Speak up if you need to have something included.
Thanks,
St.Ack
96?
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 3:02 PM, Stack st...@duboce.net wrote:
Speak up if you need to have something included.
Thanks,
St.Ack
. There is a rumor that a program to
reproduce this issue exist, does it?
Eager to hear thoughts.
[1] HBase version 0.92.2 , Hadoop version CDH3u0
-Shrijeet
handlers) for 11 hours, so it can not be #1 OR #2.
We have not back ported the patch yet so cant say if it fixes the issue or
not. Also it is difficult to reproduce. There is a rumor that a program to
reproduce this issue exist, does it?
Eager to hear thoughts.
[1] HBase version 0.92.2
it?
Eager to hear thoughts.
[1] HBase version 0.92.2 , Hadoop version CDH3u0
-Shrijeet
not back ported the patch yet so cant say if it fixes the issue
or
not. Also it is difficult to reproduce. There is a rumor that a program
to
reproduce this issue exist, does it?
Eager to hear thoughts.
[1] HBase version 0.92.2 , Hadoop version CDH3u0
-Shrijeet
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans jdcry...@apache.orgwrote:
This really looks like the issue we got that prompted applying HBASE-5898.
Never heard about the rumor.
Was referring to Stack's comment http://goo.gl/1dMVb
If you can isolate the region that exhibits the
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Ted Yu yuzhih...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't know whether CDH3u0 is close to hdfs 1.0.3 or 1.0.4
Ted, CDH3u0 does not have HDFS-2246 (Shortcut a local client reads to a
Datanodes files directly) I think it is included in CDH3u3.
We might be facing HBASE-3622 . Recently removed the UseMemBar from our GC
opts. I will bring it back see if the issue gets resolved.
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 12:50 PM, Shrijeet Paliwal
shrij...@rocketfuel.comwrote:
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Ted Yu yuzhih...@gmail.com wrote:
I
Ted,
Another thing to keep in mind when releasing, you need to mark 0.92.2
as released in Jira else it shows in the wrong categories. In the
project's administration page there's a Versions link on the left,
then find 0.92.2 and there should be a gear icon that you can use to
release.
Thx,
J-D
Done.
Thanks for the reminder, J-D.
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 6:17 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans jdcry...@apache.orgwrote:
Ted,
Another thing to keep in mind when releasing, you need to mark 0.92.2
as released in Jira else it shows in the wrong categories. In the
project's administration page
Thanks Ted!
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 6:33 PM, Ted Yu yuzhih...@gmail.com wrote:
Done.
Thanks for the reminder, J-D.
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 6:17 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans jdcry...@apache.orgwrote:
Ted,
Another thing to keep in mind when releasing, you need to mark 0.92.2
as released in Jira
wrote:
Done.
Thanks for the reminder, J-D.
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 6:17 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans jdcry...@apache.org
wrote:
Ted,
Another thing to keep in mind when releasing, you need to mark 0.92.2
as released in Jira else it shows in the wrong categories. In the
project's
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Jonathan Hsieh j...@cloudera.com wrote:
I've brought this up before but could we close (as opposed to just
resolving) the issues once there has been a release that contains the JIRA
?
Yes. Lets. If folks are agreed, I can go through and close out what
we've
, October 1, 2012 6:41 PM
Subject: Re: ANN: hbase-0.92.2 is available for download
I've brought this up before but could we close (as opposed to just
resolving) the issues once there has been a release that contains the JIRA
?
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 6:38 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans jdcry...@apache.orgwrote
Tried out the 0.92.2 RC1.
Started one Master and two RS. Inserted data, scanned the data. Issued
split operations.
Restarted RS, restarted Master, split logs worked fine - got back the data.
These are the steps we carried out to test the RC. Thanks to RajeshBabu for
helping out in this test
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Ted Yu yuzhih...@gmail.com wrote:
I think there seem to be two concepts here (as J-D said in his first
email): stable release vs. stable branch.
Yeah. You are conflating two applications of 'stable'; the 'stable'
symlink upper under downloads and releases that
Thanks Ram and Rajesh for your work.
I think we have 3 binding +1's
I will make the announcement later in the morning.
