[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-878?page=comments#action_36939 ]
james strachan commented on AMQ-878:
Could you confirm that the original issue is fixed now in 4.1?
JMX Exception: Destination already created when recovering
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-816?page=comments#action_36940 ]
james strachan commented on AMQ-816:
We currently have the fanount transport which does most of this - the main
thing to add is the ability to choose the
On 9/12/06, tianqio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am a newbie of activemq,
Welcome!
I want to connect several broker together, and
then message can be routed from one broker to anthoer. How to implement
this?
See
http://incubator.apache.org/activemq/networks-of-brokers.html
--
James
+1
Looks good to me.
On 9/11/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've fixed the missing headers files that Hiram pointed out, so I'm starting
a new vote.
I have uploaded the 3.0-incubating release at
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository
Distributions are
but how can I write program to accomplish my task? any suggestion? thanks
tianqio wrote:
I am a newbie of activemq, I want to connect several broker together, and
then message can be routed from one broker to anthoer. How to implement
this?
thanks.
--
View this message in context:
On 9/12/06, tianqio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but how can I write program to accomplish my task? any suggestion? thanks
Use the XML configuration file on the page I just mentioned.
http://incubator.apache.org/activemq/networks-of-brokers.html
tianqio wrote:
I am a newbie of activemq, I
Can someone help me?
emicalc wrote:
Hello,
I'm using servicemix under tomcat; at this moment I have used components
(lightweight components) only configuring the applicationContext.xml
under the folder \webapps\servicemix\WEB-INF.
Now I want to know if it's possible that a
Can someone help me???
emicalc wrote:
Hello,
I want to run the soap-example under tomcat; I have copied the zip files
servicemix-http-3.0-M2-incubating-installer.zip and
servicemix-jsr181-3.0-M2-incubating-installer.zip under the folder
.\webapps\servicemix\install and
Take a look at servicemix-eip [1].
You could use a content based router to do that.
[1] http://servicemix.goopen.org/site/servicemix-eip.html
On 9/7/06, emicalc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I'm using servicemix under tomcat; at this moment I have used components
(lightweight components)
+1
John
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Folks,
Dain has volunteered to be the 1.2 release manager and Alan has also
volunteered to be the co-pilot. I have not seen a formal discussion
or vote on this. I don't know that we have a policy on this so I'm
starting the discuss thread. At some point in
Congratulations Hernan!
Regards,
John
Congratulations Rick!
Regards,
John
[X] +1 CTR with documentation guidelines
I agree with Joe that we need to work hard at this for it to work and
should review its effectiveness in a few months.
Regards,
John
Joe Bohn wrote:
[X] +1 CTR with documentation guidelines
We'll have to work extra hard to ensure that we hold each
On Sep 11, 2006, at 9:27 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
On Sep 11, 2006, at 10:17 PM, David Blevins wrote:
[X] +1 CTR with documentation guidelines
And to clarify, my proposal was actual for CTR w/optional RTC with
Lazy Consensus, where we as a community agree RTC with Lazy
Consensus is
On 9/12/06, David Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The heart of this debate is acting as an individual vs. a group.
It's fine to do either, but just know this; if you make your
decisions alone, don't be surprised if one day you are alone.
I like it! Very concise explanation. It should become
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Folks,
Dain has volunteered to be the 1.2 release manager and Alan has also
volunteered to be the co-pilot. I have not seen a formal discussion
or vote on this. I don't know that we have a policy on this so I'm
starting the discuss thread. At some point in the past
MagicGBall deployment plans lost when converted to maven 2 build.
-
Key: GERONIMO-2394
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2394
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-876?page=comments#action_36941 ]
Rob Davies commented on AMQ-876:
Hi Vadim,
I couldn't reproduce this - and as I'd fixed something like this a few weeks
ago - I'd assumed it was fixed.
Could you
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2394?page=all ]
Rick McGuire resolved GERONIMO-2394.
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision 442568.
Original deployment plans restored. These are just in the source directory for
now.
MagicGBall
XBeanProcessor does not skip comments
-
Key: SM-576
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-576
Project: ServiceMix
Issue Type: Bug
Components: servicemix-core
Affects Versions:
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2388?page=comments#action_12434136
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy commented on GERONIMO-2388:
---
Please note: Patch for GERONIMO-2378 Problems in JavaScript validation
cod... need to be
Hi All,
We do have a place to put integration test deployables now;
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/trunk/testsupport
Lets move magicGBall there and it would be great if you were to put
the mini-apps you are doing there too then the other module can use
them as
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-76?page=all ]
Sachin Patel closed GERONIMODEVTOOLS-76.
