[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5573?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15889790#comment-15889790
]
Felix Meschberger commented on FELIX-5573:
--
My understanding is like David&
17-02-28 14:49 GMT+01:00 Felix Meschberger :
>
>> Hi
>>
>> The problem seems that utils actually declares its own dependencies with
>> scope=compile which pollutes the transitive dependency space.
>>
>> The fix is for utils to declare the dependencies as
Hi
The problem seems that utils actually declares its own dependencies with
scope=compile which pollutes the transitive dependency space.
The fix is for utils to declare the dependencies as scope=provided so that
these dependencies are not transitive.
Regards
Felix
> Am 28.02.2017 um 11:30 sc
Hi all
Hmm, thinking a bit more about this and looking at the FrameworkFactory class
which is targeted at launching frameworks in an implementation independent
manner, I wonder, whether logging being a crucial function in each and every
application should not get special treatment on a specific
Hi Christian
> Am 24.02.2017 um 15:32 schrieb Christian Schneider :
>
> Currently felix framework uses reflection to allow other logging frameworks.
> It is a quite complicated and still pretty limited approach.
> As far as I know this is only used for karaf to hook in. So I propose to only
>
Hi
I tend to agree with this …
plus: that project even implements the standard javax.json API…
Regards
Felix
> Am 21.02.2017 um 09:06 schrieb Achim Nierbeck :
>
> Hi,
>
> I wouldn't do it, in the end you'll endup re-inventing the wheel a 50th
> time.
> If you think the minimum parser isn't s
Hi all
I think this is a very bad idea !
According to RFC 4627 [1]:
> An object is an unordered collection of zero or more name/value
> pairs, where a name is a string and a value is a string, number,
> boolean, null, object, or array.
Parsing the JSON and then storing in a defined order create
Welcome David and Neil !
Regards
Felix
> Am 07.02.2017 um 05:27 schrieb dav...@apache.org:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'm very happy to announce that the Apache Felix project has invited two
> new committers and both have accepted:
> David Leangen and Neil Bartlett.
>
> Please join me in welcoming David
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5507?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15839427#comment-15839427
]
Felix Meschberger commented on FELIX-5507:
--
I tend to agree with [~djencks]
Hi all
I think Guillaume’s idea of defining that provisional, WIP, interim, temporary
OSGi API commits be isolated and refer to a concrete OSGi Repository commit
(URL ideally) makes sense to me. So that we can track back this source.
In any case, OSGi API will always bei OSGi copyrighted and t
Hi all
And we should also mention that quite a number of active community members
actually working on those things are members (or employees of members) of the
OSGi alliance and as such open to feedback received from the communities on the
evolution of the specifications.
As such, I think it i
Hi
> Am 05.01.2017 um 17:06 schrieb Carsten Ziegeler :
>
> Felix Meschberger wrote
>> Hmm, this sounds confusing somehow…
>>
>> why not have:
>>
>> felix/trunk/configadmin — releasable R6 based Config Admin
>> felix/trunk/scr — relea
o OSGi R-next work
>>> in? I
>>>> would prefer to keep trunk in a releasable state based on the latest
>>>> published specification from OSGi. But we have more and more R7 work now
>>>> going on directly in trunk. Is it past the point of no return?
>>>>
Congratulations and welcome, Stefan !
Keep the good stuff coming.
Regards
Felix
> Am 23.12.2016 um 11:47 schrieb Stefan Seifert :
>
> thanks!
>
> it is a tradition that a new committer introduces himself, so here are some
> words about myself:
>
> i'm living in berlin, and using OSGi and Fel
Hi
As of now, we don’t have an official branch policy. In fact we had a discussion
before and we decided against such.
So I would think that we should continue releasing from trunk and from trunk
only.
As such I like Tom’s proposal for a R-Next working branch. And since OSGi
generally release
Hi
Upfront I like the amended proposal of using a version < 1 and a mandatory
attribute „provisional“ with value „felix“. As Neil said, BND will solve this
for imports be it the bndtools or the maven bundle plugin.
Not declaring a version and thus using 0.0.0 will have BND generate a
version-l
> My 2 cents.
