Hi,
I just tested the last changes and it seems that the continuation manager
is still not working correctly.
It seems that the ContinuationInterrupt is still not executed as soon
as jetty is listening. Can someone confirm this?
Carsten
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 09:01, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Hi,
I just tested the last changes and it seems that the continuation manager
is still not working correctly.
It seems that the ContinuationInterrupt is still not executed as soon
as jetty is listening. Can someone confirm this?
Did
Bruno Dumon wrote:
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 09:01, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Hi,
I just tested the last changes and it seems that the
continuation manager
is still not working correctly.
It seems that the ContinuationInterrupt is still not executed as soon
as jetty is listening. Can
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 09:16, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Bruno Dumon wrote:
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 09:01, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Hi,
I just tested the last changes and it seems that the
continuation manager
is still not working correctly.
It seems that the
Bruno Dumon wrote:
I just verified and it works here (both jdk 1.4 and 1.3), so I'm looking
for alternative explanations: did you remove the old util.concurrent jar
from your WEB-INF/lib ?
Yes. Hmm, strange - just to make sure that I did nothing wrong when testing,
I changed the following two
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 10:10, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Bruno Dumon wrote:
I just verified and it works here (both jdk 1.4 and 1.3), so I'm looking
for alternative explanations: did you remove the old util.concurrent jar
from your WEB-INF/lib ?
Yes. Hmm, strange - just to make sure that I
Bruno Dumon wrote:
SNIP
Looks ok, I changed the parameters in the cocoon.xconf though, but
that's the same.
Just tried it over here on a Windows box with java 1.4.2 and it also
works. With working I mean I added a System.out.println to the
ContinuationsInterrupt.execute() method and see it
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 12:48, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Bruno Dumon wrote:
SNIP
Looks ok, I changed the parameters in the cocoon.xconf though, but
that's the same.
Just tried it over here on a Windows box with java 1.4.2 and it also
works. With working I mean I added a
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 14:42, Bruno Dumon wrote:
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 12:48, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Bruno Dumon wrote:
SNIP
Looks ok, I changed the parameters in the cocoon.xconf though, but
that's the same.
Just tried it over here on a Windows box with java 1.4.2 and it also
Bruno Dumon wrote:
Another idea: could you try my original changed jar available here:
http://outerthought.net/~bruno/concurrent.jar
Never mind, I can reproduce the problem now on marc's pc.
Great, so I'm not insane! (I tried your version anyway, but without success)
Carsten
Bruno Dumon wrote:
Or maybe not so great. I'm not sure the CommandManager is well suited
for a general purpose scheduler.
What follows now should be read with a 'AFAIU' disclaimer:
All commands added to the CommandManager are executed sequentially and
on one thread. So if there is one command
Carsten Ziegeler wrote, On 02/09/2003 15.21:
Bruno Dumon wrote:
Another idea: could you try my original changed jar available here:
http://outerthought.net/~bruno/concurrent.jar
Never mind, I can reproduce the problem now on marc's pc.
Great, so I'm not insane! (I tried your version anyway, but
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 15:21, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Bruno Dumon wrote:
Another idea: could you try my original changed jar available here:
http://outerthought.net/~bruno/concurrent.jar
Never mind, I can reproduce the problem now on marc's pc.
Great, so I'm not insane! (I tried
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
I'll have to start to play golf just to find a
use for my tonsils)
Eeeck. Spare us the details! ;-)
/Steven
--
Steven Noelshttp://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source Java XMLAn Orixo Member
Read my weblog at
Bruno Dumon wrote:
Looking at the code again, I still think that all events from one
CommandManager are handled by one thread.
If you look at the code of the AbstractThreadManager:
In the method register( EventPipeline pipeline ) one PipelineRunner is
created to handle events from the given
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 15:52, Berin Loritsch wrote:
Bruno Dumon wrote:
Or maybe not so great. I'm not sure the CommandManager is well suited
for a general purpose scheduler.
What follows now should be read with a 'AFAIU' disclaimer:
All commands added to the CommandManager are
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 19:24, Berin Loritsch wrote:
Bruno Dumon wrote:
Looking at the code again, I still think that all events from one
CommandManager are handled by one thread.
