Hi all,
there is a request [1] for [configuration] to mark the packages of
certain dependencies in the OSGi manifest Import-Package header as
optional. [configuration] has some optional dependencies to other
Commons libraries; they are marked as optional in the pom, but this
information is no
Hi,
build worked for me with Java 1.5 and 1.6 on Windows 7. However, I found
the following problems:
- commons-email-1.3.jar from the binary distribution does not contain
the license and NOTICE files in its META-INF folder.
- The clirr report contains 29 errors. I did not follow discussions
+1
I get a Java HeapSpace error in a test case when building with Java 1.5,
but ISTR that I had a similar issue for the 1.4 release, so this is
probably not an issue. Otherwise everything is fine.
Oliver
Am 22.05.2012 09:00, schrieb Stefan Bodewig:
Hi all,
I'd like to release Compress 1.4.
Am 03.06.2012 15:56, schrieb Gary Gregory:
I use http://wiki.apache.org/commons/UsingNexus
Gary
On Jun 3, 2012, at 4:25, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
Hi
I am trying to make an RC release of Commons Imaging, and according to
http://commons.apache.org/releases/prepare.html the command which is
mea
Maven and ant builds work fine on Windows 7 with JDK 1.6. Artifacts and
site look good.
+1
Oliver
Am 13.06.2012 00:33, schrieb Gary Gregory:
Hello All:
This is a VOTE to release Commons IO 2.4-RC2.
Changes since RC1:
- Fix a bug in the new code for IO-326: Add new FileUtils.sizeOf[Directory
Am 19.06.2012 20:50, schrieb sebb:
Several components don't appear to have created GA tags for their releases.
Normally when a release vote succeeds, the successful tag is copied to
a new tag without the RCn suffix.
For example, if the successful release vote was based on
commons-xyz-1.6_RC3
Am 20.06.2012 00:18, schrieb sebb:
On 19 June 2012 21:11, wrote:
Author: oheger
Date: Tue Jun 19 20:11:15 2012
New Revision: 1351831
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1351831&view=rev
Log:
Created tag for Configuration 1.8 release.
Added:
commons/proper/configuration/tags/CONFIGURATIO
Am 21.06.2012 18:36, schrieb sebb:
On 21 June 2012 17:18, sebb wrote:
On 20 June 2012 20:25, Oliver Heger wrote:
Am 20.06.2012 00:18, schrieb sebb:
On 19 June 2012 21:11, wrote:
Author: oheger
Date: Tue Jun 19 20:11:15 2012
New Revision: 1351831
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev
Hi,
there is a request [1] to publish a release of [configuration] which is
compatible with the newest version of [lang]. This really makes sense, I
am myself in a situation where I have to include [lang] in two versions
(2.x and 3.x) due to the dependency to [configuration]. Unfortunately,
s
Am 24.06.2012 03:05, schrieb sebb:
On 23 June 2012 23:00, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 6/17/12 2:20 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 17/06/2012 16:26, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 6/17/12 1:13 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 17/06/2012 08:49, Phil Steitz wrote:
Looks like only the relatively trivial POOL-220 and POOL
+1
All looks good.
Oliver
Am 17.07.2012 14:08, schrieb Simone Tripodi:
Hi all guys,
I am opening the current [VOTE] thread to release Apache
commons-dbutils-1.5 based on RC2.
Release Notes:
http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/dbutils/1.5/RC2/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
Tag:
https://s
Is there any relation or overlap to [configuration]?
Depending on your concrete requirements, this is probably over-sized.
But maybe a source of inspiration?
Oliver
Am 22.07.2012 10:00, schrieb Elijah Zupancic:
Thanks!
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 11:54 PM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
Just tracked C
at 4:49 PM, Oliver Heger
wrote:
Is there any relation or overlap to [configuration]?
Depending on your concrete requirements, this is probably over-sized. But
maybe a source of inspiration?
Oliver
Am 22.07.2012 10:00, schrieb Elijah Zupancic:
Thanks!
