>
> So, in each class, I have a whole bunch of setters and getters I would like
> to be transformed. There would likely be methods like draw, drawRect, etc.
> that need to be left empty. Is that possible? Or is that too specific?
>
Yes, way too specific ;-) I can 'do' ALL empty implementations,
On 9/2/14 10:36 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> Justin took a quick look at the code and says it is pretty much ready
>>for donation.
>
>It needs a small amount of work but nothing major, a few compiled example
>swf removed, a few headers added and minor modification to LICENSE. IMO
>there
Hi,
> Justin took a quick look at the code and says it is pretty much ready for
> donation.
It needs a small amount of work but nothing major, a few compiled example swf
removed, a few headers added and minor modification to LICENSE. IMO there only
one file we wouldn't be able to accept withou
The creators of the FlatSpark theme (https://github.com/akamud/FlatSpark)
have generously offered to donate the theme to Apache Flex. Justin took a
quick look at the code and says it is pretty much ready for donation. In
the thread subject "Designers needed for default theme" [1], the FlatSpark
f
Hi,
> ButtonIcon and TextInputIcon were implemented based on Button and
> TextInput, no other examples were used, so I think those are fine.
Looks fine to me.
> ToogleSwitch was implemented based on the example from this post:
> http://yonaskolb.com/blog/2012/1/18/flex-toggle-switch-spark-skin.h
OK. Sounds like the code is in good shape although it might be better to
leave ToggleSwitch behind for now.
In skimming older parts of this thread, looks like there might be some
difference in opinion on FlatSpark vs BootFlat. I'll start a DISCUSS
thread to try to sort that out before we run a V
ButtonIcon and TextInputIcon were implemented based on Button and
TextInput, no other examples were used, so I think those are fine.
ToogleSwitch was implemented based on the example from this post:
http://yonaskolb.com/blog/2012/1/18/flex-toggle-switch-spark-skin.html
There is a reference to it in
Hi,
Just had a quick look and it looks like it would be reasonably easy to donate,
and IMO the zip from github is probably in good enough form to be the donation.
A few files would need to be removed from it for the final grant.
Here's what I can see:
- The original inspiration is under CC/MIT
FlatUI is written by DesignModo, and I am not affiliated with them.
I wrote new source code to implement their visuals, withouth copying it
from their source code.
FlatSpark does not have any dependency on Bootstrap.
All the code is just ActionScript + some CSS.
Donating just the skins might be
Unless someone from legal-discuss responds to my last query saying we
"must" change the README, I'll vote +1 when I start my day tomorrow (in
the other thread).
-Alex
On 9/2/14 9:25 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>+1 Binding
>
>MD5 looks fine
>Valid signature found
>README looks good
>RELEASE
Hi Mahmoud,
Let me see if I understand:
Was Flat-UI written by some other group of people, maybe a group called
DesignModo, and you are not affiliated with them?
Did you just write new source code to implement their visuals?
Does your source code have dependencies on BootStrap?
Is your code wr
I would like to donate the entire source code.
It is actually based on FlatUI, which is open-source but under CC 3.0 and
MIT License. While it is not a fork, all the color schemes are based on
this. (https://github.com/designmodo/Flat-UI)
We had planned a version of BootFlat but other things got i
Hi,
Just moving Om 's vote to here so it's all in one thread.
+1 Binding
MD5 looks fine
Valid signature found
README looks good
RELEASE_NOTES look good
LICENSE looks good
Source kit compiles fine
Thanks,
Om
Hi,
This vote has actually open for about 100 hours, but here's a new thread so the
gmail users among you don't get confused :-)
So far we have only one binding vote:
+1 Justin Mclean
This is a Squiggly Release Candidate 1. Please see the RELEASE_NOTES and the
README.
Changes from the last
+1 Binding
MD5 looks fine
Valid signature found
README looks good
RELEASE_NOTES look good
LICENSE looks good
Source kit compiles fine
Thanks,
Om
On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 2:31 AM, Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> +1 binding
>
> - artefact names good
> - signatures and hash good
> - NOTICE and LI
On 9/2/14 9:18 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> The author assumed he had permission because it was on my blog and the
>> intent of the blog was to share code with the community.
>
>Given it's actually found in quite a few places, and Adobe doesn't seem
>to mind, it may be considered public
Hi,
> The author assumed he had permission because it was on my blog and the
> intent of the blog was to share code with the community.
