:47 AM, Brian LeRoux b...@brian.io wrote:
Good feedback: thx Ian and Carlos. Just pushed an update.
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 6:46 AM, Ian Clelland iclell...@google.com
wrote:
MIssed this earlier, but here goes:
If you are working with a `cordova` generated project then you can
install using
.
Some extra comments are inline IN ALL CAPS.
---
layout: post
author:
name: Brian LeRoux
url: https://twitter.com/brianleroux
title: Apache Cordova 3.0
date: 2013-07-19 15:45:04 -5
categories: blog releases
published: false
tags: news releases MAJOR
---
# Cordova 3.0 Released
of 2013-07-19-cordova-3.md goes in
2013-07-08-cordova-has-a-blog.md
--Carlos
On Thursday, July 18, 2013, Brian LeRoux wrote:
Fuck, its here:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cordova/site/www/_posts/
svn. I tell ya.
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Brian LeRoux b
does anyone else experience this?
Brooks.
Repository: cordova-site
Description
---
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cordova/site/www/_posts/2013-07-08-cordova-has-a-blog.md
Diffs
-
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12742/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Brian LeRoux
Pls review all:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cordova/site/www/_posts/2013-07-08-cordova-has-a-blog.md
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Anis KADRI anis.ka...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
The CLI treats the platform code as a build
/css/master.css )
Need to install lessc I did it with npm
npm install -g less
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Brian LeRoux b...@brian.io wrote:
think it was a missing ref to less in the gemfile ---
brian.ler...@gmail.com at any rate =)
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Carlos Santana
I'll do a draft and send a review out sometime this afternoon.
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote:
I've been hit with some pretty unplanned baby duties today, so don't expect
to have much time today to work. I would like to urge someone to take
of these?
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 6:52 PM, Brian LeRoux b...@brian.io
wrote:
go go go
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Steven Gill
stevengil...@gmail.com
wrote:
Any blockers on me mass tagging the plugins?
using CLI, then use upgrade guide to merge
your existing cordova project with new 3.0.0 generated project.
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 2:16 PM, Brian LeRoux b...@brian.io wrote:
I'll do a draft and send a review out sometime this afternoon.
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Andrew Grieve
So, we're not out of the woods on 3.0 just yet but I'm casting some
thoughts forward I'd like to propose we look at adding some hardening
time to our release cadence next year.
My proposal:
3.1 Sept
3.2 Oct
3.3 Nov
3.4 Jan
3.5 Feb
3.6 Mar
3.7 Apr
3.8
driving to PDX for most
of tomorrow and will most likely unable to tag until late afternoon.
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Brian LeRoux b...@brian.io wrote:
Awesome, thanks Steve. I'm thinking we tag 3 proper tmrw for
everything. (Pending group consensus of course.)
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013
I'm not in favor of of this. The basic flows work. There should be
visibility into these perceived issues in the form of blog post.
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 10:43 AM, David Lewis lewi...@gmail.com wrote:
This is why I'm upgrading from 2.5 to 2.9 now.
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Andrew
No need to apologize. These labeling semantics are unnecessary and not
at all hubris. Wait if you want. We'll just keep shipping code that
constantly improves over the last release.
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 10:50 AM, David Pfahler da...@excellenteasy.com wrote:
Unfortunately, any .0 release of
to be clear about the state of a release, not
the user's to have to be constantly wary.
Also, known-issue visibility in blog post form does sound good.
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Brian LeRoux b...@brian.io wrote:
I'm not in favor of of this. The basic flows work. There should
go go go
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Steven Gill stevengil...@gmail.com wrote:
Any blockers on me mass tagging the plugins?
Yar
On Jul 16, 2013 5:23 PM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote:
SGTM as well.
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 8:02 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote:
SGTM!
On 7/16/13 4:59 PM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote:
For https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-4222
I added this note
Oh this rules, thanks so much Ian, I'll add to those beers!
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 9:33 AM, Michael Brooks
mich...@michaelbrooks.ca wrote:
Beautiful Ian!