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 11:54 PM, Simo
Am 22.07.2012 21:01, schrieb Ted Dunning:
I don't believe that there are any commons math algorithms that would
benefit from execution in a Hadoop map-reduce style. The issue is that
iterative algorithms are essentially incompatible with the very large
startup costs of map-reduce programs under
ation portion. Are there any plans to support YAML?
Thanks,
-Elijah
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Oliver Heger
wrote:
Hi Simo,
Am 22.07.2012 17:54, schrieb Simone Tripodi:
Good point Oliver,
I honestly didn't think about [configuration], please apologize! since
[chain] already had a
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 9:43 PM, Oliver Heger
wrote:
Am 23.07.2012 09:00, schrieb Simone Tripodi:
Good morning all,
so I continue proposing the already proposed roadmap: let's add the
façade APIs for the [chain] configuration stuff, adapt th
Build works fine on Windows 7 with a JDK 1.6 and Java-1.5 compatibility
profile. Artifacts look good.
There are some issues with the site:
- There is indeed a number of findbugs and pmd warnings. I trust you
that you already fixed many problematic ones. All these MALICIOUS_CODE
warnings are pr
Slightly off-topic:
Do you think the following approach could work: Consider there is a
central component - e.g. [flatfile] in sandbox - which implements
parsers for various text-base formats like YAML, JSON, CSV, ... and a
generic mechanism for transforming the parsed data into XML SAX events
ople.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Oliver Heger
wrote:
Slightly off-topic:
Do you think the following approach could work: Consider there is a
central
component - e.g.
There is a checkstyle warning about double-checked locking in method
DynamicCombinedConfiguration.getCurrentConfig(). Indeed, the
double-check locking idiom is used, however, there is a comment saying
that this safe due to the usage of a ConcurrentMap.
This may be true, but I wonder whether it
would catch someone's eye.
Ralph
Thanks for clarifying. I added a suppression in the Checkstyle
configuration so that this warning will not pop up again.
Oliver
On Jul 29, 2012, at 12:40 PM, Oliver Heger wrote:
There is a checkstyle warning about double-checked locking in m
Just a heads up: I plan to get out a 1.9 release with what we currently
have in trunk soon.
Then I would like to switch to 2.0-SNAPSHOT in trunk, mainly to update
the [lang] dependency to 3.x (which is a binary incompatible change).
This has been requested multiple times. Therefore, it would b
Am 31.07.2012 21:30, schrieb Oliver Heger:
Just a heads up: I plan to get out a 1.9 release with what we currently
have in trunk soon.
Then I would like to switch to 2.0-SNAPSHOT in trunk, mainly to update
the [lang] dependency to 3.x (which is a binary incompatible change).
This has been
/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Oliver Heger
wrote:
Am 31.07.2012 21:30, schrieb Oliver Heger:
Just a heads up: I plan to get out a 1.9 release with what we currently
have in trunk soon.
Then I would
This is a vote to release Apache Commons Configuration 1.9 based on the
first release candidate.
Tag:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/configuration/tags/CONFIGURATION_1_9RC1/
Site:
http://people.apache.org/~oheger/configuration-1.9rc1/
Binaries:
https://repository.apache.org/con
+1
Oliver
Am 16.08.2012 22:09, schrieb Oliver Heger:
This is a vote to release Apache Commons Configuration 1.9 based on the
first release candidate.
Tag:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/configuration/tags/CONFIGURATION_1_9RC1/
Site:
http://people.apache.org/~oheger
configuration files (which is generated by JavaCC) and define its
state transition graph. They have changed because the parser now
supports comments in configuration files.
Thanks for the review.
Oliver
Thank you,
Gary
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Oliver Heger
wrote:
This is a vote to
Am 17.08.2012 23:58, schrieb sebb:
On 17 August 2012 21:02, Oliver Heger wrote:
Hi Gary,
Am 17.08.2012 21:19, schrieb Gary Gregory:
Hi All,
Are the Clirr warning about constant value changes from 1.8 be an issue
for
existing clients?
Or, are the values only used by [configuration] itself
er
On Aug 18, 2012, at 11:13, Oliver Heger wrote:
Am 17.08.2012 23:58, schrieb sebb:
On 17 August 2012 21:02, Oliver Heger wrote:
Hi Gary,
Am 17.08.2012 21:19, schrieb Gary Gregory:
Hi All,
Are the Clirr warning about constant value changes from 1.8 be an issue
for
existing clients?
