[jira] Resolved: (GERONIMO-4865) Login module to enable Kerberos authentication

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4865?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kevan Miller resolved GERONIMO-4865. Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 3.0 Patch applied. JDK specific configuration

[jira] Assigned: (GERONIMO-4865) Login module to enable Kerberos authentication

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4865?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kevan Miller reassigned GERONIMO-4865: -- Assignee: Ashish Jain (was: Kevan Miller) > Login module to enable Kerbe

[jira] Assigned: (GERONIMO-4865) Login module to enable Kerberos authentication

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4865?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kevan Miller reassigned GERONIMO-4865: -- Assignee: Kevan Miller (was: Ashish Jain) > Login module to enable Kerbe

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-4956) Tomcat should use Keystore GBean for access to Geronimo keystore

Security Level: public (Regular issues) Affects Versions: 2.2.1, 3.0 Reporter: Kevan Miller Fix For: 2.2.1, 3.0 Currently, Tomcat is configured to directly access the Geronimo keystore (and thus requires the keystorePass password. Better that it should be

[jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-4927) keystorePass attribute on TomcatWebSSLConnector GBean should be encrypted/obscured

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4927?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kevan Miller closed GERONIMO-4927. -- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: (was: 2.2.1) (was: 3.0

[jira] Assigned: (GERONIMO-4927) keystorePass attribute on TomcatWebSSLConnector GBean should be encrypted/obscured

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4927?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kevan Miller reassigned GERONIMO-4927: -- Assignee: Kevan Miller > keystorePass attribute on TomcatWebSSLConnector GB

Re: Toplink plugin for geronimo

On Nov 15, 2009, at 10:08 AM, Fei LI wrote: > Hi Kevan, > > This is a very good subject. I am an experienced Java/J2EE application > developer but only have the experience how to use a Web server, never develop > a Web server. Understood. Implementing an EE server is certainly different. How

Re: Toplink plugin for geronimo

On Nov 13, 2009, at 10:02 AM, Fei LI wrote: > Yes, I vote for it strongly. But if IBM takes an anti-Oracle position, then I > do not know. That's not how it works in an Apache community. If users are interested in the capability and someone in the community is interested in developing (and su

Re: Toplink plugin for geronimo

On Nov 14, 2009, at 3:18 AM, Ashish Jain wrote: > It will be a geronimo plugin which can be installed using the plugin portlet > or command line. > This will be only for those user who wants to use toplink as the persistence > provider with geronimo. > However the default persistence provider o

[jira] Resolved: (GERONIMO-4900) MissingDependencyException while deploying EAR in Clustering Environment

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4900?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kevan Miller resolved GERONIMO-4900. Resolution: Fixed Should be resolved. Amit, if you could verify and close the jira

[jira] Assigned: (GERONIMO-4900) MissingDependencyException while deploying EAR in Clustering Environment

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4900?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kevan Miller reassigned GERONIMO-4900: -- Assignee: Kevan Miller (was: Ashish Jain) > MissingDependencyException wh

Re: Could not build Geronimo server from SVN branch 2.2

On Nov 11, 2009, at 10:14 AM, Joe Bohn wrote: Thanks for documenting this Jeff. Hopefully this will be a temporary work-around which can later be removed once things are fixed in the repository. Which brings me to the next point - what can be done to really fix this? I guess Sun owns t

Re: Could not build Geronimo server from SVN branch 2.2

Forwarding to dev list thread, also... --kevan On Nov 11, 2009, at 10:33 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: On Nov 10, 2009, at 11:00 PM, Fei LI wrote: Hi, I am exhausted and decide to give up. If you really want to help me out, please remove your local repo completely, build from the ground and

Re: Could not build Geronimo server from SVN branch 2.2

On Nov 10, 2009, at 3:31 PM, Joe Bohn wrote: After looking into this some more and discussing it off-line with Jarek I've learned the following: - It isn't really returning a bogus pom or jar ... it is just returning a redirect. Maven wrongly assumes that this is the actual file that wa