If you look at the code of the AbstractThreadManager:
In the method register( EventPipeline pipeline
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Bruno Dumon wrote:
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 15:21, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Bruno Dumon wrote:
Another idea: could you try my original changed jar available here:
http://outerthought.net/~bruno/concurrent.jar
Never mind, I can reproduce the problem now on
Giacomo Pati wrote:
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Bruno Dumon wrote:
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 15:21, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Bruno Dumon wrote:
Another idea: could you try my original changed jar available here:
http://outerthought.net/~bruno/concurrent.jar
Never mind, I can reproduce the problem now on
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Bruno Dumon wrote:
On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 16:29, Giacomo Pati wrote:
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Bruno Dumon wrote:
On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 11:37, Giacomo Pati wrote:
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Reinhard Poetz wrote:
On Behalf Of Giacomo Pati
On Mon, 1
Bruno Dumon wrote:
I don't want to spend very much time on this thread anymore, but here's
the short summary:
Understandable. Again, I do want to fix the issues. Also note that it is
accessible to Cocoon committers.
I don't have any problem with the concepts behind the
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 21:09, Giacomo Pati wrote:
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Bruno Dumon wrote:
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 15:21, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Bruno Dumon wrote:
Another idea: could you try my original changed jar available here:
http://outerthought.net/~bruno/concurrent.jar
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 12:48, Giacomo Pati wrote:
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Bruno Dumon wrote:
On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 16:29, Giacomo Pati wrote:
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Bruno Dumon wrote:
On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 11:37, Giacomo Pati wrote:
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Reinhard Poetz wrote:
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Berin Loritsch wrote:
Giacomo Pati wrote:
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Bruno Dumon wrote:
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 15:21, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Bruno Dumon wrote:
Another idea: could you try my original changed jar available here:
Hi!
Just in case you didn't know:
Did you have a look at the Quartz Scheduler?
http://www.part.net/quartz.html
http://www.part.net/quartz_features.html
Perhaps it already does what you need.
It's licensed under a BSD and Apache-Style license.
Here's another one:
http://jcrontab.sourceforge.net/
I
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Andreas Hochsteger wrote:
Hi!
Just in case you didn't know:
Did you have a look at the Quartz Scheduler?
http://www.part.net/quartz.html
http://www.part.net/quartz_features.html
Perhaps it already does what you need.
It's licensed under a BSD and Apache-Style license.
On Behalf Of Giacomo Pati
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Andreas Hochsteger wrote:
Hi!
Just in case you didn't know:
Did you have a look at the Quartz Scheduler?
http://www.part.net/quartz.html
http://www.part.net/quartz_features.html
Perhaps it already does what you need.
It's
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Reinhard Poetz wrote:
On Behalf Of Giacomo Pati
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Andreas Hochsteger wrote:
Hi!
Just in case you didn't know:
Did you have a look at the Quartz Scheduler?
http://www.part.net/quartz.html
http://www.part.net/quartz_features.html
On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 11:37, Giacomo Pati wrote:
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Reinhard Poetz wrote:
On Behalf Of Giacomo Pati
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Andreas Hochsteger wrote:
Hi!
Just in case you didn't know:
Did you have a look at the Quartz Scheduler?
From: Bruno Dumon
On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 11:37, Giacomo Pati wrote:
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Reinhard Poetz wrote:
On Behalf Of Giacomo Pati
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Andreas Hochsteger wrote:
Hi!
Just in case you didn't know:
Did you have a look at the Quartz
Giacomo Pati [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
snip/
First, if you look at the Cornerstone Scheduler you'll see
that the ability to define repeated tasks are somehow
limited. Business apps can easily request administration
tasks to be run twice a day on work days. To define this with
the
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Hunsberger, Peter wrote:
Giacomo Pati [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
snip/
First, if you look at the Cornerstone Scheduler you'll see
that the ability to define repeated tasks are somehow
limited. Business apps can easily request administration
tasks to be run twice a
Giacomo Pati [EMAIL PROTECTED] asks:
I did this once upon a time, I think in C code. As I recall it's
basically the equivalent of building a Map of tasks and the
calculated
delta time until they need to be executed next and then using the
minimum of these deltas. I don't think it's
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Bruno Dumon wrote:
On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 11:37, Giacomo Pati wrote:
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Reinhard Poetz wrote:
On Behalf Of Giacomo Pati
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Andreas Hochsteger wrote:
Hi!
Just in case you didn't know:
Did you have a
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Reinhard Poetz wrote:
From: Bruno Dumon
On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 11:37, Giacomo Pati wrote:
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Reinhard Poetz wrote:
On Behalf Of Giacomo Pati
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Andreas Hochsteger wrote:
Hi!
Just in case
On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 16:29, Giacomo Pati wrote:
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Bruno Dumon wrote:
On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 11:37, Giacomo Pati wrote:
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Reinhard Poetz wrote:
On Behalf Of Giacomo Pati
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Andreas Hochsteger wrote:
Hi!
On Sat, 2003-08-30 at 15:20, Giacomo Pati wrote:
Is someone on the Doug Lea list (if there is any) to report this?