This has been on my backlog of tasks, so I'm happy to see that you've
spearheaded it.
I'll give the completion and shot and see how it
I think all of this makes good sense but will have to land sometime
post 3.0 as that we're pretty much in the final stretch now anyhow.
Which APIs are you specifically proposing we change?
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 9:14 AM, Max Woghiren m...@chromium.org wrote:
On Android, all Cordova plugins
happen *for* 3.0, before
people actually start using the plugins all bundled in one package. It's
not a giant change.
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 1:16 PM, Brian LeRoux b...@brian.io wrote:
I think all of this makes good sense but will have to land sometime
post 3.0 as that we're pretty much
ignored and not maintained, no surprise. Moving to node won't eliminate
windows neglect but should mitigate the issue of unix fixes not making
their way into windows scripts. Don't think it's super high priority to
get done soon, though.
On 7/12/13 10:27 AM, Brian LeRoux b...@brian.io wrote
, Brian LeRoux b...@brian.io wrote:
In an earlier incarnation of Cordova the CLI had a a --recipe flag. That
could be modified to accept a path or a Git repo. This would retain the
existing and fulfill Ray's use case.
Thoughts?
On Jul 12, 2013 7:34 AM, Lucas Holmquist lholm...@redhat.com
Indeed you did. I was responding to Michal.
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 8:48 AM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote:
Brian, The discussion is in the mailing list as I mentioned, we can
continue there.
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 8:45 AM, Brian LeRoux b...@brian.io wrote:
Well, hold on, mailing list
I don't mind this but it seems like a lot of work to release artifacts
for...who? End users we want to encourage to use the tooling golden
path for creating projects, working w/ plugins, etc.
If anything I'd rather we *only* distribute cordova-cli as the
canonical repo and entry point for usage
Most of the scripts themselves shell out to things like adb or
whatever so putting another layer of scripting abstraction over top
feels unnecessary (to me). I suppose the benefit is that on Android
we'd have less code?
Are there other benefits?
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 6:55 PM, Andrew Grieve
already uses
node for those anyways..
On 7/12/13 9:47 AM, Brian LeRoux b...@brian.io wrote:
Most of the scripts themselves shell out to things like adb or
whatever so putting another layer of scripting abstraction over top
feels unnecessary (to me). I suppose the benefit is that on Android
we'd
at 12:49 PM, Brian LeRoux b...@brian.io wrote:
I agree we should clearly scope what coho is for as a group and get
that solid before charging ahead and making it central to automations.
(Nobody here is against automation but I think the issue Joe brings up
is that we like small clearly defined
Given the only reason is compatibility w/ the DOM spec, which this has
little to nothing to do with, I see no reason why we would add that
code.
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote:
See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3785
Thoughts?
I rescind my last comment. Given http://issues.cordova.io/3786 it
looks like he wants compat at the event object on our custom events
which makes sense. We should have this level of compatibility on our
event code!
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Brian LeRoux b...@brian.io wrote:
Given
Hey John, that is indeed the plan! First step was 'plugin breakout
release' aka PBR which we have mostly now achieved. The cordova.js
file is still generated for each platform but the surface for
differences is now isolated to individual plugin repos rather than in
the ball of mud that we sling
move that method from cordova-js and into
cordova-platform repositories, cordova-js will always need changes between
platforms.
On 7/12/13 3:30 PM, Brian LeRoux b...@brian.io wrote:
Hey John, that is indeed the plan! First step was 'plugin breakout
release' aka PBR which we have mostly now
Sure, YOLO, we could use a plugin so that spoofing concerns are not.
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 4:08 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote:
And then what? Selecting `exec` method based on user agent string?
On 7/12/13 3:56 PM, Brian LeRoux b...@brian.io wrote:
Yes, but it could all live in one
at 2:56 PM, Brian LeRoux b...@brian.io wrote:
I'd say we should hold off on this particular work. The schema is
changing pretty rapidly and this would just fall out of sync. That and
there is pretty strong argument brewing to move to JSON.
