is developing outside of
iOS and Android is screwed.
So, do we want to adopt a core plugin, or add this code to the keyboard
plugin that iOS has? Who is going to feed this puppy and scoop up the
poops?
@purplecabbage
risingj.com
On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 10:03 AM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com
events)
4. Can also be implemented using a plugin (Ionic is an example, but it's
pretty easy to copy paste the Stack Overflow code into one of your own)
Let's just get rid of them in 4.0.x
W
On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 4:24 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed Nov 05 2014 at 1:19
Hey
I'm still working on the Mozilla Bridge and I'm running into problems with
how non-modular the current bridge is and how it was abstracted. When we
created the ExposedJsApi class and added it to the API, we did so because
we may need to abstract the whole bridge later. However, right now
Hey
Unfortunately, I don't have anything working yet for the new MozillaView,
but because MozillaView is so radically different than any other view, I've
been forced to re-think some things with our current exec script in
cordova.js, namely why we're still using a prompt-based solution for
On Wed Oct 29 2014 at 10:58:08 AM Michal Mocny mmo...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey
Unfortunately, I don't have anything working yet for the new MozillaView,
but because MozillaView is so radically different than any other
, Oct 29, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Michal Mocny mmo...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey
Unfortunately, I don't have anything working yet for the new
MozillaView,
but because MozillaView is so radically different than any other view
On Wed Oct 29 2014 at 11:46:43 AM Michal Mocny mmo...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 2:18 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
Not sure KK and L will kill 2.3, but perhaps Android One etc will (cheap
devices and 512 ram was previous motivation to continue shipping these old
...@chromium.org
wrote:
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hey
Unfortunately, I don't have anything working yet for the new
MozillaView,
but because MozillaView is so radically different than any other
view,
I've
been forced to re
On Mon Oct 27 2014 at 11:04:14 AM Marcel Kinard cmarc...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm reading the Lollipop API notes and the following seem like
possibilities:
- Add new entries to config.xml to selectively enable
setMixedContentMode() and setAcceptThirdPartyCookies() when desired for
backward
Agreed. We should delete feature branches once they're merged in. That
said, we should have a LOT more feature branches.
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 9:52 AM, Josh Soref jso...@blackberry.com wrote:
There are a number of branches in cordova-js.
I think there should be two kinds of branches:
1.
/about/versions/lollipop.html#WebView
WebView will auto update through play store.
On Oct 17, 2014 12:44 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
So, Lolipop is landing and here are the changes:
http://developer.android.com/sdk/api_diff/preview-21/changes.html
It looks like there's a lot
So, Lolipop is landing and here are the changes:
http://developer.android.com/sdk/api_diff/preview-21/changes.html
It looks like there's a lot of new stuff relating to the file picker. I'll
probably poke around with these changes, but if anyone else could shed some
light on this, that'd be
So, what's going on with this? Did this land in any release of Cordova?
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 10:34 AM, Archana Naik naik.arch...@gmail.com
wrote:
We have tested this behavior and in fact AmazonWebView which
Do we need more core plugins? We're already pretty terrible at supporting
what we have on our plate now. I would rather we have less core plugins
than more.
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Jesse purplecabb...@gmail.com wrote:
This one supports everything:
, 2014 at 1:33 PM, Brian LeRoux b...@brian.io wrote:
I'm all for code removal. Which plugins tho?
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
Do we need more core plugins? We're already pretty terrible at
supporting
what we have on our plate now. I would
But yeah, thanks for the bump. We should talk about timers, since they're
important!
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 9:02 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
This JIRA issue exists already and I think we were thinking of removing
the pausing of timers, but never got consensus. I'll try to fish
This JIRA issue exists already and I think we were thinking of removing the
pausing of timers, but never got consensus. I'll try to fish for it. As
for your fix, I made a comment about it on JIRA which could very well turn
into bikeshedding.