Resolution: Fixed
This seems to have been fixed in trunk using WTP 1.5.1 drivers.
Geronimo Fails if deploying a 'Bottom Up Web
Hi Anita,
Any luck? Any further thoughts? I'm happy to help in anyway I can to
get this resolved.
Thanks,
-bd-
On Sep 6, 2006, at 8:31 PM, anita kulshreshtha wrote:
inline..
--- Bill Dudney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Anita,
initial patch? The patch I posted had a single deleted line
Voting has concluded. There were 7 +1 votes and a comment by Paul
that has been researched and addressed.
I will release 1.1.1 later today.
Thanks to everyone who worked on this monster :)
Congratulations Matt.
VamsiOn 9/12/06, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Voting has concluded.There were 7 +1 votes and a comment by Paulthat has been researched and addressed.I will release 1.1.1 later today.Thanks to everyone who worked on this monster :)
Nop.. I tried deploying MYSQL DBPool using the wizard. The
deployment was successful, but I got a stack trace. There was a stack
trace during shutdown (see the attached log). So I decided to get the
latest source. I have been getting openejb (rev 2897) compile failures
due to:
Hi All,
Last few months I have been writing sample applications to the Geronimo.
I found several sample applications to the Geronimo but not for Little
G. So I thought to write a sample application to illustrate Little G or
convert existing sample application to it's Little G version. Please
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-704?page=comments#action_36942 ]
Jamie McCrindle commented on AMQ-704:
-
hi, is this really fixed or is the workaround considered the fix? if it's just
the workaround, it's not great, since it
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2354?page=comments#action_12434168
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-2354:
I missed a couple files in my GERONIMO-2383 commit last night. The problems
should be fixed now.
Replace
Sorry to be a pain, but I thought we had to vote on the actual
artifact we plan to release, not something similar to the artifact we
plan to release.
So, IMO we may have voted to release something called 1.1.1-rc3, with
lots of 1.1.1-rc3 versioned jars inside it. I don't think we can
We need to have only the current version of geronimo plan schemas in svn.
-
Key: GERONIMO-2395
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2395
Project: Geronimo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kevan Miller wrote:
1. Relaxed RTC
Geronimo follows a Review-Then-Commit (RTC) model. Patches for new
function are provided by developers for review and comment by their
peers. Feedback is conducted through JIRA comments.
- -1 on that
On Sep 12, 2006, at 10:56 AM, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-Hash: SHA1Kevan Miller wrote: 1. Relaxed RTCGeronimo follows a Review-Then-Commit (RTC) model. Patches for new function are provided by developers for review and comment by their peers. Feedback is
On Sep 12, 2006, at 4:26 AM, David Blevins wrote:
On Sep 11, 2006, at 9:27 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
On Sep 11, 2006, at 10:17 PM, David Blevins wrote:
[X] +1 CTR with documentation guidelines
And to clarify, my proposal was actual for CTR w/optional RTC
with Lazy Consensus, where
Hi Ken,
General question: Why is it bad to hold a discussion in a JIRA since
the whole of the discussion is archived in the issues mailing list.
Seems like the JIRA is the ideal place to hold the discussion because
its archived and organized for all to follow. If the JIRA magically
or
DatabaseInitializationGBean to run db scripts on startup
Key: GERONIMO-2396
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2396
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: New Feature
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2396?page=all ]
David Jencks updated GERONIMO-2396:
---
Attachment: GERONIMO-2396.patch
Hacked together prototype for a sql-script-running gbean
DatabaseInitializationGBean to run db scripts on startup
Need to use the jee5 schemas without redistributing them
Key: GERONIMO-2397
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2397
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-92?page=all ]
Donald Woods updated GERONIMODEVTOOLS-92:
-
Patch Info: [Patch Available]
Affects Version/s: 1.x
Patch created against devtools/trunk/
Support builds on Linux
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-92?page=all ]
Donald Woods updated GERONIMODEVTOOLS-92:
-
Attachment: Devtools-92.patch
Adds support for x86_64, Solaris and AIX.
Support builds on Linux x86_64 based systems
Tx/Connector support should be separated from j2ee-server and client
Key: GERONIMO-2398
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2398
Project: Geronimo
Issue
Support both jetty 5 and jetty 6
Key: GERONIMO-2399
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2399
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: New Feature
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2395?page=all ]
David Jencks closed GERONIMO-2395.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Removed from g rev 442622
removed from openejb (+ fixing a bad reference) rev 2900
We need to have only the current version of
On Sep 12, 2006, at 10:50 AM, David Jencks wrote:
Sorry to be a pain, but I thought we had to vote on the actual
artifact we plan to release, not something similar to the artifact
we plan to release.