>
> Ferry
>
> On 22/12/16 08:50, Felix Meschberger wrote:
>> I wonder, whether not go directly to Java 7 (or even 8) ? IIRC we stayed at
>> 1.4 for a long time as Java 1.4 was the latest version available on
>> mobile/embedded platforms for a
I wonder, whether not go directly to Java 7 (or even 8) ? IIRC we stayed at 1.4
for a long time as Java 1.4 was the latest version available on mobile/embedded
platforms for a long time. Now the latest versions for these is Java 8, so I
think we might not restrict ourselves to Java 6 any longer.
Hi
Apache runs a SNAPSHOT repository which is public. But reliance on SNAPSHOTs
deployed there is brittle.
I just tried to deply a SNAPSHOT build but I get test failures, so I am a bit
unsure, whether that makes a lot of sense.
Regards
Felix
> Am 20.12.2016 um 14:57 schrieb David Leangen :
>
Hi Neil
Yes, the Jetty server is setup programmatically and is a private field to the
implementation. And there is no hook to add such an NCSARequestLog instance.
Having said that, I would think the community would be open to a decent patch
;-)
Regards
Felix
> Am 19.12.2016 um 18:41 schrieb N
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5446?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15741687#comment-15741687
]
Felix Meschberger commented on FELIX-5446:
--
I have looked again, and it l
Felix Meschberger created FELIX-5446:
Summary: Http Service ignores Whiteboard Servlet API Listeners
Key: FELIX-5446
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5446
Project: Felix
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15728607#comment-15728607
]
Felix Meschberger commented on FELIX-5443:
--
Good catch. Current uses do not
; SCR runtime and through configuration of its own disable any component?
>>
>> - Ray
>>
>> On Nov 11, 2016 23:28, "Felix Meschberger" wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Ray
>>>
>>> Indirectly: have your component require configuration. In thi
Hi Ray
Indirectly: have your component require configuration. In this case the
component is only activated if there is configuration for it. This is similar
to a mandatory reference.
Regards
Felix
--
Typos caused by my iPhone
> Am 11.11.2016 um 20:42 schrieb Raymond Auge :
>
> Hey all,
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5394?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15650513#comment-15650513
]
Felix Meschberger commented on FELIX-5394:
--
On rethought and some discuss
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5394?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15637414#comment-15637414
]
Felix Meschberger commented on FELIX-5394:
--
bq. could you just clarify who
Felix Meschberger created FELIX-5397:
Summary: Memoryusage plugin default configuration incorrect
Key: FELIX-5397
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5397
Project: Felix
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5394?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15636472#comment-15636472
]
Felix Meschberger edited comment on FELIX-5394 at 11/4/16 2:1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5394?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15636472#comment-15636472
]
Felix Meschberger commented on FELIX-5394:
--
Apart from that, there is inde
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5394?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15635568#comment-15635568
]
Felix Meschberger commented on FELIX-5394:
--
If I understand it correctly,
Hi all
Over at legal-discuss there is a discussion of whether the json.org library
with the amended MIT license (remember the „use for good not evil“ clause ?)
should be „banned“ by reconsidering the „A“ rating of this license (assuming
the clause is just a joke) and turning it into an „X“ rati
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5148?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15105216#comment-15105216
]
Felix Meschberger commented on FELIX-5148:
--
I have to admit [~olli], th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4890?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Felix Meschberger updated FELIX-4890:
-
Fix Version/s: webconsole-metatype-plugin-1.0.0
> Implement a MetaType service invent
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4890?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14547767#comment-14547767
]
Felix Meschberger commented on FELIX-4890:
--
Added first version in co
Felix Meschberger created FELIX-4890:
Summary: Implement a MetaType service inventory printer
Key: FELIX-4890
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4890
Project: Felix
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4599?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14317926#comment-14317926
]
Felix Meschberger commented on FELIX-4599:
--
No they are really on called
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4599?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14317907#comment-14317907
]
Felix Meschberger commented on FELIX-4599:
--
[~chetanm] The pro
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4792?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Felix Meschberger resolved FELIX-4792.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Implemented catching any Throwable during initial component
Felix Meschberger created FELIX-4792:
Summary: [SCR] Handle Errors on component initialization
Key: FELIX-4792
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4792
Project: Felix
Issue
Hi
> Anfang der weitergeleiteten Nachricht:
>
> Antwort an:
> Datum: 8. Februar 2015 20:19:29 MEZ
> Betreff: Aw: [SCR] BND file ok ?
