Re: autologin to another HTML page from flex app

2013-03-24 Thread Madhu Dutta
yes..but in that case i need a small amount of..then i can try to modify those thing. On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 9:45 AM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote: On 3/23/13 1:25 PM, Madhu Dutta iammadhusudan...@gmail.com wrote: can you send me a code snippets? I'm not sure it is safe to put the

Re: autologin to another HTML page from flex app

2013-03-24 Thread Alex Harui
The code could vary widely. A session id is usually a string returned from the server at login. Does your server return it? And then after that I think it depends the API. Hopefully the URL you will pass into navigate URL will take the session id as an argument as in:

Re: [Git/Wiki] please review the proposed workflow and comment

2013-03-24 Thread Frédéric THOMAS
As I am digging further into this though, I am coming up with a lot of questions. I am guessing, based on the fact that I am seeing whiteboards, etc. that committers don't really have their own forks in our current apache model, but rather everyone is using their own clone of the same fork. Am

FXG - SVG progress

2013-03-24 Thread Om
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 6:48 AM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote: On 3/22/13 12:36 AM, Erik de Bruin e...@ixsoftware.nl wrote: I think both the FlexJS as well as VanillaSDK frameworks can benefit from this. So it should be available to both. I don't know much about XSLT, but if it

Re: [Git/Wiki] please review the proposed workflow and comment

2013-03-24 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, Would you mind if I wrote up a proposed alternate that doesn't use rebase and eliminate fast forwards? Yes, it will mean there is an extra 'useless' commit... which I don't actually always find useless, but I think it simpler. Then let's just discuss. +1 to at least considering this.

Re: [Git/Wiki] please review the proposed workflow and comment

2013-03-24 Thread Erik de Bruin
+ 1 on starting out simple and keeping the message clear. When needed, or as a suggested way to work for those who have a better than noob level understanding of git, I think we should keep the rebase workflow in the wiki. Furthermore, we should write up as much of this discussion in the wiki as

Re: [4/4] git commit: Updated .gitignore

2013-03-24 Thread Erik de Bruin
Fred, I'm afraid that with these generic terms in .gitignore, there is the risk that at some point too much is excluded. Remember, most active committers are noobs at git, and when someone want to actually add an out directory to the project, he/she wouldn't see it in git because it is

[jira] [Commented] (FLEX-28967) PopUpManagerImpl - centerPopUp method - TypeError: Error #1009: Cannot access a property or method of a null object reference

2013-03-24 Thread Carlos Rovira (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-28967?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13612071#comment-13612071 ] Carlos Rovira commented on FLEX-28967: -- The Fix by miroslav.havrlent was tested and

[jira] [Assigned] (FLEX-28967) PopUpManagerImpl - centerPopUp method - TypeError: Error #1009: Cannot access a property or method of a null object reference

2013-03-24 Thread Carlos Rovira (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-28967?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Carlos Rovira reassigned FLEX-28967: Assignee: Carlos Rovira PopUpManagerImpl - centerPopUp method - TypeError: Error

Re: FXG to SVG - working example

2013-03-24 Thread Harbs
I barely touch mobile (at the moment). If I did I would probably be interested. I'm hoping someone else picks up on this… Harbs On Mar 23, 2013, at 6:39 AM, Daniel Freeman wrote: I wrote one of those. I wrote SVG - AS3 graphics. And extending that class, I wrote FXG - AS3 graphics. It

[jira] [Updated] (FLEX-28967) PopUpManagerImpl - centerPopUp method - TypeError: Error #1009: Cannot access a property or method of a null object reference

2013-03-24 Thread Carlos Rovira (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-28967?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Carlos Rovira updated FLEX-28967: - Description: Steps to reproduce: ?xml version=1.0 encoding=utf-8? s:Application

[jira] [Assigned] (FLEX-33408) UIComponent#getVisibleRect() omitted from documentation

2013-03-24 Thread Carlos Rovira (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33408?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Carlos Rovira reassigned FLEX-33408: Assignee: Carlos Rovira UIComponent#getVisibleRect() omitted from documentation

[jira] [Resolved] (FLEX-33408) UIComponent#getVisibleRect() omitted from documentation

2013-03-24 Thread Carlos Rovira (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33408?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Carlos Rovira resolved FLEX-33408. -- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: Apache Flex Next UIComponent#getVisibleRect()

