2006/1/26, Alan D. Cabrera [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I want to add a field that marks bugs w/ a regression flag so that we
can track tests that used to pass. Currently people just exclude the
tests or, worse, comment them out in the code.
Thoughts?
+1.
Alan
--
Jacek Laskowski
The problem is somewhere in the xmlbeans plugin. I had to modify it to generate xmlbeans in target/xmlbeans_apache_org. Patch: Index: maven.xml === RCS file: /home/projects/openejb/scm/openejb/modules/pkgen-builder/maven.xml,v
I think we need to defer to 1.1 unless we have a graphic artist that can
make replacement ASL 2 licensed icons in a short amount of time.
John
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Great research John. Do you think we should defer the installer to
1.1 given these issues? It would certainly make a bigger
I'm not sure if this is related.. I have run into problems a while ago
where if my windows temporary files folder (e.g. C:\Documents and
Settings\sissonj\Local Settings\Temp) filled up with temporary files I
got access denied errors. It is though windows had problems creating a
unique
I imagine that this was due to plugin versions. This works now and the patch below is an error.Philip Mark DONAGHY [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit: The problem is somewhere in the xmlbeans plugin. I had to modify it to generate xmlbeans in target/xmlbeans_apache_org. Patch: Index: maven.xml
John,
Perhaps you can assemble an archive of the files that are needed and
attach this archive to a relevant Jira; this would make it more
straight-forward for someone to pick up the task without having to
know details of the installer.
Kresten
On Jan 26, 2006, at 10:06 AM, John Sisson
Virtual Host Configuration
--
Key: GERONIMO-1543
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1543
Project: Geronimo
Type: Wish
Environment: linux
Reporter: Sérgio Eduardo Rodrigues
Configure a virtual host in geronimo console.
On Jan 25, 2006, at 9:20 PM, David Jencks wrote:
What is the relationship between this and the trifork code just
donated via Jira and the code we've been working on in the geronimo
tree?
The code I uploaded yesterday implements RMI/IIOP on top of the ORB.
Example: When you invoke a corba
I am still using maven 1.0.2! I have not seen this
problem
in win XP since it was fixed. I think that geronimo
assembly should not produce 8 ( 4 for each server)
such large files by default. Now I have modified my
assemblies/*-server/project.xml to use
assemble:assemble goal instead of
Installer - Straighten out licensing issues for IzPack sub-components.
--
Key: GERONIMO-1544
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1544
Project: Geronimo
Type: Task
Components:
I am using Maven 1.1-beta-2. I'll try to clear temp and see if that
helps.
One more thing it might be my imagination but I seem to get this
more often when building off-line (-o). Last night I did two off-line
builds which both failed in the CRLF step. After that I did an on-line
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1540?page=comments#action_12364086
]
Dave Colasurdo commented on GERONIMO-1540:
--
It appears the corruption of the war file was a temporary JIRA problem. The
same war file looks fine today. Please
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1540?page=all ]
Kevan Miller reassigned GERONIMO-1540:
--
Assign To: Kevan Miller
Fix security vulnerability in jsp-examples
--
Key: GERONIMO-1540
CMP update statements will cause incorrect trigger firing in a database
---
Key: GERONIMO-1545
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1545
Project: Geronimo
Type: Bug
Versions: 1.0
+1
Regards,
Alan
On 1/25/2006 11:37 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
= PROJECT PROPOSAL =
Yoko, a CORBA Server.
This proposal outlines the creation of a Geronimo sub-project within
the Apache Software Foundation.
= RATIONALE =
The current Apache Geronimo project (http://geronimo.apache.org/)
+1
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
+1
Regards,
Alan
On 1/25/2006 11:37 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
= PROJECT PROPOSAL =
Yoko, a CORBA Server.
This proposal outlines the creation of a Geronimo sub-project within
the Apache Software Foundation.
= RATIONALE =
The current Apache Geronimo
+1
On 1/26/06, Alan D. Cabrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
Regards,
Alan
On 1/25/2006 11:37 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
= PROJECT PROPOSAL =
Yoko, a CORBA Server.
This proposal outlines the creation of a Geronimo sub-project within
the Apache Software Foundation.
=
Ping! Anybody out there?
Jeff Genender wrote:
Hi,
I was going through the generic, tomcat and jetty web xsds and I saw a
number of issues I wanted to chat about and see if I can personally be
cleared up, or if I am seeing some anomolies.
I notice a couple of differences that weren't
+1
thanks,
Adi
-Original Message-
From: Alan D. Cabrera [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 10:25 AM
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Yoko - A CORBA Server Sub-Project
+1
Regards,
Alan
On 1/25/2006 11:37 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
+1
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
= PROJECT PROPOSAL =
Yoko, a CORBA Server.