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Carlos Santana csantan
config.tylerdurden
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote:
Not quite deprecation I suppose, but fight club ;) (we know how this one
ends)
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Brian LeRoux b...@brian.io wrote:
Well, nothing saying we can't support two formats and let
added to the wiki
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 8:34 AM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=803414
/simonmacdonald
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 3:32 PM, Brian LeRoux b...@brian.io wrote:
Shouldn't happen! Lets keep the dev mode stuff on a branch then to
master when the tests pass: PLS!
We should backlog this for 3.1 and rip it out if we can't get it fixed
before the week is done. Windows support for 3.0 is rather important
and this is a blocker / showstopper if every there was one.
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Wargo, John john.wa...@sap.com wrote:
I'm not sure I
to create a new
ecosystem of file-based tools. Young Hahn and Dave Cole join Jen
Simmons to
explain.
Quote of the day: Shame on you for setting deadlines on Fridays, you
don't
love developers
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Brian LeRoux b...@brian.io wrote:
ya for sure, its
Having just explored Bower for Topcoat I can say w/ confidence its
simply not ready for primetime as a package manager. You can't remove
an entry from its registry yet! (That and, its slow.)
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote:
Using Bower instead of npm
to strongly encourage developers to
upgrade b/c we think its a far better development experience.
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 2:53 PM, David Pfahler da...@excellenteasy.com wrote:
What about support for 2.x? They'll still need plugins.
—
Sent from mobile
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 11:49 PM, Brian LeRoux b
Totally awesome idea. I've had this sitting in my inbox for a week so
I decided to just use it as a stub in the wiki. Please edit!
http://wiki.apache.org/cordova/WorkingWithThree
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 1:05 PM, Steven Gill stevengil...@gmail.com wrote:
Great idea
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at
Its a good point about ios6+. I can't imagine anyone is developing for
anything less (other than corodva@=2.9 legacy support).
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Michal Mocny mmo...@chromium.org wrote:
To answer the question of why we may want to leave it out:
- If you are using remote
,
Tyler
On Jul 2, 2013, at 3:22 PM, Brian LeRoux b...@brian.io wrote:
Its a good point about ios6+. I can't imagine anyone is developing
for
anything less (other than corodva@=2.9 legacy support).
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Michal Mocny mmo...@chromium.org
wrote
I'm not convinced the device namespace thing is actually helpful for
our larger goals at all. Its essentially user agent detection on
steroids. Now, ua detection has been vilified even though it was quite
useful for polyfilling messed up phones. Given we now have the
`./merges` folder I'm less
this is helpful: thank you!
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote:
To quickly clone all plugin repos:
./cordova-coho/coho repo-clone -r plugins
ya for sure, its basically a jekyll like clone now
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 9:05 PM, Carlos Santana csantan...@gmail.com wrote:
Brian you mean port the whole site to JekyII?
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 12:03 AM, Brian LeRoux b...@brian.io wrote:
+1 lets port the whole template over
On Jun 24
July 19. In the past we've aimed at the last tues of every month.
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 8:34 AM, Marcel Kinard cmarc...@gmail.com wrote:
Sounds like I missed something. What firm date?
On Jun 24, 2013, at 2:04 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
Unlike other releases, 3.0 is the only
The latter yes. The former is a problem for the downstream distributions.
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Benn Mapes benn.ma...@gmail.com wrote:
I've noticed two different xmls namespaces for the core cordova plugins :
xmlns=http://www.phonegap.com/ns/plugins/1.0;
and
Yes. The idea would be, as it always has been, the platform
maintainers tag as their vote. That tag says, 'hey this part is
tested, stable, and works'.
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
So, we're using coho for tagging everything now? That seems like a
major
help? (admin, setup, tutorials, screencasts, migration, ideas
for
posts, etc..)
--Carlos
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 1:09 PM, Brian LeRoux b...@brian.io wrote:
OR we could use Github pages for the Cordova org and just host on a
subdomain:
http://blog.cordova.io
+1 on a blog but I'd like to do something static if possible. (Jekyll,
Scotch, Docpad are all nice enough). We used to use Wordpress for
http://phonegap.com and it was a complete struggle to keep it up to
date and online. The running joke when were dealing w/ this was
'static sites are web scale'.
