Hi,
Eric's fix did not fix because I'm building with APR 1.7.0.
In apr.hw 1.7.0 there is
/* If we have a TCP implementation that can be "corked", what flag
* do we use?
*/
#define APR_TCP_NOPUSH_FLAG @apr_tcp_nopush_flag@
/* Is the TCP_NODELAY socket option inherited from listening socket
d performance compared to other XML
libraries. I note that it has a C++ wrapper which is LGPL'ed so there are
likely to licensing/distribution issues if I ever decided to try release
code under an Apache License.
Regards,
John
).
The input and output buffers appears to be 8-bit char* based but I can't see
any references to specific encodings.
How do I go about massaging the input & output into UTF-8 and fixed width
16-bit Unicode?
Are there any good references on how to achieve this?
Regards,
John
--
John Dougrez-Lewis
this capability?). But for now, you're
right, I can do what I need to do with Curl or some other client.
Thanks,
John M
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 7:29 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> On Oct 30, 2012, at 3:12 PM, John M wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have a new feature r
modify and where it would go in the
codebase..
Thanks,
John M
, we would love to have your help.
I'm not on the mailing list, so please CC me on any correspondence if
interested in helping or want more information about Calxeda and our ARM-based
SOCs.
Thanks,
John Mao
Calxeda
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> (adding dev@apr, since some of the report covers apr code)
>
>
> There are some harmless bugs, some bugs which are truly useful to fix
> beyond "cleanness", and false positives. I can't tell you how many of
> each ;)
>
> I'm sure some of the
files
are located here:
https://sites.google.com/site/apache2scan/clang-scan.tar.gz
Regards,
John Smith.
question were completely missing, so the next possibility is an
occasional DNS lookup failure.
cheers
John
Paul Querna wrote:
mod_log_forensic was created for exactly this purpose:
<http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_log_forensic.html>
hope that helps,
Paul
tually doing,
rather than what you think it's doing.
Definitely - I've decided to bite the bullet and run tshark in the
background, hopefully that will turn up some new information. Debugging
an error which happens at random a few times a month is an interesting
challenge!
cheers
John
;m trying to avoid that if possible.
cheers
John
ey is not in the KEYS file. Obviously having it there would be
nice for at least ~5 of us. :-)
John
t's
actually sounding like a much simpler solution now!
thanks
John
Hi,
I've solved the problem, though I may not exactly understand how.
It was an issue with the way I was building the module, which was
fixed once I added in the flags I got from "apr-config --cppflags".
(I used to rant that the mostly-undocumented design change to apxs in
apache 2.0 was
could be added to the
docs.
cheers
John
don't have a hard limit, some suggested values could be added to the
docs.
cheers
John
that's not possible, is there a way to reserve a child for a
particular request, vhost, or source IP?
thanks
John
build log for the full details.
Regards,
John Smith.
httpd-2.2.9.compile.log.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
thing.
cheers
John
Hi folks,
Who's currently maintaining flood? I'm hoping to put in some time on
improvements in the next month or two but might need to discuss it with
someone to avoid submitting silly patches.
cheers
John
Already tested up thread, fixes the issue nicely .. thanks
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 3:07 PM, Ruediger Pluem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On 03/04/2008 08:28 PM, John D'Ausilio wrote:
> >
> > mod_authnz_ldap.c(774): [client 10.5.131.52] [31275] auth_ldap
&g
That did the trick .. thanks!
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 2:40 PM, Eric Covener <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 2:28 PM, John D'Ausilio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > authorise: require group (sub-group): authorisation successful
> >
e group: testing for group membership in
"CN=bar,OU=Applications,OU=Resources,OU=Groups,DC=AD,DC=XXX,DC=com"
mod_authnz_ldap.c(747): [client 10.5.131.52] [31275] auth_ldap
authorize: require group: testing for member: CN=D'Ausilio\\,
John,OU=eDevlopment,OU=IT,OU=AD_Users,DC=AD,DC=XX
ly!) into developing flood, so I'll keep the
list posted on that.
cheers
John
Hi folks,
I grabbed flood from svn and built it according to the instructions at
http://httpd.apache.org/test/flood/
I've been getting 'Regular expression match failed' most of the time,
and even tried running one of the examples:
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/
Hi Seth,
I'm glad to help out with particular questions on either side -- mysql
or apache.