This proposal outlines the creation of a Geronimo sub-project within the
Apache Software Foundation.
= RATIONALE =
The current Apache Geronimo project (http://geronimo.apache.org/) is in
great need of a CORBA ORB that
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1336?page=all ]
Joe Bohn reassigned GERONIMO-1336:
--
Assign To: Aaron Mulder (was: Matt Hogstrom)
Setting the Max PoolSize on a DataBase pool with invalid information does not
yield an error message
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1336?page=all ]
Joe Bohn updated GERONIMO-1336:
---
Attachment: DBPoolValidate2.patch
Aaron, I've updated the patch to ensure that min max. The patch already
prevented submit for the deploy and plan but not
+1 for giving John more work :)
I think we could also post this on the things todo page.
Kresten Krab Thorup (Trifork) wrote:
John,
Perhaps you can assemble an archive of the files that are needed and
attach this archive to a relevant Jira; this would make it more
straight-forward for
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1541?page=all ]
Joe Bohn reassigned GERONIMO-1541:
--
Assign To: David Jencks (was: Joe Bohn)
David, I'm assigning this issue to you so that you can verify and integrate the
fix. Thanks!
Unable to
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1544?page=comments#action_12364094
]
erik daughtrey commented on GERONIMO-1544:
--
I have verified that the Crystal icons can be replaced by injecting new icons
into /img in the output jar file.
I
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1544?page=all ]
erik daughtrey updated GERONIMO-1544:
-
Priority: Critical (was: Blocker)
Installer - Straighten out licensing issues for IzPack sub-components.
On Jan 26, 2006, at 7:53 AM, Jeff Genender wrote:
Ping! Anybody out there?
Jeff Genender wrote:
Hi,
I was going through the generic, tomcat and jetty web xsds and I
saw a
number of issues I wanted to chat about and see if I can
personally be
cleared up, or if I am seeing some
+1
david jencks
On Jan 25, 2006, at 11:37 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
= PROJECT PROPOSAL =
Yoko, a CORBA Server.
This proposal outlines the creation of a Geronimo sub-project
within the Apache Software Foundation.
= RATIONALE =
The current Apache Geronimo project
I have successfully installed Jetspeed on Geronimo thanks to David. Looking forward to looking at the security implementation.Philip Mark DONAGHY [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit: From what I can see the builder is null because the plan is null. Because the planFile is of type application-1.0 and not
David Jencks wrote:
On Jan 26, 2006, at 7:53 AM, Jeff Genender wrote:
Ping! Anybody out there?
Jeff Genender wrote:
Hi,
I was going through the generic, tomcat and jetty web xsds and I saw a
number of issues I wanted to chat about and see if I can personally be
cleared up, or if I
Problem with ActivationSpec setters for MessageDribenBean
-
Key: GERONIMO-1546
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1546
Project: Geronimo
Type: Bug
Components: deployment
Versions: 1.0
Aaron,
Can you send out a summary from the poll ?
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On 1/24/2006 11:52 AM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
[X] Change all configIds to 1.0 even though it's the 1.0.1 release
[ ] Change all references to use no version and make that work
[ ] Something else (please explain)
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1539?page=comments#action_12364105
]
Matt Hogstrom commented on GERONIMO-1539:
-
I get this error when doing a tar zxvf on the tarball
[snip]
Thanks for looking into this.
I've created JIRA 1544 to address the issue and believe that I have a
work-around.
Regards,
erik
On Wednesday 25 January 2006 18:44, John Sisson wrote:
Hi Erik,
There appears there are some issues with the licensing of some files in
the installer JAR file
It's OK with me so long as we have a converter to change the attribute
into an element on any schemas that had the old one and will now have
the new one.
I think we must also put in a header comment with a change log in each
schema we change. Perhaps under the license, something like:
!--
Legal license issue in schemas
--
Key: GERONIMO-1547
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1547
Project: Geronimo
Type: Bug
Components: general
Versions: 1.0
Environment: Linux
Reporter: Daniel Bornkessel
Hi.
Seems there are some legal issues in the files packaged with Geronimo:
In the following files:
geronimo-tomcat-j2ee-1.0.tar.gz/geronimo-1.0/schema/application-client_1_2.dtd
geronimo-tomcat-j2ee-1.0.tar.gz/geronimo-1.0/schema/application-client_1_4.xsd
+1
-dain
On Jan 25, 2006, at 11:37 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
= PROJECT PROPOSAL =
Yoko, a CORBA Server.
This proposal outlines the creation of a Geronimo sub-project
within the Apache Software Foundation.
