On Wed, 26 Nov 2003, Reinhard Poetz wrote:
>
> From: David Crossley
>
> > Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
> > > Reinhard Poetz wrote:
> > >
> > > >No problem, that was not the difficult part - I had more problems
> > > >with the publishing process itself:
> >
> > I presume that you know about
> > ht
From: David Crossley
> Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
> > Reinhard Poetz wrote:
> >
> > >No problem, that was not the difficult part - I had more problems
> > >with the publishing process itself:
>
> I presume that you know about
> http://wiki.cocoondev.org/Wiki.jsp?page=CocoonWebsiteUpdate
>
> Agr
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
> Reinhard Poetz wrote:
>
> >No problem, that was not the difficult part - I had more problems with
> >the publishing process itself:
I presume that you know about
http://wiki.cocoondev.org/Wiki.jsp?page=CocoonWebsiteUpdate
Agreed, the process could be easier. Thank your l
Reinhard Poetz wrote:
...
No problem, that was not the difficult part - I had more problems with
the publishing process itself:
1) complete build of Cocoon including documentation
2) use forrest to generate 'real' documentation
"build docs" does these two items.
3) then I used 'forrest run'
From: David Crossley
> Tony Collen wrote:
> > Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> > > Reinhard Poetz a écrit :
> > >
> > >> ..It's time for Doco because moving content from Wiki to
> CVS is a
> > >> very, very, very, very boring job. (Aren't there any tools which
> > >> could help?)...
> > >
> > >
Tony Collen wrote:
> Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> > Reinhard Poetz a écrit :
> >
> >> ..It's time for Doco because moving content from Wiki to CVS is a very,
> >> very, very, very boring job. (Aren't there any tools which could
> >> help?)...
> >
> > If you're talking about format conversion, JS
Joerg Heinicke wrote:
On 24.11.2003 21:55, Upayavira wrote:
Tony Collen wrote:
BTW, when a page is moved, I think we should keep the page on the
wiki, and perhaps keep a record of when the last version was
committed to CVS.
Blowing away docs (like the features list) isn't too useful,
especia
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Le Lundi, 24 nov 2003, à 22:00 Europe/Zurich, Joerg Heinicke a écrit :
...From that point of view my solution must be really good in your
opinion :-)
http://wiki.cocoondev.org/Wiki.jsp?page=CocoonFeatures
hmmm..maybe we should push a little more towards patches?
Ins
Tony Collen wrote:
Joerg Heinicke wrote:
The problem I saw (and because of this I removed the list) are the
missing diffs (or the bad usability with it) after further additions
to the page are made. Imagine in a half year you want to update the
page in the CVS, in the meantime there were 10 ch
On 24.11.2003 22:05, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Le Lundi, 24 nov 2003, à 22:00 Europe/Zurich, Joerg Heinicke a écrit :
...From that point of view my solution must be really good in your
opinion :-)
http://wiki.cocoondev.org/Wiki.jsp?page=CocoonFeatures
hmmm..maybe we should push a little more
Le Lundi, 24 nov 2003, à 22:00 Europe/Zurich, Joerg Heinicke a écrit :
...From that point of view my solution must be really good in your
opinion :-)
http://wiki.cocoondev.org/Wiki.jsp?page=CocoonFeatures
hmmm..maybe we should push a little more towards patches?
Instead of
If you want to add fur
Le Lundi, 24 nov 2003, à 22:06 Europe/Zurich, Tony Collen a écrit :
...Would a centralized list of pages that were moved over (along with
the last date they were moved) be useful to maintain?
If all moved pages point to
http://wiki.cocoondev.org/Wiki.jsp?page=MovedToCvs then the "Referenced
by"
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
I have added a note about this at
http://wiki.cocoondev.org/Wiki.jsp?page=MovedToCvs .
Of course this can still be discussed here, but having the "rules" on
the wiki should help.
I also put a note on the CocoonFeatures page about when it was last moved over to CVS, wh
On 24.11.2003 21:58, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
...I agree that blowing away docs is bad. However, just leaving them
is pretty bad too.
IMO, once a doc is moved to CVS, the original wiki page should be
replaced by a placeholder, which is where people can place comments
about the related page i
On 24.11.2003 21:55, Upayavira wrote:
Tony Collen wrote:
BTW, when a page is moved, I think we should keep the page on the
wiki, and perhaps keep a record of when the last version was committed
to CVS.
Blowing away docs (like the features list) isn't too useful,
especially since I was going t
Le Lundi, 24 nov 2003, à 21:55 Europe/Zurich, Upayavira a écrit :
...I agree that blowing away docs is bad. However, just leaving them
is pretty bad too.
IMO, once a doc is moved to CVS, the original wiki page should be
replaced by a placeholder, which is where people can place comments
about
Tony Collen wrote:
BTW, when a page is moved, I think we should keep the page on the
wiki, and perhaps keep a record of when the last version was committed
to CVS.
Blowing away docs (like the features list) isn't too useful,
especially since I was going to point to the version of the docs in
Joerg Heinicke wrote:
The problem I saw (and because of this I removed the list) are the
missing diffs (or the bad usability with it) after further additions to
the page are made. Imagine in a half year you want to update the page in
the CVS, in the meantime there were 10 changes in the wiki pa
On 24.11.2003 21:28, Tony Collen wrote:
BTW, when a page is moved, I think we should keep the page on the wiki,
and perhaps keep a record of when the last version was committed to CVS.
Blowing away docs (like the features list) isn't too useful, especially
since I was going to point to the vers
BTW, when a page is moved, I think we should keep the page on the wiki, and perhaps keep a record of
when the last version was committed to CVS.
Blowing away docs (like the features list) isn't too useful, especially since I was going to point
to the version of the docs in the Wiki, and possibly
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Le Lundi, 24 nov 2003, à 19:22 Europe/Zurich, Reinhard Poetz a écrit :
..It's time for Doco because moving content from Wiki to CVS is a very,
very, very, very boring job. (Aren't there any tools which could
help?)...
If you're talking about format conversion, JSPWiki
Le Lundi, 24 nov 2003, à 19:22 Europe/Zurich, Reinhard Poetz a écrit :
..It's time for Doco because moving content from Wiki to CVS is a very,
very, very, very boring job. (Aren't there any tools which could
help?)...
If you're talking about format conversion, JSPWiki's HTML shouldn't be
hard to
22 matches
Mail list logo
