[FlexJS] Building Apache Flex team page with FlexJS + MDL

Before getting into writing new components for FlexJS/MDL, I thought I would familiarize myself with the library by building our Apache Flex team page with FlexJS. I thought it would be interesting if I first created a reference app using AngularJS and Angular Material library. The result can be

Re: [FlexJS] Building with Maven

On Dec 21, 2016 9:52 AM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: On 12/21/16, 9:10 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" <omup...@gmail.com on behalf of bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: >Chris, any chance we can disable the rat check by d

Re: [FlexJS] Building with Maven

Chris, any chance we can disable the rat check by default? I got hit by that as well. Seems like a common place that could trip people up. Thanks, Om On Dec 21, 2016 9:05 AM, "Peter Ent" wrote: > Got a little help from Alex. Seems the clean step didn't purge all of the > old

[FlexJS] Setting up FlexJS and MDL

I find myself with some free time till the end of the year. I was hoping to get setup with the MDL library projects. Carlos/Piotr, what would be the best way for me to get setup and going? A quick and basic tutorial on how to build and test changes to the MDL library would be of much use. VS

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Flex SDK 4.16 RC1 release

> -Alex > > On 12/19/16, 7:07 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" > <omup...@gmail.com on behalf of bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >Hmm, it went through osmf and saxon fine this time. > > > >But failed right after getting vel

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Flex SDK 4.16 RC1 release

\4.16.0_test\src3\modules\build.xml:64: The following error occurred while executing this line: C:\temp\4.16.0_test\src3\modules\downloads.xml:507: Unable to delete directory C:\temp\4.16.0_test\src3\in\velocity-1.4\build\lib Total time: 3 minutes 9 seconds On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 6:56 PM, OmPrakash

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Flex SDK 4.16 RC1 release

On it. On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 6:10 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > OK. Good to know. A new CI artifact is now available. Let's see if it > works for Om. > > -Alex > > On 12/19/16, 5:33 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: > > >Hi, > > > >JFYI it worked locally here

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Flex SDK 4.16 RC1 release

sed to be the correct one? On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 1:29 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > Still failing on osmf: > > download-osmf-swc: > [get] Getting: http://downloads.sourceforge. > net/project/osmf.adobe/OSMF%202.0%20Release%20%28final% > 20

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Flex SDK 4.16 RC1 release

=pilotfiber to C:\temp\4.16.0_test\src2\in\osmf.swc double-check-file: [echo] Need file: ${still_no_file} On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 1:20 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > I might have got the src.zip file from the wrong jenkins url. > > To be sure, is this whe

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Flex SDK 4.16 RC1 release

I might have got the src.zip file from the wrong jenkins url. To be sure, is this where I should get the src.zip file from? http://apacheflexbuild.cloudapp.net:8080/job/flex-sdk_release-candidate/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/out/apache-flex-sdk-4.16.0-src.zip On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 1:19 PM,

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Flex SDK 4.16 RC1 release

==1366147457_mirror=superb-dca2 to C:\temp\4 .16.0_test\src\in\saxonb9-1-0-8j.zip On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 11:14 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > I just tried the src build on windows. Failing on osmf.swc download :-( > > download-osmf-swc: > [

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Flex SDK 4.16 RC1 release

I just tried the src build on windows. Failing on osmf.swc download :-( download-osmf-swc: [get] Getting: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/osmf.adobe/OSMF%202.0%20Release%20%28final%20source%2C%20ASDocs%2C%20pdf%20guides%20and%20release%

Re: [FlexJS] Updated Closure compiler from v20151015 to v20161201

binary, so you might not > need to change anything. > FlexJS npm installer does indeed download these two files. I've gone ahead and updated them. Thanks, Om > > - Josh > > On Dec 17, 2016 1:06 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bigosma...@gmail.com> > wrote: > &g