Or, are
Just a question about our current documentation about cutting releases:
[1] mentions that symbolic links should be created for the
distributions. I think this is outdated. Can anybody confirm this? I
will then update the instructions accordingly.
Thanks
Oliver
[1] http://wiki.apache.org/comm
Am 20.08.2012 18:35, schrieb sebb:
On 20 August 2012 13:32, Oliver Heger wrote:
Just a question about our current documentation about cutting releases:
[1] mentions that symbolic links should be created for the distributions. I
think this is outdated. Can anybody confirm this? I will then
Am 20.08.2012 16:08, schrieb Gilles Sadowski:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 02:32:25PM +0200, Oliver Heger wrote:
Just a question about our current documentation about cutting releases:
[1] mentions that symbolic links should be created for the
distributions. I think this is outdated. Can anybody
Am 20.08.2012 16:54, schrieb Ralph Goers:
Yes - and I didn't get a chance to do it last night. Please give me another 24
hrs.
Ralph
Sure, no problem.
Oliver
On Aug 20, 2012, at 4:43 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
Oops I meant Ralph not Sebb!
Gary
On Aug 20, 2012, at 7:38, Oliver
The vote to release Commons Configuration based on RC1 has passed with
the +1 votes from following people:
Gary Gregory
Phil Steitz
Oliver Heger
All votes are binding, no other votes were cast.
Thanks to all who reviewed the artifacts.
Oliver
Am 16.08.2012 22:09, schrieb Oliver Heger:
This
Am 21.08.2012 00:11, schrieb Gilles Sadowski:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 07:58:52PM +0200, Oliver Heger wrote:
Am 20.08.2012 16:08, schrieb Gilles Sadowski:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 02:32:25PM +0200, Oliver Heger wrote:
Just a question about our current documentation about cutting releases:
[1
://commons.apache.org/configuration/download_configuration.cgi
(Please remember to verify the provided checksums and/or signatures
after you have downloaded a distribution!)
Oliver Heger
on behalf of the Apache Commons Team
-
To
In [lang] there are a few places where Class.forName(String, boolean,
ClassLoader) is used to load classes dynamically (e.g. in
ClassUtils.getClass()).
According to the book "OSGi in action" (written by guys from the Felix
community) it is recommended to use ClassLoader.loadClass() instead. Th
Am 01.09.2012 19:11, schrieb Gary Gregory:
Hi All:
Checkstyle can report warnings like:
'+' should be on the previous line.
FWIW, I'm not fond of this particular checkstyle rule.
Does anyone know if the Eclipse formatter can be made to behave like this?
I've not found such setting in the gian
Hi all,
the pom was updated to make 2.0-SNAPSHOT the current development
version. This means we are free to implement major changes without
having to enforce binary backwards compatibility.
The question is: What are the goals for version 2.0? I would recommend
to define a clear focus so that
Am 08.09.2012 03:44, schrieb sebb:
On 7 September 2012 20:46, Oliver Heger wrote:
Hi all,
the pom was updated to make 2.0-SNAPSHOT the current development version.
This means we are free to implement major changes without having to enforce
binary backwards compatibility.
BC breakage will
Currently XMLConfiguration allows setting multiple values for an
attribute node. (This is possible through the Configuration interface,
but of course not supported by XML.) When saving the configuration it
tries to encode the list as a comma-separated string. On reloading, such
strings are spli
with attribute splitting and delimiter parsing needs to go away.
Ralph
On Sep 7, 2012, at 12:46 PM, Oliver Heger wrote:
Hi all,
the pom was updated to make 2.0-SNAPSHOT the current development version. This
means we are free to implement major changes without having to enforce binary
back
Ralph
On Sep 8, 2012, at 8:11 AM, Oliver Heger wrote:
Currently XMLConfiguration allows setting multiple values for an attribute
node. (This is possible through the Configuration interface, but of course not
supported by XML.) When saving the configuration it tries to encode the list as
a comma
ation] who voted
against removing these tags.
