On Feb 18, 2012, at 3:20 AM, Luc Maisonobe <luc.maison...@free.fr> wrote:
> Le 17/02/2012 23:30, Ralph Goers a écrit : >> >> On Feb 17, 2012, at 2:18 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: >>>> >>>> That seems like way too much effort for very little benefit. In fact, >>>> when I created the checkstyle configuration I started from the one used by >>>> Commons Configuration and then tweaked it to shut up a bunch of the >>>> "errors" I didn't care about and that seemed to have been the convention of >>>> the existing code base. I'd prefer that all of commons use the same >>>> checkstyle configuration. >>>> >>> >>> +1, that would be great, we could put it in the parent POM and be done with >>> it once and for all. > > Are we sure all components use the same style ? > The checkstyle.xml file for [math] origin has evolved its own way, > partly when the mantissa library has been merged. I am pretty sure it is > not compatible with other ones. That was kind of the point for using a single checkstyle config. Why should the various projects use different rules? Ralph --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