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Flex SDK 4.16 RC1 release

Thanks Justin! BTW, Installer working fine on Windows as well for the 4.16.0, AIR 24 combination. At some point, we should disable selecting AIR 24+ for Flex SDK less than 4.16.0. How easy would be to do that? Thanks, Om On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 8:16 PM, Justin Mclean

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Flex SDK 4.16 RC1 release

On Dec 18, 2016 5:45 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: Hi, >> Yass! That works on my Mac via the installer as well. We have support >> for >> AIR 24 on mac now! > > Did you see Finder windows pop up during the install? That's what > happened to me. Yep the finder window

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Flex SDK 4.16 RC1 release

On Dec 18, 2016 5:33 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: On 12/18/16, 5:21 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" <omup...@gmail.com on behalf of bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: >Yass! That works on my Mac via the installer as well.

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Flex SDK 4.16 RC1 release

, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > > > > > > >On 12/18/16, 1:19 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash > Muppirala" > ><omup...@gmail.com on behalf of bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >>I just tried the fix to the installer.x

Re: [FLEXJS] ASDoc App

On Dec 18, 2016 7:32 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote: > > >> So my line of thinking is: folks have limited time to contribute, so >> spending that limited resource on static site generation of data is a >>bit >> contradictory. > > >Don't we already generate HTML from asdocs? What more

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Flex SDK 4.16 RC1 release

I just tried the fix to the installer.xml via the Installer (i.e. using Ant 1.7 behavior for if/unless) It does not seem to have fixed the problem. I am out of ideas on how to fix this. Alex, can you please take a look? If Alex does not have time, I suggest we remove support for AIR 24 at this

Re: [FLEXJS] ASDoc App

On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 11:41 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > > > On 12/16/16, 11:28 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash > Muppirala" <omup...@gmail.com on behalf of bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 9

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Flex SDK 4.16 RC1 release

I will be able to test around 4 hours from now. Thanks, Om On Dec 17, 2016 4:55 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: > Hi, > > OK I found a saxon mirror URL that works (but it may of course break > again) and can now make a release candidate. Before I do can people please >

Re: Unable to check out source repo - URL down or moved?

If you are simply checking out the code, you can try the github mirror as well: https://github.com/apache/flex-sdk https://github.com/apache/flex-asjs Hope that helps for now. Thanks, Om On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 1:11 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > Hi everyone,

Re: [FlexJS] Updated Closure compiler from v20151015 to v20161201

Josh, will this affect the npm flexjs installer? What are the changes I need to make? Thanks, Om On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 9:40 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > For some reason the maven build did not report failure. Errors were in > the console log. I plan to look into that tonight.

Re: [FLEXJS] ASDoc App

On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 9:45 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > > > On 12/16/16, 7:05 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" > <omup...@gmail.com on behalf of bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >On Dec 16, 2016 3:1

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Flex SDK 4.16 RC1 release

On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 9:50 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > > > On 12/16/16, 6:22 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: > > >Hi, > > > >Looks like the CI build has finished and has produced artefacts: > >http://apacheflexbuild.cloudapp.net:8080/job/flex- >

Re: [FLEXJS] ASDoc App

On Dec 16, 2016 3:15 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote: On 12/16/16, 3:06 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote: >I am surprised by the complexity of [1]. But because we have a tool >chain, I wonder if the tool chain should somehow help. Should we have a >tool that calls

Re: FlexJS via Installer - broken

Hmm, I tried again just now and am getting the same error (on multiple tries) With and without caching enabled. Weird. No one else seeing this issue? On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 12:16 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > > > On 12/16/16, 11:42 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Flex SDK 4.16 RC1 release

Yes, the regular nightly has been failing for a few days as well. It is always one of those sourceforge urls. Should we just bundle them up in our bin artifact instead of downloading each time? Thanks, Om On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 1:22 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi

Re: [FLEXJS] ASDoc App

On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 12:13 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > > > On 12/16/16, 11:58 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash > Muppirala" <omup...@gmail.com on behalf of bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 11