I got an answer from him, he provided me with a slightly edited change:
protected synchronized void workerDone(Worker w) {
threads_.remove(w);
if (--poolSize_ == 0
On Sat, 2003-08-30 at 17:24, Bruno Dumon wrote:
On Sat, 2003-08-30 at 15:20, Giacomo Pati wrote:
snip/
I like the way how the Cornerstone Scheduler recently integrated by
Carsten more than the CommandManager way because of its
componentisation. Still, I like to see a Scheduler as a single
On Sun, 31 Aug 2003, Bruno Dumon wrote:
On Sat, 2003-08-30 at 17:24, Bruno Dumon wrote:
On Sat, 2003-08-30 at 15:20, Giacomo Pati wrote:
snip/
I like the way how the Cornerstone Scheduler recently integrated by
Carsten more than the CommandManager way because of its
componentisation.
On Sun, 2003-08-31 at 20:38, Giacomo Pati wrote:
On Sun, 31 Aug 2003, Bruno Dumon wrote:
On Sat, 2003-08-30 at 17:24, Bruno Dumon wrote:
On Sat, 2003-08-30 at 15:20, Giacomo Pati wrote:
snip/
I like the way how the Cornerstone Scheduler recently integrated by
Carsten more than
On Sun, 31 Aug 2003, Bruno Dumon wrote:
On Sun, 2003-08-31 at 20:38, Giacomo Pati wrote:
First, if you look at the Cornerstone Scheduler you'll see that the
ability to define repeated tasks are somehow limited. Business apps can
easily request administration tasks to be run twice a day
Giacomo Pati wrote:
First, if you look at the Cornerstone Scheduler you'll see that the
ability to define repeated tasks are somehow limited. Business apps can
easily request administration tasks to be run twice a day on work days.
To define this with the Cornerstone Scheduler you'll need to
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 10:18:40PM +0200, Bruno Dumon wrote:
...
[on bug http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18131]
...
ok, 10 minutes later now, got an idea:
if you add the following code before the closing bracket of the
PooledExecutor.workerDone(...) method, then it --seems
Jeff Turner dijo:
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 10:18:40PM +0200, Bruno Dumon wrote:
...
[on bug http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18131]
...
ok, 10 minutes later now, got an idea:
if you add the following code before the closing bracket of the
PooledExecutor.workerDone(...)
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, Bruno Dumon wrote:
On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 19:55, Giacomo Pati wrote:
if you add the following code before the closing bracket of the
PooledExecutor.workerDone(...) method, then it --seems to-- work:
if (!shutdown_) {
if (poolSize_ maximumPoolSize_) {
On Sat, 2003-08-30 at 15:20, Giacomo Pati wrote:
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, Bruno Dumon wrote:
On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 19:55, Giacomo Pati wrote:
if you add the following code before the closing bracket of the
PooledExecutor.workerDone(...) method, then it --seems to-- work:
if
On Thu, 2003-08-28 at 08:12, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Hi,
as several of you have already pointed out, a 2.1.1 release seems
to make sense.
I can make a release next week, but I really would like to have the
scheduling (CommandManager) problem fixed in the release. Is anyone
working
Have a look at this thread:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-devm=106189194527050w=2
and this bug
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18131
Now, it seems that the CommandManager is not working in all environments.
In my it's not working but I don't have the shutdown
On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 15:35, Berin Loritsch wrote:
Bruno Dumon wrote:
On Thu, 2003-08-28 at 08:12, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Hi,
as several of you have already pointed out, a 2.1.1 release seems
to make sense.
I can make a release next week, but I really would like to have the
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, Berin Loritsch wrote:
Bruno Dumon wrote:
On Thu, 2003-08-28 at 08:12, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Hi,
as several of you have already pointed out, a 2.1.1 release seems
to make sense.
I can make a release next week, but I really would like to have the
scheduling
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, Bruno Dumon wrote:
For me it works with Linux/Sun jdk 1.4.2, it doesn't work with 1.3.1.
For Carsten it doesn't work with Windows/jdk 1.4 either. I've done all
my testing with the Jetty which ships with Cocoon.
I've added some println's here and there and it appears
On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 19:55, Giacomo Pati wrote:
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, Bruno Dumon wrote:
For me it works with Linux/Sun jdk 1.4.2, it doesn't work with 1.3.1.
For Carsten it doesn't work with Windows/jdk 1.4 either. I've done all
my testing with the Jetty which ships with Cocoon.
I've
On Thu, 28 Aug 2003, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Hi,
as several of you have already pointed out, a 2.1.1 release seems
to make sense.
I can make a release next week, but I really would like to have the
scheduling (CommandManager) problem fixed in the release. Is anyone
working already on it?
53 matches
Mail list logo