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 7:09 PM, Tyler Freeman
SDK lands Friday, as does the Nexus 9
On Oct 15, 2014 11:05 AM, Marcel Kinard cmarc...@gmail.com wrote:
5.0 Lollipop.
http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2014/10/android-be-together-not-same.html
Remember to search before filing. There may already be a related open
issue.
On Oct 13, 2014 11:56 AM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi David,
Thanks for the report. Please file an issue at:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB
... so it can be tracked and evaluated by the devs, and
change, so agree 4.0.x makes sense.
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
This should land in 4.0.x
On Oct 9, 2014 7:38 AM, Ian Clelland iclell...@chromium.org wrote:
I'm running into more and more problems caused by the whitelist
(today,
it's
On Oct 10, 2014 10:05 AM, Brian LeRoux b...@brian.io wrote:
OR we move to named releases externally.
Cordova MX === 4.0
Cordova Mexico?
On Oct 10, 2014 10:03 AM, Michal Mocny mmo...@chromium.org wrote:
4 was also discussed as fine, and in isolation would have been our
choice
for sure
of
it?
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com
javascript:; wrote:
I'm in agreement with Andrew on this one. If we can get CSP
working,
that's a far better solution than our Whitelist, which was done
because it was needed at the time
How can you guarantee that the port will be released when it goes in the
background and not still be bound? That sounds like a main point of
failure. Would you have it increment to the next port if the port is
bound?
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Brian LeRoux b...@brian.io wrote:
I guess if
I honestly don't like reply-all because of context. I already have
problems with scathing technical e-mails being taken personally, that can
only be compounded by them actually being sent to a single person instead
of read by a group.
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 5:39 AM, Ian Clelland
OK, let's try this again:
What time zone is this mean for?
BTW: Can we get that fixed?
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 7:59 AM, Michal Mocny mmo...@chromium.org wrote:
Here is a doodle for those interested -- but if this timeline is too hasty
we can figure out a future date:
, and that will workaround this issue.
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 10:54 AM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
I honestly don't like reply-all because of context. I already have
problems with scathing technical e-mails being taken personally, that
can
only be compounded by them actually
I agree with what Jesse said. That being said, despite talk to the
contrary, I don't think any platform will sprint ahead. We've never seen
any platform realistically have this happen, especially now that most
features are encapsulated in plugins.
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 9:02 PM, purplecabbage
No, you should upgrade to 3.5.1. We have dropped support for Cordova 2.x
months ago, and we recommend upgrading.
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 7:33 AM, steve.wil...@bentley.com wrote:
We have released applications in the Google Play store based on Cordova
2.7.0 and have received notification from
Response inline as usual:
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 4:53 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 1:18 PM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org
wrote:
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Joe Bowser
, the relevant patch is here:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-android/commit/2ab81bc5aeb575fef3657cf48a671607e81ca37d
(Ian / Joe, please correct me if there's more than that)
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
No, you should upgrade
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 7:20 AM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote:
The ask had come up by someone, but I can't find the email now.
My thinking at the time was that if you've customized the native code, then
that's a bit going outside of our we promise to not change a thing zone.
And
dialog in case of 401 response?
https://github.com/apache/cordova-android/blob/master/framework/src/org/apache/cordova/CordovaWebViewClient.java#L116
Thx!
Sergey
-Original Message-
From: Joe Bowser [mailto:bows...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 10:44 PM
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 1:18 PM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 7:24 AM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org
wrote:
Good idea (I think)!
In my mind there's two main things wrong
:
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 4:53 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 1:18 PM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org
wrote:
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 7:24 AM, Andrew Grieve
agri
it be possible to have the Apache httpd client take the place of
okhttp, or are there okhttp-specific functions being used?
On Sep 29, 2014, at 5:16 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey
Can we unbundle okhttp without breaking Cordova? I think that our
bundling
has become
Hey
So, as part of the work for Third Party Webviews, I decided to write up a
super quick reference implementation by just copying the AndroidWebView and
making it a plugin. I haven't fully tested this yet, but it should work as
a third-party WebView.
