The notification came on comm...@flex.apache.org, the usual address for
commits.
Thanks,
Om
On Jun 5, 2014 10:53 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
> HI,
>
> > Commit notifications are coming through fine!
>
> Perhaps issues@ rather than dev@?
>
> Justin
>
HI,
> Commit notifications are coming through fine!
Perhaps issues@ rather than dev@?
Justin
Thanks Alexander! :) It helped me a lot!
Piotr
-
Apache Flex Committer
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/No-Flash-Player-version-in-Nightly-build-Intellij-IDEA-tp37787p38069.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Develo
Commit notifications are coming through fine!
Thanks,
Om
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Harbs wrote:
> Branch: refs/heads/master
> Home: https://github.com/Harbs/TLF-Table-Work
> Commit: 172afdaed9a3309706441491eb47d9379a199f9c
>
> https://github.com/Harbs/TLF-Table-Work/commit/172afd
Okie Dokie.
I made the repository public: https://github.com/Harbs/TLF-Table-Work
And I added commit email notifications.
Hope it’s useful…
On Jun 6, 2014, at 2:00 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Harbs wrote:
>
>> If adding an email hook or opening the Githu
Hmm, ok, I'll go with seven. In my head I had an eighth person.
Thanks for catching that,
-Alex
On 6/5/14 3:57 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>>
>> -Eight committers gave presentations on Flex at the 360|Flex conference.
>>
>
>I count only 7 here [1] Are you sure your count is correct?
>
>T
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Harbs wrote:
> If adding an email hook or opening the Github repository will help, I’m
> fine with doing that.
>
>
That will definitely be useful in considering Jude for committership, which
is what I am looking forward to as well. It should be straightforward to
>
> -Eight committers gave presentations on Flex at the 360|Flex conference.
>
I count only 7 here [1] Are you sure your count is correct?
Thanks,
Om
[1] http://www.360flex.com/#speakers
If adding an email hook or opening the Github repository will help, I’m fine
with doing that.
But, yeah I gotta do as much hunkerin' down as I can… ;-)
On Jun 6, 2014, at 1:37 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 6/5/14 3:29 PM, "Harbs" wrote:
>
>> I¹m actually paying Jude to work on this, so it
Hi,
> -Frédéric Thomas
> -Frédéric THMOAS
> -fthomas
You can join your names together on the site.
> And they mention only JAVA and XML, not actionscript where I did some work
> too.
They guestimate but it better than no stats.
Justin
Hi,
> Hmm. It felt like we saw more activity like Fred on FDB, Chris on Maven
> and contributions from Nick and MikeL. I'm tempted to leave it in.
Up to you.
> Are you suggestion that we not say this in the report?
Leave it in - that fin by me.
Justin
On 6/5/14 3:29 PM, "Harbs" wrote:
>I¹m actually paying Jude to work on this, so it¹s probably not necessary
>for him to sign anything.
OK, if you have documentation that you own his work, then yes, no other
paperwork is required.
>
>I¹m very concerned about time and overhead invested in this (
I am asking because I am working on migration current TLF tests to Flex Unit
4. I have migrated 13 classes already, but more than 50 left. :) Once you
finish your work you could look into my migrated test, (FlexUnit4TestsTLF
branch) and I will also take a look into your code an try to write some
te
This is very strange. My copy of HTTPService.js does not have a value
argument, and I don't see that it ever had one in source control.
Can you verify what version of FlexJS you are using and how you are doing
the cross-compile? Maybe you are using and old launch config or something
that is poin
I’m actually paying Jude to work on this, so it’s probably not necessary for
him to sign anything.
I’m very concerned about time and overhead invested in this (I’m on a really
tight schedule), so of the three options that Om mentioned, adding the email
hook is the only one I can see working.
P
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> I know that requiring Jude to use patches will slow things down, but right
> now his work isn't happening at Apache so it isn't clear we can/should use
> that in considering committership for him, and also, all of his work is
> not granted to Ap
I know that requiring Jude to use patches will slow things down, but right
now his work isn't happening at Apache so it isn't clear we can/should use
that in considering committership for him, and also, all of his work is
not granted to Apache so really, you can't land your changes back in the
Apac
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Harbs wrote:
> Well, I’m open to suggestions. I could invite other folks to the
> repository to see what we’re doing. I could also make it public. I could
> also port the code over to the main Apache git repository.
>
> I’m kind of hesitant to do the last option ri
We need unit tests, but I’m really inexperienced with doing that.
I could really use help with that…
On Jun 6, 2014, at 12:22 AM, piotrz wrote:
> Hi Harbs.
>
> I am happy that you and June are working on TLF tables. :) I have a question
> - Are you going write some unit tests once you finish
Well, I’m open to suggestions. I could invite other folks to the repository to
see what we’re doing. I could also make it public. I could also port the code
over to the main Apache git repository.
I’m kind of hesitant to do the last option right now, because I can’t really
afford the time it wo
Hi,
After debugging the JS code, found on the HTTPService.js class something that I
think is not ok.
The function org.apache.flex.net.HTTPService.prototype.send = function(value)
expects an argument, but that is not send, and the value of the var "value"
defaults to null.
Around line 320 ther
Hi,
After debugging the JS code, found on the HTTPService.js class something
that I think is not ok.
The function org.apache.flex.net.HTTPService.prototype.send =
function(value) expects an argument, but that is not send, and the value of
the var "value" defaults to null.
Around line 320 there's
Hi Harbs.
I am happy that you and June are working on TLF tables. :) I have a question
- Are you going write some unit tests once you finish everything ?
