At 06:19 PM 09/03/2001, Graham Leggett wrote:
Greg Marr wrote:
How exactly do you use Cache-Control directives so that the
content that
is cached is before includes are processed, and that when it is
retrieved from the cache, the includes are processed? It just
doesn't
work that
On Monday 03 September 2001 23:57, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jerenkrantz01/09/03 23:57:58
Modified:server util_filter.c
Log:
**NO CODE CHANGES**
This is a reformat commit *ONLY*
Please drive on through.
(One spelling tpyo fixed...)
Didn't we decide a LONG time ago
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
jerenkrantz01/09/03 23:50:52
Modified:server util_filter.c
Log:
The ap_add_input_filter/ap_add_output_filter functions do an O(n) scan
through the list of registered filters. This patch replaces the linear
list with a hash table for better
On Mon, 3 Sep 2001, Ryan Bloom wrote:
!--#include virtual=/cgi-bin/redir.cgi-- ASSERT FAILED (see below)
I would be willing to bet that this is a bug in mod_include, not the
change that I made earlier today.
Oh, I'm right with you on that one... I seriously doubt the two are
related.
On Sunday 02 September 2001 01:22, Greg Stein wrote:
On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 09:16:15PM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote:
On Friday 31 August 2001 19:31, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
From: Greg Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 9:30 PM
On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 03:02:32PM
From: Bill Stoddard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 10:02 AM
I agree with this. Our current AP_FTYPE_* classifications is not granular enough to
support this but that is easily fixed. Patch on the way...
Err or not. Jeff convinced me that it was premature to add
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
rbb 01/09/02 20:27:48
Modified:buildrules.mk.in
support Makefile.in
Log:
Make Apache 2.0 install all files in the same location as Apache 1.3
did.
PR: 7626
Revision ChangesPath
1.4 +2 -2
On Tuesday 04 September 2001 08:52, Ian Holsman wrote:
Index: rules.mk.in
===
RCS file: /home/cvs/httpd-2.0/build/rules.mk.in,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4
---
On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 06:40:03AM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote:
Didn't we decide a LONG time ago not to do this unless it was absolutely
necessary? Format changes just add cruft to the CVS logs. I have noticed
a lot of changes to the format in this patch that were more opinion than code
style.
Hi Kevin,
Guenter Knauf wrote...
Hi,
I was glad as Ian contributed his mod_gz; I tested it on Linux and Win32
and it works for me.
What did you test?
that it compiles, loads into server and compresses.
How 'heavily loaded' was the Server?
you're right, I did only a quick test with some
From: Rasmus Lerdorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 11:05 AM
Ok, so the Apache 1.3 walks/hooks flow looks like this:
I'll rework this for you just a bit...
::post read-request hook::
location_walk
- checks r-uri and sets server-wide config
XXuri-filename
On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 04:28:45PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jerenkrantz01/09/04 09:28:45
Modified:server util_filter.c
Log:
Jeff pointed out that the character array must be constant.
Well, it's not, so make it allocated from the correct pool rather than
the
It shouldn't. You potentially need to protect yourself from NULL r-filename
(we haven't decided what to do yet with *this*is*not*a*file* requests.) Since
PHP generally serves -files-, this won't be a huge change for you. For serving
from an SQL database, or proxied requests, or internal
On Tuesday 04 September 2001 09:16, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 06:40:03AM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote:
Didn't we decide a LONG time ago not to do this unless it was absolutely
necessary? Format changes just add cruft to the CVS logs. I have
noticed a lot of changes to
just to add my 2c to the picture.
I dont see why the cache-filter could not live anywhere in the filter chain
it could sit just after the handler (where it could cache a report generator)
which would then feed into php/include
it could sit after php/include and possibly after the gzip/byte
Both Cliff and OtherBill sent me emails complaining about the
change to strcasecmp in some places to support Brian Pane's
new hash code in util_filter.c. (Never mind that a lot of
the code already did strcasecmp...)
This patch makes the filter name lowercase for the searches
and lets us use
In a message dated 01-09-04 09:35:50 EDT, Jim wrote...
That's right and one of them is...
Will Apache accept ZLIB into the Apache source tree in either
source or binary library format for all platforms.
Check one box only...
[__] Yes
[__] No
Actually, it's not a
On Tue, 4 Sep 2001, Ryan Bloom wrote:
On Tuesday 04 September 2001 09:16, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
Ryan, you may veto this commit. However, if you wish to repeal or
modify our style guide, I suggest you call a vote. -- justin
That is complete BS. We have a long standing tradition of
In a message dated 01-09-04 12:39:44 EDT, Guenter writes...
