can do this and many other things in Jira now. Feel free to assig

Re: [MERGE]object_store branch into master

On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Sudha Ponnaganti wrote: > Also open defects need to be addressed as testing has been done on feature > branch and the numbers seem to be high on this branch - atleast blocker and > critical should be addressed. > > Key Summary AssigneeReporter

Re: Using rados-java as a new Maven dependency for KVM

On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 09:33:17PM +0200, Wido den Hollander wrote: >> >> >> On 05/21/2013 09:16 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote: >> >Hi, >> > >> >In the rbd-snap-clone [0] branch I'm working on the new RBD features >> >like snapshotting, clonin

Re: [DISCUSS] Should we pause merges into master until 4.1 is out the door?

On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 4:18 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 12:34:45AM +, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: >> I don't see limited interest. It seems that bugs are trickling in every >> day and they are being taken up as they come in. Is there any blocker >> without any action for mo

Re: [VOTE] Move forward with 4.1 without a Xen-specific fix for CLOUDSTACK-2492?

On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > All, > > As discussed on another thread [1], we identified a bug > (CLOUDSTACK-2492) in the current 3.x system VMs, where the System VMs > are not configured to sync their time with either the host HV or an NTP > service. That bug affects th

Re: localization tables in CS database

On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 12:28 AM, Adnan Ashraf wrote: > Hi, > > I would appreciate if anyone could point me to understand how cloudstack > schema model accommodates the localization strings within its database > tables. I am interested in understanding whether a central strings table is > used or

Re: Using rados-java as a new Maven dependency for KVM

On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 7:51 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote: > On 05/21/2013 09:53 PM, David Nalley wrote: >> >> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Chip Childers >> wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 09:33:17PM +0200, Wido den Hollander wrote: >>>&

Re: [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-2406) language display error

On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 9:12 PM, Hiroaki Kawai (JIRA) wrote: > > [ > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2406?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13667432#comment-13667432 > ] > > Hiroaki Kawai commented on CLOUDSTACK-2406: > --

Re: [PROPOSAL] Pushback 4.2.0 Feature Freeze

On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 7:59 PM, John Burwell wrote: > All, > > Since we have taken an eight (8) week delay completing the 4.1.0 release, I > would like propose that we re-evaluate the timelines for the 4.2.0 release. > When the schedule was originally conceived, it was intended that the projec

Re: [PROPOSAL] Pushback 4.2.0 Feature Freeze

On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 3:02 AM, murali reddy wrote: > We should do a health-check of proposed features [1] which are at risk for > 4.2 feature freeze before deciding to re-evaluate timelines. > We are supposedly doing time-based release, so we don't care about what features make it versus don't.

Re: [PROPOSAL] Pushback 4.2.0 Feature Freeze

On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 11:02:32AM +, Koushik Das wrote: >> >> >> > -Original Message- >> > From: David Nalley [mailto:[email protected]] >> > Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 12:36 PM >>

RPM building tests in jenkins

Hi folks: I came across an interesting problem today, and think it's one that deserves fixing. I looked at our jenkins config and found that we build packages in a manner that is different from how our documentation tells users to build those packages. IMO while there may be more than one way to

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (fifth round)

On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 9:47 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > Hi All, > > I've created a 4.1.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a > vote. > +1 Checked sigs and hashes Built Packaged RPMs for EL6.4 (using nonoss profile) Did some basic testing --David

Re: RPM building tests in jenkins

On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 2:59 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 10:51:12AM -0400, David Nalley wrote: >> Hi folks: >> >> I came across an interesting problem today, and think it's one that >> deserves fixing. >> >> I looked a

Re: netscaler jars hosted in maven central

Wonderful news Vijay. Glad to see this accomplished. On Jun 3, 2013 10:13 AM, "Vijay Venkatachalam" < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > The Apache licensed netscaler jars are now hosted in maven central. > It is possible to make the netscaler plug-in as part of the OSS. > > Please c

Re: RPM building tests in jenkins

On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 04:58:45AM -0400, David Nalley wrote: >> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 2:59 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: >> > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 10:51:12AM -0400, David Nalley wrote: >> >> Hi folks

Re: Board report for June board meeting...

