If this is the wrong list to ask for help on this please redirect me.
We are porting our application to Fedora 15 and to systemd from SysV init.
The httpd configuraturation we are using work without problem on earlier
Fedora 13 systems.
We are hitting an odd problem with httpd handling requests
Eric Covener wrote:
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 5:57 AM, Barry Scott barry.sc...@onelan.co.uk wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 10:05 AM, Edgar Frank ef-li...@email.de wrote:
In the interim, is mod_fastcgi really that bad?
mod_fastcgi is fine for handling GET/POST
Eric Covener wrote:
On 12/4/09, Barry Scott barry.sc...@onelan.co.uk wrote:
Eric Covener wrote:
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 5:57 AM, Barry Scott barry.sc...@onelan.co.uk
wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 10:05 AM, Edgar Frank ef-li
Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 10:05 AM, Edgar Frank ef-li...@email.de wrote:
In the interim, is mod_fastcgi really that bad?
mod_fastcgi is fine for handling GET/POST requests, but it fails to
implement
Authorization or Authenication.
So yes mod_fastcgi is really bad.
Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 6:53 AM, Barry Scott barry.sc...@onelan.co.uk wrote:
I have configure with a limit of 16 processes but have 17 running and logs
claiming 16 running.
You should probably open a bug report for this. That's not to say
that others haven't
I have configure with a limit of 16 processes but have 17 running and
logs claiming 16 running.
Barry
httpd.conf fcgid config lines:
FcgidCmdOptions /usr/local/onelan/html/dsmauthorizer.fcgi MaxProcesses
16 IOTimeout 200
FcgidCmdOptions /usr/local/onelan/html/dsm.fcgi
pqf wrote:
Hi, all
I am Ryan Pan, who wrote the first version of mod_fcgid.
While I uesd mod_fastcgi(not mod_fcgid), one issue that bother me is: while
a fastcgi process(created by mod_fastcgi's process manager process)in a dead
loop, no one is respond to kick it out. So from time to
Jeff Trawick wrote:
Variation number three:
As with your patch, it remembers to add the eos bucket to the brigade
of data sent to the app. As with my earlier patch, it doesn't send
the trailing FCGI_STDIN record.
In the spec (http://www.fastcgi.com/devkit/doc/fcgi-spec.html#S6.3),
there's no
Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 3:30 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
...
Silly me. Chris's patch at
http://people.apache.org/~chrisd/patches/mod_fcgid_auth/mod_fcgid-1auth-trunk.patch
handles this, and it does send a trailing FCGI_STDIN record to an
authorizer.
Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 1:26 PM, Barry Scott barry.sc...@onelan.co.uk wrote:
One test that needs doing is to have a Responder and an Authorizer running
for the same request. I'll see if I can do that test for you next week with
the pieces
I have.
Chris Darroch has
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Thanks to Jeff's catch, we scuttled 2.3.3. We have yet another candidate
for your consideration. Please fetch up the newly minted
mod_fcgid-2.3.4.tar.gz
(or .tar.bz2) or the win32/netware suitable package
mod_fcgid-2.3.3-crlf.zip from:
Barry Scott wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Thanks to Jeff's catch, we scuttled 2.3.3. We have yet another
candidate
for your consideration. Please fetch up the newly minted
mod_fcgid-2.3.4.tar.gz
(or .tar.bz2) or the win32/netware suitable package
mod_fcgid-2.3.3-crlf.zip from
This has been filed as issue
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47973
Further testing of our application has shown up a problem using
mod_fcgid 2.3.4.
With the following configuration we are seeing the request body
of POST messages get stripped out if FcgidAuthorizer is used
Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Barry Scott barry.sc...@onelan.co.uk wrote:
Barry Scott wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Thanks to Jeff's catch, we scuttled 2.3.3. We have yet another
candidate
for your consideration. Please fetch up the newly minted
Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 12:04 PM, Barry Scott barry.sc...@onelan.co.uk wrote:
This has been filed as issue
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47973
Further testing of our application has shown up a problem using
mod_fcgid 2.3.4.
With the following
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Thanks to Jeff's catch, we scuttled 2.3.3. We have yet another candidate
for your consideration. Please fetch up the newly minted mod_fcgid-2.3.4.tar.gz
(or .tar.bz2) or the win32/netware suitable package mod_fcgid-2.3.3-crlf.zip
from:
Ricardo Cantu wrote:
On Friday 02 October 2009 11:10:25 am Barry Scott wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 5:15 AM, Barry Scott barry.sc...@onelan.co.uk
mailto:barry.sc...@onelan.co.uk wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
(instead of based on uri or vhost
Jeff Trawick wrote:
(instead of based on uri or vhost)
FCGIDCommand /path/to/command
IdleTimeout n
MaxProcessLifetime n
MinProcesses n
MaxProcesses n
MaxRequestsPerProcess n
InitialEnv var[=val] ...
class
(the names of these options follow my proposal for the names of
existing
Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 5:15 AM, Barry Scott barry.sc...@onelan.co.uk
mailto:barry.sc...@onelan.co.uk wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
(instead of based on uri or vhost)
FCGIDCommand /path/to/command
IdleTimeout n
MaxProcessLifetime n
Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Barry Scott
barry.sc...@onelan.co.uk mailto:barry.sc...@onelan.co.uk wrote:
At this point let me ask this:
Is it possible with the current code to ever have the fcgid
Authorizer called?
yes
thanks for the confirmation
With mod_fastcgi I can to the following:
FastCgiServer /usr/local/onelan/html/dsm.fcgi -processes 1 -idle-timeout 200
FastCgiServer /usr/local/onelan/html/dsmxml.fcgi -processes 1
-idle-timeout 30
Which creates two servers running waiting for request with only once
instance of each.
I
Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 11:28 AM, Barry Scott barry.sc...@onelan.co.uk
mailto:barry.sc...@onelan.co.uk wrote:
With mod_fastcgi I can to the following:
FastCgiServer /usr/local/onelan/html/dsm.fcgi -processes 1
-idle-timeout 200
FastCgiServer /usr/local
At this point let me ask this:
Is it possible with the current code to ever have the fcgid Authorizer
called?
If it is not possible I'm willing to try and code the missing pieces,
with a little
help being pointed in the right direction.
Barry
Jeff Trawick wrote:
I borrowed a few ideas from my friends and botched the rest personally:
(omitting FCGID prefix)
leave alone
AccessChecker
AccessCheckerAuthoritative
Authenticator
AuthenticatorAuthoritative
Authorizer
AuthorizerAuthoritative
Wrapper
MaxRequestsPerProcess
PassHeader
It
The mod_fcgid page says to ask on dev I assume that this is the right
place to ask.
I'm using mod_fcgid from svn with HTTPD 2.2.
I want to use a fast CGI authorizer to allow me to control access based
on my rules.
The authorizer needs to be a long running process - never exits.
I know that
Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 8:18 AM, Barry Scott barry.sc...@onelan.co.uk
mailto:barry.sc...@onelan.co.uk wrote:
The mod_fcgid page says to ask on dev I assume that this is the
right place to ask.
I'm using mod_fcgid from svn with HTTPD 2.2.
I want to use
Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 11:26 AM, Barry Scott
barry.sc...@onelan.co.uk mailto:barry.sc...@onelan.co.uk wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 8:18 AM, Barry Scott
barry.sc...@onelan.co.uk mailto:barry.sc...@onelan.co.uk
Barry Scott wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 11:26 AM, Barry Scott
barry.sc...@onelan.co.uk mailto:barry.sc...@onelan.co.uk wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 8:18 AM, Barry Scott
barry.sc...@onelan.co.uk mailto:barry.sc...@onelan.co.uk
28 matches
Mail list logo
