Our press release has gotten several "hits" so the word is getting out. I plan
to thank each writer for taking the time to write about our project & will
offer an interview with one of the AFP team members in case they want a follow
up quote / interview about what was published.
http://mediades
HI,
Another mention here on ZDNet:
http://www.zdnet.com/apache-moves-flex-forward-should-flash-be-next-709843/
Perhaps we come come up with an "official" short statement with a link back to
the apache flex site to add to many of these articles?
Thanks,
Justin
> Another mention here on ZDNet:
> http://www.zdnet.com/apache-moves-flex-forward-should-flash-be-next-709843/
>Perhaps we come up with an "official" short statement with a link back to the
>apache flex site to add to many of these articles?
>Thanks,
>Justin
I do not think that an official s
Hi,
> Who can speak for Apache Flex?
Well the community can but not in any official capacity.
> 1) Would donating Flash to the ASP be a good path for Adobe?
My understanding is that this is very unlikely to happen as the Flash Player
contains IP that would be unable to be donated to Apache eg v
On 1/15/13 4:09 PM, "Guthmann, Scott" wrote:
>> Another mention here on ZDNet:
>> http://www.zdnet.com/apache-moves-flex-forward-should-flash-be-next-70984
>> 3/
>> Perhaps we come up with an "official" short statement with a link back to the
>> apache flex site to add to many of these art
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 11:19 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> > 3) Who are the strong backers who maintain that there's still a place for
> > Flash and Flex and why are they right or wrong?
>
> Flex is investigating being independent of Flash and if successful, will
> hopefully pick up some new support
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 1:09 AM, Guthmann, Scott
wrote:
> Who can speak for Apache Flex?...
>From my experience in Apache projects, posting on a project's blog is
a good way to express the project's position, and if people are
interviewed they can refer to that.
If the PMC wants to make offi
> Scott's query:
> .And there's the rub. Who can speak for Apache Flex?
>
> Alex Harui's answer & proposal:
> I looked around and couldn't find a definitive set of rules for "who can
> speak for Apache Flex". I would like to see any community member who is
> interested do any interview. I s
FWIW, I don't mind doing an interview. There might be better candidates though…
On Jan 16, 2013, at 7:41 PM, Guthmann, Scott wrote:
>> Scott's query:
>> .And there's the rub. Who can speak for Apache Flex?
>>
>> Alex Harui's answer & proposal:
>> I looked around and couldn't find a definitiv
> FWIW, I don't mind doing an interview. There might be better candidates
> though.
> 1) Hans-Joachim Baader, CEO/Editor, Pro-Linux.de, Poppelfeld 9,
> D-76646 Bruchsal, Geschäftsführer/Herausgeber, Fon +49 07257-930142 *
> Mobil 0170-6500228, e-mail h...@pro-linux.de This is the article he
>
Okay. I'll send you an email with my info. I don't think I can do it until some
time next week though. I came down with a migraine last night and I'm feeling
pretty lousy today…
On Jan 17, 2013, at 12:57 AM, Guthmann, Scott wrote:
>> FWIW, I don't mind doing an interview. There might be better
On 1/16/13 2:57 PM, "Guthmann, Scott" wrote:
> Alex: I plan to arrange a call between you and Abel. Will you please review
> the article he wrote and provide your complete contact information including:
> title, address, city, state, postal code, website, phone number and time zone?
> I will s
In response to the publicity we released a couple of weeks ago, we received
request from the Software Editor from the Register, Gavin Clark, who wants to
speak to one of the Apache Flex team members. Here is a link to the article he
wrote [1]
These were his questions:
"Thanks for getting in to
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Guthmann, Scott <
sguthm...@on3solutions.com> wrote:
> In response to the publicity we released a couple of weeks ago, we
> received request from the Software Editor from the Register, Gavin Clark,
> who wants to speak to one of the Apache Flex team members. Here
> [1] http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/01/14/adobe_flex_apache/
>
> Om: I can talk to the editor. For the record, my response to "where the
> project is" would be:
Thanks Om! I plan to arrange a call between you and Gavin. Will you please
review the article he wrote and provide your complete c
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Guthmann, Scott <
sguthm...@on3solutions.com> wrote:
> > [1] http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/01/14/adobe_flex_apache/
> >
> > Om: I can talk to the editor. For the record, my response to "where the
> project is" would be:
>
> Thanks Om! I plan to arrange a call
I have been contacted by a German blogger / author who published this article
about Apache Flex:
> http://www.pro-linux.de/news/1/19333/apache-flex-wird-zum-top-level-projekt.html
> I would like to offer an interview or comment from one of the members of the
> Apache Flex team to your author f
I would like to coordinate writing a press release to announce the arrival of
Apache Flex 4.10, assuming it is ready for release. IMO, our project’s release
notes [1] are very impressive. But, I’m not a developer & I do need some help
generating the content and giving context to highlights in th
Thank you to those who contributed to this publicity document.