Given it's actually found in quite a few places, and Adobe doesn't seem to
mind, it may be considered public domain, but definitely better to get
permission.
On 9/2/14 8:31 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>In the Radii8 donation I just saw that there's some code formatting code
>that formats AS/MXML code. This seems a good fit for Tour De Flex
>examples and this JIRA issue:
>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-34481
>
>Looks like the code [
Sorry, I did not notice this new vote thread. Gmail merged it with the
DISCUSS thread. I will take it for a spin.
It will be good if you changed the subject just a little bit to avoid this
in future.
Thanks,
Om
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 8:51 PM, Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Some time has pas
Hi,
Some time has passed and we only have one vote to release this.
Can a couple of PMC members please take a look and see if we can move towards
releasing this or if that there are any further issues and another RC is
required?
Thanks,
Justin
Hi,
> Does Apache still have interest in using FlatSpark?
There are PMC and committers who can help out and it looks like user want it,
so while I can't speak for all of Apache, I'd say the answer is yes.
Thanks,
Justin
I believe we are still interested. Can you re-cap what you would plan to
donate? Is it still derived from BootFlat?
I have just completed processing the donation of Radii8 from Judah
Frangipane. I think I now have cycles to work with you on this donation
if you want my assistance. (You don't h
Hi,
In the Radii8 donation I just saw that there's some code formatting code that
formats AS/MXML code. This seems a good fit for Tour De Flex examples and this
JIRA issue:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-34481
Looks like the code [1] is based on and/or extends this [2] which is Apac
Unfortunately no updates have been made, but we are still willing to donate
the project.
Does Apache still have interest in using FlatSpark?
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 10:49 PM, Vincent Sotto [via Apache Flex
Development] wrote:
> is there any flatspark update?
>
>
> On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 1:54 A
is there any flatspark update?
On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 1:54 AM, Mahmoud Ali wrote:
> > That is good news. And no pull requests were accepted?
>
> So far no pull requests were made...
>
> >Well, BootFlat is a bit different to Apache Flex. It appears to be owned
> >by a corporation. You are fr
Fixed :)
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> On 9/2/14 11:24 AM, "Chris Martin" wrote:
> >Am I right in assuming we have two sections? One for those who have a
> >photo, and another for those that don't?
> That's my understanding as well.
>
> -Alex
>
>
>
Infra responded rather quickly to the flex-radii8 request. It would be
already created but I didn't tell them if it was supposed to be a bare
repo or an import of another repo.
So, I think we should break up flex-utilities. At the top-level is:
ApacheFXG
FlexPMD
Squiggly
Common
insta
FlexJSJX in structure is pretty identical to FlexJSUI. The difference is
in the frameworks/as/build.xml file. This is where FlexJSJX is told to
x-compile into JS. The result of that compile step is in
frameworks/js/FlexJS/libs. From there you copy the resulting .js files to
your ApacheFlexJS instal
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> I believe Peter has some complete components he cross compiles from AS to
> JS. In theory any AS class can be compiled into JS ;-)
>
Yes, I would like that please.
http://www.reactiongifs.us/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/give_it_to_me_stephen_
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Yep, look at how the FlexJSJX swc is set up.
More specific, please? I am looking at them and FlexJSUI and FlexJSJX seem
quite similar to each other.
> You can then keep them as
> auto generated, or after one crank through, switch the set
I believe Peter has some complete components he cross compiles from AS to
JS. In theory any AS class can be compiled into JS ;-)
If there is any specific way you want FalconJX to treat your files, just
let me know. I can e.g. make empty JS stubs by not compiling the
implementation, and hook that u
On 9/2/14 11:24 AM, "Chris Martin" wrote:
>Am I right in assuming we have two sections? One for those who have a
>photo, and another for those that don't?
That's my understanding as well.
-Alex
Yep, look at how the FlexJSJX swc is set up. You can then keep them as
auto generated, or after one crank through, switch the setup to how the
FlexJSUI swc is set up and manually code the JS after that.
-Alex
On 9/2/14 11:23 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>I have created a slew of classes in
I can nab that. I was wondering about the order when I added my profile
in. I checked the commit log to see how we did it in previous commits ;)
Am I right in assuming we have two sections? One for those who have a
photo, and another for those that don't? So we'd have all the profiles
with phot
I have created a slew of classes in the graphics library on the AS side.