So, IMO we may have voted to release something called 1.1.1-rc3,
with lots of 1.1.1-rc3
Ken,Understand your concerns about communication occurring on the mailing lists. I think these can be addressed in the proposals. I don't think they fundamentally change the nature of the proposals. Do you agree? If we're uncomfortable with the vote, as stands. I can respin...Finally, would prefer
I'd like to thank the PMC members who promptly reviewed my jta 1.1
and jndi refactoring patches and point them to an at least equally
deserving patch that has been quietly mouldering for lack of attention
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2163
Aside from
- Integrating WADI in
Wow...that's a *lot* of patches. Before applying and giving a +1, can
we just get a small synopsis here on the clustering contract and bullet
point of the contents. Also...which patch to apply? ;-)
Jeff
David Jencks wrote:
I'd like to thank the PMC members who promptly reviewed my jta 1.1 and
Hi Anita,
This patch should not effect the datasource stuff at all, you can see
the effect from the 'Server Logs' or any number of the console 'main
functions' in the menu on the left. The error in your log file looks
to me like a mysql server problem (reboot the server or something I'd
I wanted to go over a high level design on a gcache cache component and
get some feedback, input and invite folks who are interested to join in.
..so here it goes...
The gcache will be one of several cache/clustering offerings...but
starting off with the first one...
The first pass I want to go
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-92?page=all ]
Sachin Patel reassigned GERONIMODEVTOOLS-92:
Assignee: Sachin Patel (was: Donald Woods)
Support builds on Linux x86_64 based systems
Apply only http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12340048/
GERONIMO-2163-v6c.patch
There are some instructions on setting up a testbed that require some
other files. Personally I wasn't able to follow all of them but I
think this patch is worth applying anyway.
The clustering
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sachin Patel wrote:
-1 on that last sentence. You don't hold discussions in JIRA..
Why? This to me is the ideal place to append comments. If a contributer
opened a JIRA and attached a patch, I'd expect comments on the patch to
be appended to
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-876?page=comments#action_36943 ]
Vadim Pesochinskiy commented on AMQ-876:
Rob,
Unfortunately it is not easy to reproduce this bug. It happens all the time
when I run my test, but not on
On Sep 12, 2006, at 4:26 AM, David Blevins wrote:
Sorry if I wasn't clear. My vote is for 3 without qualifications.
Was simply adding (unsuccessfully) that my proposal didn't make it
into the list of options.
I didn't mean to come across too strongly. I was noticing on this
vote
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-104?page=all ]
Sachin Patel closed GERONIMODEVTOOLS-104.
-
Fix Version/s: 1.x
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Sachin Patel
This should be fixed. If you still have problems,
specs\branches\1_1_1\geronimo-spec-corba\pom.xml has the following.
parent
artifactIdspecs/artifactId
groupIdorg.apache.geronimo.specs/groupId
version1.1/version
/parent
It is using 1.1 for version in parent. Every other pom.xml in the tree uses 1.1.1
Is this missed out or is it the way it
+1
On 9/11/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've fixed the missing headers files that Hiram pointed out, so I'm starting
a new vote.
I have uploaded the 3.0-incubating release at
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository
Distributions are available at
+1
On 9/11/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've fixed the missing headers files that Hiram pointed out, so I'm
starting a new vote.
I have uploaded the 3.0-incubating release at
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository
Distributions are available at
Btw, the subject of this vote is wrong.
It should be: *[VOTE] ServiceMix-3.0-incubating (second try)*
Sorry about that.
On 9/11/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've fixed the missing headers files that Hiram pointed out, so I'm
starting a new vote.
I have uploaded the
+1
On 12 Sep 2006, at 19:33, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
Btw, the subject of this vote is wrong.
It should be: *[VOTE] ServiceMix-3.0-incubating (second try)*
Sorry about that.
On 9/11/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've fixed the missing headers files that Hiram pointed out, so I'm
+1
Great!
On 9/11/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've fixed the missing headers files that Hiram pointed out, so I'm starting
a new vote.