Re: [FLEXJS] ASDoc App

On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > > > On 12/16/16, 11:42 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash > Muppirala" <omup...@gmail.com on behalf of bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >I think we don't need to deci

Re: FlexJS via Installer - broken

ma-9.20.jar.zip > > > -Alex > > On 12/16/16, 11:11 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash > Muppirala" <omup...@gmail.com on behalf of bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >Here is the install log: > >https://gist.github.com/bigosmallm/337baa

Re: [FLEXJS] ASDoc App

I think we don't need to decide one way or the other right now. We need simple html docs for sure. I think having the docs as an RIA as pretty cool as well. For example, AngularJS docs is available as mostly static content here: https://docs.angularjs.org/api For this kind of doc, we just need

Re: FlexJS via Installer - broken

:50 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > > > On 12/16/16, 12:25 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash > Muppirala" <omup...@gmail.com on behalf of bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >I am unable to install any version if the FlexJS SDK. Looks

FlexJS via Installer - broken

I am unable to install any version if the FlexJS SDK. Looks like one of the Falcon dependencies are broken. Known issue? Thanks, Om

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Flex SDK 4.16 RC1 release

I think that link is broken. Here is the correct one: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/A+guide+to+the+Apache+Flex+release+process On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > > > On 12/14/16, 3:53 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Flex SDK 4.16 RC1 release

On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > > > > > > >

Re: Avoiding goog renaming

(Possible unrelated to the current discussion) For what it's worth, Typescript is pushing the metadata (decorators) concept forward [1] Angular2 is fully utilizing this concept in the form of annotations [2] There is also a proposal to add metadata/decorators in Javascript directly [3] Looks

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Flex SDK 4.16 RC1 release

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-35166 It seems to work for me in my jerry-rigged test environment. Can you try directly from the Installer and confirm? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-35156 Config file has been updated to allow installation of 4.16.0 RC1. Again, if someone

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.15 RC1

You might want to create a new thread with the correct subject. When the vote is done, we may want to archive/link to this thread at a later point. The wrong subject line would cause confusion. Thanks, Om On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 1:24 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.15 RC1

Subject line says 4.15? On Dec 12, 2016 2:39 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: > Hi, > > This is a Apache Flex 4.16 release candidate 1. Please see the > RELEASE_NOTES and the README. > > The release candidate can be found here; >

Re: [LAST CALL] Flex SDK 4.16

Okay, I just cherry picked those two commits into the 4.16 branch. Thanks, Om On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 11:45 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > Hmm, I dint realize there was a 4.16 branch. I checked it into develop. > > Should I cherry pick them into 4.16 branch? >

Re: [LAST CALL] Flex SDK 4.16

Hmm, I dint realize there was a 4.16 branch. I checked it into develop. Should I cherry pick them into 4.16 branch? On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 10:36 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > I don't see my changes to installer.xml in this RC. Did you get the > latest > >

Re: [LAST CALL] Flex SDK 4.16

I don't see my changes to installer.xml in this RC. Did you get the latest code before building the RC? Thanks, Om On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 12:13 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > Just to make sure everything is working before we make an official release > candidate

Re: [LAST CALL] Flex SDK 4.16

I've pushed a fix, but unable to test it on the nightly. For some reason or the other, the nightly builds keep failing. My weekend has started, so I will be able to spend more time on this over the next couple of days. Thanks, Om On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 7:13 PM, Justin Mclean

Re: [FlexJS][Maven] Build failure caused by compiler warnings (was: Re: [FlexJS] How Binding works?)

Even if the class as marked as Bindable? On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 11:03 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > > > On 12/9/16, 10:59 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" > <omup...@gmail.com on behalf of bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: &g

Re: [FlexJS][Maven] Build failure caused by compiler warnings (was: Re: [FlexJS] How Binding works?)