Re: Could not build Geronimo server from SVN branch 2.2

On Nov 9, 2009, at 5:28 PM, Jay D. McHugh wrote: Here is what they problem is - they moved that artifact. In its place is the following html file (rather than a pom) 301 Moved Permanently Moved Permanently The document has moved href="http://download.java.net/maven/1/com.envoisolutions.sxc

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-4947) Geronimo performance

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4947?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12775983#action_12775983 ] Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-4947: In terms of Geronimo specific

Re: Mbeans for Blueprint

On Nov 10, 2009, at 2:23 AM, Rex Wang wrote: Hi dear all, The BlueprintMBean design has finished. I'd like to put the api codes in sandbox and request review comments, but seems I can not create a folder for myself in the sandbox? How to get that? Following works just fine for me... Can

Re: Mbeans for Blueprint

On Nov 10, 2009, at 2:23 AM, Rex Wang wrote: Hi dear all, The BlueprintMBean design has finished. I'd like to put the api codes in sandbox and request review comments, but seems I can not create a folder for myself in the sandbox? How to get that? Hmm. Don't know what might be wrong, off

Re: help

Hi Fei, Please try and limit your email topics to a single mailing list. Donald Woods responded to your first question as follows: On Nov 3, 2009, at 8:05 PM, Donald Woods wrote: Before building the Eclipse Plugins (GEP 2.2.0) you'll need to build a Geronimo 2.2-SNAPSHOT server locally (from

Re: Geronimo Blog

On Nov 3, 2009, at 10:49 AM, Peter Petersson wrote: If you like to brand your Geronimo community blog you can try to apply the theme plugin that contains a "glike" "Geronimo Like" theme I come up with ;) wile working with David on the Geronimo Roller plugin https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf

[jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-4943) Finalize License/Notice files for 2.2 release

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4943?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kevan Miller closed GERONIMO-4943. -- Resolution: Fixed Assignee: Kevan Miller I've made the updates, with some ch

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-4927) keystorePass attribute on TomcatWebSSLConnector GBean should be encrypted/obscured

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4927?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12773038#action_12773038 ] Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-4927: Yes. That is what I meant by &q

Geronimo Blog

All, A new Geronimo community blog has been created at http://blogs.apache.org/geronimo/ If you'd like the ability to post to the blog, reply to this email. At the moment, access is limited to Geronimo committers. If this policy changes, I'll let everyone know... --kevan

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-4943) Finalize License/Notice files for 2.2 release

issues) Affects Versions: 2.2 Reporter: Kevan Miller Fix For: 2.2 Need to update the LICENSE/NOTICE files with up-to-date license information -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-4938) Move geronimo-schema-j2ee and geronimo-schema-jee_5

Level: public (Regular issues) Reporter: Kevan Miller Fix For: 3.0 With the properly CDDL licensed xsd/dtd's. We should move the xmlbean schema svn into geronimo/components or geronimo/schema... -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-4871) Something blocking 'kill -3' signals?

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4871?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12770596#action_12770596 ] Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-4871: Thanks for the ideas Quintin. Ag

[jira] Reopened: (GERONIMO-4871) Something blocking 'kill -3' signals?

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4871?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kevan Miller reopened GERONIMO-4871: > Something blocking 'kill -3&

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-4871) Something blocking 'kill -3' signals?

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4871?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kevan Miller updated GERONIMO-4871: --- Fix Version/s: (was: 2.2) 2.2.1 Good guess, but doesn't se

[jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-4871) Something blocking 'kill -3' signals?

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4871?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kevan Miller closed GERONIMO-4871. -- Resolution: Invalid Not sure what's going on. I verified that kill -QUIT works on Ger

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-4927) keystorePass attribute on TomcatWebSSLConnector GBean should be encrypted/obscured

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4927?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kevan Miller updated GERONIMO-4927: --- Affects Version/s: (was: 3.0) (was: 2.2

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-4927) keystorePass attribute on TomcatWebSSLConnector GBean should be encrypted/obscured

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4927?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12770373#action_12770373 ] Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-4927: There is no TomcatWebSSLConne

[jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-4869) InheritableThreadLocal causing ClassLoader memory leak in TransactionTimer thread

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4869?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kevan Miller closed GERONIMO-4869. -- Resolution: Fixed Start TransactionTimer thread during start-up. > InheritableThreadLo

[jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-4809) Use platform MBean server rather than creating our own

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4809?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kevan Miller closed GERONIMO-4809. -- Resolution: Fixed Assignee: Kevan Miller Fixed with 806547 > Use platform MB

Re: logging in trunk

On Oct 26, 2009, at 10:10 AM, Jarek Gawor wrote: I'm trying to update the wiki but I keep getting these proxy errors (Reason: Error reading from remote server.). Is anybody else seeing these too? Ya. Last time that I was making some Wiki updates. Have always been able to complete my updates

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-4927) keystorePass attribute on TomcatWebSSLConnector GBean should be encrypted/obscured

: Geronimo Issue Type: Bug Security Level: public (Regular issues) Affects Versions: 2.2, 3.0 Reporter: Kevan Miller Fix For: 2.1.5, 2.2, 3.0 keystorePass does not conform to the current convention for encrypting/obscuring GBean attributes. Currently

Re: NoClassDefError problem with geronimo-transaction bundle.

On Oct 21, 2009, at 11:25 AM, Rick McGuire wrote: I spent a little time looking into this problem this morning, and uncovered a couple of issues that need discussing. Essentially, the problem here is that the javax.transaction and javax.transaction.xa class are loaded off of the system c

phoebe/selene config change

FYI, At some point X11Forwarding was turned off on selene/phoebe (in /etc/ ssh/sshd_config). IIUC, part of the TCK tests for jaxb/stax require a GUI. So, enabling allows us to run all TCK tests on phoebe/selene. I checked on #asfinfra and they didn't have a problem enabling X11Forwarding. S

Re: Central Artifact Metadata Outdated

On Oct 19, 2009, at 3:00 PM, Quintin Beukes wrote: I'm not sure if you guys are in charge of deploying the XBean project to the Maven Central repository, but I'm getting the following and they said the problem is on the deployer's side. Thanks Quintin. This looks like the MAVEN 2.2 bug which

[jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-4885) Configure default max heap and max permsize

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4885?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kevan Miller closed GERONIMO-4885. -- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 3.0 Defaults are now -Xmx 256m and -XX:MaxPermSize

[jira] Assigned: (GERONIMO-4885) Configure default max heap and max permsize

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4885?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kevan Miller reassigned GERONIMO-4885: -- Assignee: Kevan Miller > Configure default max heap and max perms

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-4902) need license file modifications for imported plexus code in osgi sandbox modules/geronimo-plugin

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4902?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12762494#action_12762494 ] Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-4902: Hmm. I think this is going to

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-jpa_2.0_spec-1.0-PFD2 and geronimo-validation_1.0_spec-1.0-CR5 for OpenJPA (2nd try)

+1 Source, and binaries look good. I spot-checked sigs and checksums. I'm ok with the unnecessary W3C license. One favor, Donald? In future votes, could you add a ' ' character between 'source:' and your URLs? Same for 'artifacts:'. My mail reader doesn't parse the URL. So, i'm forced to

tck machine maintenance

FYI, I ran apt-get update and apt-get upgrade on selene/phoebe. --kevan

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-jpa_2.0_spec-1.0-PFD2 and geronimo-valdiation_1.0_spec-1.0-CR5 for OpenJPA

Donald, The notice information does not match my understanding of Apache's agreement with Sun. Which I believe should look something like this: This is an implementation of an early-draft specification developed under the Java Community Process (JCP). The code is untested and presumed not

Re: put XSD schemas on G web

On Sep 30, 2009, at 10:03 AM, Radim Kolar wrote: Ellen Tang-2 wrote: Ellen, I can't open the URL in your email: http://geronimo.apache.org/xsd/geonimo-module-1.2.xsd Is there any typo in there? There is no typo, but these XSD

Re: October Board report

Thanks Jay! --kevan

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-4896) Commands to a Secure JMX Connector require the SSL keyStorePassword to be specified on command line

