* William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 2:01 PM, André Malo wrote:
> > * Yann Ylavic wrote:
> > > It seems that RedirectMatch isn't documented without the third (URL)
> > > argument, unless in .
> >
> > Huh? Actually it is (or maybe I'm not getting something here). I checked
> > at l
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 2:01 PM, André Malo wrote:
> * Yann Ylavic wrote:
>
> > It seems that RedirectMatch isn't documented without the third (URL)
> > argument, unless in .
>
> Huh? Actually it is (or maybe I'm not getting something here). I checked at
> least back until 2.0.
>
> http://httpd.a
Could we check that the proposed patch works and that "everyone" is
OK w/ the implementation as well as maintaining the behavior.
My hope would be to T&R 2.4.16 the end of this week :)
You are correct, however the "syntax" never illustrated this.
It seems we need two syntaxes, not a [target] optional argument.
On Jun 22, 2015 2:02 PM, "André Malo" wrote:
> * Yann Ylavic wrote:
>
> > It seems that RedirectMatch isn't documented without the third (URL)
> > argument, unless in .
* Yann Ylavic wrote:
> It seems that RedirectMatch isn't documented without the third (URL)
> argument, unless in .
Huh? Actually it is (or maybe I'm not getting something here). I checked at
least back until 2.0.
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/mod/mod_alias.html#redirect clearly
documents t
Some tests added for framework in r1686886.
These cover:
Redirect 403 /forbidden
RedirectMatch 403 /f+
Redirect 403
and should address the 2.4.13-15 regression.
I also changed the minimum version activating the expr tests
(Graham's), from 2.5 to 2.4.15.
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 4:32 PM, Jim
A sort of unusual case though, first fix is a docs patch, then a test case
for the newly-documented 16 year old behavior :) +1 to the collected
feedback and plan.
On Jun 22, 2015 9:32 AM, "Jim Jagielski" wrote:
> Agreed. We should also, everytime we catch something like this,
> add a test-case to
Agreed. We should also, everytime we catch something like this,
add a test-case to the perl test framework to ensure we don't trip
over it again :)
> On Jun 22, 2015, at 8:24 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
>
> Am 22.06.2015 um 14:04 schrieb Jeff Trawick:
>> On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 8:02 AM, Jim Jagielski
Am 22.06.2015 um 14:04 schrieb Jeff Trawick:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 8:02 AM, Jim Jagielski mailto:j...@jagunet.com>> wrote:
Seems that 3rd time was NOT the charm.
Due to the regression I am canceling this VOTE.
Let's patch 2.4.16-dev ASAP to handle this and I will T&R 2.4.16
f
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 4:50 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group
wrote:
> -1 from me as well on the release. Looks like we are a little bit out of luck
> with 2.4.x releases recently :-).
I'll show some uncharacteristic optimism -- in a way we have been very
lucky to catch both issues during voti
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 8:02 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Seems that 3rd time was NOT the charm.
>
> Due to the regression I am canceling this VOTE.
>
> Let's patch 2.4.16-dev ASAP to handle this and I will T&R 2.4.16
> forthwith.
>
Thanks, Jim! We'll get through this eventually :)
(And thanks S
Seems that 3rd time was NOT the charm.
Due to the regression I am canceling this VOTE.
Let's patch 2.4.16-dev ASAP to handle this and I will T&R 2.4.16
forthwith.
OK...
+1:
o OSX 10.10.3, Xcode 6.3.2: x86_64
o FreeBSD 9.4, 10.1: x86_64
o CentOS 6.6, 7: x86_64
> On Jun 19, 2015, at 12:50 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.15 can be found
> at the usual place:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 12:56 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>
> The attached patch enables expressions for context only a
> redirect status.
*and* a redirect status.
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 12:26 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 10:50 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group
>> @Yann: Wouldn't it make sense to check for cmd->path as well before we do
>> the expression parsing stuff to ensure we are really in a
>> section?
>
> Yes, that's where I wa
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 10:50 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group
wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Eric Covener [mailto:cove...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Montag, 22. Juni 2015 01:08
>> To: Apache HTTP Server Development List
>> Subject: Re: [VOT
> -Original Message-
> From: Eric Covener [mailto:cove...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Montag, 22. Juni 2015 01:08
> To: Apache HTTP Server Development List
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.15 as GA
>
> On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 5:24 PM, William A Rowe Jr
> w
On 6/21/2015 11:24 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
As this is not a regression from 2.4.13 or 2.4.14 candidates, it seems to
me we should ship.