On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > > > On 12/9/16, 10:25 AM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira" > wrote: > > >You're right, compile is working, but message was confused (BUILD

Re: Shared CSS Color name as constant between multiple applications

Maybe something like: Shared CSS: .myStyle { colorName: 'red'; } Application creation complete: var c:CSSStyleDeclaration = this.styleManager.getStyleDeclaration(".myStyle"); var myColor:String = c.getStyle("colorName"); Alert.show('MyColor: ' + myColor); You could also set a hex value for

Re: [LAST CALL] Flex SDK 4.16

A bit more progress over the weekend. Hopefully will be done this week. Although, you are free to release without the fixes if you feel like. Thanks, Om On Dec 5, 2016 12:46 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: > Hi, > > > I had a similar issue when I tried to set up. Looks

Re: git commit: [flex-asjs] [refs/heads/develop] - MDL Tooltip

That's an interesting suggestion. In Flex or even html, we specify a 'tooltip' attribute or 'title' attribute. MDL makes it a bit more complicated by treating the component and the tooltip as different entities and then inventing a new way to connect them. Specifying it as a bead seems like the

Re: [FlexJS] Team Page

Looks great! Eating our own dog food :-) BTW, this looks like a great use case for an MDL-Card component [1] as a container for each team member. If no one gets to it before me, I will take a shot at it! [1] https://getmdl.io/components/#cards-section Regards, Om On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 10:56

Re: [FlexJS] get rid of inline styles (was Re: [FlexJS]Layout problems)

On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 4:55 PM, Carlos Rovira wrote: > > I wish I could agree, but I don't think I can. IMO, some component > > features can only be implemented by setting style properties. In the > > example above, to keep Label as single-line (so you don't have to us

Re: [LAST CALL] Flex SDK 4.16

I had a similar issue when I tried to set up. Looks like the individual files are not downloadable from google code anymore. I just downloaded the full zip file and copied over the required files. On Nov 27, 2016 9:54 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: > Hi, > > So I just

Re: [FlexJS] className manipulation

Looks like this polyfill could be useful. https://github.com/eligrey/classList.js/ Thanks, Om On Nov 26, 2016 9:43 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote: > Seems like if we could implement ClassList as a utility class. I can > think of lots of apps that are less dynamic that won't need

Re: [LAST CALL] Flex SDK 4.16

g. Thanks, Om > > -Alex > > [1] http://ant.apache.org/manual/properties.html#if+unless > > On 11/25/16, 12:32 AM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > > > > > > >On 11/24/16, 11:50 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash > &g

Re: [LAST CALL] Flex SDK 4.16

? Thanks, Om On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > > > On 11/21/16, 6:16 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" > <omup...@gmail.com on behalf of bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>1. In sdk-instal

Re: [FALCON][FALCONJX} org.json replacement

Is there a link to the announcement? Or any other source for more details? Thanks, Om On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 8:57 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > Hi, > > Today, Apache's VP Legal announced that ASF projects can no longer use > org.json due to licensing issues. Apparently, there

Re: [LAST CALL] Flex SDK 4.16

On Nov 21, 2016 12:15 AM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > > > > On 11/20/16, 10:52 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash > Muppirala" <omup...@gmail.com on behalf of bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >Okay, I updated t

Re: [LAST CALL] Flex SDK 4.16

And oh yes, the installer config has been pushed to staging. Please do not publish the site without pushing a new release of the sdk. Otherwise the Apache Flex Installer app will be broken for AIR 24.0 beta. Thanks, Om On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 10:52 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.

Re: [LAST CALL] Flex SDK 4.16

Okay, I updated the installer.xml in the flex-sdk repository. Here is the commit diff. For some reason, the changes are not being highlighted - the who file is being shown as modified. https://github.com/apache/flex-sdk/commit/dec79b57835810f94d

Re: [FlexJS, MDL] Help with MDL

It would be nice to get a wiki page going to keep track of all the components. Thanks, Om On Nov 19, 2016 11:05 AM, "Carlos Rovira" wrote: > Hi Piotrz, I was thinking in maybe go with MDL List...and Om goes with > Table. > > If you want to start with something

