bq. Francis' namespaces is in need of review
I plan to review this feature.
The latest update to https://github.com/francisliu/hbase_namespace lagged
the last comment on HBASE-8015
I wonder if there are more significant changes to be made.
Cheers
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Stack
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Ted Yu yuzhih...@gmail.com wrote:
bq. Francis' namespaces is in need of review
I plan to review this feature.
The latest update to https://github.com/francisliu/hbase_namespace lagged
the last comment on HBASE-8015
I wonder if there are more significant
STATUS
+Build
A few of us have been working on broke junit tests. Progress is slow but
steady. Currently I am looking into zombie tests -- all tests complete
but the build still fails. Andrew Purtell has set me up w/ a clone box
from his ec2 rig which is helping figure the zombie phenomenon.
+Packaging
I would like to help you on this. Can do packaging and testing using the
Bigtop framework. I see HBASE-8187, but it's resolved. Elsewhere we
can coordinate? Could open a Bigtop jira. Whatever you prefer.
+Migration
As part of the above. Test by starting with an 0.94 install on a
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Andrew Purtell apurt...@apache.org wrote:
+Packaging
I would like to help you on this. Can do packaging and testing using the
Bigtop framework. I see HBASE-8187, but it's resolved. Elsewhere we
can coordinate? Could open a Bigtop jira. Whatever you prefer.
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Stack st...@duboce.net wrote:
I love the idea of bigtop packaging. Should we do new issue for that? Or
just use 8224.
Ok, did both. See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BIGTOP-1029, and
linked to 8224, with comment there.
Thanks Stack for pushing us.
For packaging, I think we should fix:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8224
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8488
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6929 (same for 0.94 and 0.96)
For migration, there are some steps that the a user has
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Enis Söztutar enis@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Stack for pushing us.
For packaging, I think we should fix:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8224
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8488
These are both criticals. Maybe they should be
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Andrew Purtell apurt...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Stack st...@duboce.net wrote:
I love the idea of bigtop packaging. Should we do new issue for that?
Or
just use 8224.
Ok, did both. See
These are both criticals. Maybe they should be blocker altogether since
can't ship w/o them.
Ok, did that.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6929 (same for 0.94 and
0.96)
This is a 0.94 issue. Could fall out from hbase-8224 work.
Agreed, as long as HBASE-8224 will
I am shooting for end of July for 0.96 being 'complete'. I would like to
make a 0.96 release in August. We have some criticals outstanding but I
think we could ship even if these are not fixed in time (excepting
migration polish and of course remaining build fixes). See [1.] for the
current
BTW I just wanted to bring to everyone's attention the work done over in
HADOOP-9421. Sanjay Radia has been telling me that a corresponding work
should be done in HBase as well. That will help keep the compatibility
story straight when the work to do with pluggable authentication mechanisms
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Devaraj Das d...@hortonworks.com wrote:
HADOOP-9421
How about turning that around? (smile) Any thoughts on removing the
indirection in Hadoop RPC like Stack did with HBase PB RPC so we might look
at using Hadoop RPC directly again? Seems if the goal is to
so we might look at using Hadoop RPC directly again?
Totally agree with that thought, Andrew. I must admit that I don't know
about all the context on why the HBase RPC forked in the first place :-)
Your suggestion on using the Hadoop RPC work here makes sense. I am not too
sure whether that is
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Devaraj Das d...@hortonworks.com wrote:
BTW I just wanted to bring to everyone's attention the work done over in
HADOOP-9421. Sanjay Radia has been telling me that a corresponding work
should be done in HBase as well. That will help keep the compatibility
story
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Devaraj Das d...@hortonworks.com wrote:
so we might look at using Hadoop RPC directly again?
Totally agree with that thought, Andrew. I must admit that I don't know
about all the context on why the HBase RPC forked in the first place :-)
Bug fixes and speed
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Devaraj Das d...@hortonworks.com wrote:
However doing the equivalent patch
for HADOOP-9421 in HBase will probably be easier and doable for 0.96...
If someone shows up with a patch equivalent to HADOOP-9421 for HBase real
soon now let's look at it. Maybe that is
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Stack st...@duboce.net wrote:
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Devaraj Das d...@hortonworks.com wrote:
so we might look at using Hadoop RPC directly again?
Totally agree with that thought, Andrew. I must admit that I don't know
about all the context on
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Stack st...@duboce.net wrote:
That patch won't go in to hbase.
What if we and Hadoop can come up with a common RPC connection setup, like
PB-based SASL negotiation and a common version header? Then there are
options post-singularity.
--
Best regards,
-
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Andrew Purtell apurt...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Stack st...@duboce.net wrote:
That patch won't go in to hbase.
What if we and Hadoop can come up with a common RPC connection setup, like
PB-based SASL negotiation and a common
(Changed the subject)
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Nick Dimiduk ndimi...@gmail.com wrote:
I want to see initial data type APIs ship out with 0.95.2. A patch for
ordered byte serialization is up (HBASE-8201) and is nearing steady-state.
However, sershe is the only person who's left
21 matches
Mail list logo