This is a draft of a press release announcing the arrival of Apache Flex v4.10.
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0BwtzQKOyBr2cQTdiMXdMNXRpMHM/edit?usp=sharing
Do you see changes that need to be made?
Are all the important features & be
> Carlos said:
> I think is good, but agree that incubator paragraph should be removed
I agree.
> I miss Linux reference, since we now support it and this is a great step
> forward. I would point something like "Apache Flex now supports Linux making
> possible for development teams around the w
All the edits have been made to this announcement. Thank you all for the help
proofreading and suggesting edits.
Both Nick and Justin have offered to post this to the
http://blogs.apache.org/flex/
I think this document is ready to be posted.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bG5EDWbCYhujhu_o
Scott,
Thanks for jumping into this right away! I will try my best to answer a
couple of questions:
*1. What business problems can a business manager solve with v 4.10 that
weren't possible to solve with v 4.9.1?*
- 480 dpi mobile resolution/skin support means that Flex SDK users can now
target
will let you know for impove the platform.
Franklin Garzón
Regional Development Manager
MCITP Microsoft SQLServer
*Si el hombre dejara de aprender entonces dejaría de existir*
094496862
> From: bigosma...@gmail.com
> Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2013 14:08:46 -0700
> Subject: Re: [
latform.
>
>
> Franklin Garzón
>
> Regional Development Manager
>
> MCITP Microsoft SQLServer
>
>
> *Si el hombre dejara de aprender entonces dejaría de existir*
>
> 094496862
>
>
>
> > From: bigosma...@gmail.com
> > Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2013 14:08:46 -0
Hi,
> • What business problems can a business manager solve with v 4.10 that
> weren't possible to solve with v 4.9.1?
Better for developer productivity - less RTEs and work arounds required.
Justin
Another very important: Better localization for multiple languages. Flex
4.10 is better now when trying to make application for multiple countries
and languages.
2013/7/23 Justin Mclean
> Hi,
>
> > • What business problems can a business manager solve with v 4.10
> that weren't possible to s
Hi,
And how could I forget better international support for dates in formatters,
validations, date fields and date choosers!
Justin
Scott,
> • What business problems can a business manager solve with v 4.10 that
> weren't possible to solve with v 4.9.1?
Remain up to date; not particularly a feature of THIS release, sure,
but certainly a feature of any release and worth mentioning.
Also, the testing of the platform has
Hi,
Also add:
Out of the box support for Advanced Telemetry allowing developers to easily
profile their application and improve performance using Adobe Scout.
Justin
Hi,
I just did just a quick scan, will read more thoroughly later: to me
it seems that the paragraph about 'incubation' is no longer relevant,
since we graduated and are now a top level Apache project.
EdB
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 8:50 PM, Scott Guthmann wrote:
> Thank you to those who contrib
: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: [Marketing] - publicity for the new Apache Flex v 4.10
Thank you to those who contributed to this publicity document.
This is a draft of a press release announcing the arrival of Apache Flex
v4.10.
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0BwtzQKOyBr2cQTdiMXdMNXRpMHM/edi
amework / installer.
>
> -Message d'origine- From: Scott Guthmann
> Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2013 8:50 PM
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: [Marketing] - publicity for the new Apache Flex v 4.10
>
>
> Thank you to those who contributed to this publicity
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:50 AM, Scott Guthmann wrote:
> Thank you to those who contributed to this publicity document.
>
> This is a draft of a press release announcing the arrival of Apache Flex
> v4.10.
>
>
> https://docs.google.com/file/d/0BwtzQKOyBr2cQTdiMXdMNXRpMHM/edit?usp=sharing
>
> Do y
Hi,
Looks good - more minor mods required.
- "consist of a software development kit" should be "consisting of a" If I
was being really picky I would talk about automated testing tools as they are
not actually part of the release.
- change "The v4.10 release" to "The 4.10.0 release", this o
> Looks good - more minor mods required.
I have made all the edits I could find from this thread. The press release is
ready. Last call.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bG5EDWbCYhujhu_oYl7f2eFaxmxfSTNTNa4o8W_DQQM/edit?usp=sharing
> I have made all the edits I could find from this thread. The press release is
> ready. Last call.