Re: [FlexJS, MDL] Help with MDL

ave multiple Windows VMs, and the extension runs > correctly in all of them. > > - Josh > > On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 12:02 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala < > bigosma...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > That sounds awesome, Josh. If you can take a look at the windows build, &

Re: [LAST CALL] Flex SDK 4.16

Update: I have figured out the changes required to the Ant script to make this work. I just need to integrate the new script with the installer.xml to make this work. I am hoping to get that working over the weekend. Thanks, Om On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 9:49 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala <bigo

Re: [FlexJS, MDL] Help with MDL

That sounds awesome, Josh. If you can take a look at the windows build, that would be great as well. I would like to get into some MD action myself :-) I have some ideas on the Table component that I would like to make it into the library. Thanks, Om On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 11:35 AM, Josh

Re: [LAST CALL] Flex SDK 4.16

On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 2:59 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > We’re getting closer to making a release candidate for the next Flex SDK > release. > > Currently the two things holding up this release are there two JIRAs: > [1] FLEX-34880 Place Sort and SortField state

Re: AW: 4.16 SDK release

On Nov 6, 2016 6:35 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote: > > Om has already started on this. Interestingly, he was able to "unzip" the > DMG. Not sure what that means. > > I'm told that there is an hdiutil tool that unpacks DMG files, but I > haven't tried it. > > HTH, > -Alex > > On

Re: FlexJS -- we really need to get bugs into JIRA

Justin, There is no reason for us to not file JIRA tickets. And, if someone in your company finds a bug, they should go ahead and file a JIRA ticket. And for good measure, bring it up on the list and if possible suggest some possible fixes. I agree that having issues documented in JIRA is

Re: Installer.xml changes needed (was Re: New Flex SDK release)

3 AM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > > >I thought there were symlinks for Mac. Maybe it doesn't matter for what > >we use it for. > > > >Sent from my LG G3, an AT 4G LTE smartphone > > > >-- Original message-- > >From:

Re: Installer.xml changes needed (was Re: New Flex SDK release)

er downloads. > > - Josh > > On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 11:13 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com > > > wrote: > > > Hmm, I see a dmg for mac and a zip for windows (in the Flex Developers > > section) > > Was there any announcement about this change?

Re: Installer.xml changes needed (was Re: New Flex SDK release)

gt; > I believe the zip and tar will go away or may not be the latest. > > Sent from my LG G3, an AT 4G LTE smartphone > > -- Original message-- > *From: *OmPrakash Muppirala > *Date: *Thu, Nov 3, 2016 10:10 AM > *To: *dev@flex.apache.org; > *Subject:*Re: Installe

Re: Installer.xml changes needed (was Re: New Flex SDK release)

And I still see the adl.exe inside the zip file: https://snag.gy/uSrbL5.jpg On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 10:10 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > I still see the zip file available here > > https://fpdownload.macromedia.com/pub/labs/flashruntimes/ > air/AdobeAIR

Re: Installer.xml changes needed (was Re: New Flex SDK release)

I still see the zip file available here https://fpdownload.macromedia.com/pub/labs/flashruntimes/air/AdobeAIRSDK.zip On Nov 3, 2016 9:54 AM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > > > On 11/3/16, 9:35 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala&q

Re: Installer.xml changes needed (was Re: New Flex SDK release)

I can take this work up. Depending on how much work this would take and amy available bandwidth, this could take a while. Do you know what exactly needs to be done here? Thanks, Om On Nov 3, 2016 8:54 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote: > Hi, > > The Adobe AIR SDK 24 is available in

Re: MDL Tweet

Done! On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 2:29 PM, Carlos Rovira wrote: > Please, retweet to make some noise out there! :) > > https://twitter.com/carlosrovira/status/791379921746690049 > > > -- > Carlos Rovira > http://about.me/carlosrovira >

Re: Flex news site and rss feed

The best aggregator for Flex and Flash I have seen, that is still active is: http://flashdaily.net/ All the latest news about FlexJS is also covered. Thanks, Om On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 12:09 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > Adobe back in the day had a blog