, JekyII
will do fine ,
Can we see if we can host the content on git/github instead of svn?, this
way, I think it will be easier to contribute and maintain.
--Carlos
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Brian LeRoux b...@brian.io wrote:
+1 on a blog but I'd like to do something static
NP, Colene (cc'd) can help get any/all committers tickets.
(Its ridiculously cheap for any community that isn't yet a committer
but pls email me if you need help.)
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote:
Do I (or other committers thinking of attending) need to
fine ,
Can we see if we can host the content on git/github instead of svn?, this
way, I think it will be easier to contribute and maintain.
--Carlos
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Brian LeRoux b...@brian.io wrote:
+1 on a blog but I'd like to do something static if possible
this for our NPM registry as well ?
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 2:24 AM, Brian LeRoux b...@brian.io wrote:
Right on. Thanks for taking this on Mike.
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 7:12 PM, Lorin Beer lorin.beer@gmail.com
wrote:
that would be fantastic!
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Filip Maj f
I'm a fan of shipping dependencies shrink wrapped but as mentioned
this is not generally done at Apache. (Except for when it is like
Maven.)
I wonder if there's a bootstrap way we could look at? One less install
step, and assurance of a sane (or at least expected) runtime is nice.
On Wed, Jun
Right on. Thanks for taking this on Mike.
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 7:12 PM, Lorin Beer lorin.beer@gmail.com wrote:
that would be fantastic!
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote:
Would love to see this, thanks for taking the initiative on this Mike!
On 6/19/13
Node is not the problem. But different versions of Node is a problem.
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Wargo, John john.wa...@sap.com wrote:
The way the market is going, node becomes more and more common. I don't think
it's inappropriate to expect node to be there (provided you tell them it's
Think we already have this as per the issue tracker concept of 'leads'
but I do agree formalizing the role a little more would help. I'd
really love it if we got back to shipping to a date and not to any set
of features, only finished work was being merged back to master, so
cutting a release is a
Hey Jonathan, looks super interesting. I'd like to better understand
the motivations / use case. So, can you describe more about why you
want to dynamically load modules for a plugin?
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 9:16 AM, J Prince princej.w...@hotmail.co.uk wrote:
In my project I wanted to
Hells ya. Good to have you back mang.
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 7:36 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote:
Welcome back Andrew!
On 6/17/13 10:35 AM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote:
Thanks everyone!
I'm back this week! I still have 2 more weeks of paternity to take at some
point in the
Welcome to Cordova Piotr (and thank you for JSFiddle!)
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Michal Mocny mmo...@chromium.org wrote:
Witam, Piotr!
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 11:15 AM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote:
Welcome man!
I would totally link you to all the repos and which ones are
Am I missing anything?
https://github.com/cordova/apache-board-reports/blob/master/2013-06.md
awww sorry mapes
GO HAWKS!
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Benn Mapes benn.ma...@gmail.com wrote:
:`(
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 2:49 PM, Brian LeRoux b...@brian.io wrote:
whatever he's a Bruins guy
;P
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Max Woghiren m...@chromium.org wrote:
Benn, also
Welcome Lisa (and all new IBMer's)!
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote:
Welcome Lisa!
On 6/10/13 9:26 AM, Lisa Seacat DeLuca ldel...@us.ibm.com wrote:
I've been following the Cordova mailing lists and contributing fixes back
into the mobile tech spec and docs for
I'm down for all this. Lets make 2.9 as much about hardening as
possible. The only 'new' stuff I'd like to socialize in 2.9 is
encouraging CLI usage instead of the traditional path.
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Michal Mocny mmo...@chromium.org wrote:
We hope to get a fixed up DataResource
Maj f...@adobe.com
wrote:
K lets try to land it in 2.6.0rc1. There is still time Gord!