The tricky part that I found here is how
, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey
So, as part of the work for Third Party Webviews, I decided to write up a
super quick reference implementation by just copying the AndroidWebView
and
making it a plugin. I haven't fully tested this yet, but it should work
as
a third-party WebView
-1, Cordova-Android should probably be re-tagged because of CB-7674, I'll
defer the re-tagging to Marcel.
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 3:04 PM, Steven Gill stevengil...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry, outupt of the tag was cordova-android: 3.6.4 (fcb6cc44f1)
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Steven Gill
Cherry-picked them into 3.6.x branch.
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 5:16 PM, Steven Gill stevengil...@gmail.com wrote:
If someone can merge the corresponding changes into 3.6.x branch, I can
handle the retag tomorrow.
-Steve
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 5:11 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote
That's a very good question, why was this removed Andrew?
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 11:08 AM, Martin Gonzalez
martin.c.glez.g...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi devs,
I'm getting some problems performing async tasks (android.os.AsyncTask)
over android 3.6.x master, using native code before performing
Hey
Can we unbundle okhttp without breaking Cordova? I think that our bundling
has become a serious problem, and we should find a way to abstract the
dependency away somehow into a plugin and should do this in 4.0.x.
Ian, anyone else who knows what's going on with File/URIs? What's your
thoughts
I wanted to unpack the android_assets to the app storage to fix various
problems with the file URI but it was vetoed every time. This sounds very
similar.
On Sep 25, 2014 10:39 PM, Jesse purplecabb...@gmail.com wrote:
FYI, Windows Phone 7 had to unpack all www/ files to temp ( IsolatedStorage
I've said this 1000 times, and I'll say it again.
Cordova is compiled to the latest API level, and works on Android 2.3 to
4.4.3. It even works on L, but we recommend building with the latest
stable API level, which API 19. When we say it's backwards compatible, we
mean that you can run this on
The purpose of this code is because when you start an app, onResume is
called, even though you didn't pause anything. You aren't receiving any
results, and you're not restoring any multi-tasking state. There is no
state, because you just started the application. If you were to not have
this,
As we've seen with Apple Maps, iPhone users don't ride the bus.
On Sep 16, 2014 12:16 PM, julio cesar sanchez jcesarmob...@gmail.com
wrote:
Bad news
http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2014/09/16/iphones-nfc-tech-will-only-work-with-apple-pay
+1 to that!
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 9:45 AM, Marcel Kinard cmarc...@gmail.com wrote:
The agenda is currently empty. I'd suggest that if there are no agenda
items within 1 hour of the start time, that it be cancelled.
On Sep 14, 2014, at 10:38 AM, Michal Mocny mmo...@google.com wrote:
to...@devgeeks.org
wrote:
Big -1 for breaking current background behaviour.
Or am I misunderstanding?
On 11 Sep 2014 10:34, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
Pausing timers means that the JS isn't running in the background at
all.
This now means that the Javascript
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 10:21 AM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org
wrote:
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
After testing this again for sanity, we should probably kill this option.
I don't like it (in fact I hate it), but resumeTimers doesn't actually
12, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
After testing this again for sanity, we should probably kill this
option.
I don't like it (in fact I hate it), but resumeTimers doesn't actually
resume the timers on KitKat, and since other browsers may not even
support
Sadly, I already pulled the plug on my Berlin trip yesterday. Perhaps this
would make more sense in San Francisco next month.
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Ian Clelland iclell...@chromium.org
wrote:
Since it appears that PhoneGapDayEU has been postponed, and there are
several of us already
Can you put this on its own branch before it lands in 4.0.x? That'd be
awesome!
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 5:32 PM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote:
For cordova-android 4.0, I'd like to go as far as just deleting the
KeepRunning preference.
Apps get a pause event when they are
.
What do you think about the never auto-pausing on backgrounding? or
about auto-pausing when intent sending?
