Hi Paul,
On 26.12.2008 21:56, Paul Querna wrote:
Hi,
As in the Subject, I intend to roll and start a vote for 2.3.1 on Friday
January 2nd, 2009.
Thanks,
Paul
I committed 4 minor fixes today, but will be offline soon. I tested
them, but if anyone is unhappy with them for the 2.3.1 tag,
When compiling trunk, I get
simple_run.c:242: warning: implicit declaration of function
'ap_run_drop_privileges'
I can fix it with the following patch:
Index: server/mpm/simple/simple_run.c
===
--- server/mpm/simple/simple_run.c
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
To: undisclosed-recipients:;
to headeradd for c...@httpd, overriding the normal To:
c...@httpd.apache.org. That should prevent Reply-All from picking up
the commit list, since there won't be anything in the To: or CC:
fields for it to use.
Last I checked,
- Original Message
From: William A. Rowe, Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Friday, January 2, 2009 9:12:28 AM
Subject: Re: Configuration change for c...@httpd?
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
To: undisclosed-recipients:;
to headeradd for c...@httpd,
Joe Schaefer wrote:
- Original Message
From: William A. Rowe, Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Friday, January 2, 2009 9:12:28 AM
Subject: Re: Configuration change for c...@httpd?
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
To: undisclosed-recipients:;
to headeradd for
- Original Message
From: William A. Rowe, Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Friday, January 2, 2009 9:37:58 AM
Subject: Re: Configuration change for c...@httpd?
Joe Schaefer wrote:
- Original Message
From: William A. Rowe, Jr.
To:
On 01/02/2009 03:04 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
When compiling trunk, I get
simple_run.c:242: warning: implicit declaration of function
'ap_run_drop_privileges'
I can fix it with the following patch:
Index: server/mpm/simple/simple_run.c
- Original Message
From: Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Friday, January 2, 2009 9:42:20 AM
Subject: Re: Configuration change for c...@httpd?
- Original Message
From: William A. Rowe, Jr.
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent:
On 02.01.2009 15:57, Joe Schaefer wrote:
- Original Message
From: Joe Schaeferjoe_schae...@yahoo.com
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Friday, January 2, 2009 9:42:20 AM
Subject: Re: Configuration change for c...@httpd?
- Original Message
From: William A. Rowe, Jr.
To:
- Original Message
From: Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Friday, January 2, 2009 11:43:44 AM
Subject: Re: Configuration change for c...@httpd?
On 02.01.2009 15:57, Joe Schaefer wrote:
- Original Message
From: Joe Schaefer
To:
On 02.01.2009 17:58, Joe Schaefer wrote:
- Original Message
From: Rainer Jungrainer.j...@kippdata.de
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Friday, January 2, 2009 11:43:44 AM
Subject: Re: Configuration change for c...@httpd?
On 02.01.2009 15:57, Joe Schaefer wrote:
- Original Message
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 8:58 AM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
So, is that better or worse than getting a bounce message? I'll point out
that Yahoo! used to have a similar problem, but have since resolved it. I
wonder what gmail does now?
When you hit 'reply-all' now, GMail adds
- Original Message
From: Justin Erenkrantz jus...@erenkrantz.com
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Friday, January 2, 2009 12:32:37 PM
Subject: Re: Configuration change for c...@httpd?
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 8:58 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
So, is that better or worse than getting a
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 9:38 AM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
Nice. How do people actually handle moderation at the ASF then?
You're *supposed* to be using Reply-All when you want to accept
a post. Are none of these clients out there ezmlm-compatible?
Gmail does the same thing
- Original Message
From: Justin Erenkrantz jus...@erenkrantz.com
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Friday, January 2, 2009 12:45:39 PM
Subject: Re: Configuration change for c...@httpd?
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 9:38 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
Nice. How do people actually handle
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 9:38 AM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
Nice. How do people actually handle moderation at the ASF then?