On Sep 12, 2012, at 10:58 PM, Ramkrishna.S.Vasudevan
ramkrishna.vasude...@huawei.com wrote:
Tried out the 0.92.2 RC1.
Started one Master and two RS. Inserted data
Thanks for the reminder, Stack.
I have copied the security tar ball to hbase-0.92.2-rc1 directory.
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:24 PM, Stack st...@duboce.net wrote:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 9:32 PM, Stack st...@duboce.net wrote:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 9:18 PM, Ted Yu yuzhih...@gmail.com wrote
Usually it takes 3 +1s by committers. Maybe hang a little while to
get another one or so?
Little nit, it's actually 3 PMC members. Historically committers were
also PMC members but this changed recently.
I'm referring to http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
We may want to eventually
We're having more and more releases across 0.92, 0.94 and soon 0.96
branches.
It would be wise to revisit the historical convention.
Thanks for bringing this up, J-D.
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Jean-Daniel Cryans jdcry...@apache.orgwrote:
Usually it takes 3 +1s by committers. Maybe
So it looks like I must have just caught a region as it was moving or
something. I can't seem to re-produce that error. So I'm fully +1.
Sorry for the false alarm.
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Elliott Clark ecl...@stumbleupon.com wrote:
I'm +1'ish
Spun up a 0.92.1 cluster wrote some
Thanks Elliot for your validation effort.
Appreciate it.
On Sep 12, 2012, at 12:07 PM, Elliott Clark ecl...@stumbleupon.com wrote:
So it looks like I must have just caught a region as it was moving or
something. I can't seem to re-produce that error. So I'm fully +1.
Sorry for the false
J-D:
So far we have 2 +1 (binding) and 2 +1 (non-binding), no -1 on RC1.
Do you think I can roll this RC as 0.92.2 ?
Thanks
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 12:07 PM, Elliott Clark ecl...@stumbleupon.comwrote:
So it looks like I must have just caught a region as it was moving or
something. I can't
on RC1.
Do you think I can roll this RC as 0.92.2 ?
Thanks
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 12:07 PM, Elliott Clark ecl...@stumbleupon.comwrote:
So it looks like I must have just caught a region as it was moving or
something. I can't seem to re-produce that error. So I'm fully +1.
Sorry for the false
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Ted Yu yuzhih...@gmail.com wrote:
I went through the following thread:
Re: ANN: The 2nd hbase 0.94.1 release candidate is available for download
I didn't see 3 binding +1's on that RC.
FYI
One: http://search-hadoop.com/m/Vqs68Jxybc2
Two:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Ted Yu yuzhih...@gmail.com wrote:
J-D:
So far we have 2 +1 (binding) and 2 +1 (non-binding), no -1 on RC1.
Do you think I can roll this RC as 0.92.2 ?
Looks like you already did yesterday?
http://apache.cs.utah.edu/hbase/stable/
J-D
), no -1 on RC1.
Do you think I can roll this RC as 0.92.2 ?
Looks like you already did yesterday?
http://apache.cs.utah.edu/hbase/stable/
J-D
To: dev@hbase.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 3:13 PM
Subject: Re: ANN: The second hbase 0.92.2 release candidate is available for
download
I wasn't fully aware of the 3 binding vote rule.
I have restored the symlink.
Cheers
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans jdcry
From: Ted Yu yuzhih...@gmail.com
To: dev@hbase.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 3:13 PM
Subject: Re: ANN: The second hbase 0.92.2 release candidate is available
for download
I wasn't fully aware of the 3 binding vote rule.
I have restored
@hbase.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 3:13 PM
Subject: Re: ANN: The second hbase 0.92.2 release candidate is available
for download
I wasn't fully aware of the 3 binding vote rule.
I have restored the symlink.
Cheers
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans jdcry
.
-- Lars
From: Ted Yu yuzhih...@gmail.com
To: dev@hbase.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 3:13 PM
Subject: Re: ANN: The second hbase 0.92.2 release candidate is available
for download
I wasn't fully aware of the 3 binding vote
I think there seem to be two concepts here (as J-D said in his first
email): stable release vs. stable branch.
So how should we interpret this single stable symlink ?