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
Can you put this on its own branch before it lands in 4.0.x? That'd be
awesome!
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 5:32 PM
that we're planning to release
soon, not demoware. Also, it make us accountable to our users, which is
important to some of us.
-Michal
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
I think this needs to be thought through more, and I'm extremely wary
when
you say
discovery and a
sense of stability, especially for a feature branch like Android-4.0.
There are workarounds for demos (i.e. create your own branch off of a
known working version), but its not as easy to solve the eyeball
problem.
-Michal
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Joe Bowser bows
Why did you go to Strathcona?
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote:
Aaaand, I'm back!
Here's the highlight from my trip :)
https://plus.google.com/117659366035020803272/posts/EqC8xgy72L8
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 1:42 PM, Brian LeRoux b...@brian.io
script to create
an app. This broke the default cordova project.
Perhaps we should add a (few?) pages to mobile-spec that we should confirm
render correctly before a release?
-Michal
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 6:38 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
At any rate, I'm going to re-tag
correctly.
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Michal Mocny mmo...@chromium.org wrote:
I did that and did not see this. Very weird. Which device/os version are
you using?
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 11:55 AM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 7:09 AM, Michal Mocny mmo
Yes.
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 9:35 AM, Archana Naik naik.arch...@gmail.com wrote:
so I cherry-picked the commit on both master and 3.6.x and pushed them. Do
I need to re-tag?
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 9:19 AM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
HTC One (M8) running 4.4.3, and Nexus 7
So, should we also fix this before the release? I'm thinking we probably
should:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-7463
I've fixed it on master, so we could just cherry-pick it into Android.
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Jason Proctor ja...@redfish.net wrote:
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at
:
Joe Bowser wrote:
So, should we also fix this before the release? I'm thinking we probably
should:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-7463
I've fixed it on master, so we could just cherry-pick it into Android.
I'm assuming that you aren't shipping the tests.
$ find . -name
I looked at BigTop, and it's using C-style comment syntax. I'm adding the
headers now.
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 10:41 AM, Josh Soref jso...@blackberry.com wrote:
Joe Bowser wrote:
So, should we also fix this before the release? I'm thinking we probably
should:
https://issues.apache.org
I did the re-tag of the release with the licences added. We should be able
to get this going again, assuming we don't find more issues with Android.
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Josh Soref jso...@blackberry.com wrote:
Joe Bowser wrote:
I think we do ship the native tests.
You do
I think the Apache Way specifies that we have to vote on the final release,
not the tag. If we can get clarification from an ASF person who knows the
policy and isn't a troll, that would be helpful.
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 12:30 PM, Jesse purplecabb...@gmail.com wrote:
Moving to a 3.6.1 sounds
Sounds good.
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Jesse purplecabb...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree with all of Marcel's suggestions.
@purplecabbage
risingj.com
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Marcel Kinard cmarc...@gmail.com wrote:
Here is more specifics on what I'd suggest:
- on the
Well, for some reason we deviated from that last release. I don't know why
but Steve proposed the change and it made sense at the time.
On Sep 4, 2014 1:05 PM, Brian LeRoux b...@brian.io wrote:
0.0.1rc1
0.0.1rc2
no?
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Marcel Kinard cmarc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey
I just tested on KitKat the 3.6.0 release and I noticed the page when you
first create a Cordova application is Black. It's the correct colour on L,
but that's not super helpful since L isn't even on any devices at the
moment AFAIK.
Has there been any changes that would cause the background
believe people approved a release without doing a simple check like
this. This is insane!
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey
I just tested on KitKat the 3.6.0 release and I noticed the page when you
first create a Cordova application is Black. It's
, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Jesse purplecabb...@gmail.com wrote:
Can you post a link to the offending commit?
@purplecabbage
risingj.com
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 3:21 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
It turns out that the change proposed by a user was merged in without any
testing, or without
At any rate, I'm going to re-tag the release on Android, since we can't
release the current tag.
