On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 04:45, Ikuo Yamasaki
yamasaki.i...@lab.ntt.co.jp wrote:
Felix, and David,
Thank you for your reply.
I understand about the framework stuff.
If anyone can provide information or a web page provides those info, it
would be very helpful, especially for newcomers to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2579?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefano Lenzi reassigned FELIX-2579:
Assignee: Stefano Lenzi
deviceType in desciption of subdevices missing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2579?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Work on FELIX-2579 started by Stefano Lenzi.
deviceType in desciption of subdevices missing
--
Key: FELIX
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2579?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefano Lenzi updated FELIX-2579:
-
Fix Version/s: upnp-basedriver-1.0.0
Affects Version/s: upnp-basedriver-0.8.0
UPn
---
Key: FELIX-2588
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2588
Project: Felix
Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: Stefano Lenzi
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2588?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefano Lenzi updated FELIX-2588:
-
Summary: UPnP Base Driver should nod depend on OSGi Compendium
bundle (was: UPn
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2588?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Work on FELIX-2588 started by Stefano Lenzi.
UPnP Base Driver should nod depend on OSGi Compendium bundle
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2579?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Work on FELIX-2579 stopped by Stefano Lenzi.
deviceType in desciption of subdevices missing
--
Key: FELIX
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2588?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Work on FELIX-2588 stopped by Stefano Lenzi.
UPnP Base Driver should nod depend on OSGi Compendium bundle
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2588?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefano Lenzi closed FELIX-2588.
Resolution: Fixed
Merged classes and added as export directive to the bundle
UPnP Base Driver
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2579?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefano Lenzi closed FELIX-2579.
Resolution: Fixed
Added the deviceType not only to rootDevice but also to its children
Dear Charbel,
Sorry for the late answer, I really believe that is a problem related
from the wiring. Actually, the problem is not caused by bundle 20 and
22 but to others bundle on your configuration. If you want to find the
source of the problem you should inspect the import/export tree for the
On 01/06/2010 1.58, charbel el_kaed wrote:
Hi Stefano,
Thanks for your reply.
I can't actually touch those bundles. Is there another way to do so ?
Have you checked if the hypothesis regarding the import/export headers
of bundle 20 and 22 are correct? If they aren't then the source of
On 27/05/2010 14.47, charbel el_kaed wrote:
Hi Stefano,
This is the wiring I had:
===
start 4
...
DEBUG: WIRE: 4.0 - javax.xml.parsers - 0
DEBUG: WIRE: 4.0 - org.w3c.dom - 20.0
DEBUG: WIRE: 4.0 - org.xml.sax - 22.0
I believe that the problem is
On 27/05/2010 9.47, charbel el_kaed wrote:
Hi Stephano,
During the step:
3 - stop Felix with the command stop 0 (if you stop it with ^C or by killing
java the next steps will fail)
Ok
Then starting felix with java -jar bin\felix.jar -Dfelix.log.level=5
If you start felix with
java -jar
On 26/05/2010 10.53, charbel el_kaed wrote:
Hi Stephano,
I attached the configuration file of the OSGi framework.
I couldn't see any file attached to your email, can you try to send it
again?
Thanks and Regards,
Charbel
Stefano Kismet Lenzi
It looks like that you are facing a classloading issue
The problem is related to your OSGi configuration , in fact I have just
tried to execute the UPnP Base Driver 0.8.0 on Felix 2.0.5 and it runs
perfectly. By looking at your configuration I don't think that the problem
is related to the
Dear Charbel,
Actually I have never had such problem, at the moment the only things
that I can think of is some issue with bootdelagation of classes, but I
need further information to come up with a solution. Would you mind to
send us:
- The OSGi version that you are using
- Java version
-archive.com/dev@felix.apache.org/msg09267.html
[9] - http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@felix.apache.org/msg09311.html
Regards,
Clement
Ciao,
Stefano Kismet Lenzi
On 21.05.2009, at 14:07, Stefano Lenzi wrote:
Hi All,
The vote has passed with the following result :
+1 (binding): Richard Hall
Richard S. Hall wrote:
Yes, I did vote on the new release too.
BTW, Stefano, you can vote on your own release, but didn't...