[jira] [Commented] (FLEX-33408) UIComponent#getVisibleRect() omitted from documentation

2013-03-24 Thread Carlos Rovira (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33408?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13612087#comment-13612087 ] Carlos Rovira commented on FLEX-33408: -- Applied Patch by Mark Kessler. Thanks Mark

Re: [Git/Wiki] please review the proposed workflow and comment

2013-03-24 Thread Frédéric THOMAS
Hi Guys, Just to say I created a new page on the wiki [1] to demonstrate Good vs Bad scenarios / Git usage, I'll fill it with more complex scenarios over the time. It can be reviewed too :) Thanks, -Fred [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Good+vs+Bad+Git+usage

Re: [Git/Wiki] please review the proposed workflow and comment

2013-03-24 Thread Frédéric THOMAS
Folks, During the review of [1] you'll probably do, I've got no doubts the explanation parts I wrote with my English will not be grammatically correct, I hope anyway, that will be understandable, feel free to make me some proposals to improve it, that will save headaches for the others.

[MENTORS] Voting on code donations

2013-03-24 Thread Alex Harui
Hi Former Mentors, We’ve had some generous offers of code donations. I noticed that some projects have votes about whether to accept code donations, but we haven’t for any Adobe donations to Apache Flex. Is voting optional? -- Alex Harui Flex SDK Team Adobe Systems, Inc.

Re: Unsubscribe

2013-03-24 Thread Adnan Doric
Wrong email, sorry :)

[jira] [Commented] (FLEX-29004) BitmapImage.scaleMode=zoom does not always center vertically

2013-03-24 Thread Carlos Rovira (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-29004?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13612149#comment-13612149 ] Carlos Rovira commented on FLEX-29004: -- Could not find a way to reproduce this issue.

[jira] [Assigned] (FLEX-21066) Make removeItem( item:Object) accessible in ArrayCollection

2013-03-24 Thread Carlos Rovira (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-21066?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Carlos Rovira reassigned FLEX-21066: Assignee: Carlos Rovira Make removeItem( item:Object) accessible in ArrayCollection

Re: Unsubscribe

2013-03-24 Thread Frédéric THOMAS
Hi, Try to send an email here: dev-unsubscr...@flex.apache.org Thanks, -Fred -Message d'origine- From: Adnan Doric Sent: Sunday, March 24, 2013 4:44 PM To: dev@flex.apache.org Subject: Re: Unsubscribe Wrong email, sorry :)

Re: [VOTE] Accept Falcon into the Apache Incubator (was originally named Ivory)

2013-03-24 Thread Dave Fisher
Hi, Does the Apache Flex project intend to have a product called Apache Falcon? If so then someone ought to say so on gene...@i.ao Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone On Mar 24, 2013, at 12:18 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli vino...@hortonworks.com wrote: +1 (non-binding) Thanks, +Vinod

Re: [Git/Wiki] please review the proposed workflow and comment

2013-03-24 Thread Frédéric THOMAS
Sorry, I meant sparse checkouts :P Me and my English... -Fred -Message d'origine- From: Frédéric THOMAS Sent: Sunday, March 24, 2013 9:34 PM To: dev@flex.apache.org Subject: Re: [Git/Wiki] please review the proposed workflow and comment Hi Mike, I'm not sure what you mean talking

Re: [Git/Wiki] please review the proposed workflow and comment

2013-03-24 Thread Justin Mclean
HI, Out of curiosity, and I am sorry if this was discussed in another thread, is there anything from an infrastructure perspective that is stopping commiters from having forks of the main repo? Effectively the concept of a whiteboard is more or less redundant to me if people were using

Re: [Git/Wiki] please review the proposed workflow and comment

2013-03-24 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, With 1. what happens if you do a pull before the commit like so: echo Create File1 File1 git add File1 git pull git commit -m Added File1 git push Justin

[jira] [Resolved] (FLEX-21066) Make removeItem( item:Object) accessible in ArrayCollection

2013-03-24 Thread Carlos Rovira (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-21066?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Carlos Rovira resolved FLEX-21066. -- Resolution: Implemented Fix Version/s: Adobe Flex SDK Next The added removeItem method

Re: [Git/Wiki] please review the proposed workflow and comment

2013-03-24 Thread Frédéric THOMAS
Hi Justin, --- With 1. what happens if you do a pull before the commit like so: echo Create File1 File1 git add File1 git pull git commit -m Added File1 git push --- Nothing in this case as nothing happened remotely. Btw, I just did a git update +