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 3:32 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
This is the offending commit:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cordova-android.git;h=67f474e
I knew
-1
I had to re-tag 3.6.0, so we should redo this with the regression fix.
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Jesse purplecabb...@gmail.com wrote:
I have applied Josh's changes to master, and cherry-picked into the 3.6.x
branch.
I have updated 3.6.x package.json with the correct version number,
start a new vote thread.
@purplecabbage
risingj.com
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 3:44 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
-1
I had to re-tag 3.6.0, so we should redo this with the regression fix.
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Jesse purplecabb...@gmail.com wrote:
I have applied
Or you can try out the 4.0.x branch and get involved in that effort.
Crosswalk currently works, and GeckoView is a Work in Progress.
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 12:52 AM, julio cesar sanchez jcesarmob...@gmail.com
wrote:
But if you want a better webview and still use phonegap api you can try
application (My Chrome install is at 36.0.1985.135).
Plenty of time for the UI to be changed between those two versions.
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 6:47 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
Can you file a new issue in JIRA for it with details on the device? That
sounds device specific.
On Aug
I'm currently on vacation until Sept 3rd BTW
On Aug 28, 2014 3:17 PM, Steven Gill stevengil...@gmail.com wrote:
I will be heading off to my delayed honeymoon Sept 3rd. I will be back Sept
18th.
I'm hoping we can get the 3.6.0 vote started tomorrow and I am able to
release it next Tuesday
Can you file a new issue in JIRA for it with details on the device? That
sounds device specific.
On Aug 28, 2014 3:45 PM, Leonardo Martínez leolib2...@gmail.com wrote:
I found this weird behaviour in Cordova:
I have created two apps, one simple HTML 5 app and a Cordova app that runs
on
Amazon's Chromium is different than Android Chromium. I don't know exactly
how they're different, but I wouldn't expect GPU profiling to work the same
way.
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 2:18 PM, Parashuram n.parashu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am working on a performance framework (
Wow, that's a first. An Apache person who didn't passive-aggressively bash
Cordova.
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Marcel Kinard cmarc...@gmail.com wrote:
I stumbled across this video from /., where they interview Rich Bowen of
the ASF, who mentions Cordova and explains some common
Technically, companies don't join Apache projects, individuals do.
Furthermore, opinions of contributors may not reflect those of the company
that they work for. That said, it's good to know who is working where at
any time for transparency's sake.
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 10:54 AM, Shazron
I have no idea. I booked the flight, but I'm assuming that I'm sleeping on
someone's floor. The hotels are $500+ a night because of Oktoberfest.
Basically, book a hostel, because a Hotel is probably not going to happen,
and even then you might need to bring a tent. :S
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 9:15 AM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 13 Aug 2014, at 17:35, Joe Bowser wrote:
I have no idea. I booked the flight, but I'm assuming that I'm sleeping on
someone's floor. The hotels are $500+ a night because of Oktoberfest.
Oktoberfest
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 10:03 AM, Josh Soref jso...@blackberry.com wrote:
Joe Bowser wrote:
I'm assuming that I'm sleeping on someone's floor.
The hotels are $500+ a night because of Oktoberfest.
Basically, book a hostel, because a Hotel is probably not going to happen,
and even then you
+1 on promises leading to worse JS code. I really wish that the Battery
Spec and others wouldn't use promises, since they're absolutely terrible
and events accomplish the same thing in that case.
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 11:05 AM, Jesse purplecabb...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree the polyfil should
Let's not release until the new whitelist is figured out. That feature is
too important. I also need to land the test to confirm my fix is still in
master.
Back from PTO tomorrow.
On Aug 11, 2014 6:55 AM, Mike Billau mike.bil...@gmail.com wrote:
There was talk about adding the internal
The spec is flawed in that there's no way we could implement it as it
stands. The spec needs to be reworked to be more event driven and
asynchronous. Right now it's too much like device with everything up
front.