/GERONIMO-4896 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Bug Security Level: public (Regular issues) Affects Versions: 2.1.5, 2.2, 3.0 Reporter: Kevan Miller Fix For: 2.1.5, 2.2, 3.0 To my knowledge, it is not possible to run a Geronimo command (e.g

Re: [DISCUSS] Donate Blueprint implementation to Aries podling

On Sep 25, 2009, at 3:38 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: It seems there is a consensus to move Blueprint to Aries as long as it remains independanly consumable, which point I fully agree with. I'll restart the vote. Sounds good. Thanks Guillaume! --kevan

Re: [VOTE] Donate blueprint to Aries podling (2nd try)

+1 --kevan On Sep 25, 2009, at 3:39 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: The Aries podling has just been accepted (see http://incubator.apache.org/aries/) and would be a much better place for the blueprint implementation that has been developped in Geronimo. This vote is mainly for donating the code to t

Re: [DISCUSS] Donate Blueprint implementation to Aries podling

On Sep 24, 2009, at 12:33 PM, Rick McGuire wrote: Jarek Gawor wrote: I'm +1 for the move. I'm just curious. Is the plan to move the Blueprint trunk and tags? or just trunk? I suspect the tags really should remain here for the benefit of anybody looking for the code for the one version t

Re: [DISCUSS] Donate Blueprint implementation to Aries podling

On Sep 23, 2009, at 11:20 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: Some time ago, a few Geronimo committers have started an implementation of the OSGi Blueprint Services spec, which is basically an OSGi standardized version of Spring-DM (the next version of Spring-DM being the RI of this spec). The code was

Re: [VOTE] Donate blueprint to Aries podling

Guillaume, This topic was slightly touched on during the Blueprint release vote. However, I encourage you to start by discussing with the community, first. Rather than simply calling a VOTE. --kevan On Sep 23, 2009, at 9:14 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: The Aries podling has just been accepte

Re: 2.2 progress

On Sep 21, 2009, at 8:21 PM, David Jencks wrote: I think things are moving along for 2.2. - our last internal dependency, the tomcat fork, seems to have passed its vote, although I'd prefer it if Kevan would take a look. - ActiveMQ is pushing release candidates. The first one showed no

Re: [VOTE] release geronimo's forked mavenized tomcat 6.0.20.0 2nd try

+1. Source, build, sigs/checksums -- all look good. --kevan On Sep 18, 2009, at 9:56 PM, David Jencks wrote: I've removed the leftover archetype scripts, fixed up the pom names so the NOTICE files look nicer, added license goo to the script sources in the unreleased archetype, as well as a s

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-4885) Configure default max heap and max permsize

issues) Affects Versions: 2.2 Reporter: Kevan Miller Fix For: 2.2 It seems that the amount of PermGen space being used by Geronimo 2.2. I think users are more likely to run into OutOfMemoryErrors as a result. Even on small to medium size apps. Setting a default max heap

Re: [VOTE] release geronimo's forked mavenized tomcat 6.0.20.0

Unless there's a good reason against, I'm going to be -1 until there are license headers in the following: build-archetype.sh fixup.sh mv-resource.sh mydos2unix.sh run.sh svn-actions.sh Similar non-blocking comments about the text in the jar NOTICE files and your digital signature. Everythin

Re: [discuss] update Transaction.commit method signature in jta spec jar

On Sep 17, 2009, at 4:13 PM, Lin Sun wrote: What do you think of adding the missing unchecked exception "IllegalStateException" back to our JTA spec and release a newer version of the JTA spec jar just to be the same as what is in the Java doc? I think it is good for us to be consistent with

Re: [VOTE] release geronimo-jpa_1.0_spec 1.1.2

+1 I checked source, digital signature/checksums, and build. A few non- blocking issues: 1) KEYS -- I don't see your digital key in the KEYS file. Would also prefer that you sign your key with an apache.org email address, rather than yahoo. There are multiple KEYS files floating about svn an