= RATIONALE =
The current Apache Geronimo project (http://geronimo.apache.org/)
I'm having a hard time following this discussion, because I'm not
sure of the scope of this problem. Is this a problem that only
impacts our xml configs, and does it only impact the following:
o parentId attribute
o import short form element
o import long form
If there are more places we
Runtime path not showing when editing target runtime
Key: GERONIMODEVTOOLS-53
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-53
Project: Geronimo-Devtools
Type: Bug
Components: eclipse-plugin
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-53?page=all ]
Sachin Patel resolved GERONIMODEVTOOLS-53:
--
Resolution: Fixed
Assign To: Sachin Patel
Runtime path not showing when editing target runtime
I believe the problem only affects Geronimo deployment plans written
by users. Either for their own J2EE applications, or for custom
Geronimo services. (And users includes vendors writing Geronimo
extensions or Geronimo-based products). So if a user writes a plan
with any 1.0 in it and then
start geronimo from eclipse, the console output could be enhanced
-
Key: GERONIMODEVTOOLS-54
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-54
Project: Geronimo-Devtools
Type: Bug
In general, we have two forms of the configuration reference in
Geronimo:
parentId=geronimo/foo/1.0/car
import
groupIdgeronimo/groupId
artifactIdfoo/artifactId
version1.0/version
typecar/type
/import
I think the second form is the easiest to deal with. We can easily,
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-54?page=all ]
Sachin Patel resolved GERONIMODEVTOOLS-54:
--
Resolution: Won't Fix
Assign To: Sachin Patel
The output is already set to DEBUG. A defect already exists on the
On 1/26/06, Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about we just eliminate the single string from? In most cases,
you shouldn't need the parentId anyway, and in the cases you do, you
simply use this:
parent
groupIdgeronimo/groupId
artifactIdfoo/artifactId
/parent
I kind of like the string form as its easier to type. It works well if you take
Dain's ideas and reverse the version and the type so you have:
geronimo/foo - Means I'll take what's current in the server
geronimo/foo/car - If you want to be specific about it being a car or other
type
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-54?page=comments#action_12364137
]
Sachin Patel commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-54:
--
FYI, you can modify any start parameters, vm args, system vars you like by
modifying the launch
On Jan 26, 2006, at 1:06 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
On 1/26/06, Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about we just eliminate the single string from? In most cases,
you shouldn't need the parentId anyway, and in the cases you do, you
simply use this:
parent
Do you think this is something people will be typeing often. My
guess is that the defaults will work 98% and I think most of our
users will either use our maven plugins (and ant ones one day) or the
eclipse tooling to manage these, so they would never type them anyway.
On Jan 26, 2006, at
If I contribute the code for the following enhancement https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=125381 What is the answer to the following questions?(1) Would it be possible to squeeze into 1.0.1, given that geronimo is the only one currently using this support?(2) If so, what is my time
shoot sorry ingore wrong devlist - sachin On Jan 26, 2006, at 4:44 PM, Sachin Patel wrote:If I contribute the code for the following enhancement https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=125381 What is the answer to the following questions?(1) Would it be possible to squeeze into 1.0.1, given
Unfortunately, according to JSR-88, CAR means a client JAR. :( Oh,
well, not much we can do about that.
Anyway, in terms of meaningful issues, I think we should also consider
zip a valid type, for people who still deploy dependencies as ZIPs
(aargh! Oracle drivers). And I do think we need to
somethings seriously wrong with me. I can't seem to get the pull down to choose the correct to: - sachin On Jan 26, 2006, at 4:46 PM, Sachin Patel wrote:shoot sorry ingore wrong devlist - sachin On Jan 26, 2006, at 4:44 PM, Sachin Patel wrote:If I contribute the code for the following enhancement
Ever since we shipped 1.0, I have been getting a surprising number of
private emails from old fiends, old Geronimo contributers, companies,
and just random people telling me that the are excited about Geronimo
and want to join in. They all inevitably ask me for advise on what
to work on,
Once I'm finished with this infernal installer, I'm working on web services --
period -- unless someone stops me.
BTW, do I have any f'ing karma yet?
Sorry, bad day.
regards, erik
On Thursday 26 January 2006 17:18, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Ever since we shipped 1.0, I have been getting a
o Conversion to Maven 2 - Very important and a huge task
Ha, its not that big :-P
--jason
A couple more off the top of my head,
Other Application integration (not that I know anything about many of
these):
Jetspeed 2 (Jian Liao and I have been working on it but are not done)
James
Roller
OfBiz
Jira
drools
...