Blackberry +
iOS not tagged yet so we can land some more commits in
cordova-cli
On 3/22/13 3:02 PM, Brian LeRoux b...@brian.io wrote:
Like that plan. Say we
The plot thickens!
https://twitter.com/kethinov/status/343492248450781184
Yup I'm around too (tho not at WWDC). Maybe an informal cordova dinner
is in order?
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 1:30 AM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi James, I will be at WWDC next week, let's meet up. Feel free to drop by
the Adobe SF office as well :)
(although its not exactly near Moscone
.
-Michal
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 2:43 PM, Brian LeRoux b...@brian.io wrote:
+1
Lets do that nao.
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 12:11 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote:
Joe and I were just talking about how the process of integrating an
API-less cordova (I.e
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Brian LeRoux b...@brian.io wrote:
So this is a thing:
https://github.com/pwnall/chromeview
And we know our friends at The Google are going to give us an embedded
ChromeView (someday maybe).
So is this something the Cordova team should be considering
Seems simple enough. I find online/offline/pause/resume and other
events of the app lifecycle to be plausibly core for all platforms.
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 4:44 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
Actually, online/offline has to be core, because it's part of the
bridge. We can't rip that
, Brian LeRoux b...@brian.io wrote:
Seems simple enough. I find online/offline/pause/resume and other
events of the app lifecycle to be plausibly core for all platforms.
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 4:44 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
Actually, online/offline has to be core, because it's part
to make network information its own plugin and are
willing to do the changes required to do so (No idea what that would
involve).
If we aren't ripping it out of Android, we shouldn't rip it out for the
other platforms.
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Brian LeRoux b...@brian.io wrote:
Seems
No worries John, I think we can all agree better and more verbosity
(opting into it) is useful for polishing this gem into a two handed
bastard sword that kills mobile dragons.
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Wargo, John john.wa...@sap.com wrote:
Of course, after I sent that email, I noticed
So this is a thing:
https://github.com/pwnall/chromeview
And we know our friends at The Google are going to give us an embedded
ChromeView (someday maybe).
So is this something the Cordova team should be considering?
Can we work w/ our committers from Chromium to create a buildbot that
creates
+1
Lets do that nao.
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 12:11 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote:
Joe and I were just talking about how the process of integrating an
API-less cordova (I.e. The 3.0 branches) back into the master branches
would work. I imagine that, as soon as we create a release branch
to the ChromeView approach is
that it makes the resulting app huge (upwards of 30MB). Also 4.0+. But I'm
just going from what I remember; Andrew would know more.
Braden
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Brian LeRoux b...@brian.io wrote:
So this is a thing:
https://github.com/pwnall/chromeview
Think we need a run cmd too. Specifying target makes sense.
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Braden Shepherdson bra...@chromium.org wrote:
I'm okay with adding a run command and/or emulate command to CLI. `cordova
run android` or similar? Since we (will soon) have these platform-level
scripts
We run survey's like these all the time for the PhoneGap distribution.
While a useful indicator there is some big responsibility with this
data that should be taken into consideration. If we pursue surveying
and other metrics it should be kept private to the PMC.
The original goal of the project
yup, see no reason why not
On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 11:24 AM, Steven Gill stevengil...@gmail.com wrote:
Looking at coho and the 2.8.0rc1, it is not in the release bundle.
I believe we should add it to the release bundle and push it to npm. The
readme with the CLI can have instructions for
Congratulations Andrew!
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 7:00 AM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote:
Coming 1 month early
Everett Arend Grieve born Thursday May 30 at 9:45 am. 5 lbs 15 oz. 18.5
inches long.
Mom is currently in the ACOU and Everett in the ICU. They are on track to
meet
Welcome John!
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 4:52 AM, John Wargo jwarg...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello, my name is John Wargo - I'm the author of PhoneGap Essentials
(www.phonegapessentials.com) and I'm working on an update to the book which
will be out later this year. I will have some questions related
Hey John, we've decided to stop distributing these platforms but of
course all the src is still available. We should update the docs to
reflect that. (Would be good to get Jira tickets for all.)