Is there a way to stub out these classes in JS automatically instead of
having to do each one manually? I know the internals have to be changed,
but if I have stuff automatically built, I figured it would make my life
easier.
Hehe, Team Chris! :D
On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 8:16 AM, Christofer Dutz
wrote:
> Yeah! Welcome ... yet another Chris on board ;-)
>
> Chris
>
>
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Maurice Amsellem [mailto:maurice.amsel...@systar.com]
> Gesendet: Freitag, 29. August 2014 19:08
> An: dev@fle
Well that is probably the ideal method to have each repo for each utility. I
believe you can push a branch to a new repository. We could test this out on a
github throw away repo. But if not, I still like the branch separation as a
second best.
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: Alex H
On 9/2/14 5:31 AM, "Kessler CTR Mark J" wrote:
>+1
>
>I like the idea. I can see Justin's concerns too. Is there a way to
>have multiple github repos one with each of the dev-subprojects ?
I've asked for a new repo for radii8. We'll see how quick it is to get
one. If you look at the total s
@Chris we tested the normal ANT build of the originally donated code.
Sorry that I don't have time to test the new versions.
On 2 September 2014 12:22, Christofer Dutz wrote:
> @Mihai: Are you testing the Mavenized version or simply the output of the
> normal ANT build?
>
> Chris
>
> ___
Always good news.
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: Justin Mclean [mailto:jus...@classsoftware.com]
Sent: Sunday, August 31, 2014 9:48 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Almost 4,000 installs of Apache Flex 4.13.0 and 60,000 total installs
Hi,
By the end of the day we'll should have 4,000
+1
I like the idea. I can see Justin's concerns too. Is there a way to have
multiple github repos one with each of the dev-subprojects ?
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: Christofer Dutz [mailto:christofer.d...@c-ware.de]
Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2014 11:14 AM
To: 'dev@flex.apache.o
Oh crap ... yeah well when I think about it It couldn't have worked as the
build uses Flexmojos zu build and that needs a mavenized FDK available :-( ...
anyone know if we could send the Apache Guys a zip with artifacts that they
could manually deploy to the local maven repo of jenkins?
Chris
Ok ... so I setup a flex-pmd jenkins build ... let's see how it goes.
Chris
Von: Christofer Dutz
Gesendet: Dienstag, 2. September 2014 13:19
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: AW: Allmost finished fixing the FlexPMD build
Hi Justin,
search for "@Ignore" i
@Mihai: Are you testing the Mavenized version or simply the output of the
normal ANT build?
Chris
Von: Mihai Chira
Gesendet: Dienstag, 2. September 2014 12:42
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [DISCUSSION] Squiggly 1.0 release candidate 0
I hope so.
Hi Justin,
search for "@Ignore" in the Java classes. I disabled tests that referenced
these files and added a comment that I disabled them because they were not part
of the donation. I think they were about 3-4 Files in total.
If its a bandwidth problem that I can't deploy the SNAPSHOTs, I migh
I hope so. But from what I remember (and I wasn't the main developer
dealing with this), the flex version of the project depended on
classes inside the non-flex version, which means that if the wrong
compiler argument was used, it would also replace the flex-SpellUI
with the non-flex-SpellUI. But a
Hi,
> Even if this is not a problem anymore, it might be worth adding a new
> step to the release verification process to create a project without
> Flex and make sure that squiggly works well, and the same for a Flex
> project.
I think this is just a matter of including the right swcs and not al
I wanted to add two things related to squiggly, in order of importance:
1. (Sorry if I'm stating the obvious:) There are two versions of the
class SpellUI.as - one of flex projects and one for projects which
don't include the Flex framework. We had a big problem when we tried
to compile the projec
Hi,
> Most problems in the tests were related to the different length of the Adobe
> and Apache file headers.
I know your pain but I only fixed a dozen or so of them. Seem a silly thing to
base tests on - absolute line number in code that is rather than relative line
numbers.
> Another big pro
Chris,
Thank you! I think I know a cure for that allergy, but that involves a
boiled mix of hop, malt and yeast and only comes in pint or half liter size
portions. You probably won't like it ;-)
EdB
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 8:42 AM, Christofer Dutz
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I just finished the last i
50 matches
Mail list logo