Re: Request for editor access for G docs

On Sep 17, 2009, at 9:42 PM, Ellen Tang wrote: Could someone please set up the editor access for me? I really hope that I can get the access within this week. Ellen, Sorry for the delay. You should have access, now... --kevan

Re: Request for editor access for G docs

Can somebody set up access for Ellen? I've confirmed that there's an ICLA on file... --kevan On Sep 16, 2009, at 2:39 AM, Ellen Tang wrote: Hi, I am a technical writer. I would like to apply for the editor access for geronimo related docs. I have just signed up an account on the confluen

Re: [VOTE] xbean 3.6 3rd try

+1 given the updated checksums. --kevan On Sep 14, 2009, at 4:20 PM, Kevan Miller wrote: Looks good, except the md5/sha1 checksum errors. I'm -1 until they're fixed. --kevan On Sep 11, 2009, at 7:07 PM, David Jencks wrote: I've prepared a 3rd release candidate for xb

Re: [VOTE] txmanager 2.1.3 2nd try

+1 --kevan On Sep 13, 2009, at 3:58 AM, David Jencks wrote: I fixed the build problem where we weren't building the test jars. I've set up a release candidate for the transaction manager and connector code 2.1.3, needed for geronimo 2.2: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/g

Re: [VOTE] Release Blueprint 1.0.0 (4th try)

+1 --kevan On Sep 11, 2009, at 12:38 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: I've uploaded another 1.0.0 release of the blueprint project. I think I've addressed all the issues raised in the discussion thread. The staging repository is available at: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/geroni

Re: [VOTE] geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec version 1.0.2

+1 --kevan On Sep 10, 2009, at 8:16 PM, David Jencks wrote: I've built a release candidate for the jacc spec jar: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/geronimo-staging-002/ Site is staged here: http://people.apache.org/~djencks/staging-site/maven/specs/geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec/1.

Re: [VOTE] release jaspic implementation component 1.0

Spot check of checksums looks good. Here's my +1. Thanks David! --kevan On Sep 10, 2009, at 10:08 PM, David Jencks wrote: It's time for the first release of our jaspic implementation for inclusion in g. 2.2. Release artifacts staged here: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/g

Re: [VOTE] release jaspic implementation component 1.0

On Sep 14, 2009, at 5:41 PM, David Jencks wrote: This turned out to be because I was inadvertently using maven 2.2 for these releases, which has a problem with uploading files twice to nexus, and calculating the checksum on the doubled file. Good to know. John Casey regenerated the chec

Re: [VOTE] txmanager 2.1.3 2nd try

Changing my vote to -1 until the checksum issues are resolved. --kevan On Sep 13, 2009, at 1:45 PM, Kevan Miller wrote: +1 Source, build, and generated binaries look good. There's a problem with the staging and site links in your note, however. The text of the links is correct. Ho

Re: Geronimo branches/2.2 build failure

On Sep 14, 2009, at 4:14 PM, Jason Warner wrote: The automated TCK tests are failing when building the geronimo server from the branches/2.2 source with a missing artifact error[1]. This was caused by the tests jar problem that David recently fixed. I've deployed a fixed version of 2.1.3-S

Re: [VOTE] geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec version 1.0.2

The license file contains a W3C license for XMLSchema.dtd. However, the generated jar file does not contain the license. AFAICT, there's no need for this license. Am I missing something? --kevan On Sep 10, 2009, at 8:16 PM, David Jencks wrote: I've built a release candidate for the jacc spe

Re: [VOTE] release jaspic implementation component 1.0

Dave, It looks like the md5 and sha1 checksums are bad on all of your release votes. I'm now -1 until resolved. --kevan On Sep 10, 2009, at 10:08 PM, David Jencks wrote: It's time for the first release of our jaspic implementation for inclusion in g. 2.2. Release artifacts staged here: h

Re: [VOTE] Release Blueprint 1.0.0 (4th try)

Guillaume, Your PGP key is missing from the Geronimo KEYS file -- https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/KEYS --kevan On Sep 11, 2009, at 12:38 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: I've uploaded another 1.0.0 release of the blueprint project. I think I've addressed all the issues raised in the discus

Re: [VOTE] release jaspic implementation component 1.0

+1 source, build, and binaries all look good --kevan On Sep 10, 2009, at 10:08 PM, David Jencks wrote: It's time for the first release of our jaspic implementation for inclusion in g. 2.2. Release artifacts staged here: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/geronimo-staging-0

Re: What's the reason why didn't agent-car-jmx get shipped with geronimo server by default ?