Thanks
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans jdcry...@apache.orgwrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Ted Yu
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Ted Yu yuzhih...@gmail.com wrote:
I went through the following thread:
Re: ANN: The 2nd hbase 0.94.1 release candidate is available for download
I didn't see 3 binding +1's on that RC.
So, Ted, why would you even go back to the old releases to do the
above
Stack:
I take your and J-D's advice.
Cheers
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 9:12 PM, Stack st...@duboce.net wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Ted Yu yuzhih...@gmail.com wrote:
I went through the following thread:
Re: ANN: The 2nd hbase 0.94.1 release candidate is available for download
I
0.92.2 has been running for a couple of weeks on all of our production
data centers. No issues yet.
-Shrijeet
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Ted Yu yuzhih...@gmail.com wrote:
A gentle reminder that Sept. 12th is approaching.
I am +1 on this RC: I have done some basic checking in a dev
I tested 0.92.2 this weekend under heavy workload and induced master/region
server fail-over. No issues were observed.
Kind regards,
Aditya Kishore
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Shrijeet Paliwal
shrij...@rocketfuel.comwrote:
0.92.2 has been running for a couple of weeks on all of our
With 3 +1's and no -1, 0.92.2 RC1 passes.
I will announce 0.92.2 release tomorrow.
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Aditya adityakish...@gmail.com wrote:
I tested 0.92.2 this weekend under heavy workload and induced master/region
server fail-over. No issues were observed.
Kind regards
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 9:18 PM, Ted Yu yuzhih...@gmail.com wrote:
With 3 +1's and no -1, 0.92.2 RC1 passes.
Usually it takes 3 +1s by committers. Maybe hang a little while to
get another one or so?
St.Ack
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 9:32 PM, Stack st...@duboce.net wrote:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 9:18 PM, Ted Yu yuzhih...@gmail.com wrote:
With 3 +1's and no -1, 0.92.2 RC1 passes.
I am +1 on releasing this tgz as 0.92.2.
I verified the md5 and the signature. Layout when I untar looks good
(doc, api
A gentle reminder that Sept. 12th is approaching.
I am +1 on this RC: I have done some basic checking in a dev cluster and
everything was working.
Have a nice weekend.
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Ted Yu yuzhih...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
The second 0.92.2 RC is available for download here
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Stack st...@duboce.net wrote:
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 10:26 AM, Ted Yu yuzhih...@gmail.com wrote:
bq. Can we not disable tests that we've labelled flakey and not issues in
hbase?
No tests were disabled this past week.
? Because 0.92 branch had no flakey
Thanks for the response Dave.
I exchanged a few emails with Lars H last night and we felt we shouldn't
block 0.92.2 / 0.94.2 releases due to a few flaky tests.
Let's fix flaky tests continuously.
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Dave Wang d...@cloudera.com wrote:
+1 on limiting changes
Hi,
The second 0.92.2 RC is available for download here:
http://people.apache.org/~tedyu/hbase-0.92.2-rc1/http://people.apache.org/%7Etedyu/hbase-0.92.2-rc0/
I signed the tarball. My gpg key (signed by stack) is available from
pgp.mit.edu. Key id:
F48B08A4http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 8:48 AM, Ted Yu yuzhih...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the response Dave.
I exchanged a few emails with Lars H last night and we felt we shouldn't
block 0.92.2 / 0.94.2 releases due to a few flaky tests.
Let's fix flaky tests continuously.
That seems basically fine
...@duboce.net wrote:
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 8:48 AM, Ted Yu yuzhih...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the response Dave.
I exchanged a few emails with Lars H last night and we felt we shouldn't
block 0.92.2 / 0.94.2 releases due to a few flaky tests.
Let's fix flaky tests continuously
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 10:26 AM, Ted Yu yuzhih...@gmail.com wrote:
bq. Can we not disable tests that we've labelled flakey and not issues in
hbase?
No tests were disabled this past week.
? Because 0.92 branch had no flakey tests this week?
