Re: Releasing from trunk

2007-02-07 Thread Reinhard Poetz
Reinhard Poetz wrote: I also think that it is an *important signal to us*: 2.2 is complete, the contracts are stable and they can't be changed One thing to add: As Cocoon is modularized now, we can and _will_ have different release cycles for our modules, e.g. if we think it's useful we can

Re: [graphics] New version of masthead - update

2007-02-07 Thread Reinhard Poetz
hepabolu wrote: Guys, Thien did it again: - he changed the masthead, making it a bit smaller and darker. - he also added a search box and changed the color of apache cocoon to be more prominent. - he removed some tiles to make things look better at 800x600. - the green blocks are now moved

Re: Releasing from trunk

2007-02-07 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On 2/7/07, Carsten Ziegeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ...The version from trunk is used by several of us already in production, several people have tried it out and it seems that most of the problems have been fixed. So I really think that this qualifies for an RC release... Excuse the silly

Re: Error creating bean with name 'javax.servlet.http.HttpServletRequest/callstack'

2007-02-07 Thread Daniel Fagerstrom
Ok. In the trunk version of Spring framework, one can also use ordinary Java (interface based) proxies, so I guess it is better to wait with this functionality until the next minor version of Spring is released. I turned it off in our trunk. In Cocoon we use a call stack for handling some

Re: Releasing from trunk

2007-02-07 Thread Daniel Fagerstrom
Reinhard Poetz skrev: Carsten Ziegeler wrote: Vadim Gritsenko wrote: RC has a meaning of release candidate, which to most people means well tested almost production quality code. Going through recent commits I noticed a lot of refactoring, new code, untested code, and so on. This hardly

Re: Releasing from trunk

2007-02-07 Thread Andrew Savory
Hi, On 7 Feb 2007, at 07:13, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: I really doubt that most of the code for final releases (or rc) is tested better than what we currently have in trunk. We do releases for 2.1.x without real tests for most of the code base. We rely on user experience/tests. The version from

[off-topic] Index path in patch files from Subclipse

2007-02-07 Thread Grzegorz Kossakowski
Hello, It's little bit off-topic but my question is related to my patches I've recently sent on JIRA. I've seen that all my patches produced by Subclipse contain absolute path of Index: field. I think it's not desired and these patches will cause problems to the others. Could someone using

Re: Releasing from trunk

2007-02-07 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Andrew Savory wrote: Hi, Not wishing to spread FUD and rain on the parade, but ... I think 2.2 is *massively* less tested than 2.1.x. The main reason 2.1.x goes out with not much testing is because it's been used in production by a very large number of people. How many are actually

What should context:// be changed to in src attribute in 2.2 version (servlet service version)?

2007-02-07 Thread Rice Yeh
Hi, What should context:// be changed to in src attribute in a block like cocoon-forms-sample in 2.2 version (servlet service)? For example, how should I rewrite the following statement in th cocoon-forms-sample? map:transform src=context://samples/common/style/xsl/html/simple-

Re: Dojo paths problem

2007-02-07 Thread Jeremy Quinn
On 6 Feb 2007, at 13:06, Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote: Jeremy Quinn napisał(a): I think part of the problem is that I was unable to get the proper sitemap glue working for Cocoon 2.2 as I was unable to run the samples. This section in the root sitemap (same mechanism in 2.1.n) is designed

Re: Dojo paths problem

2007-02-07 Thread Grzegorz Kossakowski
Jeremy Quinn napisał(a): On 6 Feb 2007, at 13:06, Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote: Jeremy Quinn napisał(a): The point is, while using servlet-service-fw there is *no* root sitemap handling all request. Request are handled by dispatcher servlet, instead. This is all news to me as I am not in a

CForms: dojo drag-and-drop repeater sample not working in IE

2007-02-07 Thread Bart Molenkamp
Hi, The dojo drag-and-drop repeater isn't working with IE (checked with IE 6 and IE 7). Both Cocoon 2.1 and 2.2 have the same problem (as expected...) Somehow Dojo isn't capable of drag-and-drop, where tr elements are used. The problem was reported, and I also found a sulution here [1].