You're *supposed* to be using Reply-All when you want to accept
a post. Are none of these clients out there ezmlm-compatible?
On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 12:00:15PM -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
I'd prefer we don't throw away the to: header, it will make filtering
and sorting emails more difficult for some folks who lack any-header
rich regex filtering features.
Yeah, it broke my filtering. I much prefer the keeping
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 9:55 AM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
Shrug, I can try completely removing the To: header, but I'm fairly
certain that some MTA's will add one back (and a missing To: header
will trigger anti-spam). Other than that, it's pick your poison
time, since no
- Original Message
From: Justin Erenkrantz jus...@erenkrantz.com
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Friday, January 2, 2009 1:28:27 PM
Subject: Re: Configuration change for c...@httpd?
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 9:55 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
Shrug, I can try completely removing the To:
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
Andre and Roy are the only ones signed up for moderation of c...@httpd.
I think the people who want it to go back to being a moderated list
should first step up and offer to moderate it before we revert the
config.
On Jan 2, 2009, at 12:55 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
- Original Message
From: Justin Erenkrantz jus...@erenkrantz.com
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Friday, January 2, 2009 12:45:39 PM
Subject: Re: Configuration change for c...@httpd?
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 9:38 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
Andre and Roy are the only ones signed up for moderation of c...@httpd.
I think the people who want it to go back to being a moderated list
should first step up and offer to moderate it before
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 10:48 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
I for one don't want the duplicate messages; reply-to says dev@ and that is
where patches for discussion should be discussed. Re: Crap doesn't belong
on a commits notification list.
I don't want crap every time I
- Original Message
From: Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Friday, January 2, 2009 1:47:57 PM
Subject: Re: Configuration change for c...@httpd?
On Jan 2, 2009, at 12:55 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
- Original Message
From: Justin
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 10:54 AM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
nob...@apache.org routes to the bit-bucket, so that would work for the To:
header. That's what I would recommend doing at this point, although I've
just implemented Justin's recommended config and will stop there until
* Mads Toftum m...@toftum.dk [2009-01-02 19:06:21]:
Yeah, it broke my filtering. I much prefer the keeping the To: rather
than adding yet another clumsy workaround for gmail oddities.
+1 on this, please keep the To: header.
- Maxime
--
Maxime Petazzoni http://www.bulix.org
+1 (650) 390-7483
On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 10:52:49AM -0800, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
I don't want crap every time I hit reply either. Remembering every
time to cut the address or living with the blowback is even more
unacceptable. -- justin
File a bug with whomever makes your mail client then. It's worked
On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 11:01:18AM -0800, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
nobody@ sounds fine as long as it doesn't blow up too many people's filters.
seems to me that this will be almost as broken as the use of
undisclosed. you're still removing what was used to filter on. Existing
filters are still
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 11:26 AM, Mads Toftum m...@toftum.dk wrote:
On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 10:52:49AM -0800, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
I don't want crap every time I hit reply either. Remembering every
time to cut the address or living with the blowback is even more
unacceptable. -- justin
- Original Message
From: Justin Erenkrantz jus...@erenkrantz.com
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Friday, January 2, 2009 2:43:23 PM
Subject: Re: Configuration change for c...@httpd?
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 11:26 AM, Mads Toftum wrote:
On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 10:52:49AM -0800,
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 11:30 AM, Mads Toftum m...@toftum.dk wrote:
seems to me that this will be almost as broken as the use of
undisclosed. you're still removing what was used to filter on. Existing
filters are still broken.
No, correct filters should be keying off List-Post/List-Id.
File a
On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 11:43:23AM -0800, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
Considering mutt, Gmail, and Thunderbird all include c...@httpd in the
replies when you do 'reply-all', I have no clue what you're talking
about. Is there any MUA that doesn't include c...@httpd in the CC line
when you hit
On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 11:49:04AM -0800, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
No, correct filters should be keying off List-Post/List-Id.