Oliver
Benedikt
2012/9/7 Oliver Heger :
Hi all,
the pom was updated to make 2.0-SNAPSHOT the current development version.
This means we are free to implement major changes without having to enforce
binary backwards compatibility.
The question is:
Am 09.09.2012 14:26, schrieb sebb:
On 8 September 2012 15:45, Oliver Heger wrote:
Am 08.09.2012 03:44, schrieb sebb:
On 7 September 2012 20:46, Oliver Heger
wrote:
Hi all,
the pom was updated to make 2.0-SNAPSHOT the current development version.
This means we are free to implement major
Build works fine with Maven and ant on Windows 7 with JDK 1.6. Artifacts
look good, site, too, except for the following very minor points (in
addition to the things Simone already discovered):
- The JIRA report is just a blank page (I think during build an
exception is thrown - maybe an incompat
Am 11.09.2012 00:08, schrieb sebb:
On 10 September 2012 20:33, Oliver Heger wrote:
Am 09.09.2012 14:26, schrieb sebb:
On 8 September 2012 15:45, Oliver Heger
wrote:
Am 08.09.2012 03:44, schrieb sebb:
On 7 September 2012 20:46, Oliver Heger
wrote:
Hi all,
the pom was updated to make
+1
The open points from the previous RC have been addressed.
BTW: The success rate of only 99.422% in the surefire report seems to be
caused by the fact that two tests in QuotedPrintableCodecTest are
skipped. Of course not an issue.
Oliver
Am 11.09.2012 14:26, schrieb Gary Gregory:
Hello A
Hi,
one limitation of the 1.x versions of [configuration] is the incomplete
support for concurrent access to Configuration objects. In version 2.0
we should try to improve this.
I have some ideas about this topic - not fully thought out - and would
like to start a discussion. Here they are (
Hi Jörg,
many thanks for your input!
Am 17.09.2012 10:01, schrieb Jörg Schaible:
Hi Oliver,
Oliver Heger wrote:
Hi,
one limitation of the 1.x versions of [configuration] is the incomplete
support for concurrent access to Configuration objects. In version 2.0
we should try to improve this
Hi Phil,
Am 18.09.2012 20:09, schrieb Phil Steitz:
On 9/17/12 12:39 PM, Oliver Heger wrote:
Hi Jörg,
many thanks for your input!
Am 17.09.2012 10:01, schrieb Jörg Schaible:
Hi Oliver,
Oliver Heger wrote:
Hi,
one limitation of the 1.x versions of [configuration] is the
incomplete
support
Am 20.09.2012 22:38, schrieb Honton, Charles:
This obviously makes the concurrency problem easier :)
Apart from this case, it would be good to agree on exactly what it
means for [configuration] to be threadsafe. Is it basically the
semantics of ConcurrentHashmap? Or are there sequencing / e
One of the pain points in the 1.x versions of [configuration] is IMHO
the implementation of FileConfiguration using inheritance over
AbstractFileConfiguration and AbstractHierarchicalFileConfiguration.
I started an attempt to work around this: The part of
AbstractFileConfiguration which deals
For [configuration] there is currently a feature request [1] to add some
data type conversion facilities. In the ticket the reporter describes an
algorithm how to construct an object of class A from input of class B by
first searching for a corresponding valueOf() method, and then - if this
fai
Hi Matt,
Am 03.10.2012 21:25, schrieb Matt Benson:
If [configuration] depends on [lang] already, presumably this new
version should depend on [lang] 3.x instead; in which case why not use
its Builder interface?
Yes, we are going to switch to [lang] 3.x. I would like to use the
Builder interfa
Hi,
in the last few days I have worked on a new approach for handling
reloading in a more generic and loosely coupled way. To get a better
base for discussion, I created some code (mainly in the reloading and
the new builder packages).
The basic idea is that reloading is no more handled by t
changes. However, there is not yet a persist
event. Could you give a use case for such a notification?
Thank you for the feedback!