I thought that the vote of the releaser wasn't valid so I didn't vote
- richard
Hi All,
The vote has passed with the following result :
+1 (binding): Richard Hall, Clement Escoffier, Francesco Furfari
I will copy this release to the Felix dist directory and
promote the artifacts to the central Maven repository.
The Felix team is pleased to announce the release of Apache Felix UPnP
Extra version 0.4.0
This is the first release of a bundle containing a set of utility that
simplify the development of UPnPDevice
http://felix.apache.org/site/apache-felix-upnp.html
This release is available from
The Felix team is pleased to announce the release of Apache Felix UPnP
Tester version 0.4.0
This is the first release of a bundle containing a GUI tool implementing
a generic UPnP Control Point which allows the user to:
- discover device either on the OSGi platform or UPnP Network ( by
means
, Stefano Lenzi wrote:
I would like to call a vote for the release of two UPnP project:
- UPnP Extra 0.4.0
- UPnP Tester 0.4.0
The source and binary release archives, signature files, SHA and MD5
message digests for each are available as zip and tar.gz here:
http://people.apache.org/~lenzi/releases
Hi,
This is the second tentative for the first public release of the artifacts:
- Apache Felix UPnP Extra 0.4.0
- Apache Felix UPnP Tester 0.4.0
Since the previous tentative, I have updated the NOTICE files and I have
updated the releasing process to the new one.
During the first try the
This releasing process has been canceled and a new one has been started,
the new releasing tentative fixes the minor issues that this thread has
risen.
Ciao,
Stefano Kismet Lenzi
Stefano Lenzi wrote:
I would like to call a vote for the release of two UPnP project:
- UPnP Extra 0.4.0
- UPnP
I would like to call a vote for the release of two UPnP project:
- UPnP Extra 0.4.0
- UPnP Tester 0.4.0
The source and binary release archives, signature files, SHA and MD5
message digests for each are available as zip and tar.gz here:
http://people.apache.org/~lenzi/releases
Please vote to
Jackson, Bruce wrote:
Hi Stefano
I'm far from happy with the way the base driver actually works in various
areas, particularly subscriptions.
We have recentlty worked on some internal code of the CyberLink library
regarding the UPnP Subscription. So we may have fixed even your issues.
Hi Bruce,
Jackson, Bruce wrote:
Hi there
Using the felix UPnP base driver, I'm unable to retrieve icons for Windows
Media Player UPnP content sources.
I've followed the code through, and I come to the class:
org.apache.felix.upnp.basedriver.importer.util.HTTPRequestForIcon
...which is where
Hi Bruce and Surviant,
I would like to clarify which HTTP implementation is used by the Apache
Felix UPnP Base Driver, basedriver from now one. The only HTTP
implementation used by the basedriver uses the HTTP server developed by
CyberLink which uses jre-1.3 classes (so neither NIO nor MINA).
Felix Meschberger wrote:
Hi,
[cut]
The reason for this is the maven bundle plugin and bnd, which create the
Import-Package declaration with versions from the dependencies. So if we
include a dependency to o.o.framework of the o.o.core 1.2.0 bundle, we
get a required package version of 1.4.
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Richard S. Hall wrote:
P.S.:I have also found that the org.apache.felix.metatype is using a
wrong version number it should be 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT instead of
1.0.3-SNAPSHOT. Should we change it?
I think that version is correct - updating it to 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT creates
a
Service, MOSGi, Service Binder, Shell, UPnP
Subproject, Wire Admin
Environment: Empty local m2 repository, and SVN verion of Felix
Reporter: Stefano Lenzi
Priority: Minor
Several bundles depends on org.osgi.core:1.1.0-SNAPSHOT and
org.apache.felix.bundlerepository
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-715?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefano Lenzi updated FELIX-715:
Attachment: trunk.r693405.patch
A simple patch for let the trunk compile with an empty m2 maven
. WDYT?
Finally, my idea is to apply my patch and let the other developer fix it
if they do not agree.
Ciao,
Stefano Lenzi
P.S.:I have also found that the org.apache.felix.metatype is using a
wrong version number it should be 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT instead of
1.0.3-SNAPSHOT. Should we change it?