Re: [Git/Wiki] please review the proposed workflow and comment

2013-03-24 Thread Frédéric THOMAS
I mean the pull does not anything. -Fred -Message d'origine- From: Frédéric THOMAS Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 12:50 AM To: dev@flex.apache.org Subject: Re: [Git/Wiki] please review the proposed workflow and comment Hi Justin, --- With 1. what happens if you do

Re: [Git/Wiki] please review the proposed workflow and comment

2013-03-24 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, I mean the pull does not anything. The pull would do a fetch and then merge in the README change wouldn't it? Justin

Re: [Git/Wiki] please review the proposed workflow and comment

2013-03-24 Thread Frédéric THOMAS
I guess you're talking about the really 1rst case ? Then, yes but nothing changed remotely, so, it doesn't pull anything. -Fred -Message d'origine- From: Justin Mclean Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 1:05 AM To: dev@flex.apache.org Subject: Re: [Git/Wiki] please review the proposed

Re: [Git/Wiki] please review the proposed workflow and comment

2013-03-24 Thread Frédéric THOMAS
Btw, even after the commit, it doesn't do anything and for the same reason, the point is as you used to do with Svn, you do an update before doing a commit, to check if there are conflicts. -Fred -Message d'origine- From: Frédéric THOMAS Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 1:09 AM To:

Re: [Git/Wiki] please review the proposed workflow and comment

2013-03-24 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, Btw, even after the commit, it doesn't do anything and for the same reason, the point is as you used to do with Svn, you do an update before doing a commit, to check if there are conflicts. I assume you mean do a pull to merge any changes before you do a push? I don't see why you would

Re: [Git/Wiki] please review the proposed workflow and comment

2013-03-24 Thread Frédéric THOMAS
You right, I meant a git push talking about svn commit. -Fred -Message d'origine- From: Justin Mclean Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 1:20 AM To: dev@flex.apache.org Subject: Re: [Git/Wiki] please review the proposed workflow and comment Hi, Btw, even after the commit, it doesn't do

Re: [1/4] git commit: add removeItem to IList and ListCollectionView

2013-03-24 Thread Alex Harui
Carlos, Did you consider that this change will break all third-party IList implementations? I would prefer that you revert this change and create an IList2 interface. Sorry, -Alex On 3/24/13 4:06 PM, carlosrov...@apache.org carlosrov...@apache.org wrote: Updated Branches:

Re: [1/4] git commit: add removeItem to IList and ListCollectionView

2013-03-24 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, Did you consider that this change will break all third-party IList implementations? Just wondering how common that would be? Over the years I used it quit often but can't recall needing to implement it. The AS3 commons collections use there own (different) IList interface. I would

Re: [1/4] git commit: add removeItem to IList and ListCollectionView

2013-03-24 Thread Alex Harui
On 3/24/13 9:20 PM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote: Hi, Did you consider that this change will break all third-party IList implementations? Just wondering how common that would be? Over the years I used it quit often but can't recall needing to implement it. The AS3

Re: [1/4] git commit: add removeItem to IList and ListCollectionView

2013-03-24 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, The fact he had to change all of those SDK files was a first clue that this could impact third-parties. Another possibility (possibly a little less useful but 100% 3rd party compatible) is to leave the interface as it was before (perhaps with the new method commented out to indicate it

Re: [1/4] git commit: add removeItem to IList and ListCollectionView

2013-03-24 Thread Alex Harui
On 3/24/13 9:42 PM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote: Hi, The fact he had to change all of those SDK files was a first clue that this could impact third-parties. Another possibility (possibly a little less useful but 100% 3rd party compatible) is to leave the interface as it

[jira] [Closed] (FLEX-16875) Add 'justify' to TextStyles.as

2013-03-24 Thread Cyrill Zadra (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-16875?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Cyrill Zadra closed FLEX-16875. --- Resolution: Later Fix Version/s: Apache Flex Next Before FLEX-385 isn't implemented there is

Re: [1/4] git commit: add removeItem to IList and ListCollectionView

2013-03-24 Thread Alex Harui
On 3/24/13 10:22 PM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote: On 3/24/13 9:42 PM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote: Hi, The fact he had to change all of those SDK files was a first clue that this could impact third-parties. Another possibility (possibly a little less