The last two builds of 0.92 succeeded as did my
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Ted Yu yuzhih...@gmail.com wrote:
According to:
https://builds.apache.org/view/G-L/view/HBase/job/HBase-0.92/519/testReport/junit/org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver/TestSplitTransactionOnCluster/testSplitBeforeSettingSplittingInZK/
The test failure was due
Looking at TestDrainingServer failure:
admin.enableTable(TABLENAME);
// Assert that every regionserver has some regions on it.
MiniHBaseCluster cluster = TEST_UTIL.getMiniHBaseCluster();
for (int i = 0; i cluster.getRegionServerThreads().size(); i++) {
HRegionServer hrs =
Does HBASE-5992 fix this? That fix is only in trunk right now.
- Dave
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Ted Yu yuzhih...@gmail.com wrote:
Looking at TestDrainingServer failure:
admin.enableTable(TABLENAME);
// Assert that every regionserver has some regions on it.
Looking at 5992.v11.patch, it is quite big, touching master,
AssignmentManager, etc.
At this moment, I want to limit the scope of changes going into 0.92 branch.
Cheers
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Dave Wang d...@cloudera.com wrote:
Does HBASE-5992 fix this? That fix is only in trunk
5992.v11.patch couldn't be cleanly applied to 0.92
I got:
./src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/master/AssignmentManager.java.rej
./src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/master/handler/ServerShutdownHandler.java.rej
./src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/master/HMaster.java.rej
+1 on limiting changes into 0.92. Just wanted to point out a patch that we
may be able to pull part of to fix the test.
- Dave
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 2:07 PM, Ted Yu yuzhih...@gmail.com wrote:
Looking at 5992.v11.patch, it is quite big, touching master,
AssignmentManager, etc.
At this
Hi Devs,
I did an upgrade to HBase 0.92.2 recently. It ran fine for couple of days,
then I did online merge of regions. This got into a bit of inconsistent
state. To fix it the corruption I ran hbck and managed to get into
a situation described in
http://search-hadoop.com/m/sm2APK8FMo1subj=Re
Thanks for sharing your experience, Shrijeet.
Was the region cited below involved in your previous merging activity ?
Cheers
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Shrijeet Paliwal
shrij...@rocketfuel.comwrote:
Hi Devs,
I did an upgrade to HBase 0.92.2 recently. It ran fine for couple of days
...@rocketfuel.comwrote:
Hi Devs,
I did an upgrade to HBase 0.92.2 recently. It ran fine for couple of
days,
then I did online merge of regions. This got into a bit of inconsistent
state. To fix it the corruption I ran hbck and managed to get into
a situation described in
http://search-hadoop.com/m
, Shrijeet Paliwal
shrij...@rocketfuel.comwrote:
Hi Devs,
I did an upgrade to HBase 0.92.2 recently. It ran fine for couple of
days,
then I did online merge of regions. This got into a bit of inconsistent
state. To fix it the corruption I ran hbck and managed to get
According to:
https://builds.apache.org/view/G-L/view/HBase/job/HBase-0.92/519/testReport/junit/org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver/TestSplitTransactionOnCluster/testSplitBeforeSettingSplittingInZK/
The test failure was due to:
java.lang.RuntimeException: java.io.FileNotFoundException:
Hi,
The first 0.92.2 RC is available for download here:
http://people.apache.org/~tedyu/hbase-0.92.2-rc0/
I signed the tarball. My gpg key (signed by stack) is available from
pgp.mit.edu. Key id:
F48B08A4http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xCBC29E86F48B08A4
HBase
Something is wrong w/ the email below Ted. Its signed by Lars rather
than you and its all indented. Did you mean to send it?
Over here in this thread, it looks like a few of us were trying to fix
the flappying 0.92.2 unit tests before putting up an RC:
http://search-hadoop.com/m/0NVGg2eSHaJ
indented. Did you mean to send it?
Over here in this thread, it looks like a few of us were trying to fix
the flappying 0.92.2 unit tests before putting up an RC:
http://search-hadoop.com/m/0NVGg2eSHaJ/%255BDiscuss%255D+Release+0.92.2%253Fsubj=+Discuss+Release+0+92+2+
There's also at least one
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Ted Yu yuzhih...@gmail.com wrote:
Expect another RC.
Would suggest you wait till closure over on the thread [Discuss]
Release 0.92.2? [1] before you cut another RC.