Security
Several of us are already looking at various things to improve
- JEE 5 175 based annotations- Tooling Better tooling/runtime integration (GERONIMO-1526) XDoc integration into tools (hook into WTP content assist) Full UI editors/wizards pages for deployment plans- Hot Deployment Run off exploded directories- DConfigBeans - sachin On Jan 26, 2006, at 5:18 PM,
On Jan 26, 2006, at 3:03 PM, David Jencks wrote:
Security
Several of us are already looking at various things to improve in
our security setup. One aspect that could probably use quite a bit
more research is how to integrate with third party security
servers. I see 2 levels of
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Do you think this is something people will be typeing often. My guess
I think the goal is for people to not being typing this often :) I think the
ultimate form (string or maven style) is less important that what is required
and what is optional.
is that the
Welp...looks like we have a volunteer on the m2 conversion ;-)
Jason Dillon wrote:
o Conversion to Maven 2 - Very important and a huge task
Ha, its not that big :-P
--jason
I have some ideas about how to set up web clustering in terms of
geronimo modules and configurations and connections between gbeans.
I've talked with Jules and Jeff about this and think that they agree
that this is a good starting point so I'll try to describe it and
possibly even help
It would be cool to have automated performance tests for components that get kicked off with continuum. We could graphically chart the results to be able to track perf improvements or regressions. If there are any regressions it would then be easy to determine what build and point, and possibly
On Jan 26, 2006, at 4:19 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
Isn't jpam JNI based?
Yes. It is a project to expose the native security libraries on Unix
to Java
If so, is it prudent to work with binaries?
Um java is a binary program :) Seriously, I think it is important
for Geronimo to play
Are you proposing a new API? I think the session management API
James and I wrote will satisfy these needs. I suggest you take a
look at:
modules/session/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/session/Locator.java
modules/session/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/session/
SessionLocation.java
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
On Jan 26, 2006, at 4:19 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
Isn't jpam JNI based?
Yes. It is a project to expose the native security libraries on Unix to
Java
If so, is it prudent to work with binaries?
Um java is a binary program :) Seriously, I think it is important
On Jan 26, 2006, at 5:06 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
On Jan 26, 2006, at 4:19 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
Isn't jpam JNI based?
Yes. It is a project to expose the native security libraries on
Unix to
Java
If so, is it prudent to work with binaries?
Um java is a
Sachin Patel wrote:
It would be cool to have automated performance tests for components
that get kicked off with continuum. We could graphically chart the
results to be able to track perf improvements or regressions. If
there are any regressions it would then be easy to determine what
A few of us are working on a project, LiveTribe, that does service
provisioning/configuration, management, and monitoring. One of the
things that we are actively working on is adding application response
monitoring using the ARM standard to Geronimo. Soon you will see this
in ServiceMix,
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1293?page=all ]
anita kulshreshtha updated GERONIMO-1293:
-
Attachment: geronimo-stats-1.1-SNAPSHOT.war
tomcat.patch
management.patch
Added servlet statistics. This
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1293?page=all ]
anita kulshreshtha updated GERONIMO-1293:
-
Attachment: tomcat-builder.patch
This patch is same as G-1035 and is attached here for convenience.
Provide tomcat statistics
Nice, where can i get some details?
thanks,
dims
On 1/26/06, Alan D. Cabrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A few of us are working on a project, LiveTribe, that does service
provisioning/configuration, management, and monitoring. One of the
things that we are actively working on is adding
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1035?page=comments#action_12364170
]
anita kulshreshtha commented on GERONIMO-1035:
--
Added servletStats. The latest patches are attached to G-1293. The patch names
reflects the module name. Here
There are a variety of integration points that you get added function by
crossing the Java / Binary line. Security is one, some platforms have XML
acceleration in C based funtions as well as some monitoring and management function.
Of course OSGi provides this cool binary functionality today
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1426?page=all ]
Paul McMahan updated GERONIMO-1426:
---
Attachment: GERONIMO-1426.patch
When testing the fix on windows I was still seeing an error in both the
database and jsm manager wizards. The
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1341?page=comments#action_12364180
]
Bruce Snyder commented on GERONIMO-1341:
The patch has been committed:
Adding javamail-transport/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/javamail/store
Adding
On 1/4/06, Rajith Attapattu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1341?page=all
Thanks Bruce,
Looking forward for your comments !!!
My apologies for taking so long ot get this committed - I've been
under water until this week. At any rate, Rajith, I didn't
On 1/25/06, Alan D. Cabrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
= PROJECT PROPOSAL =
Yoko, a CORBA Server.
This proposal outlines the creation of a Geronimo sub-project within the
Apache Software Foundation.
= RATIONALE =
The current Apache Geronimo project (http://geronimo.apache.org/) is in
79 matches
Mail list logo