: Felix
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Maven Bundle Plugin
Affects Versions: maven-bundle-plugin-1.4.3
Reporter: Stefano Lenzi
Priority: Minor
At the moment maven-bundle-plugin allow a comma separated list as
excludeDependencies, but this list
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-684?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefano Lenzi updated FELIX-684:
Attachment: excludedependencies.r686718.patch
The patch implements the behavior request by my e
: UPnP Subproject
Affects Versions: upnp-basedriver-0.8.0
Reporter: Stefano Lenzi
Assignee: Stefano Lenzi
Priority: Minor
Allow UPnP Base Driver to be built with the cyberlink library.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-685?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefano Lenzi updated FELIX-685:
Attachment: pom.xml
Fixing POM
Compile the UPnP Base Driver with the cyberlink library
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-670?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefano Lenzi reassigned FELIX-670:
---
Assignee: Stefano Lenzi
UPnP Base Driver OBR description
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-670?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefano Lenzi updated FELIX-670:
Affects Version/s: upnp-basedriver-0.8.0
UPnP Base Driver OBR description
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-670?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefano Lenzi resolved FELIX-670.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Added the provided obr.xml
UPnP Base Driver OBR description
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-494?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefano Lenzi updated FELIX-494:
Affects Version/s: upnp-basedriver-0.8.0
basedriver bundle require split-package
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-494?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefano Lenzi resolved FELIX-494.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Patch has been already applied
basedriver bundle require split-package
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-494?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefano Lenzi closed FELIX-494.
---
Done
basedriver bundle require split-package
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-487?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefano Lenzi updated FELIX-487:
Component/s: UPnP Subproject
Compile bundles using org.osgi.foundation classlibrary instead
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-487?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefano Lenzi updated FELIX-487:
Component/s: (was: UPnP Subproject)
Compile bundles using org.osgi.foundation classlibrary
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-630?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12613220#action_12613220
]
Stefano Lenzi commented on FELIX-630:
-
So the problem seems to be related
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-630?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefano Lenzi updated FELIX-630:
Priority: Minor (was: Major)
Affects Version/s: upnp-basedriver-0.8.0
Severity
Jackson, Bruce ha scritto:
Hi Stefano,
Finally got to the heart of the problem and filed it. I've opened a case in
Jira witht the details.
Thanks
Bruce
Jira ticket is now assigned to me.
Ciao,
Stefano Kismet Lenzi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefano Lenzi closed FELIX-486.
---
Yes it is right :)
Felix release conting mixed bytecode: 1.3 and 1.4, we should compile all as
1.3
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-495?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefano Lenzi closed FELIX-495.
---
release classified version of the basedriver
Jackson, Bruce wrote:
Hi Stefano
I'll post the XML on Monday, but in answer to your question:
Looking at the code the id should never be empty, because the function
is called as follow:
String localId = new
StringBuffer(id).append(/device/).append(i).toString();
Jackson, Bruce wrote:
We are experiencing a problem, when trying to build a ContentDirectory which
can be seen by an Xbox 360.
We are aware that the Xbox uses a modified UPnP implementation, and having
taken this into account, the Xbox can see the UPnP device, (that is, it requests the
device
Jackson, Bruce wrote:
Hi there
I have a question regarding the underlying driver in the UPnP bundle.
In the class BuildDevice.java, we find the method below:
private static void buildDevice(String id,Device parent, ServiceReference sr) {
Node dev = new Node(Device.ELEM_NAME);
Hi All,
After two weeks more or less, and early closer of the vote, I'm going to
_definitly close_ the vote for releasing the first version 0.8.0 of the
UPnP Basedriver. The releasing vote is passed successfully with:
one +4 vote Richard S. Hall, Karl Pauls, Francesco Furfari, Stefano Lenzi
Felix Meschberger wrote:
Hi all,
I have just started the vote on releasing version 1.0.2 of the Apache
Felix Declarative Services implementation. The first release has been
1.0.0.
So, where is the 1.0.1 release ?
The short answer: There is none.
The longer answer: I did not create an 1.0.1
the release after 48hrs, just to leave you time to agree with
my above statement.