Re: [FlexJS] CSS (was Re: [FlexJS] Mobile Apps)

> at least, seems not the right way. > > Thanks > > just my 2... > > C. > > > > > > 2016-10-24 22:09 GMT+02:00 OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com>: > > > +1 for implementing it based on beads. > > > > mdl:DefaultMDLButton

Re: [FlexJS] CSS (was Re: [FlexJS] Mobile Apps)

+1 for implementing it based on beads. mdl:DefaultMDLButton would look like this: We could simply use DefaultMDLButton in our code instead of having to write out all the beads, if the user so chooses. Thanks, Om On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 12:10 PM, Josh Tynjala

Re: MDL - possible different approach?

On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 11:17 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > All (especially Carols and Alex), > I am very sorry, I meant Carlos. Auto-correct :-( > > I have been following the conversations in the other thread about the > approach to bring Mate

MDL - possible different approach?

All (especially Carols and Alex), I have been following the conversations in the other thread about the approach to bring Material Design Lite (MDL) theme to FlexJS. I was browsing through the Button.js class in MDL's implementation [1] My first instinct was to simply mimic how the

Re: [FlexJS] Maveninze MobileStocks (was [FlexJS] Mobile Apps)

10/21/16, 1:03 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" > <omup...@gmail.com on behalf of bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >Chris, > > > >Can you please take this opportunity to create a wiki page on how to > >create > >

Re: [FlexJS] Translation from framework to JS

The wording in the license is very clear. Which part of the highlighted text do you have concerns with? You can double check with Legal if you want, but this is definitely not a blocker issue for Carlos experimenting with MDL-FlexJS integration. Thanks, Om On Oct 14, 2016 4:40 PM, "Justin

Re: [FlexJS] Translation from framework to JS

Justin, please see my earlier response. We dont need to worry about the license if we are using scss to generate the css. Thanks, Om On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 3:33 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > The MIT license text in question can be found here [1] > > Thanks, >

Re: [FlexJS] Working on a MDL branch

On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 10:25 AM, Carlos Rovira wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to setup a MDL library to start making some components with that > look and feel. > I'm following the Flat library project indications, and right now I'm > building it ok with maven (didn't test

Re: [Website] Progress on the Website-Generation topic

t; On Oct 14, 2016, at 11:07 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Where can I find this site? > > > > It sounds like the nav bar has CSS setting position: sticky; > > Either that, or the position of the nav bar is being translated in

Re: [FlexJS] Translation from framework to JS

Here is the relevant part from the license: === All code in any directories or sub-directories that end with *.html or *.css is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License, which full text can be found here:

Re: [Website] Progress on the Website-Generation topic

Where can I find this site? It sounds like the nav bar has CSS setting position: sticky; Either that, or the position of the nav bar is being translated in an onScroll event handler in javascript. Thanks, Om On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 12:59 AM, Christofer Dutz wrote:

Re: [FlexJS] Translation from framework to JS

I have this on my to do list as well. Will jump in as soon as I get some time. Thanks, Om On Oct 10, 2016 1:08 PM, "OK" wrote: > Carlos Rovira-3 wrote > > As I get more knowledge on this, I think w could discuss, if we could get > > a > > MDL library to expose MDL look'n

Re: Current FlexJS license/notice issues

At this point we are going around in circles. Justin, if you can simply send a PR with a short explanation of why this is important to you, maybe they will just merge the PR. Let's not try to game out all the possibilities beforehand. Thanks, Om On Oct 6, 2016 9:49 AM, "Justin Mclean"

Re: Current FlexJS license/notice issues

On Oct 6, 2016 8:09 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: > > Hi, > > My intention was never to throw weight around. So just so everyone is clear on the course of action if I approach them as an individual it’s IMO very likely that I will get no response and that means as per the