Re: Releasing from trunk

2007-02-07 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
Carsten Ziegeler wrote: Andrew Savory wrote: Hi, Not wishing to spread FUD and rain on the parade, but ... I think 2.2 is *massively* less tested than 2.1.x. The main reason 2.1.x goes out with not much testing is because it's been used in production by a very large number of people.

Re: Releasing from trunk

2007-02-07 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
Reinhard Poetz wrote: What we need now is more people who use/try it and in this sense it doesn't help to ship more milestone releases. Make it easy to try it and people will come. http://cocoon.apache.org/mirror.cgi http://cocoon.apache.org/2.2/ Contrast and compare with 2.1

Block Docs, Re: svn commit: r503964 - in /cocoon/trunk/blocks/cocoon-profiler/cocoon-profiler-impl/src/main: java/org/apache/cocoon/components/profiler/ resources/META-INF/cocoon/avalon/

2007-02-07 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
Simone Gianni wrote: Hi all, I was playing with the profiler when I noticed the way the ProfilingXMLPipe works. Every component is given the opportunity to stream its sax events, they are buffered in a DOM, the DOM is then used (to display the intermediate XML and) to stream SAX events to the

[jira] Created: (COCOON-2006) ClassCastException in Rhino when creating a continuation in a catch block

2007-02-07 Thread Rob Berens (JIRA)
ClassCastException in Rhino when creating a continuation in a catch block - Key: COCOON-2006 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-2006 Project: Cocoon

Re: Releasing from trunk

2007-02-07 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Vadim Gritsenko wrote: You are missing a point. It's not about a bug free version. It is about a version which seen more than like 4 hours of testing after major surgery. Sorry, but that's not fair. There were no code or api changes to the core in the last weeks (apart from bug fixes). There

Re: Block Docs

2007-02-07 Thread Reinhard Poetz
Vadim Gritsenko wrote: Simone Gianni wrote: Can someone point me to the right documentation branch where I should update documentation? I'd guess it should be cdocs: Profiler Block, but it is not listed on: http://cocoon.zones.apache.org/daisy/ Not sure how easy/hard it is to add it

Re: Releasing from trunk

2007-02-07 Thread Reinhard Poetz
Vadim Gritsenko wrote: Carsten Ziegeler wrote: [...] We need to get a 2.2 out; imho it is more important to have something out after so many years than having a 115% bug free version. You are missing a point. It's not about a bug free version. It is about a version which seen more than

Re: Releasing from trunk

2007-02-07 Thread Reinhard Poetz
Carsten Ziegeler wrote: [...] Anyways, I'm a little bit clueless how to continue. Some of us say, let's call it RC, some say no as things are missing. Since writing more mails would take longer than releasing another series of core milestone releases, I will release cocoon-core-2.2 as M3.

Re: [graphics] New version of masthead - update

2007-02-07 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
hepabolu wrote: Awesome! Looks good ... but ... is that a page curl beside What is Apache Cocoon ? *shudder* I suppose it is. I think it's very well done, no tackiness about it. What makes you shudder? I'm not crazy about this page curl as well... Would it perhaps be better to move both

Re: Releasing from trunk

2007-02-07 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
Reinhard Poetz wrote: Vadim Gritsenko wrote: It is a bit different for 2.2 though: there were no real downloadable release yet, And maybe there will never be one. Don't know. There doesn't seem to be much energy in this community to provide it - especially if you use Maven 2 you don't

Re: Releasing from trunk

2007-02-07 Thread Andrew Savory
Hi, On 7 Feb 2007, at 14:01, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: Now, I will ask the open question right away: who will work on the missing parts? FX: TUMBLEWEED Gosh, no rush of people to say I will! ;-) On 7 Feb 2007, at 14:49, Reinhard Poetz wrote: From my experience over the last months, I'd say

Re: Releasing from trunk

2007-02-07 Thread Reinhard Poetz
Vadim Gritsenko wrote: Reinhard Poetz wrote: Vadim Gritsenko wrote: It is a bit different for 2.2 though: there were no real downloadable release yet, And maybe there will never be one. Don't know. There doesn't seem to be much energy in this community to provide it - especially if you