> Von: Pierre De Rop
> An: "dev@felix.apache.org"
>
> Hi Felix, David;
>
> - create a bndtools project for SCR, and activate semantic versioning using
> our A
ately I haven't even had time to investigate that. Could
>> anyone comment on it?
>>
>> Based on the speed of the bnd and osgi ct builds I would suspect that it
>> would cut the ds build time by about 75%. However I have no concrete
>> evidence to support this.
&
r of trying it out.
Regards
Felix
>
> thanks
> david jencks
>
> On Feb 6, 2015, at 3:42 AM, Felix Meschberger wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> With FELIX-4537 [1] the bundle plugin configuration was moved out into a
>> .bnd file.
>>
>> While th
Hi
With FELIX-4537 [1] the bundle plugin configuration was moved out into a .bnd
file.
While the format of either pom.xml or .bnd is debatable I think we should be
having a discussion around this. For now we always had all bundle plugin
configuration in the pom.xml and I see a clear advantage
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4787?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14308846#comment-14308846
]
Felix Meschberger commented on FELIX-4787:
--
In light of FELIX-4785 wher
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4692?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Felix Meschberger resolved FELIX-4692.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Thanks for the feedback. I have applied the second patch in Rev
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4692?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14265944#comment-14265944
]
Felix Meschberger commented on FELIX-4692:
--
For illustration purposes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4692?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Felix Meschberger updated FELIX-4692:
-
Attachment: FELIX-4692-2.patch
Simpler patch with three changes as described in previous
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4692?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14265906#comment-14265906
]
Felix Meschberger commented on FELIX-4692:
--
Digging a bit deeper, I found
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4704?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14264411#comment-14264411
]
Felix Meschberger commented on FELIX-4704:
--
bq. while often important
I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4704?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14264409#comment-14264409
]
Felix Meschberger commented on FELIX-4704:
--
Ok
> Show ranking in web
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3773?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14264405#comment-14264405
]
Felix Meschberger commented on FELIX-3773:
--
I like this very much. We should
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4692?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14264296#comment-14264296
]
Felix Meschberger commented on FELIX-4692:
--
bq. Looking at the cod
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4704?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14264260#comment-14264260
]
Felix Meschberger edited comment on FELIX-4704 at 1/5/15 7:1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4704?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14264260#comment-14264260
]
Felix Meschberger commented on FELIX-4704:
--
While I appreciate this patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4734?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14253595#comment-14253595
]
Felix Meschberger commented on FELIX-4734:
--
Please make sure to not c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4692?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14253374#comment-14253374
]
Felix Meschberger commented on FELIX-4692:
--
[~cziegeler] For the reasons st
… and updated dist in Rev. 7398
Regards
Felix
> Am 12.12.2014 um 17:01 schrieb Felix Meschberger :
>
> Hi
>
> I have released the Maven Repository and am now updating dist
>
> Regards
> Felix
>
>> Am 12.12.2014 um 16:30 schrieb Valentin Valchev :
>>
Hi
I have released the Maven Repository and am now updating dist
Regards
Felix
> Am 12.12.2014 um 16:30 schrieb Valentin Valchev :
>
> The vote passes with four binding +1 votes.
>
> Thank you all.
>
> Now I had to publish the staging repository. But I'm not a PMC member,
> so I would kindly
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4730?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Felix Meschberger resolved FELIX-4730.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: http-2.4.0
Fixed in Rev. 1644885 by applying
Felix Meschberger created FELIX-4730:
Summary: RequestDispatcher's servletPath is wrong for the root
servlet
Key: FELIX-4730
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4730
Project:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4720?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14240770#comment-14240770
]
Felix Meschberger commented on FELIX-4720:
--
Somehow I have the impression,
Hi
> Am 09.12.2014 um 15:57 schrieb Carsten Ziegeler :
>
> I think we don't need to support 1.4 with the web console anymore.
> I guess we could directly go at least to Java 6, but Java 5 is imho
> definitely fine.
Careful !
AFAICT there are users of the WebConsole bound to 1.4 due to Java ME.
Hi
Sounds reasonable to me.
But I read „redo the entire mirror“: What is the consequence of a such redoing
for existing clones ?