I have uploaded the 3.0-incubating release at
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository
Distributions are available at
Sachin Patel wrote:
Also, try out the updated driver, it hasn't been released, but
contains many fixes...
http://people.apache.org/dist/geronimo/eclipse/unstable/g-eclipse-plugin-1.1.x-deployable.zip
The versions have not been bumped up yet, so you'll want to remove
*geronimo* from both
On 9/11/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree on the professional side, tough I' m not a native
english speaker and I think I may miss lots of subtilities
when choosing a name (unless one point them explicitely).
On a side note, Mojo = M(aven) (P)ojo, so there is still
a link to
On Sep 12, 2006, at 7:56 AM, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
Geronimo follows a Review-Then-Commit (RTC) model. Patches for new
function are provided by developers for review and comment by their
peers. Feedback is conducted through JIRA comments.
- -1 on that last sentence. You don't hold
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2396?page=comments#action_12434245
]
Jason Dillon commented on GERONIMO-2396:
Why not leverage Ant's SQL task to do this?
* http://ant.apache.org/manual/CoreTasks/sql.html
It is trivial
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2354?page=comments#action_12434246
]
Jason Dillon commented on GERONIMO-2354:
Okay, checking again.
Replace concurrent with backport-concurrent-util
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-99?page=all ]
Sachin Patel closed GERONIMODEVTOOLS-99.
Resolution: Fixed
fixed in head. Option is now available in sever editor enable in place shared
lib in which for a given project
Oh i don't care about my suggestion really, just trying to get us to
think outside the box.
Well, here are a few that spring to mind to get the creative process
rolling:
InTheMix
MixCentral
MixDepot
MixCore
BeyondServiceMix
MixBase
Terry
We could always go for ServiceReMix
P
On 9/12/06, Terry Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh i don't care about my suggestion really, just trying to get us to
think outside the box.
Well, here are a few that spring to mind to get the creative process
rolling:
InTheMix
MixCentral
MixDepot
On 9/12/06, Terry Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh i don't care about my suggestion really, just trying to get us to
think outside the box.
Well, here are a few that spring to mind to get the creative process
rolling:
InTheMix
MixCentral
MixDepot
MixCore
BeyondServiceMix
MixBase
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2354?page=comments#action_12434255
]
Jason Dillon commented on GERONIMO-2354:
Okay, now I'm seeing that JCL error for 3 tests:
* org.openejb.deployment.UnpackedModuleDeploymentTest
*
On 9/11/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've fixed the missing headers files that Hiram pointed out, so I'm starting
a new vote.
I have uploaded the 3.0-incubating release at
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository
Distributions are available at
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2365?page=comments#action_12434261
]
Jason Dillon commented on GERONIMO-2365:
Based on David Jencks' comments, I'm going to remove the derby version instead
of applying
I had thought Alan was going to resume the 1.0 vote with the
artifacts thats I published to:
http://people.apache.org/~jdillon/repository/org/apache/geronimo/
genesis/
This is a re-release of 1.0, with the clover license removed, but not
the artifact (its empty now).
--jason
On
I'm not up to speed on how the plugin repositories are setup... if it
follows the same layout as m2, then we could publish artifacts
directly to central, but if not, then we'd need a separate space to
publish to.
--jason
On Sep 11, 2006, at 2:56 PM, Paul McMahan wrote:
I'm not totally
I see this too... have not looked into it, but we need to fix this,
its causing bootstrap builds of G to fail.
--jason
On Sep 11, 2006, at 3:22 PM, David Jencks wrote:
I sometimes get this error building openejb-core:
testcase time=1.273
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2377?page=all ]
Bill Dudney updated GERONIMO-2377:
--
Attachment: GERONIMO-2377.bdudney.patch
displays an error instead of just moving on
deploying a new datasource with the same name does not indicate
I noticed two peculiar things about the latest trunk build and activeMQ.
1) The image size of the activeMQ rar file is now huge ... going from
something like 1 meg to a present 7.5 meg:
7,508,415 ge-activemq-rar-1.2-SNAPSHOT.rar
2) This is now included in all assemblies when it was
The rar deps need to be excluded... Open issue for that which I will fix
shortly.
And David Jencks said to add the rars to the minimal boilerplate, so I did. If
that is not correct we can move it to the j2ee boilerplate.
--jason
-Original Message-
From: Joe Bohn [EMAIL
Thanks Jason. I had just remembered about the boilerplate assemblies
and noticed the activemq-rar in there.
I don't know why we would need the activemq-rar in the boilderplate for
minimal. David, can you give some more details?
I'll open a JIRA on the deps.