This is all based on memory, but the spec was seriously broken the last
time I
Hey
I'll be on PTO starting on Monday, August 4, 2014. I'll be back on August
12, 2014. I'm also going to be out of the office from Aug 20nd to Sept 3
as well. I'll probably have internet, but I probably won't be able to
respond with anything more meaningful than +1, -1 and DON'T DO THAT
at
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Peter Metz peter.m...@unarin.com wrote:
Hello Cordova Devs,
I wrote a Cordova plugin
https://github.com/petermetz/cordova-plugin-ibeacon which kind of
accidentally ended up with an official-like plugin ID:
org.apache.cordova.ibeacon.
I know that's lame,
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 6:33 PM, Josh Soref jso...@blackberry.com wrote:
Chuck Lantz wrote:
The problem does seem to tie to platform implementations.
we have been seeing issues with both Android and iOS failing to compile
if the name of the app
(name/name in config.xml not the project)
Android doesn't support Unicode activity/class names. This is a limitation
of their tools, which we use to generate activities.
On Jul 23, 2014 2:32 PM, Carlos Santana csantan...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree maybe adding NAME is a human readable field = NAME is an
application name *that can be
And that's the excuse I'm using at OSCON to not give out stickers.
On Jul 21, 2014 10:34 AM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/
*Using Apache trademarks on merchandise:*
You *must obtain prior written approval from the VP, Apache Brand
Management* [1]
agri...@chromium.org wrote:
I did it to test whether the backgroundColor preference was working. Do you
know another way to test that preference?
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
So, this is only an issue if you set the html tag opacity to 0? Why would
What's the purpose of the hangout? If it's to allow our users to ask
questions, etc, that's fine. If it's to actually discuss planning
decisions to be made on the list, that's fine as well. However, I
don't think we have time to do both, and I can see us dropping QA
really quickly.
On Fri,
AM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
So, where's your repro steps? Also, where's the basic info, like which
device you used to reproduce it. Which version of Android?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-7159
Also, if this is really just a few hundreds of a millisecond, and this
is only
this without doing weird things like set
the opacity of the HTML tag to 0.
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 6:31 AM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
So, where's your repro steps? Also, where's the basic info, like which
device you used to reproduce it. Which version of Android? https://issues
set
the opacity of the HTML tag to 0.
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 6:31 AM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
So, where's your repro steps? Also, where's the basic info, like which
device you used to reproduce it. Which version of Android? https://issues.
(https://issues.) apache.org/jira
weird things like set
the opacity of the HTML tag to 0.
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 6:31 AM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
So, where's your repro steps? Also, where's the basic info, like which
device you used to reproduce it. Which version of Android? https://issues.
(https://issues
The WebView element isn't supposed to have the backgroundColor, it's
the view behind the WebView that's supposed to have the
backgroundColor.
Also, I haven't seen this behaviour on any of the tests that we done.
Unless we can reproduce the issue, we can't fix it, and shouldn't just
throw things
at 10:54 AM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
The WebView element isn't supposed to have the backgroundColor, it's
the view behind the WebView that's supposed to have the
backgroundColor.
Also, I haven't seen this behaviour on any of the tests that we done.
Unless we can reproduce
, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote:
I did it to test whether the backgroundColor preference was working. Do you
know another way to test that preference?
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
So, this is only an issue if you set the html tag opacity to 0
I'd personally prefer it if we limited it to committers. It's
extremely difficult to fit all the current committers in these
hangouts as it is.
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 2:12 PM, Frederico Galvão
frederico.gal...@pontoget.com.br wrote:
Or even people who doesn't contribute in code as of now, but
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 8:10 PM, Marcel Kinard cmarc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 16, 2014, at 3:11 PM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote:
Good call here. I should have made JIRAs for a bunch of these. I've now
done so retroactively.
Watching this, I very much agree that if Jira issues
501 - 600 of 1563 matches
Mail list logo