JD
On Feb 7, 2008, at 6:20 AM, Joe Lewis wrote:
Seth Cherney wrote:
OK, I signed onto this list about 4 months ago, and have never seen
anything remotely close to my low level of skill posed as a
alid concern? If so , how
can I reclaim the connection-related memory or use a
different memory pool?
Thanks,
John
en I tried
apache 2.0, I merely pointing the *.lib and *.h files
to the apache 2.0 folders (to generate the mod_my.so
for apache 2.0).
Thanks again for your help any further suggestions.
John
Hi,
I am seeing a very strange issue with per-server config processing.
Consider a config directive:
{ "ServerThing",
(CMD_HAND_TYPE) config_server_thing,
NULL,
RSRC_CONF, TAKE1,
"For Testing"
}
I have a struct to hold the per-server configuration (struct srv).
An inst
with my config? Or is the
responsetemplate / responsename functionality broken?
I have mimicked this test with wget, some command line tools, and siege,
but have yet to validate flood's results.
Any help on this would be greatly appreciated.
Let me know if you need more information.
Thanks in advance,
John Cook
Regards,
John M.
Jim Gallacher wrote:
> A new mod_python 3.2.2 beta tarball is now available for testing.
> Hopefully this will be the last beta before the official 3.2 release.
>
> Here are the rules:
>
> In order for a file to be officially annou
_include.c
This isn't what I expect from the docs and it seems an extremely
strange thing for a _server_ to be doing. At the least it should be
documented (and maybe made optional?)
John
the day, if somebody can't work out what that means who's
going to want to read their pages anyway? :-)
John
> Note: I haven't actually tested this in mod_cache. Very similar code
> works very well elsewhere.
s (device, inode
number) but that's not always very useful: for security reasons you
can't actually open a file from its device and inode number.
John
William,
Dagone spam filtering, this patch never made it to the
list. Well I'll send it again, from a different e-mail..
So, here's the patch that fixes it for Netscape/Mozilla,
and whatever other browsers work similarly.
John Wojtowicz
Senior Secure Systems Engineer
Truste
the Date header has changed,
and nothing else.
John Wojtowicz
Senior Secure Systems Engineer
Trusted Computer Solutions
2350 Corporate Park Drive
Suite 500
Herndon, VA 20171
P: 703-318-7134
F: 703-318-5041
can dish them up to php scrips. I have some questions about the
security of this scheme, mostly about the ability to forge/spoof the
main URI (mostly from a php script).
Other comments are also welcome.
John.
--
John Newbigin - Computer Systems Officer
School of Information Technology
Swinburne
First of all, thanks for all the effort that goes into apache. We
switched from NCSA to apache1 longer ago than I like to remember..
The rewriting guide has a short section called "On-the-fly
Content-Regeneration" but it's actually just "Generation" as there's no
way for the server to know if the
. Thx.
John Kolvereid
www.akaodin.com
Actually I thought you should have kept your mouth shut
rather than bullying somebody else.
You clearly could do with going to the user line before you "promote"
yourself
and or demote others. ;(
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 15 Oct 2003, Joshua Slive wrote:
Oops. Actually, the argument
d appeared
twice in the httpd.conf file. Is this supposed to happen? -John
__
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
http://shopping.yahoo.com
On Friday, August 15, 2003, at 08:51 AM, Farheen Jafri wrote:
apxs -L /usr/include/c++/ -L
/usr/include/c++/3.2/i386-redhat-linux/ -I/usr/lib/ -i
-c mod_replace.cpp
Hi Farheen -
1) what version of apache?
2) are any of your symbols defined in the so (use 'nm' and grep for
them)?
3) is your code d
On Thursday, August 14, 2003, at 05:20 PM, Colm MacCarthaigh,,, wrote:
Can you just confirm it's listening in v6 only ? the output of
"netstat -an | grep LISTEN" (Darwin has netstat and grep, right?)
should be enough.
heh. very funny:
% netstat -an | grep LISTEN
tcp46 0 0 *.80
On Thursday, August 14, 2003, at 03:55 PM, Colm MacCarthaigh,,, wrote:
Patch attached. Since I havnt got a DARWIN machine to test on I
can't confirm it works, but it should. It works on Linux anyway
(not that it needs to).