Good on you Ted,
St.Ack
1.
http://search-hadoop.com/m/0NVGg2eSHaJ/%255BDiscuss%255D+Release
About test failures, I saw the following in
https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-0.92-securityhttps://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-0.92-security/ws/trunk/target/surefire-reportsbuild
118:
Failed tests: queueFailover(org.apache.
hadoop.hbase.replication.TestReplication): Waited too much time for
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:25 AM, Devaraj Das d...@hortonworks.com wrote:
I'll take a look at the flaky tests. I'll post updates.
I think we're making pretty good progress on the flakeys. There is
still a log splitting and replication test that we could nail and then
I'd say we should cut the
0.92.2 has following error messages in region server logs (while it is
initializing RegionServerMetrics). Some one reported it here
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6514 .
1591 2012-08-22 20:08:28,106 ERROR org.apache.hadoop.metrics.MetricsUtil:
unknown metrics type
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Shrijeet Paliwal
shrij...@rocketfuel.com wrote:
0.92.2 has following error messages in region server logs (while it is
initializing RegionServerMetrics). Some one reported it here
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6514 .
1591 2012-08-22 20:08
I believe this would be solved by a backport of HBASE-6211 into 0.92.x.
- Dave
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Stack st...@duboce.net wrote:
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Shrijeet Paliwal
shrij...@rocketfuel.com wrote:
0.92.2 has following error messages in region server logs (while
Hi,
I wanted to report one more issue. Recently I upgraded three data centers
to our own checkout of 0.92.2, last commit :
commit 5accb6a1be4776630126ac21d07adb652b74df95
Author: Zhihong Yu te...@apache.org
Date: Mon Aug 20 18:19:45 2012 +
24
HBASE-6608 Fix for HBASE
Sorry sent too early by mistake.
Continuing..
I upgraded three data centers to our own checkout of 0.92.2. Two went fine,
upgrade to one data center failed. Failed in the sense that
ROOT and META assignment took unusually long. Panic struck I restarted
master and all region servers and managed
own checkout of 0.92.2. Two went
fine, upgrade to one data center failed. Failed in the sense that
ROOT and META assignment took unusually long. Panic struck I restarted
master and all region servers and managed to get ROOT assigned.
But META assignment got stuck badly.
The log is here :
https
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Shrijeet Paliwal
shrij...@rocketfuel.com wrote:
Notice how region server was stuck in a loop of NPE (grep
processBatchCallback).
There is one more NPE related to zookeeper constructor.
JD was there at irc channel and he thought it could be regression.
FIle a
What's the log splitting one?
I am looking at the replication one .. if anyone else (including you, Stack) is
willing to look at it, welcome..
On Aug 24, 2012, at 11:19 AM, Stack wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:25 AM, Devaraj Das d...@hortonworks.com wrote:
I'll take a look at the flaky
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Devaraj Das d...@hortonworks.com wrote:
What's the log splitting one?
I am looking at the replication one .. if anyone else (including you, Stack)
is willing to look at it, welcome..
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Dave Wang d...@cloudera.com wrote:
I believe this would be solved by a backport of HBASE-6211 into 0.92.x.
I did the backport David but the little test program in HBASE-6211
still throws the ERROR loggings. Elliott is taking a look.
St.Ack
I have filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6660 . Sorry for
spoiling the party :(
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Stack st...@duboce.net wrote:
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Dave Wang d...@cloudera.com wrote:
I believe this would be solved by a backport of HBASE-6211 into
On Aug 17, 2012, at 11:40 AM, Stack wrote:
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Shrijeet Paliwal
shrij...@rocketfuel.com wrote:
Hi Stack ,
Should I hold my breath ? Let me know if you need a hand. Looking
forward towards 0.92.2 RC.
We have a couple of flakey tests. See
https
Hi Stack ,
Should I hold my breath ? Let me know if you need a hand. Looking
forward towards 0.92.2 RC.
-Shrijeet
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 8:56 AM, Stack st...@duboce.net wrote:
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 9:05 AM, Devaraj Das d...@hortonworks.com wrote:
Thanks, Stack. I can spend some time
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Shrijeet Paliwal
shrij...@rocketfuel.com wrote:
Hi Stack ,
Should I hold my breath ? Let me know if you need a hand. Looking
forward towards 0.92.2 RC.