Joe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
There is already an issue GERONIMO-1722
--jason
-Original Message-
From: Joe Bohn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 17:01:50
To:dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Peculiar things about the latest trunk build wrt ActiveMQ
Thanks Jason. I had just remembered about the
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2333?page=comments#action_12434280
]
Chris Cardona commented on GERONIMO-2333:
-
Chris the new portlet looks fantastic!! It will be a huge help for
administrators and developers needing
I have updated build in the following ways:
- Removed the code that left extraneous 0 length DTDs in the build.
- Built on 1.1.1. These binaries are the final ones that will be
used for distribution.
They can be found at
http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/1.1.1-rc4/
Please note that these
I hadn't really thought about this issue so here is my 2c.
The only potential issue I see is that I (and others) often see and
issue and reply to the e-mail generated from JIRA and do not
automatically go into JIRA to add the comments. So, those comments
are in the e-mail and are not in
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2397?page=comments#action_12434292
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-2397:
I've committed a build of the jee5 schemas in the tck directory. Jason, could
you take a look and if it
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2354?page=all ]
Jason Dillon closed GERONIMO-2354.
--
Looks good. Thanks for Kevan and David J for helping to commit this.
Replace concurrent with backport-concurrent-util
On Sep 12, 2006, at 5:01 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
Thanks Jason. I had just remembered about the boilerplate
assemblies and noticed the activemq-rar in there.
I don't know why we would need the activemq-rar in the boilderplate
for minimal. David, can you give some more details?
I guess I
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1722?page=all ]
Jason Dillon updated GERONIMO-1722:
---
Fix Version/s: 1.2
Affects Version/s: 1.2
(was: 1.x)
Module migration to Maven 2: activemq-embedded-rar
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1722?page=all ]
Jason Dillon reassigned GERONIMO-1722:
--
Assignee: David Jencks (was: Jason Dillon)
David, can you please check the FIXME comments in the pom.xml and make sure
that we need to exclude
I've excluded the transitive deps, bringing the rar down to ~1m
Not sure if we need to exclude the others too.. if so, then we should
remove the deps from the pom.
Anyways, I've passed this issue (GERONIMO-1722) to David J for
completion as I am not really sure what needs to be in the rar
Why are jee5 bits in the schema/j2ee_1.4/trunk?
Do we need to rename this dir? If we want one project for all
schemas, then we should drop the intermediate j2ee_1.4 dir and just
make a schema/trunk.
Why is the version set to 1.0? Trunk versions should almost never
bet set to anything
[X] +1 CTR with documentation guidelines
Regards,
Alan
+1
Regards,
Alan
On Sep 11, 2006, at 4:06 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I've fixed the missing headers files that Hiram pointed out, so I'm
starting
a new vote.
I have uploaded the 3.0-incubating release at
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository
Distributions are available
Congrats Rick!
Regards,
Alan
On Sep 11, 2006, at 7:17 AM, Jeff Genender wrote:
All,
The Geronimo PMC is pleased to welcome Rick McGuire as the newest
member
of the Geronimo PMC. We're very happy to have Rick joining us to help
with the oversight of the Geronimo project. Lets give a
Congrats Hernan!
Regards,
Alan
On Sep 11, 2006, at 7:08 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
All,
The Geronimo PMC is pleased to welcome Hernan Cunico as the newest
member of the Geronimo PMC. We're very happy to have Hernan joining
us to help with the oversight of the Geronimo project.
Well done,
On Sep 12, 2006, at 8:06 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Sep 12, 2006, at 4:26 AM, David Blevins wrote:
On Sep 11, 2006, at 9:27 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
On Sep 11, 2006, at 10:17 PM, David Blevins wrote:
[X] +1 CTR with documentation guidelines
And to clarify, my proposal was actual
David Jencks wrote:
On Sep 12, 2006, at 5:01 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
Thanks Jason. I had just remembered about the boilerplate assemblies
and noticed the activemq-rar in there.
I don't know why we would need the activemq-rar in the boilderplate
for minimal. David, can you give some
+1
Regards,
Alan
On Sep 8, 2006, at 6:53 AM, Hiram Chirino wrote:
This is the first independently released version of the ActiveMQ maven
plugins. These are the maven plugins that the ActiveMQ build requires
to build.
You can checkout the binary build here:
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2397?page=comments#action_12434326
]
Jason Dillon commented on GERONIMO-2397:
Okay, I split up schemas/j2ee_1.4/trunk into:
* schemas/geronimo-schema-j2ee_1.4/trunk
*
1 - 100 of 120 matches
Mail list logo