Darwin might need some slightly different sa.[members] set to make
getnamei
--On Wednesday, August 13, 2003 17:13:33 -0700 Justin Erenkrantz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I just committed fixes to sync up the other way (NULL returns) and
added
back the 'retry' logic if we have IPv6-enabled, but not configured
(but
in a different way than before).
Hey Justin -
I'm still
On Thursday, August 14, 2003, at 01:06 PM, Colm MacCarthaigh,,, wrote:
.. or similar. The darwin one is complicated, but I know of at least
3 people running Apache on Darwin for months, all they've been doing
is changing v6_broken to 0 in the apr configure script ;)
Yup.. that worked. make that 4
g binary.
#hardcode_minus_L=no
hardcode_minus_L=yes
==
I'm not sure if this should be considered a libtool bug, although I believe
the flags are set by configure.
--John
John Fortin - Pepsi Bottling Group
(914) 767-7844
Singing
ATH
with the same result.
--John
John Fortin - Pepsi Bottling Group
(914) 767-7844
Singing is Life - The Rest is Just Details!!
http://www.newyorkerschorus.org
http://www.spebsqsa.org
-Original Message-
From: Bill Stoddard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2003 11:37 AM
./configure
--prefix=/var/opt/dist/apache20/apache2.0.47 --enable-so --enable-ssl
--enable-rewrite --enable-headers
I'm thinking this may be a libtool issue, but I'm not sure/
Any pointers would be appreciated!!
Thanks!
John
John Fortin - Pepsi Bottling Group
(914) 767-7844
Based on
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9222
mod_deflate shouldn't do anything when let's say my
PHP script outputs with the header;
Content-Encoding: deflate
Unfortunately, I've noticed that it still does it
occasionally.
Here's part of the transmission that I've managed to
I've been doing some development with SOAP recently
and I've noticed that the SOAP toolkits I have namely
SOAP::Lite (PERL) and PocketSOAP (Visual Basic, Win32)
only supports deflate encoding. After searching
through the archives for this mailing list, someone
was saying that there are no HTTP clie
>-- Original Message --
>From: Geoff Thorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Nonetheless, I'd like to know who the person(s) are that are behind the
>statement in the STATUS file so that I can find out what it is (exactly)
>that they mean and what (if any) history there is to the idea. "session
>cache store sh
As a side note, check the archives, this conversation has happened many
times before.
sterling
>-- Original Message --
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2003 12:44:26 -0700
>From: Chris Monson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Contribution and Accepted Pra
>-- Original Message --
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 16:59:41 -0500 (EST)
>From: Cliff Woolley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>I'm still unclear why this requires a full-blown regex. Isn't all we
>really need to do to loop over the delimiters (semicolon and comma),
>remove whitespac
>-- Original Message --
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 18:39:05 +0100 (CET)
>From: Dirk-Willem van Gulik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: mod_authn_mysql
>
>Any one any objections to me adding that into the 2.0 tree as soon as we
>have a few +1's. I can kind of use it in the regr
Hi -
>-- Original Message --
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 08:45:33 -0700
>From: "Brad Nicholes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: Standarizing mod_auth_ldap across LDAP SDKs...
>
>This model was already supported in mod_auth_ldap
Hi Brad -
the only suggestion I would have is to try to support SOME backward compatibility
(e.g. if StartTLS directive is used switch the url to ldaps or something
like that).
Looks like great progress for the software, though - I too would like to
see it committed.
sterling
>-- Original Message --
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From: Martin Kutschker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: mod_authn_mysql
>Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 12:08:02 +0100 (MET)
>
>> Looking at existing 1,3 modules for sybase, postgress, msql and mysql
>> I see that we essentially
Hi -
This is more of a question for the users list, not the dev list, but i'll
answer below:
>-- Original Message --
>Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 19:15:56 +0100
>From: Estrade Matthieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>[Wed Jan 29 19:02:00 2003] [error] [client 192.168.100.3] (9)Bad file
>descriptor: Could not ope
Not using basic authentication. basic auth IS the browser dialogue based
authentication. you will need to write your own auth module to accept the
username and password from the vars.
sterling
>-- Original Message --
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From: "Laxmikanth M.S." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To:
I know Gerald Richter has a mod_perl module that does what you are describing.
might be worth a peek.
perldoc Apache::ImageMagick
sterling
you would not want to modify the core for this. You would want to use optional
functions and add an optional function to mod_cgi to register for it. Then
have mod_cgi notify all registered methods of any stderr data.
sterling
>-- Original Message --
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RFC on
>-- Original Message --
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 13:22:20 -0500
>From: Rodent of Unusual Size <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: Apache Developers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: modification!
>
>
>not acked. he seems to be saying that the 2.0 msi should
>be renamed 1.3 ..?
>-
note as i said in the original email, the problem was that mod_auth
was enabled, not a problem with auth_ldap.
sterling
On Wednesday, October 23, 2002, at 05:19 PM, Estrade Matthieu wrote:
Hi,
I finally made mod_auth_ldap work.
First, basic authentication:
AuthName auth
AuthType Basic
Then
>-- Original Message --
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 18:07:30 +0200
>From: Estrade Matthieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: mod_auth_ldap
>
>
>John K. Sterling wrote:
>
>>try disabling mod_auth.
&g
try disabling mod_auth.
sterling
>-- Original Message --
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 17:33:26 +0200
>From: Estrade Matthieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: mod_auth_ldap
>
>
>Hi,
>
>I am using apache 2.0 + proxy + mod_auth_ldap
>
>i have this error i
erling
On Wednesday, October 16, 2002, at 02:47 AM, Xavier MACHENAUD wrote:
> Ooops!
> I wanted to say I was NOT using authoritative mode!
>
> In this case, I want to be able to restrict a require to only one auth
> module.
>
> Xavier
>
> john wrote:
>>
>>> -
>-- Original Message --
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 18:27:18 +0200
>From: Xavier MACHENAUD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: ability to restrict scope of require directive to a single module
Hi,
>
>I'm facing the following problem :
>I'm using 2 auth mo
On Wednesday, October 2, 2002, at 08:07 PM, Joshua Slive wrote:
>
>
>
>
> require valid-user
>
>
>
>
> require valid-user
>
>
> This has the effect of leaving GET unrestricted, according to the bug
> report. Is this correct behavior? It seems like, since the other
> methods
> are not cha
>-- Original Message --
>Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 11:19:53 -0700
>From: Greg Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: auth stuff still broken
>
>
>But since our running of auth hooks comes from server/, then this stuff
>could prolly go there as well. IMO, it sucks that our "core" server knows
>about
>-- Original Message --
>Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 10:26:02 -0700
>From: Aaron Bannert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: auth stuff still broken
>
>
>+1 for the core, or at least a module that's always statically compiled
>(which is easy to do with the .m4 macros we have).
Yup - I suppose if we do
On Wednesday, September 11, 2002, at 04:55 PM, Jon Travis wrote:
> Jeff,
>
> I cc'd the dev@ lists, since the original proposition was made there,
> and the public following the discussion should know the resolution.
>
> My comments at the end.
to Rasmus' point - maybe the group should have jus
>-- Original Message --
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 06:57:33 -0700
>From: Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: resolving aaa related symbol in auth_provider.c
>
>
>On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 09:57:5
Hi -
this brings up an issue I noticed while implementing the AddAuthProvider
scheme (to allow multiple providers per location):
Don't you think the register method should be implemented as an optional
function? This would elminate these linking issues but it would also
allow third party mod
i have the really old cvs/ssh windows binaries here:
http://zlilo.com/ssh/
works for command line cvs'ing on windows.
you just need to set HOME and CVS_RSH env variables.
-j
>-- Original Message --
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 09:47:01 -0700 (PDT)
>From: Scott Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Friday, September 6, 2002, at 04:53 PM, Andy Cutright wrote:
> hi,
>
> so could you possibly speak those unspeakable hacks you've made to
> apache to run c++ modules on hp? we're trying to get a c++ module
> linked into 2.0.39. any help would be appreciated. we can take this
> particular a
>-- Original Message --
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2002 16:24:01 +0200
>From: Peter Van Biesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Vote: mod_jk connector in /experimental
>
>
>Point taken. I didn't think about that. The problem is that it is not at
>all c
Here we go.
kitchen sink come on - we let a module into experimental (auth_ldap) and
suddenly experimental will become the CPAN of apache.