On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 12:22 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > Hi all, > > Since I'm going to be on vacation until next Monday (starting Tuesday > evening), I'd like to ask for help in creating the board report for > this month. > > I've created the template here: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/di

Re: [ACS41] Release process update

On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > Hi, > > I've edited downloads.mdtext, and committed to staging. I'll be > building the DEB's and RPM's today. > > We have that new tomcat issue to address, which I'll do in the RPM > build. I think we have a decision to make... announce 4.

Re: [VOTE] Pushback 4.2.0 Feature Freeze

On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Musayev, Ilya wrote: > How would this vote work? Is it consensus that wins? Consensus would win if we had it. However, we don't, thus we have a vote.

Re: [VOTE] Pushback 4.2.0 Feature Freeze

On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > Following our discussion on the proposal to push back the feature freeze > date for 4.2.0 [1], we have not yet achieved a clear consensus. Well... > we have already defined the "project rules" for figuring out what to do. > In out project b

Re: CloudMonkey on PyPi

On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 12:09:21AM +0530, Rohit Yadav wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 12:05 AM, Chip Childers >> wrote: >> >> > The problem I'm seeing is that -SNAPSHOT is a newer version than -0, so >> > 4.1.0-0 (the one I published from th

Re: CloudMonkey on PyPi

On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 12:22:02AM +0530, Rohit Yadav wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 12:14 AM, Chip Childers >> wrote: >> >> > On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 12:09:21AM +0530, Rohit Yadav wrote: >> > > On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 12:05 AM, Chip Childer

Re: CloudMonkey on PyPi

On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 03:09:47PM -0400, David Nalley wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Chip Childers >> wrote: >> > On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 12:22:02AM +0530, Rohit Yadav wrote: >> >> On Wed, Ju

Re: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (fifth round)

On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > Joe, >I don't normally follow the cloudstack-users list, but I tested > with ubuntu 12.04, and don't get that error. It would be a real shame > if nobody caught that during voting/testing, it would mean that nobody > used standard OSes

Re: Review Request: fix for cloudstack-2859 (incorrect secondary dns address)

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11657/#review21497 --- Ship it! Applied - thanks for the patch! - David Nalley On June

Re: [DISCUSS] code-freeze and integration tests

On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 1:20 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to get everyone's opinions on the timeline and policies > for bringing in automated tests into the repo. Integration tests are > written in marvin by various people today within and without Citrix. > Similar to docs I

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-rat-master #1468

Why is jenkins trying to create a tag in our repo? --David On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 9:00 AM, Apache Jenkins Server wrote: > See > > -- > Started by an SCM change > Building remotely on ubuntu2 in wo

Re: [ACS42][DONATED FEATURE] CloudStack Advanced Password Management Engine

On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Musayev, Ilya wrote: > ISWest contracted CloudSand to develop the Advanced Password Management > Engine (APME). ISWest the owner and sponsor of APME, would like to donate > the APME feature to Apache CloudStack Community. Special thanks goes to > ISWest - Clay

Re: [ACS42][DONATED FEATURE] CloudStack Advanced Password Management Engine

On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 1:36 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > > >> -Original Message----- >> From: David Nalley [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2013 9:18 AM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [ACS42][DONATED FEATURE] CloudS

Re: Hello (Upgrade to 4.1)

That advice is now deprecated. I believe RHT began shipping the patches in 6.2 or 6.3 - so you should be fine with 4.0.x or 4.1 and those version of qemu-* --David On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 11:15 PM, Maurice Lawler wrote: > Thank you for the update... > > However, upon installing Cloud Stack MONTHS

Re: Runtime Error: "could not find systemvmiso" in master branch

On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 6:27 AM, Nguyen Anh Tu wrote: > Thanks Vijay. It helps me alot. Pheww. It should be noted! Someone doesn't > know about clear tags > Please document this. :) --David

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >