On 19 February 2012 14:55, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>> Unlike Commons, you have to be granted permission to commit at other
>> projects at the ASF and each of them have their own PMC and build their own
>> communities. Commons is a single community and thus it makes sense for
>> developers to be
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> On Feb 19, 2012, at 5:12 AM, Simone Tripodi
> wrote:
>
> >> I'm +1 as well. A common style would make development easier. I think
> configuration files should be downloadable from commons website. Maybe that
> will spare some "good patch bu
> Unlike Commons, you have to be granted permission to commit at other projects
> at the ASF and each of them have their own PMC and build their own
> communities. Commons is a single community and thus it makes sense for
> developers to be able to easily switch between sub projects. Having
>
On Feb 19, 2012, at 5:12 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>> I'm +1 as well. A common style would make development easier. I think
>> configuration files should be downloadable from commons website. Maybe that
>> will spare some "good patch but there are some style issues..." replies to
>> new contr
On Feb 19, 2012, at 12:50 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
>
> Am 18.02.2012 um 19:06 schrieb Ralph Goers :
>
>>
>> I use IntelliJ so obviously I'd want a style that it can handle. FWIW,
>> Jetbrains provides a free license for the full product for open source
>> development or you can use the co
> I'm +1 as well. A common style would make development easier. I think
> configuration files should be downloadable from commons website. Maybe that
> will spare some "good patch but there are some style issues..." replies to
> new contributors. ;-)
>
-1 we've let each component developers the
Le 19/02/2012 09:50, Benedikt Ritter a écrit :
>
> Am 18.02.2012 um 19:06 schrieb Ralph Goers :
>
>>
>> On Feb 18, 2012, at 8:54 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>>
>>> Le 18/02/2012 17:27, Gary Gregory a écrit :
On Feb 18, 2012, at 11:00, Oliver Heger
wrote:
> Am 18.02.2012 15:25, s
Am 18.02.2012 um 19:06 schrieb Ralph Goers :
>
> On Feb 18, 2012, at 8:54 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>
>> Le 18/02/2012 17:27, Gary Gregory a écrit :
>>> On Feb 18, 2012, at 11:00, Oliver Heger
>>> wrote:
>>>
Am 18.02.2012 15:25, schrieb Ralph Goers:
>
> On Feb 18, 2012, at 3:20
On Feb 18, 2012, at 8:54 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Le 18/02/2012 17:27, Gary Gregory a écrit :
>> On Feb 18, 2012, at 11:00, Oliver Heger wrote:
>>
>>> Am 18.02.2012 15:25, schrieb Ralph Goers:
On Feb 18, 2012, at 3:20 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Le 17/02/2012 23:30, Ralph
Le 18/02/2012 17:27, Gary Gregory a écrit :
> On Feb 18, 2012, at 11:00, Oliver Heger wrote:
>
>> Am 18.02.2012 15:25, schrieb Ralph Goers:
>>>
>>> On Feb 18, 2012, at 3:20 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>>>
Le 17/02/2012 23:30, Ralph Goers a écrit :
>
> On Feb 17, 2012, at 2:18 PM, Gary
On Feb 18, 2012, at 11:00, Oliver Heger wrote:
> Am 18.02.2012 15:25, schrieb Ralph Goers:
>>
>> On Feb 18, 2012, at 3:20 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>>
>>> Le 17/02/2012 23:30, Ralph Goers a écrit :
On Feb 17, 2012, at 2:18 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>
>> That seems like way too mu
Am 18.02.2012 15:25, schrieb Ralph Goers:
On Feb 18, 2012, at 3:20 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Le 17/02/2012 23:30, Ralph Goers a écrit :
On Feb 17, 2012, at 2:18 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
That seems like way too much effort for very little benefit. In fact,
when I created the checkstyle conf
On Feb 18, 2012, at 6:12 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>
Can you have a checkstyle.xml reused that way?
>>>
>>> Not easily. If you look at how the checkstyle.xml is used in VFS you will
>>> see it is a bit of a hack. The plugin has
>>>
>>> ${vfs.parent.dir}/checkstyle.xml
>>>
>>> In
On Feb 18, 2012, at 3:20 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Le 17/02/2012 23:30, Ralph Goers a écrit :
>>
>> On Feb 17, 2012, at 2:18 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
That seems like way too much effort for very little benefit. In fact,
when I created the checkstyle configuration I started from
On Feb 18, 2012, at 6:19, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Le 17/02/2012 23:30, Ralph Goers a écrit :
>>
>> On Feb 17, 2012, at 2:18 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Ralph Goers
>>> wrote:
>>>
On Feb 17, 2012, at 1:17 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Fri, Feb
Le 17/02/2012 23:30, Ralph Goers a écrit :
>
> On Feb 17, 2012, at 2:18 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Ralph Goers
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Feb 17, 2012, at 1:17 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>>
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Ralph Goers >>> wrote:
> Real
On Feb 17, 2012, at 2:18 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Ralph Goers
> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Feb 17, 2012, at 1:17 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Ralph Goers >> wrote:
>>>
Really? I've gotten so used to putting the '{' at the end
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> On Feb 17, 2012, at 1:17 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Ralph Goers >wrote:
> >
> >> Really? I've gotten so used to putting the '{' at the end of the line
> >> that I assumed VFS was that way.
> >>
> >
> > I'
18 matches
Mail list logo