File a bug with whomever makes your mail client then. It's worked
fine for ages.
Except I can easily filter on those, but I haven't had the need to until
someone
On Jan 2, 2009, at 1:54 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
nob...@apache.org routes to the bit-bucket, so that would work for
the To:
header. That's what I would recommend doing at this point, although
I've
just implemented Justin's recommended config and will stop there until
the list comes to a
Hi,
I've solved the problem, though I may not exactly understand how.
It was an issue with the way I was building the module, which was
fixed once I added in the flags I got from apr-config --cppflags.
(I used to rant that the mostly-undocumented design change to apxs in
apache 2.0 was
- Original Message
From: Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Friday, January 2, 2009 3:06:42 PM
Subject: Re: Configuration change for c...@httpd?
On Jan 2, 2009, at 1:54 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
nob...@apache.org routes to the bit-bucket, so that
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 11:30 AM, Mads Toftum m...@toftum.dk wrote:
seems to me that this will be almost as broken as the use of
undisclosed. you're still removing what was used to filter on. Existing
filters are still broken.
No, correct filters should be keying off
Hi,
I compiled a list of our defaults for the enablement of modules on trunk
(attached).
I think some modules should change. There is a nice default setting,
that will enable a module when --enable-modules=all is used.
Some of the new modules (and filters) use this default, like mod_sed,
On 01/02/2009 09:09 PM, wr...@apache.org wrote:
Author: wrowe
Date: Fri Jan 2 12:08:59 2009
New Revision: 730835
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=730835view=rev
Log:
Clean up fugly initialization of AcceptFilter mappings
Modified:
httpd/httpd/trunk/server/core.c
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Otherwise the table will not be empty anymore in the case that
neither APR_HAS_SO_ACCEPTFILTER nor APR_TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT is set.
Uhm ... huh? What gave you the idea that APR_TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT
is a volatile? It's present in apr 1.3 (our baseline) and will
be sticking
On 01/02/2009 10:27 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Otherwise the table will not be empty anymore in the case that
neither APR_HAS_SO_ACCEPTFILTER nor APR_TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT is set.
Uhm ... huh? What gave you the idea that APR_TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT
is a volatile? It's
Some might have noticed I've been busy eliminating Win9x support from trunk.
The essential logic is that the 9x/ME family has been retired from even
extended support for some time, no security updates are forthcoming, and
the code path was altogether different than the NT generation.
The one
Hi all,
I am currently struggling to build httpd-trunk, the build of ab fails
with undefined symbols as below. Is this broken for anyone else, or have
I done something dumb?
/tmp/httpd-trunk//build-1/libtool --silent --mode=link gcc -g -Wall
-Wmissing-prototypes -Wstrict-prototypes
Jim Jagielski wrote:
- create() - takes num_items and item_size
- to be called during initial config pass, providers
should not initialize or create mutexes here, etc.
should not??
That comes from writing mod_shmap which lets you load a bunch of
socache
Hi Graham,
On 03.01.2009 01:39, Graham Leggett wrote:
Hi all,
I am currently struggling to build httpd-trunk, the build of ab fails
with undefined symbols as below. Is this broken for anyone else, or have
I done something dumb?
/tmp/httpd-trunk//build-1/libtool --silent --mode=link gcc -g
rj...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rjung
Date: Fri Jan 2 16:58:11 2009
New Revision: 730881
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=730881view=rev
Log:
We need to link only ab against libm (because of
sqrt()).
Uhm - sure that mod_status and a few others didn't also need this
on some
Piotr Gackiewicz wrote:
Hi,
my name is Piotr Gackiewicz and I am the autor of these patches.
I confirm, that I personaly consider them as minor changes and agree, that
you should put them into minor patch group. Without signing CLA and official
Software Grant.
I appreciate transferring this
On 03.01.2009 02:02, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
rj...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rjung
Date: Fri Jan 2 16:58:11 2009
New Revision: 730881
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=730881view=rev
Log:
We need to link only ab against libm (because of
sqrt()).
Uhm - sure that mod_status and a few
On Jan 2, 2009, at 10:33 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
From: Justin Erenkrantz jus...@erenkrantz.com
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Friday, January 2, 2009 1:28:27 PM
Subject: Re: Configuration change for c...@httpd?
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 9:55 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
Shrug, I can try completely
- Original Message
From: Roy T. Fielding field...@gbiv.com
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Friday, January 2, 2009 8:08:47 PM
Subject: Re: Configuration change for c...@httpd?
On Jan 2, 2009, at 10:33 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
From: Justin Erenkrantz
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Rainer Jung wrote:
On 03.01.2009 02:02, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
rj...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rjung
Date: Fri Jan 2 16:58:11 2009
New Revision: 730881
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=730881view=rev
Log:
We need to link only ab against libm (because of
sqrt()).
Uhm - sure
On 03.01.2009 02:50, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Rainer Jung wrote:
On 03.01.2009 02:02, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
rj...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rjung
Date: Fri Jan 2 16:58:11 2009
New Revision: 730881
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=730881view=rev
Log:
We need to link only ab
Rainer Jung wrote:
That's the platform I do most tests on. I compiled all trunk modules and
could load them, so no missing symbols.
I do the same change regularly for 2.2.x, so I know it works there to
(but didn't test there with all more exotic modules).
Cool, leaving the change on
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 5:08 PM, Roy T. Fielding field...@gbiv.com wrote:
I am completely uninterested in fixing the config just because some
person reflexively does a reply-all and then doesn't edit their own
destination addresses. There is nothing to fix here. A bounce is what
they are
On Jan 2, 2009, at 8:04 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 5:08 PM, Roy T. Fielding field...@gbiv.com
wrote:
I am completely uninterested in fixing the config just because some
person reflexively does a reply-all and then doesn't edit their own
destination addresses. There is
test reply-all
jerenkra...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jerenkrantz
Date: Fri Jan 2 21:06:43 2009
New Revision: 730911
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=730911view=rev
Log:
Silence ulimit warnings on platforms/configs that don't support setting the
soft limit to the hard limit (aka default
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
BTW, if you maintain that the list config is immutable, then my
suggestion would be to shut down cvs@ and route commits to d...@. This
way we don't place unnecessary barriers to discussions around commits.
If folks can't live with the commit traffic, they shouldn't be on
test reply
jerenkra...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jerenkrantz
Date: Fri Jan 2 21:34:52 2009
New Revision: 730914
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=730914view=rev
Log:
Fix up SSL autoconf-fu so as not to emit bogus lines.
* acinclude.m4
(APACHE_CHECK_SSL_TOOLKIT): Move CHECKING line to
Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.3.1-alpha are available at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Your votes please;
±1
[ ] Release httpd-2.3.0 as Alpha
Vote closes at 7:00 UTC on Thursday January 8 2009.
Thanks,
Paul
Paul Querna wrote:
Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.3.1-alpha are available at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Your votes please;
±1
[ ] Release httpd-2.3.0 as Alpha
This should actually be Release httpd-2.3.1 as Alpha, but I
fail at editing copied text.
I hope everyone
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 10:45 PM, Paul Querna c...@force-elite.com wrote:
[ -1 ] Release httpd-2.3.1 as Alpha
For me, r730882 busts the build on Mac OS X. (It can't find pcre.)
More in my reply to the commit msg... -- justin
[ It's odd as I didn't get the email for this commit...anyway... ]
Author: rjung
Date: Fri Jan 2 17:01:56 2009
New Revision: 730882
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=730882view=rev
Log:
Only link libhttpd against pcre.
Modified:
httpd/httpd/trunk/configure.in
Modified:
62 matches
Mail list logo