Re: [graphics] New version of masthead - update

2007-02-07 Thread hepabolu
Vadim Gritsenko said the following on 7/2/07 16:11: hepabolu wrote: Awesome! Looks good ... but ... is that a page curl beside What is Apache Cocoon ? *shudder* I suppose it is. I think it's very well done, no tackiness about it. What makes you shudder? I'm not crazy about this page curl as

Re: Releasing from trunk

2007-02-07 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Reinhard Poetz wrote: Carsten Ziegeler wrote: [...] Anyways, I'm a little bit clueless how to continue. Some of us say, let's call it RC, some say no as things are missing. Since writing more mails would take longer than releasing another series of core milestone releases, I will

Re: Block Docs

2007-02-07 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
Reinhard Poetz wrote: Vadim Gritsenko wrote: Simone Gianni wrote: Can someone point me to the right documentation branch where I should update documentation? I'd guess it should be cdocs: Profiler Block, but it is not listed on: Not sure how easy/hard it is to add it there... Reinhard? It

Re: Releasing from trunk

2007-02-07 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
Reinhard Poetz wrote: Vadim Gritsenko wrote: Regardless of download presence, at the very least there should be a 2.2 site set up and running. http://cocoon.apache.org/2.2/ IMNSHO we don't have http://cocoon.apache.org/2.2/ anymore. Information about the core will be available at

Re: Releasing from trunk

2007-02-07 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
Carsten Ziegeler wrote: Reinhard Poetz wrote: Carsten Ziegeler wrote: Anyways, I'm a little bit clueless how to continue. Some of us say, let's call it RC, some say no as things are missing. Since writing more mails would take longer than releasing another series of core milestone releases,

[jira] Assigned: (COCOON-2005) Cocoon's build broken due to invalid parent in cocoon-samples-style-default's pom

2007-02-07 Thread Reinhard Poetz (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-2005?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Reinhard Poetz reassigned COCOON-2005: -- Assignee: Reinhard Poetz Cocoon's build broken due to invalid parent in

[jira] Closed: (COCOON-2005) Cocoon's build broken due to invalid parent in cocoon-samples-style-default's pom

2007-02-07 Thread Reinhard Poetz (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-2005?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Reinhard Poetz closed COCOON-2005. -- Resolution: Fixed should work now. please crosscheck. thanks! Cocoon's build broken due to

Re: continuum put offline

2007-02-07 Thread Jorg Heymans
Reinhard Poetz wrote: Jorg Heymans wrote: Hi, I've killed off the instance as obviously it can't cope with Reinhard's recent structural refactorings. I'll see about rebuilding in the next few weeks unless someone beats me to it. What needs to be done for a rebuild? I would remove all

Re: Releasing from trunk

2007-02-07 Thread Jorg Heymans
Vadim Gritsenko wrote: Continuum was stopped because I started to flatten the POM hierarchy in trunk. This will hopefully save me a lot of time during the release process. Do I understand it correctly - it should be turned off to simplify release process? Sounds Ok to me if that's the case.

Re: Releasing from trunk

2007-02-07 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
Jorg Heymans wrote: So for me, currently, the best solution ATM for CI would be to cron something like this: #!/bin/bash rm -fr ~/.m2/repository Or: rm -rf ~/.m2/repository/org/apache/cocoon cd src/cocoon-trunk svn update mvn clean install ~/cocoon-build.log 21 if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then

Re: Releasing from trunk

2007-02-07 Thread Jorg Heymans
Vadim Gritsenko wrote: #!/bin/bash rm -fr ~/.m2/repository Or: rm -rf ~/.m2/repository/org/apache/cocoon possibly yes. I'm still debating the usefulness of downloading everything new each time. It was useful back in the days where existing poms were updated, they seem to have this

[jira] Created: (COCOON-2007) cocoon-block-deployer plugin falis to build war file

2007-02-07 Thread Felix Knecht (JIRA)
cocoon-block-deployer plugin falis to build war file Key: COCOON-2007 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-2007 Project: Cocoon Issue Type: Bug Components: * Cocoon

[jira] Updated: (COCOON-2007) cocoon-block-deployer plugin falis to build war file

2007-02-07 Thread Felix Knecht (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-2007?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Felix Knecht updated COCOON-2007: - Attachment: deployer-pom.diff patch for cocoon-block-deployer pom.xml cocoon-block-deployer