Oliver
Thanks,
chas
On 10/11/12 1:09 PM, "Oliver Heger" wrote:
Hi,
in the last few days I have worked on a new approach for handling
reloading
Hi Benedikt,
Am 05.11.2012 21:04, schrieb Benedikt Ritter:
2012/11/5 Benedikt Ritter
Hi Oliver,
2012/11/5
Author: oheger
Date: Mon Nov 5 17:29:01 2012
New Revision: 1405889
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1405889&view=rev
Log:
Initial version of an immutable configuration interfa
Oliver Heger
Hi Benedikt,
Am 05.11.2012 21:04, schrieb Benedikt Ritter:
2012/11/5 Benedikt Ritter
Hi Oliver,
2012/11/5
Author: oheger
Date: Mon Nov 5 17:29:01 2012
New Revision: 1405889
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?**rev=1405889&view=rev<http://svn.apache.org/vie
Build works fine with Java 1.5 on Windows 7, artifacts and site look good.
Minor nits:
- The cobertura report shows a pretty low coverage rate.
- There is a bunch of findbugs errors; most of them are related to
encoding issues, so I guess this is nothing critical.
+1
Oliver
Am 26.11.2012 19:
Hi all,
in [configuration] [beanutils] is used to initialize properties of Java
objects defined in configuration files. This works fine as long as the
objects conform to the Java Beans specification.
Now I would like to initialize other objects, too, which implement a
fluent interface as fol
in this component
currently.
Oliver
Regards,
Benedikt
[1] http://markmail.org/thread/5zgoyid5ld7otwsv
2012/12/5 Oliver Heger
Hi all,
in [configuration] [beanutils] is used to initialize properties of Java
objects defined in configuration files. This works fine as long as the
objects
Checked build with Java 1.5 under Windows 7. Artifacts and site look good.
+1
Oliver
Am 16.12.2012 15:03, schrieb Thomas Neidhart:
Hi,
I would like to call a vote from commons-email-1.3 based on RC6.
This release candidate has the following changes compared to RC5
+) fixed Clirr errors by r
Build works fine with JDK 1.5 on Windows 7. Artifacts look good.
Some reports (checkstyle, findbugs) show errors, but this does not seem
to be problematic. Also the missing license headers in test files are no
blockers IMHO.
I am not sure about the clirr errors. There is nothing mentioned in
This seems to be a Java 1.5 problem related to generics. Build works
fine with Java 6 and 7.
As we depend on [lang] which now requires Java 1.6, I guess we have to
switch to 1.6 anyway.
Are there any objections?
Oliver
Am 18.12.2012 23:22, schrieb Continuum@vmbuild:
Online report :
http://
version: 1.6.0_30, vendor: Sun Microsystems Inc.
Java home: C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.6.0_30\jre
Default locale: de_DE, platform encoding: Cp1252
OS name: "windows 7", version: "6.1", arch: "x86", family: "windows"
Oliver
Am 19.12.2012 21:59, schrieb Oliver
Am 20.12.2012 01:23, schrieb Gilles Sadowski:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 10:10:05PM +0100, Oliver Heger wrote:
Sent the main too early: The build takes pretty long on my old
machine, and it eventually failed with two test failures:
Results :
Failed tests:
testMath753Shape142
liver Heger:
Am 20.12.2012 01:23, schrieb Gilles Sadowski:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 10:10:05PM +0100, Oliver Heger wrote:
Sent the main too early: The build takes pretty long on my old
machine, and it eventually failed with two test failures:
Results :
Failed tests:
testMath753Sha
Am 02.01.20 um 12:08 schrieb Bruno P. Kinoshita:
> Also not a user of OSGi. But I feel like it is a bug that could be reverted
> and informed in the changelog and release email?
> But not too sure if that's the best option.
> Bruno
>
> Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
>
> On Thu, 2 Jan 202
Hi Rob,
many thanks for working on the release.
I also did a check. The builds of the jar and the site were successful
with the configuration below. Artifacts and site look good.
The NOTICE file has still a copyright year of 2019; so if you re-roll
the RC, you should adapt this. Otherwise, I fou
+1
Build works fine with Java 8, artifacts and site look good.
Oliver
Am 09.03.20 um 15:55 schrieb Rob Tompkins:
> We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some significant enhancements since
> Apache Commons Configuration 2.6 was released, so I would like to release
> Apache Commons Configura
processor.