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 5:34 AM, John Wargo jwarg...@gmail.com wrote:
I've been poking through the
ya the rename easiest
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 8:00 AM, Braden Shepherdson bra...@chromium.org wrote:
I'll keep this thread up to date with INFRA's responses.
I asked INFRA about options and their implications. These are the four
options I described, after I was informed that our original
createElement would fix that
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 1:23 PM, Bryan Higgins br...@bryanhiggins.net wrote:
I bet it has to do with this change to mobile-spec.
By injecting the script tag, cordova.js does not load until after the DOM
has rendered.
different workspaces using it as you want.
-Michal
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Brian LeRoux b...@brian.io wrote:
Not buying that either. The `./app` directory lives in the root so
everything will have to change when we hit the reality you describe
where `./app` IS the root
, 2013 at 6:59 PM, Brian LeRoux b...@brian.io wrote:
I'd rather we did not go ahead w/ the new directory structure. It
offers no
functional benefit, and comes at an upgrade cost for ppl using the
CLI
tools today.
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org
wrote
Kind of Adobe PhoneGap centric but a good starting point:
http://brian.io/slides/phonegap-standard-deck
Src here:
http://github.com/brianleroux/phonegap-standard-deck
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 8:13 AM, Marcel Kinard cmarc...@gmail.com wrote:
A person in my area has an opportunity to attend a
Welcome to the group David! =)
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Lorin Beer lorin.beer@gmail.com wrote:
Hi David, welcome!
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote:
Welcome David!
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 11:08 AM, David Kemp drk...@chromium.org wrote:
Hi
, May 10, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Brian LeRoux b...@brian.io wrote:
yes, exactly that
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Lorin Beer
lorin.beer@gmail.com
wrote:
that confused me too,
windows phone already has separate repos. apache/wp7 and
apache/wp8.
If
we
Welcome Richard! The more help the better. =)
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 3:35 AM, Richard Sentino
rich...@mindginative.com wrote:
Thanks Filip!
Yes I've submitted my application to Mozilla few hours after the news [2]
went out, hoping for a positive feedback though. Cheers
--
Richard
On
?
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote:
Which repos would need refactoring, Brian?
On 5/9/13 2:56 PM, Brian LeRoux b...@brian.io wrote:
I'm a no on this. Conceptually grouping by operating system vendor
makes more sense (to me). If we're going down this path
I'm a no on this. Conceptually grouping by operating system vendor
makes more sense (to me). If we're going down this path the other
repos need to be refacored to reflect it: cordova-platform-* (and
Windows will need breaking out).
(Also I'm not a fan of mixing pascal case with camel case but
Rather dasherized with pascalcase! (derp)
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Brian LeRoux b...@brian.io wrote:
I'm a no on this. Conceptually grouping by operating system vendor
makes more sense (to me). If we're going down this path the other
repos need to be refacored to reflect it: cordova
While this is Media Capture API it is the declarative side of things
(so not as gnarly). I'm cool w it living in core as it is useful, and
less involved than the imperative API for Media Capture.
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey
I'm looking at this issue
Eh Don, not sure which is the culprit (man or machine) but this is the
script steve uses to build the phonegap release:
https://github.com/stevengill/robson/blob/master/robson
But I think he basically manually copies the junk from cordova into
https://github.com/phonegap/phonegap to make the
returned would be in the form of N.N.N
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Tim Kim timki...@gmail.com wrote:
Oooh - I like Shaz's idea.
+1 to that!
On 2 May 2013 15:22, Brian LeRoux b...@brian.io wrote:
thats a great idea
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Erik Johnson
erjohn
thats a great idea
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Erik Johnson erjohn...@blackberry.com wrote:
+1 on this idea.
-Erik
From: Shazron
Sent: Thursday, May 2, 2013 5:28 PM
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Reply To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: Re: Standardising How to Get Cordova Version in a
Looking solid Steve ---thanks for the heads up. I reccomend those
vested in iOS and Android to keep an eye on the 3.0 branches for stuff
that will look ugly when we get there.
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Steven Gill stevengil...@gmail.com wrote:
So Herm and I have been working towards
701 - 800 of 1061 matches
Mail list logo