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bG5EDWbCYhujhu_oYl7f2eFaxmxfSTNTNa4o8W_DQQM/edit?usp=sharing
I received a reply from the Apache VP of Publicity about distributing this as a
press release
HI,
> I received a reply from the Apache VP of Publicity about distributing this as
> a press release on the Apache news wire. Unfortunately, distribution on the
> news wire service is not possible because it is not a major release (e.g.
> version N.0 or equivalent). Apache doesn't issue a pres
On 7/25/13 8:28 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>HI,
>
>> I received a reply from the Apache VP of Publicity about distributing
>>this as a press release on the Apache news wire. Unfortunately,
>>distribution on the news wire service is not possible because it is not
>>a major release (e.g. version
On Jul 25, 2013 9:26 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>
>
>
> On 7/25/13 8:28 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>
> >HI,
> >
> >> I received a reply from the Apache VP of Publicity about distributing
> >>this as a press release on the Apache news wire. Unfortunately,
> >>distribution on the news wire service is
Hi,
> I haven't had a chance to review the document yet. My email shows that
> the document was posted only about 12 hours ago.
I don't think the intention was to put the document out before we have an the
release on the mirrors etc etc, not a huge point in sending it out before
people can dow
I just went to the link Scott provided and it says I have to request
access, so I won't be able to review it until then.
On 7/25/13 9:48 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> I haven't had a chance to review the document yet. My email shows that
>> the document was posted only about 12 hours ago
Me too, that isn't right. The previous version wasn't 'protected' this way.
Scott?
EdB
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 7:29 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> I just went to the link Scott provided and it says I have to request
> access, so I won't be able to review it until then.
>
> On 7/25/13 9:48 PM, "Justi
Scott,
I can post this to blogs. apache.org. Are we still going to wait for the
installer to be finished, or do you want me to post it right now?
-Nick
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:02 PM, Scott Guthmann wrote:
> > I have made all the edits I could find from this thread. The press
> release is r
There hasn't been a release yet, we just passed the VOTE on which
candidate will be released. We wait for the release manager to tell us
when it's OK to start the marketing.
EdB
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Nicholas Kwiatkowski
wrote:
> Scott,
>
> I can post this to blogs. apache.org. Ar
> Scott,
> I can post this to blogs. apache.org. Are we still going to wait for the
> installer to be finished, or do you want me to post it right now?
> -Nick
First, here is the shared document. Please let me know if you are not able to
see it and edit it:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1b
Hi Scott,
I finally got a look at the doc. Thanks for writing this up. Some
comments:
1) Instead of "Voting member & committer of the Apache Flex PMC", which
sounds like a title, that it say "committer and member of the Apache Flex
PMC".
2) I'm not sure I understand this paragraph:
The Pro
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Scott Guthmann wrote:
> All the edits have been made to this announcement. Thank you all for the
> help proofreading and suggesting edits.
>
> Both Nick and Justin have offered to post this to the
> http://blogs.apache.org/flex/
>
> I think this document is ready to
The blog entry has been armed to post at midnight EDT on 6/7/2013.
Basically took the press release and added the links to the downloads at
the bottom. Great job Scott!
I also updated the URL on the staging site to point to the blog entry as
soon as it posts.
Unless somebody tells me otherwise,
June 7th? ;-)
On Aug 5, 2013 7:30 PM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" wrote:
> The blog entry has been armed to post at midnight EDT on 6/7/2013.
> Basically took the press release and added the links to the downloads at
> the bottom. Great job Scott!
>
> I also updated the URL on the staging site to po
derp -- august 7th.
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 12:01 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala
wrote:
> June 7th? ;-)
> On Aug 5, 2013 7:30 PM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" wrote:
>
> > The blog entry has been armed to post at midnight EDT on 6/7/2013.
> > Basically took the press release and added the links to the downl
Congratulations on the release!
One suggested edit in places where it's possible (was away). I think we
should emphasize the new Spark components more. This is the current wording:
+ The new spark components ensure that SDK users can build functionalities
quickly and in a more performant way. The
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 11:19 AM, jude wrote:
> Congratulations on the release!
>
> One suggested edit in places where it's possible (was away). I think we
> should emphasize the new Spark components more. This is the current
> wording:
>
> + The new spark components ensure that SDK users can buil
Done.
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 2:53 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 11:19 AM, jude wrote:
>
> > Congratulations on the release!
> >
> > One suggested edit in places where it's possible (was away). I think we
> > should emphasize the new Spark components more. This is the c
53 matches
Mail list logo