On Sep 14, 2009, at 2:52 AM, Shawn Jiang wrote: Right, I'm planing to ship both of them but mark ejb agent as "load=false". So that the user will use JMX as default monitoring agent. When the users do not need EJB, they can create a EJB free assembly easily without breaking the monito

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-4871) Something blocking 'kill -3' signals?

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4871?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12755016#action_12755016 ] Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-4871: That's good, I guess, but str

Re: Request for editor access for G docs

On Sep 13, 2009, at 10:34 PM, Ellen Tang wrote: Hi, I am a technical writer. I would like to apply for the editor access for geronimo related docs. Hi Ellen, That would be great! To insure that our documentation is appropriately Apache Licensed, we require an ICLA to be on file, before w

[jira] Resolved: (GERONIMO-4868) cglib ThreadLocal causing ClassLoader memory leak

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4868?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kevan Miller resolved GERONIMO-4868. Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 3.0 I updated BasicProxyManager.createProxy

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-4871) Something blocking 'kill -3' signals?

lar issues) Reporter: Kevan Miller Fix For: 2.2 I occasionally use 'kill -3' to cause a java process to dump all thread stacks. For some reason, this isn't working on Geronimo 2.2 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this emai

[jira] Assigned: (GERONIMO-4869) InheritableThreadLocal causing ClassLoader memory leak in TransactionTimer thread

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4869?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kevan Miller reassigned GERONIMO-4869: -- Assignee: Kevan Miller > InheritableThreadLocal causing ClassLoader memory leak

Re: [VOTE] txmanager 2.1.3 2nd try

+1 Source, build, and generated binaries look good. There's a problem with the staging and site links in your note, however. The text of the links is correct. However, both hrefs refer to an invalid url (eg. http://people.apache.org/~djencks/staging-site/maven/txmanager/2.1.3/ ), which doe

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-4869) InheritableThreadLocal causing ClassLoader memory leak in TransactionTimer thread

: Geronimo Issue Type: Bug Security Level: public (Regular issues) Affects Versions: 2.1.4 Reporter: Kevan Miller Fix For: 2.1.5, 2.2 Another problem i saw in the .hprof data provided by Ghostknife was caused by a threadlocal in the

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-4868) cglib ThreadLocal causing ClassLoader memory leak

(Regular issues) Affects Versions: 2.1.4 Reporter: Kevan Miller Assignee: Kevan Miller Fix For: 2.1.5, 2.2 ghostknife reported an OOME PermGen failure during a redeploy of an app. I took at the .hprof file generated on an OOME when -XX

Re: Subscription for the developer mailing list

On Sep 10, 2009, at 10:41 PM, Ellen Tang wrote: Hi, I'm from China. I'm a new user of Apache Geronimo. I would like to subscribe for the developer mailing list to join the discussion. Please add me to the list. Thank you very much! Hi Ellen, Welcome! To subscribe, please send an email t

Re: [VOTE] Release Blueprint 1.0.0 (3thd try)

On Sep 10, 2009, at 5:35 PM, David Jencks wrote: I updated the NOTICE file generation to use the recommended remote- resources plugin techniques. I would still like to see something change on: 1. I still think that the spec xsds need to be in the spec jar and nowhere else and available fro

Re: [VOTE] Release Blueprint 1.0.0 (3thd try)

On Sep 10, 2009, at 3:11 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: Just committed some changes. Please review and I'll upload a new release asap. Looks good. --kevan

Re: [VOTE] Release Blueprint 1.0.0 (3thd try)

On Sep 10, 2009, at 12:44 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 17:54, Kevan Miller wrote: On Sep 10, 2009, at 4:29 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: I've uploaded a new 1.0.0 release of the blueprint project. I think I've addressed all the issues raised in the discussio