We have a couple of flakey tests. See
https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-0.92/. They fail the odd time
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 9:05 AM, Devaraj Das d...@hortonworks.com wrote:
Thanks, Stack. I can spend some time in the testing of the RC.
FYI, I'm running builds up on jenkins of current 0.92 trunk. I'm
finding a few tests are flakey. Looking into it. Will cut an RC
after I get things to
. Should we consider making a 0.92.2 release at
this point?
Yes. I tried to put up an RC a while back. Will have another go at it...
St.Ack
Folks, since the last release from the 0.92 branch, there have been quite a few
fixes (131) on the branch. Should we consider making a 0.92.2 release at this
point?
Thanks,
Devaraj.
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 7:12 AM, Devaraj Das d...@hortonworks.com wrote:
Folks, since the last release from the 0.92 branch, there have been quite a
few fixes (131) on the branch. Should we consider making a 0.92.2 release at
this point?
Yes. I tried to put up an RC a while back. Will have
I finally caught up with the JIRA. I think HBASE-6131 might shoot
this down. Thoughts?
Jon.
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 9:59 AM, Stack st...@duboce.net wrote:
The first hbase 0.92.2 release candidate is available for download:
http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.92.2-candidate-0/
I've
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 3:47 AM, Jonathan Hsieh j...@cloudera.com wrote:
I finally caught up with the JIRA. I think HBASE-6131 might shoot
this down. Thoughts?
Andrew agrees over in the issue.
Let me fix and put up a new RC.
St.Ack
The first hbase 0.92.2 release candidate is available for download:
http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.92.2-candidate-0/
I've posted a secure and an insecure tarball.
HBase 0.92.2 is mainly a bug fix release. Here are the list of issues
addressed:
http://goo.gl/BJ57G
See the hbase
FWIW we're running in production with a snapshot of 0.92 from May 8th
(so we're missing HBASE-5973 and 5922) and we don't see any issues.
I think we should release a first RC.
J-D
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Stack st...@duboce.net wrote:
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Luke Lu
Looks like the workload A issue was due to an incorrect recordcount
specified for 0.92 runs, as I asked for more details. AFAICT, 0.92 is
significantly faster than 0.90 on a 3 (hbase/hdfs) +1 (ycsb) node
cluster. Sorry for the noise and thanks for the great work :)
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 2:59
for the noise and thanks for the great work :)
np Luke.
Let me role an RC for 0.92.2
St.Ack
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Luke Lu l...@apache.org wrote:
Any update on the slowness of 0.92 especially for YCSB workload A
(50/50 read/write, which shows about 40% regression. A 15/85
read/write work load shows 60% regression)? 0.92 seem fine for pure
writes/reads.
Hey Luke:
What
regression from 0.90 we should
probably spend at least a few minutes looking into it.
-Todd
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Stack st...@duboce.net wrote:
Should I put up a 0.92.2 candidate? There have been a bunch of fixes
since 0.92.1:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure
Should I put up a 0.92.2 candidate? There have been a bunch of fixes
since 0.92.1:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753version=12319888
St.Ack
+1
On May 3, 2012, at 8:58 AM, Stack wrote:
Should I put up a 0.92.2 candidate? There have been a bunch of fixes
since 0.92.1:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753version=12319888
St.Ack
Anyone looked into the apparent performance issue that Elliott reported
earlier this week? If we have a big perf regression from 0.90 we should
probably spend at least a few minutes looking into it.
-Todd
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Stack st...@duboce.net wrote:
Should I put up a 0.92.2
a big perf regression from 0.90 we should
probably spend at least a few minutes looking into it.
-Todd
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Stack st...@duboce.net wrote:
Should I put up a 0.92.2 candidate? There have been a bunch of fixes
since 0.92.1:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure
Shall we open a jira for investigating the performance issue, and mark it
as a blocker for 0.92.2?
Enis
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Elliott Clark ecl...@stumbleupon.comwrote:
I'm going to try and test 0.94.0 RC3 a little today. After that I can try
and do some poking to see why 92
95 matches
Mail list logo