Ciao,
Stefano Kismet Lenzi
Stefano Lenzi wrote:
Hi all,
Finally the UPnP Subproject even is starting to release their projects,
even if the bundle is stable since the donation to the Apache Felix
project. Please
Karl Pauls wrote:
There is one issue namely, pom.xml is missing a license header but I
don't think that is a real showstopper. Furthermore, I'm not sure
that it is good to reverence outside repositories inside a subproject
pom.
Should I try to publish cyberdomo and cgupnpjava to Maven Central
+1, I am in favor.
Ciao,
Stefano Lenzi
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
As per IP Clearance recommendations, please cast your votes to accept the Pax
Logging implementation of the OSGi Log Service specification, utilizing Log4J
as the backend.
Pax Logging is already available under the Apache License
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12595679#action_12595679
]
Stefano Lenzi commented on FELIX-310:
-
I would like to work on this issue, but it seems
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-336?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12580247#action_12580247
]
Stefano Lenzi commented on FELIX-336:
-
I have just made some testes on how-to use maven
Hi All,
How does the maveb-bundle-plugin cope with native code?
AFAIK, it does nothing for native code, am I right?
Do you have any best-practices or advice for coping with native code
that we can add also to the maven-bundle-plugin?
What about interacting with reehep-nar-plugin
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Hi,
[cut]
Then upload the deployed stuff to people.apache.org and put them there
together with the KEYS file containing your public key so we can verify
the signatures.
Does it mean that I have to append my GPG create key to the file:
Karl Pauls wrote:
Stefano,
I have a couple of points inline.
I don't necessarily have any issues with releasing the bundles you
mention below, but main and framework are more complicated since we have
started committing stuff to them that should not be released yet. Thus,
to release
Hi All,
As discussed on the thread:
http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@felix.apache.org/msg03733.html
A new version schema for org.osgi.* module has been proposed. The new
version schema is the one already in use by the Apache Felix Common
subproject.
For example if the new version schema will
[X] +1 Use new version schema for org.osgi.* module
[ ] 0 Don't care.
[ ] -1 Keep the old name schema
Stefano Kismet Lenzi
Stefano Lenzi wrote:
Hi All,
As discussed on the thread:
http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@felix.apache.org/msg03733.html
A new version schema for org.osgi.* module has
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-513?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12577945#action_12577945
]
Stefano Lenzi commented on FELIX-513:
-
What about:
- Inspecting a FELIX_HOME
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-336?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12577949#action_12577949
]
Stefano Lenzi commented on FELIX-336:
-
How can we use minijar with maven-bundle-plugin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-331?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12577951#action_12577951
]
Stefano Lenzi commented on FELIX-331:
-
Is mangen deprecated?
If yes we should close
Alin Dreghiciu wrote:
(not binding)
I'm wondering about two facts related to this artifacts:
1. Are this bundle you are talking about 4.0.0 or 4.0.1 ?
I'm speaking about the one that we release and that are inside the repo,
honestly I don't know if they are 4.0.0 or 4.0.1 ( Does a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-299?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefano Lenzi reassigned FELIX-299:
---
Assignee: Stefano Lenzi
backport-util-concurrent 3.0 wrapping
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-299?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefano Lenzi resolved FELIX-299.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Applied a slighty modified version of the provided pom.xml
backport-util
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-183?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefano Lenzi resolved FELIX-183.
-
Resolution: Fixed
jzlib has been added to Apache Felix Common.
jzlib 1.0.7 wrapping
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-298?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefano Lenzi resolved FELIX-298.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Applied a slight modified version of the provided pom.xml
c3p0 0.9.1.1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-298?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefano Lenzi reassigned FELIX-298:
---
Assignee: Stefano Lenzi
c3p0 0.9.1.1 wrapping
-
Key
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-146?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12577974#action_12577974
]
Stefano Lenzi commented on FELIX-146:
-
is it not resolved?
Create an appropriate
range, so (due to my limit) I can't image a scenario where org.osgi.core
break while org.osgi.core-4.0.0 works. Can you provide me a use case
covering showing the benefit of org.osgi.core-4.0.0?
My 2 cents.
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 5:56 PM, Stefano Lenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All
Stefano Lenzi wrote:
Hi All,
Can anyone point me to a guide to follow for release our artifact?