Re: [VOTE] XBean 3.6

Rick and Donald, The proper vote thread for this release is on xbean-dev. David, Prolly best to CANCEL this vote thread? --kevan On Sep 10, 2009, at 12:01 PM, Rick McGuire wrote: +1 David Jencks wrote: I've prepared a release candidate for xbean 3.6: https://repository.apache.org/content/r

Re: [VOTE] Release Blueprint 1.0.0 (3thd try)

On Sep 10, 2009, at 4:29 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: I've uploaded a new 1.0.0 release of the blueprint project. I think I've addressed all the issues raised in the discussion thread. The staging repository is available at: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/geronimo-staging-05

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Blueprint 1.0.0

On Sep 9, 2009, at 12:37 PM, David Jencks wrote: Without some major justification I'm seriously -1 on releasing from the sandbox. I don't see any problem with moving this code to components and releasing it from there, whether or not it then moves somewhere else. Agreed that we should n

[DISCUSS] Release Blueprint 1.0.0

Hi Guillaume, I guess I'd like to have some discussion about this, before voting... If there's a desire to move this code to the new incubator project, I'm not sure why we'd be releasing out of Geronimo, now... Also, if we do decide to release, I wouldn't think that we'd want the code to be

Re: xbean pom parent >> genesis?

On Sep 3, 2009, at 5:24 PM, David Jencks wrote: We need to release a new xbean for geronimo 2.2. Early on genesis might have been regarded (although not by me) as possibly a little unstable and overcomplicated but IMO with genesis 2 its pretty simple, bare-bones, and useful. In particula

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-4826) Some monitoring fields are always zero.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4826?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12749724#action_12749724 ] Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-4826: Good to be looking at this. Th

Re: Welcome "Rex" Lei Wang as a new committer

On Aug 31, 2009, at 6:48 PM, David Jencks wrote: I would like to welcome Rex, as he recently accepted the Geronimo PMC invitation to become a committer. We are still waiting for his account to be created, but hope to get that straightened out shortly and start seeing commits. Congratul

A few simple comparisons of Geronimo 2.2 and 2.1.5

All, I made a few (very simple) measurements comparing 2.2 to 2.1.5. Thought I'd pass them along. As you can see, our server size has grown and EE server startup time is slower. I haven't looked at any specific causes. I don't view these as release show-stoppers. However, there may be some

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-4809) Use platform MBean server rather than creating our own

: public (Regular issues) Components: monitoring Affects Versions: 2.1.4 Reporter: Kevan Miller Fix For: 2.1.5 GERONIMO-4559 "fixed" our JMX processing so that, by default, the Geronimo server will use the Platform MBean Server, rather than

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-4807) Hidden-classes does not support excluding files

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4807?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12745933#action_12745933 ] Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-4807: That would be great! For trunk

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-4795) Multiple Server Instances: Uninstalling an application does not remove the entry from config.xml of other server instances

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4795?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12743951#action_12743951 ] Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-4795: Right. My 2) should have referre

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-4795) Multiple Server Instances: Uninstalling an application does not remove the entry from config.xml of other server instances

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4795?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12743464#action_12743464 ] Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-4795: That may be how you *think* the se

Re: Difference in start/stop and restart behavior

On Aug 12, 2009, at 6:08 AM, Ashish Jain wrote: Hi, Recently I have seen difference in the functionality of stop/start and restart options available against each module. In case of stop/ start I see old classloaders being discarded and new ones being created. In case of restart same old c

Re: [Doubts] X509 Signing

On Aug 11, 2009, at 5:15 PM, rahul.soa wrote: Hello Jarek, FYI, Jarek is on vacation. I don't think he's reading email... --kevan

Re: Multiple SharedLibs

On Aug 11, 2009, at 12:21 PM, vaughn_m wrote: When I tried the previous way I get class not found exceptions that relate to the classes in the targeted directory. I realize the repository is the best way to go however, I am deploying web apps that have several jars (20 or so) that need

<    6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   >