Credit:
This issue was discovered by Daniel Kalinowski of ISEC.pl Research Team
Oliver Heger
on behalf of the Apache Commons PMC
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e
The form at Mitre was just submitted, so I assume that the issue will be
visible soon.
Oliver
Am 12.03.20 um 19:18 schrieb Gary Gregory:
> Note that https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2020-1953 is not
> "live" yet.
>
> Gary
>
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at
Am 22.07.20 um 18:28 schrieb Stefan Bodewig:
> On 2020-07-22, Rob Tompkins wrote:
>
>> I’m happy to merge them….will get to them by tomorrow morning ok?
>
> TBH I'd prefer to turn them off and reject the PRs.
>
> Personally I don't see any value for our downstream users if we update
> our dep
Hi all,
once we had a discussion (it must be one or two years ago) whether
Commons could support components in other (JVM) languages, too. IIRC,
there were no strong objections, but there has never been a follow up.
For a project in Scala, I needed some limited functionality to process
command li
Resending with a different subject to potentially reach a broader audience.
Am 17.09.20 um 21:47 schrieb Oliver Heger:
> Hi all,
>
> once we had a discussion (it must be one or two years ago) whether
> Commons could support components in other (JVM) languages, too. IIRC,
> there
Hi Gilles,
Am 20.09.20 um 19:44 schrieb Gilles Sadowski:
> Hello.
>
> 2020-09-17 21:47 UTC+02:00, Oliver Heger :
>> Hi all,
>>
>> once we had a discussion (it must be one or two years ago) whether
>> Commons could support components in other (JVM) languages, t
Am 05.05.21 um 20:26 schrieb Gilles Sadowski:
Le mer. 5 mai 2021 à 18:57, Gary Gregory a écrit :
IMO the lack of +1s shows the lack of appetite to manage another component
That's certainly true.
And nobody is forced to do anything.
When the other CM spin-offs started, there was only _one
Am 05.05.21 um 21:54 schrieb Gilles Sadowski:
Le mer. 5 mai 2021 à 20:33, Oliver Heger
a écrit :
Am 05.05.21 um 20:26 schrieb Gilles Sadowski:
Le mer. 5 mai 2021 à 18:57, Gary Gregory a écrit :
IMO the lack of +1s shows the lack of appetite to manage another component
That&#
Am 30.06.21 um 14:41 schrieb Gary Gregory:
On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 4:24 PM Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Hi
I'm sorry, but I'm unable to see what would or would not work for the
people who chimed in. Short of calling for a vote, lets try with a poll
that could show whether there is some sort of so
+1
There are a few checkstyle errors and some problems reported by
findbugs, but these are certainly no show stoppers.
Oliver
Phil Steitz schrieb:
Hopefully all problems with JDK versions and the site build have now
been resolved. As previously discussed, the only difference between
1.3 and
In order to change the minimum required JDK to 1.4 I modified pom.xml. I
was hoping to get rid of all the XML-related dependencies, but obviously
this is not so easy.
When dropping the Xerces-dependency I get a bunch of test failures:
- Many of them are caused by tests for DatabaseConfiguration
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Oliver Heger
wrote:
In order to change the minimum required JDK to 1.4 I modified pom.xml. I was
hoping to get rid of all the XML-related dependencies, but obviously this is
not so easy.
When dropping the Xerces-dependency I get a bunch of test failures:
- Many
Xerces is required on JDK 1.4 for schema validation.
Oliver
On Jan 2, 2010, at 12:22 PM, Oliver Heger wrote:
In order to change the minimum required JDK to 1.4 I modified pom.xml. I was
hoping to get rid of all the XML-related dependencies, but obviously this is
not so easy.
When dr
Am 05.01.2010 00:55, schrieb Paul Libbrecht:
Hello developers,
I took a little time to try to rebuild the site so as to answer the
question of Oliver Heger on the commons-users mailing-list and it turned
out to be less painful then expected.
I uploaded a preview of the rebuild at:
http
+1
Build works fine on Windows 7 with JDK 1.5 and 1.6. Artifacts look good.