Thanks
Felix
> Am 28.11.2014 um 01:42 schrieb Jean-Baptiste Onofré :
>
> +1 as well
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 11/28/2014 01:31 AM, Freeman Fang wrote:
>> +1
>>
>>
://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4696
> Am 13.11.2014 um 11:42 schrieb Felix Meschberger :
>
> Hi
>
> Ok, there seems to be a larger problem to this, it seems.
>
> The ExtensionManager creates native capabilities in the
> ExtensionManager.buildNativeCapabilites()
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4696?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Felix Meschberger updated FELIX-4696:
-
Attachment: FELIX-4696.patch
Proposed patch taking code from the
Felix Meschberger created FELIX-4696:
Summary: Improve native OS version sanitation
Key: FELIX-4696
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4696
Project: Felix
Issue Type
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4695?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Felix Meschberger updated FELIX-4695:
-
Attachment: FELIX-4695-Felix.patch
FELIX-4695-ExtensionManager.patch
Two
Felix Meschberger created FELIX-4695:
Summary: Normalize os.version system property in framework
properties
Key: FELIX-4695
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4695
Project: Felix
, whether we should actually only have the normalised values in
the framework properties ?
WDYT ?
Regards
Felix
> Am 13.11.2014 um 10:03 schrieb Felix Meschberger :
>
> Hi
>
> I can reproduce this. And worse still, it actually prevents the framework
> from starting und
Hi
I can reproduce this. And worse still, it actually prevents the framework from
starting under Linux.
The situation is that the ExtensionManager wants to parse the os.version system
property into an OSGi Version. the os.version seems to be based on the kernel
version, which in my case of Ubu
Hi
I have created a patch to improve the Service Access time. With this patch
applied I measure 4-5 times faster access to the service registry in our
application which in general access services simply by its name and almost
never uses a filter.
I expect that this patch also significantly imp
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4692?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Felix Meschberger updated FELIX-4692:
-
Attachment: FELIX-4692.diff
Patch with the proposed change.
> Improve Service acc
Felix Meschberger created FELIX-4692:
Summary: Improve Service access time
Key: FELIX-4692
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4692
Project: Felix
Issue Type: Improvement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4674?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Felix Meschberger resolved FELIX-4674.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: http-2.3.2
Thanks for providing the patch. I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4674?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Felix Meschberger reassigned FELIX-4674:
Assignee: Felix Meschberger
> Allow inclusion/exclusion of protocols in
Welcome to the team, Bob !
Regards
Felix
Am 17.10.2014 um 11:00 schrieb Carsten Ziegeler :
> Hi
>
> it's my pleasure to announce that the Apache Felix PMC has invited
> Bob Paulin as a new Felix committer...and Bob accepted.
>
> So please join me in welcoming Bob.
>
> Regards
> Carsten
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Felix Meschberger resolved FELIX-4664.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: http-sslfilter-0.2.0
http
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Felix Meschberger updated FELIX-4664:
-
Attachment: FELIX-4664.patch
Proposed patch.
> [SSLFilter] Support for pre-3.0 Serv
Felix Meschberger created FELIX-4664:
Summary: [SSLFilter] Support for pre-3.0 Servlet API
Key: FELIX-4664
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4664
Project: Felix
Issue Type
Yes.
Regards
Felix
Am 29.09.2014 um 12:07 schrieb Antonio Sanso :
> thanks Felix . So IIUC the logic is based on the presence of the
> X-Forwarded-Port header right :))?
>
> regards
>
> antonio
>
> On Sep 29, 2014, at 11:47 AM, Antonio Sanso
> mailto:asa...@adobe.com>> wrote:
>
> (sorry I
Hi
Am 29.09.2014 um 11:47 schrieb Antonio Sanso :
> (sorry I am not subscribed to the list)
You should be subscribing :-)
>
> the configuration options proposed by Jan is a good solution IMHO.
Look at how we do it in the SslFilterResponse class. The
SslFilterRequest.getServerPort should (mus
Hi
Am 29.09.2014 um 11:34 schrieb Jan Willem Janssen
:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 29/09/14 11:25, Felix Meschberger wrote:
>> While you are technically correct, the request.getServerPort()
>> should really reflect the port that the actual S
29/09/14 10:59, Felix Meschberger wrote:
> Hi Antonio,
>
> I agree this is a bug.