Thanks,
Piotr
-
Apache Flex Committer
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.24
IMO, it would have been better to have Jude work via JIRA for a bit so we
could see his work and collaboration in the open which would have probably
resulted in him being voted in as a committer.
And, of course, it isn't too late to start doing that.
-Alex
On 6/5/14 2:02 PM, "Harbs" wrote:
>BT
BTW, “very active” is 59 commits since March 26. (I was working on it myself
before that.)
On Jun 5, 2014, at 11:58 PM, Harbs wrote:
> FWIW, Jude and I have both been very active on the TLF table support.
>
> We’ve been working on a private Github repository because Jude is not a
> committer
FWIW, Jude and I have both been very active on the TLF table support.
We’ve been working on a private Github repository because Jude is not a
committer and things are still quite unstable.
Current status is as follows:
* Tables render with cell strokes and backgrounds
* Selections of cell conten
I just noticed, that my updated Mavenizer currently doesn't generate the
resource bundles. Will have to fix that.
One other thing I noticed, is that I currently don't know how to download the
playerglobal resource bundles from adobe ... where exactly are these located?
Are they relative to the p
Well, I'm not sure I can trust this contributor summary anyway because first
I'm divided in 3:
-Frédéric Thomas
-Frédéric THMOAS
-fthomas
And they mention only JAVA and XML, not actionscript where I did some work too.
Frédéric THOMAS
> From: aha...@adobe.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject
On 6/5/14 5:00 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> In the past three months we've continued to see:
>> - Continued JIRA activity (more bugs raised than resolved however)
>Yep - we need more user and committers active here in helping to fix bugs.
>
>> - More committers becoming active again.
>L
Brainwashed iSheep!!! good one!!!
But Swift support Generics!! the sheep got some grass!
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 8:01 AM, wrote:
> So that guy is right in that it's still just as bad as a walled garden
> with swift as anything else from Apple. I've never been a fan of Apple but
> I dislike it
Hi all,
Recently most Google Domains including google.com, google.com.hk,
news.google.com, code.google.com etc. are blocked in China, we don't know
why, but things like this happened before.
The Flex SDK Installer will download SWFObject from code.google.com, this
step fails every time, causing a
Right, it could be written in it and not cross compiled. It could be that the
project is what get cross compiled and then packaged with the runtime. I think
though that this could be a good opportunity to improve the runtime in general
as was previously talked about with the AS4 plans but I gues
>
> features. The limitation on loading compiled byte code is purely just a
> licensing and not a technical limitation that imposed by Apple.
>
As I understand it, it is mostly a security feature. They don't want any
VMs that can potentially run 'arbitrary' (unsigned) code inside one big
sandbox.
So that guy is right in that it's still just as bad as a walled garden with
swift as anything else from Apple. I've never been a fan of Apple but I dislike
it less now that Steve Jobs is gone. I think that it has a large portion of the
market though so it's important to target for something that
Hi,
> In the past three months we've continued to see:
> - Continued JIRA activity (more bugs raised than resolved however)
Yep - we need more user and committers active here in helping to fix bugs.
> - More committers becoming active again.
Looks steady to me:
http://www.ohloh.net/p/ApacheFlex/c
I don’t think that’s correct. Unless I’m mistaken, the AIR iOS runtime is
written in Objective C from the get-go. (Although it might be written in C++.
Dunno…)
Whether or not it makes sense to rewrite the AIR iOS runtime in Swift is an
entirely different question — which probably only the engin
My understanding is that the entire runtime gets cross compiled into objective
c. So Adobe would have to rewrite this to use swift, but I think the same
process would basically be used. It's possible though that swift could enable
additional features. The limitation on loading compiled byte code
Hi Alex,
Thank you!
Same code in the Actionscript version is working like a charm, but the JS
version is not sending any data.
Also called your post app for testing using JS.
-Mensagem original-
De: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Enviada: 4 de junho de 2
Hi all,
A reply from the thread by jeffward
https://forums.adobe.com/message/6433521#6433521
"jeffward: There's no good reason to invest in a walled-garden,
single-company language, whether as a developer or a company. Swift is an
brand new experiment, and you guys are acting like brainwashed iSh
-1 (binding)
I'm vetoing this commit because it is causing the following (sets of)
Mustella tests to fail:
- components/MenuBar/Halo/Styles/MenuBar_MenuStyles
- components/Menu/Halo/Properties/Menu_Properties
- components/Menu/Halo/Styles/Menu_Styles
- components/Menu/Spark/Properties/Menu_Proper
-1 (binding)
I'm vetoing this commit because it is causing the following (sets of)
Mustella tests to fail:
- gumbo/components/ComboBox/Properties/ComboBox_Properties_UserInput
(aharui: "The ComboBox failures are due to the change FLEX-34222. I have
not looked into why.")
It has been three weeks
-1 (binding)
I'm vetoing this commit because it is causing the following (sets of)
Mustella tests to fail:
- LangPacks/Japanese/tests/runtimeErrorTests (aharui: "The new logic around
setting the hasFieldName and hadPreviousFieldName changed and is no longer
trigging the expected error which lets
Chris,
Excellent news! This will make the SDK so much more accessible and should
really help retaining existing and attracting new users.
Thanks,
EdB
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Christofer Dutz
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> so I had to to quite a lot of cleaning up in Flexmojos and some tweakin
Hi,
so I had to to quite a lot of cleaning up in Flexmojos and some tweaking of the
Mavenizer, but I guess I can see the finishing line :-)
I've managed to get Flexmojos to work with the new FDK structure, but that
demanded quite a lot of work on the testsuite and some internal work. I want
44 matches
Mail list logo