Re: [FlexJS] flex-asjs contribution/development workflow

I have been using Flash Builder and FDT for a while now. I will gladly drop everything and switch to Visual Studio if that works out!! Thanks, Om On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 2:01 AM, Greg Dove wrote: > I have been using IntelliJ for regular FlexSDK work for the last 3 years,

Re: [2/2] git commit: [flex-utilities] [refs/heads/develop] - npm-flexjs: fixed broken URLs for guava and jburg JARs

I pushed out an update to npm with these fixes. Thanks, Om On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 4:42 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > Good catch! > > Thanks, > Om > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 4:07 PM, Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@gmail.com> > wrote: &

Re: [2/2] git commit: [flex-utilities] [refs/heads/develop] - npm-flexjs: fixed broken URLs for guava and jburg JARs

Good catch! Thanks, Om On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 4:07 PM, Josh Tynjala wrote: > I discovered that the current version of FlexJS 0.7 on NPM cannot build > SWFs because a couple of dependencies failed to download (guava and jburg). > The URLs were returning 404 status, but

Re: [DRAFT] Apache FlexJS 0.7.0 and Apache Flex FalconJX 0.7.0 Released

e > > -- Original message-- > *From: *OmPrakash Muppirala > *Date: *Thu, Sep 15, 2016 5:41 PM > *To: *dev@flex.apache.org; > *Subject:*Re: [DRAFT] Apache FlexJS 0.7.0 and Apache Flex FalconJX 0.7.0 > Released > > On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 4:42 PM, Justin Mcl

Re: [DRAFT] Apache FlexJS 0.7.0 and Apache Flex FalconJX 0.7.0 Released

On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 4:42 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > Justin, any reason you did not fix the issues yourself? Were you > expecting > > someone else to fix them? > > If I had changed LICENSE/NOTICE without discussion it’s probable that my > changes would be

Re: [DRAFT] Apache FlexJS 0.7.0 and Apache Flex FalconJX 0.7.0 Released

Justin, any reason you did not fix the issues yourself? Were you expecting someone else to fix them? Also, why were no JIRA tickets filed? Thanks, Om On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 4:19 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > During the release process, he brought up the fact

Re: AW: [DRAFT] Apache FlexJS 0.7.0 and Apache Flex FalconJX 0.7.0 Released

On Sep 15, 2016 8:31 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote: > > > > On 9/15/16, 12:34 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote: > > >Just to add my 50ct to this discussion. > > > > > >Justin did bring up the issue. He even brought it when we were first > >discussing starting a

Re: [DRAFT] Apache FlexJS 0.7.0 and Apache Flex FalconJX 0.7.0 Released

I have published flexjs 0.7.0 on the npm repository. You can install it by running: npm install flexjs -g Before publishing, I confirmed that the npm flexjs package does indeed download from the mirrors: == *Downloading Apache FlexJS from mirror:

Re: [DRAFT] Apache FlexJS 0.7.0 and Apache Flex FalconJX 0.7.0 Released

The npm flexjs package is a thing on its own which points to only released Apache artifacts. We are not publishing unreleased apache code anywhere. Still not sure what the violation is. Thanks, Om On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 3:12 PM, Josh Tynjala wrote: > If that's the

Re: [DRAFT] Apache FlexJS 0.7.0 and Apache Flex FalconJX 0.7.0 Released

I read that thread and I don't see any obvious violation. Can you please expand on what you think is a violation? How do you think we should fix the said violation? Thanks, Om On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > I have pushed the new

Re: [DRAFT] Apache FlexJS 0.7.0 and Apache Flex FalconJX 0.7.0 Released

On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 4:44 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 1:46 PM, Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Om, can you give my latest changes a try? I tweaked the NPM scripts to >> actually

Re: [DRAFT] Apache FlexJS 0.7.0 and Apache Flex FalconJX 0.7.0 Released

1, 2016 at 6:56 PM, Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > I hope to find a way to reuse the existing scripts in the next version. I > > think that tweak I made recently to the NPM versions will help. When I > > expose asnodec, I'll play around with some idea

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >