Re: PR #363

+1 for the change. It is still pretty readable on any edtor. -- Originalnachricht -- Von rbo...@rcbowen.com An "dev@httpd.apache.org" Datum 24.01.2024 16:06:43 Betreff PR #363 I've been poking at some of our open PRs looking for docs-only changes that we can possibly clean up. PR

Re: [VOTE] Switch read/write repository from Subversion to Git

> [x]: Move the read/write repository from Subversion to Git and leverage > the features of Github (for now Actions and PR). > [ ]: Move the read/write repository from Subversion to Git, but I don't > want to work with Github and I will only work with > what gitbox.apache.org offers. > [ ]:

Re: [VOTE] Switch read/write repository from Subversion to Git

[x]: Move the read/write repository from Subversion to Git and leverage the features of Github (for now Actions and PR). [ ]: Move the read/write repository from Subversion to Git, but I don't want to work with Github and I will only work with what gitbox.apache.org offers. [ ]: Leave

Re: httpd on Windows crashes when ErrorLog path in httpd.conf is invalid

Hi Pavel, the 0xc005 error is an access violation on Windows. That error also appears when a hard drive dies. That isn't new in 2.4.56. I tested that with earlier versions. Your dump helped to trace. This is related to the VCRUNTIME not exclusive to httpd. Sadly httpd -S does not notice that

Re: [VOTE] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.56-rc1 as httpd-2.4.56

I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.56-rc1 as 2.4.56: [x] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! [ ] +0: Let's have a talk. [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong. +1

Re[: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.54-rc3 as httpd-2.4.54

On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 04:25:31PM +0200, Stefan Eissing wrote: Here we go again! Sorry for the repeats, but that is why we build candidates, right? Hi all, Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.51-rc1 as httpd-2.4.51

+1 on Debian 11 ste...@eissing.org schrieb am Do., 7. Okt. 2021, 15:17: > Hi all, > > due to found security weaknesses in our 2.4.50 release, the security team > feels it is necessary to do a new release on very short notice. We will > skip > the usual 3 day voting period and close the vote

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.50-rc1 as httpd-2.4.50

+1 debian 11 On Fri, 1 Oct 2021 at 16:41, ste...@eissing.org wrote: > > Hi, all; >Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > > I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release > this candidate tarball

Re: release roll soon?

On Thu, 9 Sept 2021 at 22:23, Gregg Smith wrote: > > Since OpenSSL 3.0.0 GA came out yesterday (Californuts time) I think it > would be nice to have r1891138 backported for those wishing to try it > out. What you say? +1 for the backport

Re: Question about source code comment

Hi Nikita, that was done by Daniel Gruno aka Humbedooh. Maybe he still knows why I added that comment in 2014. Cheers Mario On Tue, 8 Jun 2021 at 08:43, Nikita Popov wrote: > > Hello. While investigating source codes I've found the following > comment for

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.47

+1 on debian 10 On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 at 11:25, Christophe JAILLET wrote: > > Hi, all; > Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > > I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this > candidate tarball as

Re: mod_fcgid Release

Ping On Thu, 24 Jan 2019 at 11:23, Mario Brandt wrote: > > Hi, > it has beens a while since there was the last release of mod_fcgid. > There are some important fixes in trunk, but never made it to a > release since 2013. > Is anyone willing to file a release? > > Cheers > Mario

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.46

[x] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! [ ] +0: Let's have a talk. [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong. Debian 10 build.

Re: Help needed to test Windows builds in Travis

gful Travis config. Hope to have something to > share during the next days :) > > Luca > > Il giorno ven 29 nov 2019 alle ore 05:37 Mario Brandt > ha scritto: > > > > Hi Luca, > > > > the cmake post on AL has a batch script, so I think that will do the >

Re: [users@httpd] Is it possible to have in Apache 2.4 VirtualHosts, each with its own SSLProtocol ?

Hi Yann, Can you backport this for 2.4.x please? Cheers Mario On Wed, 23 Oct 2019 at 11:28, Mario Brandt wrote: > > Hi Yann, > thanks a lot for that patch file. > > I can confirm, that the patch works on 2.4.41 > > Build with > > SSL 1.1.1d > HTTPD 2.4.41 > AP

Re: 2.4.next coming?

+1 On Fri, 7 Feb 2020 at 14:18, Eric Covener wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 8:54 AM Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > > > > Hi, all. It's been a few months since we've rolled a release and there are > > a few bug fixes that seem like A Good Thing to get out there. > > > > Thoughts on rolling

Re: Help needed to test Windows builds in Travis

gt; > Luca > > Il giorno mer 27 nov 2019 alle ore 23:48 Mario Brandt > ha scritto: > > > > Hi Luca, > > is there any progress on this? > > > > Cheers > > Mario > > > > Luca Toscano schrieb am Do., 7. Nov. 2019, 22:56: > >> &

Re: Help needed to test Windows builds in Travis

Hi Luca, is there any progress on this? Cheers Mario Luca Toscano schrieb am Do., 7. Nov. 2019, 22:56: > Hi everybody, > > if you build httpd for Windows can you give us a list of commands and > steps that you usually do? I am not familiar enough with the platform > and [1] is still a bit

Re: Help needed to test Windows builds in Travis

Hi Luca, sorry for the delay. You can find a cmake version here https://www.apachelounge.com/viewtopic.php?t=6462 Outdated, but what I did with VS IDE https://gist.github.com/JBlond/ff51fad2ada2bf711b1b9f844c663136 Mario On Fri, 8 Nov 2019 at 07:56, Luca Toscano wrote: > > Hi everybody, > >

Re: trunk APR version requirement

+1 Joe Orton schrieb am Fr., 8. Nov. 2019, 10:40: > On trunk the configure script requires APR 1.4 but mod_proxy_balancer > fails to build with APR < 1.5 since it uses apr_escape.h unconditionally > [1]. Thinking of 2.5/2.6 it might make sense to bump up the APR version > requirement to

Re: [users@httpd] Is it possible to have in Apache 2.4 VirtualHosts, each with its own SSLProtocol ?

wrote: > > Hi Mario, > > On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 10:05 AM Mario Brandt wrote: > > > > it was PITA so apply this patch in 2.4.41 since the code lines are > > very different. > > And it fails to build. > > Sorry about that, full/single patch attached. > > Regards, > Yann.

Re: Time for httpd 2.6.x?

+1 Luca Toscano schrieb am Mi., 23. Okt. 2019, 08:29: > Not even a comment? :) > > Luca > > Il giorno dom 13 ott 2019 alle ore 20:58 Luca Toscano > ha scritto: > > > > Hi everybody, > > > > in trunk's STATUS there are a lot of suggestions about things to > > improve/change for 2.6.x. There

Re: [users@httpd] Is it possible to have in Apache 2.4 VirtualHosts, each with its own SSLProtocol ?

Hi, is there only a patch against trunk or is there one available for 2.4? On Tue, 22 Oct 2019 at 18:34, Mario Brandt wrote: > > Hi Yann, > I test the patches this week or the weekend. > > Cheers > Mario > > Yann Ylavic schrieb am Di., 22. Okt. 2019, 14:55: >> >

Re: [users@httpd] Is it possible to have in Apache 2.4 VirtualHosts, each with its own SSLProtocol ?

Hi Yann, I test the patches this week or the weekend. Cheers Mario Yann Ylavic schrieb am Di., 22. Okt. 2019, 14:55: > On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 1:54 PM Mario Brandt wrote: > > > > There is also https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62939 > > Would you mind test

Re: [users@httpd] Is it possible to have in Apache 2.4 VirtualHosts, each with its own SSLProtocol ?

There is also https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62939 Cheers On Tue, 22 Oct 2019 at 12:17, Yann Ylavic wrote: > > [user@ => dev@] > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 9:21 AM Stefan Eissing > wrote: > > > > > Am 21.10.2019 um 22:53 schrieb Marian-Nicolae Ion : > > > > > > I recompiled and

Re: keep-alive and vary in 304 responses

On Tue, 9 Apr 2019 at 12:31, Stefan Eissing wrote: > > I just did some tests with https://redbot.org/ (the site tester by Mark > Nottingham) against our server and it notifies of 2 things: > > 1. The "Keep-Alive" header is deprecated. I tried to "Header unset > Keep-Alive" but that has no

mod_fcgid Release

Hi, it has beens a while since there was the last release of mod_fcgid. There are some important fixes in trunk, but never made it to a release since 2013. Is anyone willing to file a release? Cheers Mario

Re: TLSv1.3

Hi Stefan, On 3 April 2018 at 14:58, Stefan Eissing wrote: > Chrome 65.0.3325.181 and FF 58.0.2 both do not on my MacOS desktop. With FF open the about:config page Find security.tls.version.max set the value from 3 to 4 Cheers Mario

Re: Redis and mod_cache/mod_socache

Hi, there is already a working module. Works on Linux and Windows. https://github.com/photom/mod_socache_redis You may wana check it out. On 31 October 2016 at 14:30, Jim Jagielski wrote: > Query: Think it would be worth my time to work on a > Redis implementation for

Re: [VOTE] backport mod_proxy_http2 to 2.4.x as experimental

+1 On 9 March 2016 at 13:53, Stefan Eissing wrote: > I propose to backport mod_proxy_http2 to 2.4.x as an experimental > module with the same restrictions as mod_http2. > > Purpose: > mod_proxy_http2 allows proxy HTTP/2 connections, using its own > h2: and h2c:

Re: access control for dynamic hosts (vote?)

+1 On 6 March 2016 at 14:12, Fabien wrote: > >> Attached is a patch against the sources, including a documentation, which >> use the syntax "Require forward-dns foo.apache.org". > > > Here is a v2 which adds a missing "/" in the XML documentation. > > -- > Fabien.

PHP OPcache with fcgid and restart

Hi, it would be uberawesome if you could take a look the patch 48769 [1] since than the OP cache from PHP would not die with a graceful restart. Thank you! Mario [1] https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48769

Re: access control for dynamic hosts

Hi, On 14 January 2016 at 22:36, Fabien wrote: > > Maybe the reverse dns is working on your test address? I checked it and yes it does work that way. I never knew it did. Cheers Mario

Re: access control for dynamic hosts

Hi Fabien, doesn't it work using Require host with a dyndns name? At least my test was successful. Cheers Mario On 20 December 2015 at 09:44, Fabien wrote: > > Hello folks, > > I have a simple access control use case for which I have not found a clean > solution. > > I want

Re: httpd and OpenSSL 1.0.2

Hi, got it working. From Kaspar Brand the hint[1] not to use static was very good. Thanks! Mario [1] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-dev/201504.mbox/%3c554072b0.40...@velox.ch%3E

Re: building httpd 2.2 on windows automation question.

Hi Andy, at least for the 2.4 there is a script on github [1] Maybe you can adopt that for 2.2. I wonder why you still want 2.2. Unless you use some exotic modules that do no build with 2.4, 2.4 is the better option. [1] https://github.com/winlibs/apache

Re: Next release of mod_fcgid

r1604123: Lower log graceful kill fail, sending SIGKILL level to DEBUG on Windows. PR 54597. and r16041237: Follow up to r1604123: make it compile. Cheers Mario On 22 June 2015 at 16:59, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Mario Brandt jbl...@gmail.com wrote

Next release of mod_fcgid

Hi, the last release of mod_fcgid was been a long while. There was an important bugfix on windows side in June last year. Is there anyone willing to tag and release a new version? Cheers Mario

Re: Bug 57641

Hi Nick, please add a unified diff file to the bug and add the keyword PatchAvailable Cheers Mario On 11 June 2015 at 13:31, Nick Gearls nickgea...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, Can anybody have a look at this trivial bug waiting for months? The bug is obvious and the fix is a one line change.

Re: httpd and OpenSSL 1.0.2

Hi Tom, since I'm mostly a windows user and sure how to debug that and wasn't successful, it would be nice if you could give me the working script. Thanks Mario

Re: httpd and OpenSSL 1.0.2

27, 2015 at 1:09 PM, Andy Wang aw...@ptc.com wrote: On 05/27/2015 11:33 AM, Mario Brandt wrote: ... mario@sasuke:~$ readelf -s /usr/lib/libssl.so | grep SSL_CONF_CTX_finish 532: 000536f0 6 FUNCGLOBAL DEFAULT 11 SSL_CONF_CTX_finish 327: 000536f0 6 FUNC

Re: httpd and OpenSSL 1.0.2

. at linktime it may be finding the right library, but at runtime it's not). Andy From: Mario Brandt [jbl...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, May 29, 2015 3:57 AM To: Tom Browder Cc: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: httpd and OpenSSL 1.0.2 Hi Tom, nope setting

Re: httpd and OpenSSL 1.0.2

On 29 May 2015 at 16:49, Andy Wang aw...@ptc.com wrote: Yeah, I honestly wasn't really thinking that closely about it. I do know this. The openssl default install results in the following: libssl.so.1.0.0 symlinked to libssl.so however, fedora's system provided libraries look like this:

Re: httpd and OpenSSL 1.0.2

Hi Tom, I tried on Debian 7 and 8 both x64 To see your configure options would help a lot. The missing symbol is in the lib. mario@sasuke:~$ whereis libssl.so libssl: /usr/lib/libssl.a /usr/lib/libssl.so mario@sasuke:~$ readelf -s /usr/lib/libssl.so | grep SSL_CONF_CTX_free 531:

Re: Platform specific CTR/RTC?

+1 On 22 May 2015 at 08:51, William A Rowe Jr wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote: I think this has sat enough in STATUS that I'll commit by lazy consensus prior to tag and roll of 2.2.30, unless anyone has a legitimate correction/objection? It might be worth mentioning that it's been in production

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.11 as GA

On 15 January 2015 at 21:10, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.11 can be found at the usual place: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.11 GA. [x] +1: Good to go [ ] +0: meh

Re: mod_fcgid kill all subprocesses in reload

Hi, there is a patch for busy processes https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48769 Maybe that is a starting point. Cheers Mario On 26 December 2014 at 07:05, Graham Dumpleton grah...@apache.org wrote: Sounds like it would perhaps be for the same reason as mod_wsgi has issues with

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.10 as GA

+1 event mpm on Debian wheezy 64 bit PHP via mod_fcgid. (3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP) x86_64) On 15 July 2014 19:20, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.10 can be found at the usual place: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ I'm calling a

Log pollution from mod fcgid

Hi, I had filed a bug[1] about mod fcgid polluting my apache error log. So far no commiter had reviewed my patch. Can someone please take a look that patch? My logs have tons of lines like [Fri Jun 20 11:16:32.321859 2014] [fcgid:warn] [pid 2828:tid 504] mod_fcgid: process 7404 graceful kill

Re: Where to find the unistd.h header for Apache 2.4.7??

it should be included in your distro if you use linux or unix. 2014-04-05 21:01 GMT+02:00 Miguel Villarreal miguel_villarrea...@hotmail.com: Miguel Antonio

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.7 as GA

+1 Debian 7.2 (x64) tested with event mpm On 19 November 2013 18:45, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.7 can be found at the usual place: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd

Re: windows binaries thread from users@

I think in pub/httpd/binaries/win32/README could be a link to http://httpd.apache.org/docs/current/platform/windows.html cause there are the links for Windows binaries. Cheers On 14 November 2013 15:37, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Eric Covener

Re: [VOTE] Release mod_fcgid 2.3.9

[+1 ] Release mod_fcgid 2.3.9 as GA works for me on Debian 7 (x64)

Re: [VOTE] Release mod_fcgid 2.3.8

On 29 September 2013 20:00, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote: Tarballs/zips are at http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/mod_fcgid/ Shortcut to changes: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/mod_fcgid/CHANGES-FCGID +/-1 [ +1 ] Release mod_fcgid 2.3.8 as GA tested on Debian 7 with PHP 5.4 (distro)

Re: [VOTE] Release mod_fcgid 2.3.8

Hi Jeff, at least I can say from another build that I have made that r1500307 does not have that issue on my box Debian Box. There are the number of processes that I see in htop and on the server status page the same. So the issue might happen in a later revision. Hope that helps. (May some other

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.6 as GA

On 15 July 2013 18:48, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.6 can be found at the usual place: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.6 GA. NOTE: The -deps tarballs are included

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.5 as GA

On 11 July 2013 20:54, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.5 can be found at the usual place: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.5 GA. NOTE: The -deps tarballs are included

Re: Intent to revert commit r1332643

Any news on this? Greetz Am Samstag, 18. Mai 2013 schrieb Jim Jagielski : Please don't submit what could be controversial reverts over a weekend. On May 17, 2013, at 10:36 AM, Guenter Knauf fua...@apache.orgjavascript:; wrote: Hi all, I will revert the changes done with:

Re: mod_macro… backport to 2.4

+1 Am Samstag, 9. März 2013 schrieb Jim Jagielski : I've proposed copying/backporting mod_macro to 2.4 !

Re: trunk doesn't start

Eric already has a solution in mind http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-dev/201303.mbox/%3CCALK%3DYjPiJ2X6V%3DtcrohoCEEVJMKNRuLJhfUZBXx59Hicxoaw_g%40mail.gmail.com%3E Cheers Mario On 5 March 2013 10:29, Igor Galić i.ga...@brainsware.org wrote: Hey folks, not sure if I did anything

Re: trunk doesn't start

Indeed, that. did it. Thanks! Mario - Send from my toaster via IPv6 Am Dienstag, 5. März 2013 schrieb Jim Jagielski : HEAD of trunk should fix this... missed the AP_DECLARE 'calls'. On Mar 5, 2013, at 4:55 AM, Mario Brandt jbl...@gmail.com javascript:; wrote: Eric already has

Re: svn commit: r1451620 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: include/ap_skiplist.h server/mpm/eventopt/config3.m4 server/mpm/eventopt/eventopt.c server/skiplist.c

Hi, On 1 March 2013 18:20, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group ruediger.pl...@vodafone.com wrote: Please try make extraclean instead of make clean. Thanks for the suggestion. I tried that, but I still get that issue. Cheers Mario

Re: svn commit: r1451620 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: include/ap_skiplist.h server/mpm/eventopt/config3.m4 server/mpm/eventopt/eventopt.c server/skiplist.c

Hi Jim, the compiling runs fine, but the module does not load httpd: Syntax error on line 109 of /opt/apache25/conf/httpd.conf: Cannot load modules/mod_mpm_eventopt.so into server: /opt/apache25/modules/mod_mpm_eventopt.so: undefined symbol: ap_skiplist_insert Cheers Mario On 1 March 2013

Re: svn commit: r1451620 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: include/ap_skiplist.h server/mpm/eventopt/config3.m4 server/mpm/eventopt/eventopt.c server/skiplist.c

Yepp, make clean svn up ./buildconf ./configure make sudo make install Cheers Mario On 1 March 2013 17:24, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: Did you do a fresh build? On Mar 1, 2013, at 11:18 AM, Mario Brandt jbl...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jim, the compiling runs fine, but the module does

Re: no http-404 errors in ErrorLog

Hi Reindl, the advantage is that you can define the log level for each module e.g. LogLevel warn ssl:error auth_digest:error socache_shmcb:warn mpm_worker:warn fcgid:info I think with a little patience you can figure out the best log level config for your needs. Cheers Mario On 8 February

Re: 2.4.3, build with vc11 (2012)

Hi, Alternatively porting the php build script (autoconf-like system, implemented in javascript, using cscript), it is very flexible and allows exact match to what is done using the unix autoconf configure options. I'm for it. An automatic build script no matter the language would be awesome.

Re: svn commit: r1396838 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/mod/mpm_winnt.xml

Hi, IMHO the example should be AcceptFilter http none AcceptFilter https none instead of AcceptFiler none Cheers mario On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 12:35 AM, rbo...@apache.org wrote: Author: rbowen Date: Wed Oct 10 22:35:19 2012 New Revision: 1396838 URL:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.3 as GA

+1 on debian 6 and Windows Thanx for the Win SSL Fix Am Sonntag, 19. August 2012 schrieb Jim Jagielski : +1 on: fed16, OSX 10.8.0, FreeBSD 8.3 On Aug 17, 2012, at 1:34 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.3 can be found at the usual

Re: Apache httpd 2.4.x on Windows

Hi Claudio, I assumed that EOW meant end of week. Greetz Mario On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 11:15 PM, Claudio Caldato (MS OPEN TECH) claud...@microsoft.com wrote: Hi Mario, Very sorry for the delay. It is taking a little longer than expected for the developer to get familiar with the code, we

Re: Apache httpd 2.4.x on Windows

Hi Claudio, did anything came out yet from your research? Cheers Mario

Re: Need feedback for Apache 2.4.2

Hi Pravesh, Have realized that Apache 2.4.2 don't have Win32 source available on download page (http://httpd.apache.org/download.cgi#apache24). Can you please let us know, whether the same will be available in near future? there is no need to have an extra package for windows. You can use

Re: Status of Windows-work for 2.4.x

Is here any progess? Since there is a nice guy from microsoft, we should use that! Mario Send from my toaster via IPv6 On Thursday, May 17, 2012, Gregg Smith wrote: On 5/14/2012 6:08 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: On May 13, 2012, at 11:04 AM, Steffen wrote: No news from here too. Complaints

Re: [Vote] Add commentary system to httpd docs

+1 [+/-1] Add commentary system to the trunk documentation.

Re: [Vote] Release mod_fcgid 2.3.7

+1

Re: 2.4.2 Windows still beta.

Hi, Noticed (no discuss) that AccepFilter https none is still broken. At the very least we are no longer holding the rest of the 2.4.x community hostage (by delaying releases) because of Windows issues :/ I realy understand Steffens point. But 2.4.1 with that issue is already released. I

Re: [Patch] mod_cache_socache (to replace mod_mem_cache)

+1 On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 01:33, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote: Hi all, During development of mod_cache, mod_disk_cache was renamed to mod_cache_disk to make it possible to have a sensible name for this module, mod_cache_socache, which replaces mod_mem_cache from httpd v2.2.

Re: Announcement 2.4.1

Hi Bing, On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 15:56, Bing Swen bs...@pku.edu.cn wrote: There will ben Windows source files for us to test. The source files are the same. Just the line endings are different. With the lineends.pl you can change that easily srclib\apr\build\lineends.pl Cheers Mario

Re: httpd 2.4.1 and mod_slotmem_shm / mod_proxy_balancer (AH01179)

On Windows this happens, too when not running as Adminstrator. Running the same config as Administrator it works smoothly. [Tue Mar 06 09:53:59.734436 2012] [proxy_balancer:emerg] [pid 7064:tid 356] (OS 5)Access forbidden : AH01179: balancer slotmem_create failed [Tue Mar 06 09:53:59.735436

Re: worker slotmem_grab failed (2.4.1)

Hi, that bug is reported. https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52402 There is no solution with vhosts yet. Cheers Mario

Re: [RESULT] Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.1

On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 13:56, Daniel Ruggeri drugg...@primary.net wrote: I haven't done much building on Windows. Does anyone have a good link/suggestions to begin producing httpd builds with openssl/openldap included? I'll send you a quick how to. Cheers Mario

Re: [RESULT] Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.1

Hi, On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 17:22, Michael Felt mamf...@gmail.com wrote: If this is generic to builds, I would appreciate the HOWTO (link) as well as this is very specific to Windows build. But if you want to see it. See the second post in this topic[1] I am investigating howto build httpd

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.1

[X] +1: Good to go Alomost all stuff is working well on Windows. It can't hurt to get more user feedback now. Introducing event mpm as no longer experimental on *nix system is also very nice. Mario

Re: Intent to TR 2.4.1

Hi, On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 04:55, Gregg Smith g...@gknw.net wrote: PR 52402 works for me, not with the configuration in the PR, but these errors are gone As long as I point BalancerMember to other machines, it works just fine I have the same now using an external server. With the localhost

Re: Intent to TR 2.4.1

Bug 52402[1] isn't working yet. I wonder why it is marked as fixed in 2.4.x CHANGES[2] The shared memory stuff doesn't work yet on windows. Odd Behavior: 1. If mod_auth_digest is loaded and on Windows Vista/2008/7 do not try to start from console, it will not start. 2. If mod_heartmonitor is

Re: [VOTE] Bundle apr/apu with 2.4.x

 [x] +1: Bundle apr/apu w/ Apache httpd 2.4.x  [ ] +0: I don't care  [ ] -1: Do not bundle apr/apu with Apache httpd 2.4.x

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.0

On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 16:53, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: If I had access to Windows I would. I don't. I can give you accces to a win2k8 32 bit box, if you need to have access. Mario

Re: Win 2.3.16 :: Server Status Entries

I figured out that using EnableMMAP off causes the L status. I tried it in combination with EnableSendfile off and without. I hope that helps finding the error. Greetz Mario On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 21:08, Steffen i...@apachelounge.com wrote: That's not expected. Can any Windows Seniors comment

Re: Win 2.3.16 :: Server Status Entries

, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote: On 04.01.2012 11:02, Mario Brandt wrote: I figured out that using EnableMMAP off causes the L status. I tried it in combination with EnableSendfile off and without. By without you mean EnableSendfile On or just default? Note that the default

Re: 2.4.0 GA This week?

I agree with Gregg, this server is the best I ever worked with. Since one of the early betas I run it on my prod systems on windows and *nix. Except for known issues it works like a charm. A public beta or RC does not hurt. More testers may find some more stuff to fix. An api freeze coulod gve the

Re: 2.4.0 GA This week?

The loadbalancer still crashes on windows. See https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52402 IMHO a blocker for GA. Cheers Mario On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 18:47, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: I'm proposing a TR of 2.4.0 this week with a release sometime next week... I'll RM.

Re: Looking for Windows testers for r1225199

I guess it is now r1225223 ? Cheers Mario On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 15:57, Stefan Fritsch s...@sfritsch.de wrote: Hi, Author: sf Date: Wed Dec 28 14:54:49 2011 New Revision: 1225199 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1225199view=rev Log: Check during configtest that the directories for

Advanced status table?

Since 2.3.? there is this nice overview table in the server-status page. http://www.images-hack.de/bild.php/15079,statusKCQ3G.png Since it shows the status for apache working with threads. Why I see that only with event mpm, and not with worker mpm nor winnt mpm? It is a real nice to have

Re: 2.3.15 on Windows

My test build of mod_subersion 1.7.1 against 2.3.15 works also well. Sound like progress, which is all we ask for version revs :)

Re: Pushing for httpd 2.4.0 GA

Hi, The only 2 showstoppers I see as reasonable are the documentation ones and the mod_fcgid one. What is about the Windows AcceptFilter issues?[1] Greetz Mario [1] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=1155061

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.3.14 as beta

Non binding +1 Tested on Windows with VC9

Re: Please test the build

The ldap revert also affects Windows/Netware. It would be nice if someone could confirm that mod_ldap+mod_authnz_ldap build correctly on these platforms. In r1150510 both build fine on Windows. Tested to build x86 with VC9. APR 1.4.5, APU 1.3.9, pcre 8.02 Mario

Re: mod_fcgid in httpd tarball?

I really like to see this included in 2.3.x For me it runs great since ages on Windows[1] and Linux. Mario [1] expect of Bug 50309 (patch included)

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.3.10 tarballs as Alpha

+1 Win7 x86 and x64 build On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 13:51, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: The Apache httpd 2.3.10-alpha test tarballs are available at:        http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ Please vote on whether to release as 2.3.10-alpha. I expect that this will be the last alpha

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] Apache-Test-1.34 RC1

I had a few issues on Win7 Subroutine MY::test redefined at C:\build\Apache-Test-1.34-rc1\Makefile.PL line 168. t\log_watch.t Use of uninitialized value $fn in unlink at t\log_watch.t line 16. t\log_watch.t Dubious, test returned 22 (wstat 5632, 0x1600) Test hang itself

Re: Apache httpd 2.3.10-alpha pretest tarballs....

+1 on Win7 (latest unix tarballs of APR, APR-Util and APR-Iconv, ossl 1.0.0c and pcre 8) On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 17:03, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: The Apache httpd 2.3.10-alpha pre-test tarballs are available at:        http://people.apache.org/~jim/httpd-2.3.10-alpha Please do

  1   2   >