I'm asking because I'm willing to create release artifact for review for
the following artifact:
- org.osgi.core-1.0.1
- org.osgi.compendium-1.0.1
- shell-1.0.1
- shell.tui-1.0.1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12578084#action_12578084
]
Stefano Lenzi commented on FELIX-155:
-
AFAIK all the module in Felix are free to depend
Hi All,
Can anyone point me to a guide to follow for release our artifact?
I'm asking because I'm willing to create release artifact for review for
the following artifact:
- org.osgi.core-1.0.1
- org.osgi.compendium-1.0.1
- shell-1.0.1
- shell.tui-1.0.1
- javax.servlet-1.0.1
-
Richard S. Hall wrote:
Stefano Lenzi wrote:
Before updating the current compendium we have to release it as 1.0.1
to allow people to:
- Use it with JDK 1.3 (FELIX-486)
- Remove static import which require extra bundle on JDK 1.3 (FELIX-488)
Also, releasing compendium as 1.0.1 is required
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefano Lenzi updated FELIX-486:
Fix Version/s: 1.0.4
Felix release conting mixed bytecode: 1.3 and 1.4, we should compile all
See comments below..
Richard S. Hall wrote:
Well, I was wondering about this too, but I think if there is an impact,
we can just make the impacted subprojects depend on the already released
version of compendium until they are made compatible with the newest
version. I think that should work.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-514?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefano Lenzi reassigned FELIX-514:
---
Assignee: Stefano Lenzi
Update compendium bundle to include osgi r4.1 interfaces
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-510?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefano Lenzi reassigned FELIX-510:
---
Assignee: Stefano Lenzi
pom.xml file needs to be updated to work with the current HEAD
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-510?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefano Lenzi resolved FELIX-510.
-
Resolution: Fixed
POM updated.
I tested the bundle generated and it seems to be working.
I have
Hi All,
I have some simple question about version schema that we are trying to
use/enforce:
1 - If a project as never been release should be a using a version less
or equal to 0.9.0-SNAPSHOT or it can use a version less or equal to
1.1.0-SNAPSHOT?
2 - Do the following version example
Christian van Spaandonk wrote:
[cut]
What dir structure should we use? I am fine with the structure proposed
a while ago by Felix (see below), what do you think?
+1 It's clear :)
- Christian
Felix Meschberger wrote:
Hi Marcel,
The software grant seems to have been registered 26. Nov
Hi All,
The issue FELIX-510 is related to the deploymentadmin bundle which is an
implementation of the Deployment Admin Specification defined in the OSGI
R4.1 Compendium document. At the moment the deploymentadmin bundle
contains, in its source folder, all the new API defined by the OSGi R4.1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-508?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefano Lenzi reassigned FELIX-508:
---
Assignee: Stefano Lenzi
Unresolved references to [org.kxml2.io, org.xmlpull.v1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-508?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12575196#action_12575196
]
Stefano Lenzi commented on FELIX-508:
-
I have updated to the version 633711 of SVN,I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-508?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefano Lenzi closed FELIX-508.
---
Resolution: Cannot Reproduce
No error in the current building. User confirm that now it works for him
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-491?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12571425#action_12571425
]
Stefano Lenzi commented on FELIX-491:
-
Are we going to completly replace maven-obr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-495?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12571426#action_12571426
]
Stefano Lenzi commented on FELIX-495:
-
Do you think that the pom I have committed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-496?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefano Lenzi updated FELIX-496:
Description:
We should be reversion the org.osgi.foundation in order to provided information
Hi All,
I'm trying to get some feedback on issue listed in the subject.
FELIX-486: I think we can close it.
FELIX-487: Does inheritence from parent to module work for profile?
AFAIK it doesn't work, any idea on how to implement the 487?
FELIX-496: Waiting for comment or idea.
Ciao,
Stefano
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-492?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefano Lenzi closed FELIX-492.
---
Thank you Stuart
Add support to classifier: enable bunlde:bundle goal to generate classified
artifact
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-495?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12570852#action_12570852
]
Stefano Lenzi commented on FELIX-495:
-
Stuart why have you used a different
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-498?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefano Lenzi closed FELIX-498.
---
I haven't tested the new obr javadoc command, but the rest is working.
Enable javadoc deployment on OBR
1 - 100 of 207 matches
Mail list logo