Guenter Knauf wrote...
Hi,
I was glad as Ian contributed his mod_gz; I tested it on Linux and Win32
and it works for me.
What did you test?
that it compiles, loads into server and compresses.
How 'heavily loaded'
What type of performance improvements did you see with this (under what
workload)?
Charels
-Original Message-
From: Brian Pane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 03, 2001 11:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PATCH] hash table for registered filter list
The
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
Both Cliff and OtherBill sent me emails complaining about the
change to strcasecmp in some places to support Brian Pane's
new hash code in util_filter.c. (Never mind that a lot of
the code already did strcasecmp...)
This patch makes the filter name lowercase for the
On Tue, 2001-09-04 at 12:29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ASIDE: You really only need the 'compression' part of it. You
are a Server, not a client.
we also can be a client.
think mod-proxy
..The Weekend Warrior
Yours...
Kevin Kiley
--
Ian Holsman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Performance
The good news:
With some of the recent performance patches (thanks to Justin for all
the commits), the throughput of 2.0 on SSI requests has improved quite
a bit. IanH ran the old and new code through his benchmark setup in
which clients request a .shtml file with two included files (threaded
On Tuesday 04 September 2001 12:08, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
Wouldn't this be a much cleaner patch if we went to upper case
instead of lower-case? I realize that is a detail, but currently, most
of the filters are registered as upper case, so we would have fewer
places to modify.
Ryan
Both
On Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 11:53:59PM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 10:50:01PM -0700, Brian Pane wrote:
The ap_add_input_filter/ap_add_output_filter functions do an O(n) scan
through the list of registered filters. This patch replaces the linear
list with a hash
On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 08:15:08AM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote:
On Sunday 02 September 2001 01:22, Greg Stein wrote:
...
I use distclean on my computer all the time. Along with extraclean. Neither
of those targets should toss config.nice. *That* is what I mean.
To be clear: nothing in our
On Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 05:47:02PM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote:
...
I have a big problem with this. We had a hard enough time contributing
patches back to MM. The only reason we keep expat and pcre up to date,
is that we NEVER make any changes to them. I would be very much against
adding zlib
From: Brian Pane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 6:20 PM
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
We are on the same page :) FWIW, I've made a few comments around your patch,
and am reviewing it in more detail. I'll have my comments by the end of the
week (I'm all over creation
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
From: Brian Pane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 6:20 PM
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
We are on the same page :) FWIW, I've made a few comments around your patch,
and am reviewing it in more detail. I'll have my comments by the end of the
week
On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 03:29:04PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Will the Apache group accept the ZLIB source code
into the distribution tree at this time?...
[__] Yes
[__] No
No. The zlib library is popular enough (read: typically installed) that we
will link against it, rather than
On Tue, 4 Sep 2001, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
All uppercase. 6 of one, half-dozen of the other. -- justin
I'll take the 6. I like this a whole lot better. Thanks, Justin. :)
--Cliff
--
Cliff Woolley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Sep 01, 2001 at 06:19:32PM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote:
...
3) I don't believe that we
should be adding every possible module to the core distribution. I
personally think we should leave the core as minimal as possible, and
only add more modules if they implement a part of the HTTP
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 01-09-04 19:17:25 EDT, Ian writes...
ASIDE: You really only need the 'compression' part of it. You
are a Server, not a client.
we also can be a client.
think mod-proxy
What current ( or future ) operation would require mod_proxy
to
I'm currently studying profiling data from an httpd built from
a CVS snapshot earlier today.
In general, the performance of 2.0 is starting to look good.
Here are the top 30 functions, ranked according to their CPU utilization.
(This summary is derived from a Quantify profile of a threaded-MPM
On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 08:00:35PM -0700, Brian Pane wrote:
I'm currently studying profiling data from an httpd built from
a CVS snapshot earlier today.
In general, the performance of 2.0 is starting to look good.
Cool. This probably means the code is starting to look good, too.
* The
On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 10:12:32PM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Josh just came up with what I believe is the best explanation of if and
when to reformat - I think this applies equally well to sources and docs.
I'd added only one caviat - changes to the format should always -preceed-
From: Justin Erenkrantz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 11:46 PM
Based on the patches you submitted (and my quasi-errant formatting
patch), I had to read most of the code in mod_include, so I'm more
familiar with mod_include now. I do think there are some obvious
ways
On Tuesday 04 September 2001 18:23, Greg Stein wrote:
On Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 05:47:02PM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote:
...
I have a big problem with this. We had a hard enough time contributing
patches back to MM. The only reason we keep expat and pcre up to date,
is that we NEVER make any
38 matches
Mail list logo