Minor nit: There are many findbugs errors, but I have not checked them
in detail. Probably not a blocker.
Oliver
Am 18.01.2010 22:24, schrieb henrib:
Since there was only one +0 vote pending documentation updates,
Tested build successfully under Windows 7 with JDKs 1.4 and 1.5 (for
version 1.3) and 1.6 (for version 1.4).
I was not able to generate the site because for both versions and all
JDKs it hangs after saying "[INFO] Generating "Dependencies" report.",
but maybe this is a local problem or it just
Am 09.02.2010 14:47, schrieb Phil Steitz:
Oliver Heger wrote:
Tested build successfully under Windows 7 with JDKs 1.4 and 1.5 (for
version 1.3) and 1.6 (for version 1.4).
I was not able to generate the site because for both versions and all
JDKs it hangs after saying "[INFO] Gener
Just wanted to test the RC, but I get the following test failure:
---
Test set: org.apache.commons.lang.time.DateUtilsTest
---
Tests run: 33, Fai
+1
Oliver
Am 22.02.2010 01:37, schrieb Niall Pemberton:
There have been a couple of ichanges since RC2 - fixing a DateUtils
test and ignoring Exception rather than Throwable in an Enum change.
[ ] +1 Yes go ahead an release based on RC3
[ ] -1 No, because...
Lang 2.5 RC3 is available for revi
This is a bit strange. The test that is now failing was added because
there was a bug report against [configuration] that was originally
caused by a problem in [lang] 2.4. In [lang] 2.5 (and also in the
current trunk) the problem was fixed, so after switching the dependency
to version 2.5 the t
Am 18.03.2010 08:47, schrieb Bill Barker:
--
From: "Oliver Heger"
Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 2:20 PM
To: "Commons Developers List"
Subject: Re: [g...@vmgump]: Project commons-configuration-test (in
module apache-commons
Am 20.03.2010 08:02, schrieb Bill Barker:
--
From: "Oliver Heger"
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2010 1:43 PM
To: "Commons Developers List"
Subject: Re: [g...@vmgump]: Project commons-configuration-test (in
module apache-
The only minor nit I found is that in the header of RELEASE-NOTES.txt it
says "Version 2.0" instead of "Version 2.0.1". Not a blocker, so +1 from me.
Oliver
Am 31.03.2010 19:40, schrieb henrib:
RC1 was voted out due to packaging errors, RC2 was using a non-standard pom,
RC3 is out.
JEXL 2.0.
Am 23.04.2010 20:36, schrieb Santhosh Kumar:
It is a very common requirement that some configuration value changes across
environments (dev/qa/stg/prd etc). I went through the documentation but didn't
find any feature to do this in the Configuration (please correct me if you know
a way to do t
It has been a long time since the last release of [configuration], and
their have been numerous fixes in the mean time. So I think we really
ought to get out Configuration 1.7.
The dependency to [vfs] 2.0-SNAPSHOT is a blocker, so this would have to
be released first. What is the status here?
on donating the editor as well, but the author left the
company and wasn't going to have time to work on it here so I've held back on
that for now.
This would certainly be a good addition. But it could also be added to a
later release.
Oliver
Ralph
On May 29, 2010, at 7:36 AM, Oli
Does anybody have an idea what is going on here? It seems that the tests
related to XML processing are broken.
Oliver
Am 26.06.2010 15:06, schrieb Gump:
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/
Am 28.06.2010 12:09, schrieb sebb:
On 28/06/2010, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Le 28/06/2010 10:21, Stefan Bodewig a écrit :
commons-configuration's POM lists dependencies on Xerces 2.6.2 and
xml-apis 1.0.b2 - at least the Xerces version is pretty old by now.
Inside Gump you get the trunk of Xerce
Am 30.06.2010 13:28, schrieb Stefan Bodewig:
On 2010-06-26, Oliver Heger wrote:
Does anybody have an idea what is going on here? It seems that the
tests related to XML processing are broken.
Mea culpa.
It seems to be working again now. For a few days Gump was broken and
really provided the
1 - 100 of 1045 matches
Mail list logo