>
>>
>> looking at [FELIX-3693] HTTP SSLFilter [0] specially at the
>> SslFilterRequest it looks to me that the final Request object
>> might end up having this weird behav
Hi Antonio,
I agree this is a bug.
Regards
Felix
Am 29.09.2014 um 10:54 schrieb Antonio Sanso :
> hi *,
>
> looking at [FELIX-3693] HTTP SSLFilter [0] specially at the SslFilterRequest
> it looks to me that the final Request object might end up having this weird
> behavior:
>
> - request.ge
That indeed solved build problems on my box (mac) with both Java 1.7.0_51 and
1.8.0_20. Without the fix both java versions could not build (with different
error messages, interestingly).
Regards
Felix
Am 03.09.2014 um 11:35 schrieb David Jencks :
> I don't have this problem on my mac with
> j
ate our App to
> the latest HTTP Jetty version anyone, so maybe I'll take a look at wiring
> that debug flag back in at the same time.
>
> Do you think it's worth raising a JIRA report for it?
>
> -- Rob
>
> On 26/08/2014 12:01, Felix Meschberger wrote:
>>
Hi
If I see it correctly it all happens in the Jetty
org.eclipse.jetty.util.log.Log class, which by defaults sets up logging to
SLF4J which can be overwritten by setting the
„org.eclipse.jetty.util.log.class“ property.
Looking at JettyConfig it seems that the debug flag is not currently used.
Hi David
Hmm, good question. It has always been there - ever since it was first imported
into the Felix project as part of FELIX-11.
While an empty collection does not make that much sense, I think the check
doesn't either. On the other hand: If empty collections are allowed, then it
must be m
Hi
The question really is whether the _internal_ upgrade of the Jetty bundle to
Jetty 9 really is a major change for the Http Service functionality ?
Backwards compatibility is not expected to be hampered. The only difference,
apart from the new features offered potentially by Jetty 9, such as
Ha, I wondered how long it would take for someone to notice :-)
Honestly, I am sorry for the typo, indeed.
Regards
Felix
Am 19.06.2014 um 16:52 schrieb Bertrand Delacretaz :
> On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 4:15 PM, Felix Meschberger wrote:
>> ...I would like to congratulate Carsten to his
Hi all
The ASF Board yesterday approved a resolution to change the Apache Felix PMC
Chair. I have resigned and the PMC proposed Carsten Ziegeler to be the new
Chair of the Apache Felix PMC and thus bear the title VP, Apache Felix.
I would like to congratulate Carsten to his new role and wish hi
+1 FWIW.
I agree that having the source within the bundles might be a nice-to-have.
AFAICT we already deploy the sources to maven and as such can download them as
dependencies.
I would be ok if we would have a build profile which would create a developer's
artifact which embeds the sources wit
Hi David
Not sure any longer, why we have this SNAPSHOT step. Maybe really it was about
building a release candidate for others to test.
For the actual release process it is not really relevant.
Regards
Felix
Am 17.06.2014 um 11:37 schrieb David Bosschaert :
> The Felix release process
> (htt
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4530?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14032215#comment-14032215
]
Felix Meschberger commented on FELIX-4530:
--
[~cziegeler] It's about
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4530?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Felix Meschberger updated FELIX-4530:
-
Fix Version/s: maven-scr-plugin 1.17.2
> [SCR Plugin] Revisit setting the default out
Felix Meschberger created FELIX-4530:
Summary: [SCR Plugin] Revisit setting the default output to
target/classes
Key: FELIX-4530
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4530
Project
Apache Felix is a project aimed at implementing specifications from the OSGi
Alliance as well as implementing other supporting tools and technologies
aligned with OSGi technology.
Community
* PMC: No new PMC members have been added in this report period. The last new
PMC member was added in
Dear Apache Felix (and OSGi) enthusiast,
As you may be aware, ApacheCon will be held this year in Budapest, on
November 17-23. (See http://apachecon.eu for more info.)
The Call For Papers for that conference is still open, but will be
closing soon. We need your talk proposals, to represent Apache
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4420?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14007629#comment-14007629
]
Felix Meschberger commented on FELIX-4420:
--
[~jajans] +1
Except that I w
1 - 100 of 4873 matches
Mail list logo