I think this is a silly idea personally. More cruft to maintain and to
hold back releases, etc. etc. etc. Until Aaron's (et. al) idea of a module
regis
>-- Original Message --
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 00:49:14 -0700
>From: Aaron Bannert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: authn/authz split
>Do you think this new feature is well-defined enough to warrant
>a new revision number? I'd like to see us
If we do wait for 2.1, it would give us the opportunity to collaborate and
make this really clean..you could just create a repository for the new
auth modules (even on sourceforge or something) - assuming not too many
core changes are required.
sterling
>-- Original Message --
>Reply-To: [EM
Hi -
>-- Original Message --
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 04:50:52 -0700
>From: Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: authentication rewrite
>I'm not sure I like mod_authz_dbm.c either. Hmm. But, frankly, I
>just can't come up with s
Hi -
>-- Original Message --
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 16:14:20 -0400
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From: Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: more on the charter (was: El-Kabong -- HTML Parser)
>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>Would it destroy APR to fold e-k into it...
Hi -
>-- Original Message --
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 09:51:09 -0700
>From: Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: authentication rewrite
>
>
>On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 10:12:43AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Without seeing use cas
Hi -
Shouldn't a new thread be spawned for an(other) ldap vote (its deja vu all
over again :)
sterling
>-- Original Message --
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 08:20:05 -0600
>From: "Brad Nicholes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re
Hi Justin -
>-- Original Message --
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 23:44:32 -0700
>From: Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: authentication rewrite
>
>My point is that I need to add another front end authentication
>module (namely withi
Hmm -
My biggest concern here is that you are now adding another layer of
abstraction on the apache api. It seems nice in theory, but it is not
very extensible. If this were to be going in only for the simple auth
modules we currently support (which are almost never changed or
augmented) i
>-- Original Message --
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2002 16:59:08 +0200
>From: Graham Leggett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: Brad Nicholes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: ldap
>
>
>I think the LDAP SSL stuff in the v1.3 module was largely b
>-- Original Message --
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2002 20:33:02 +0200
>From: Graham Leggett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: ldap
>
>mod_ldap* was supposed to be part of v2.0, but happened too close to GA
>for people to feel comfortable with it's stability. It looks like pe
Even Better: lets just make the whole damn configuration interface pluggable
(yup, this has been suggested since the dinosaurs.). We're on the right
track now that the config file is parsed at startup time
sterling
>-- Original Message --
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From: "Jonas Erik
On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
...snip
> >
> >
> > AuthTypebasic
> > AuthNameRestricted area
> >
> > require valid-user
> >
> >
> >
> > Same here when using a GET
On Sun, 21 Jul 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > I have often spoke of having a per directory/location ordering of auth
> > handleres. This would allow you to load a bunch of auth handler modules,
> > then in a given directory elect which ones are run, and what order they
> > run in (and the
On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, [ISO-8859-1] André Malo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 'AuthAuthoritative off' and related give the possibility to put some
> auth modules into a chain. But it seems that this directive is not very
> useful in conjunction with the 2.0 API.
AuthAuthoritative is really just a way to tell mo
Hopefully this is the right place to send this comment. I have alot of
disk images (.img) on my server. By default, there is no icon for a disk
image.
So I made one...
AddIcon /icons/diskimg.gif .img
The diskimg.gif can be found at:
http://www.essenz.com/icons/diskimg.gif
Could this be
On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 11:21:52PM -0400, Greg Ames wrote:
+ john sachs wrote:
+ > all cgis fail with:
+ > [Tue Oct 23 14:04:33 2001] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] Premature end of script
+headers: /home/john/public_html/suexec.cgi
+
+ yeah, that message sucks canal water. It's abo
current apache with mod_suexec bails on cgis.
is this a known issue?
i didnt see anything like it in STATUS...
all cgis fail with:
[Tue Oct 23 14:04:33 2001] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] Premature end of script headers:
/home/john/public_html/suexec.cgi
same cgis works when mod_suexec is not
what is the case that causes segfault?
i'd like to get a test into httpd-test to catch this.
-j
i applied this patch and the mod_include test fails in the same spot as it has been.
content file has:
'include file' with relative path to file not in same path as the file you are
requesting.
causes segv. here is stacktrace:
#0 0x80c4056 in ap_getparents (
name=0x816a840 "INTERNALLY G
this is killer. dav tests wont work unless you have HTTP::DAV and the whole ton of
modules it requires. i plan to rewrite dav.t to use HTTP::Webdav which requires less
and seems to do more.
On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 03:07:41PM -0700, Ian Holsman wrote:
+ Here is a sample 'from a nightly test ru
100 matches
Mail list logo