I am mostly a lurker on this list but I feel I need to chime in on this.
The mistake with that sentiment is that it is imposing largely invisible to
user
On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 5:24 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> As this is not a regression from 2.4.13 or 2.4.14 candidates, it seems to me
> we should ship.
I am -1 for 2.4.15 with the regression. The other candidates being
broken doesn't mitigate it much for me.
--
Eric Covener
cove...@gmail
On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 11:24 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
>
> Pulling Coar/Bowen '04 "Apache Cookbook" off the shelf, this error was
> propagated by the last example in 5.8 (and likely elsewhere);
>
> Redirect gone /foo.html
>
> which likely isn't working in 2.4.15.
It is (still) working since
On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 2:11 PM, Reindl Harald
wrote:
>
> Am 21.06.2015 um 21:02 schrieb Yann Ylavic:
>
>> It seems that RedirectMatch isn't documented without the third (URL)
>> argument, unless in .
>>
>
All the way back to 1.3... the fact that it worked at all was a coincidence.
If this were
Am 21.06.2015 um 22:05 schrieb Yann Ylavic:
On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 9:37 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 21.06.2015 um 21:28 schrieb Yann Ylavic:
On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 9:04 PM, Reindl Harald
wrote:
Am 21.06.2015 um 21:00 schrieb William A Rowe Jr:
Reindl,
Try reverting
http://svn.apac
On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 9:37 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 21.06.2015 um 21:28 schrieb Yann Ylavic:
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 9:04 PM, Reindl Harald
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Am 21.06.2015 um 21:00 schrieb William A Rowe Jr:
Reindl,
Try reverting
http://svn.apache.org/
Am 21.06.2015 um 21:28 schrieb Yann Ylavic:
On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 9:04 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 21.06.2015 um 21:00 schrieb William A Rowe Jr:
Reindl,
Try reverting
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1663259 and see if
this resolves your observed defect.
could you p
On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 9:04 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 21.06.2015 um 21:00 schrieb William A Rowe Jr:
>>
>> Reindl,
>>
>> Try reverting
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1663259 and see if
>> this resolves your observed defect.
>
>
> could you provide a unified diff fo
Am 21.06.2015 um 21:02 schrieb Yann Ylavic:
It seems that RedirectMatch isn't documented without the third (URL)
argument, unless in .
And [1] broke your configuration, assuming "^\/something\/$" is an
expression (not a regex).
[1] http://svn.apache.org/r1663259
that may be true but
* it is
Am 21.06.2015 um 21:00 schrieb William A Rowe Jr:
Reindl,
Try reverting
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1663259 and see if
this resolves your observed defect.
could you provide a unified diff for inclusion in the RPM-SPEC for
revert that commit, i can't build outside rpm
It seems that RedirectMatch isn't documented without the third (URL)
argument, unless in .
And [1] broke your configuration, assuming "^\/something\/$" is an
expression (not a regex).
[1] http://svn.apache.org/r1663259
On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 7:52 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> in fact RedirectMatc
Reindl,
Try reverting http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1663259
and see if this resolves your observed defect.
On Jun 21, 2015 12:53 PM, "Reindl Harald" wrote:
> in fact RedirectMatch is *completly* broken
>
> RedirectMatch 404 ^\/something\/$
>
> and *any* URI get a 404 respon
No issues/regressions seen with VC9/10/11/14 running XP/win7/win8+/win10 and
server 2012+/2016.
> Op 21 jun. 2015 om 19:30 heeft Gregg Smith het volgende
> geschreven:
>
>> On 6/19/2015 9:50 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.15 can be found
>> at t
in fact RedirectMatch is *completly* broken
RedirectMatch 404 ^\/something\/$
and *any* URI get a 404 response not just with the long list from my
previous post
Am 21.06.2015 um 18:57 schrieb Reindl Harald:
-1
just rebuilt my httpd rpm with the
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/httpd-2.4.15.
On 6/19/2015 9:50 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.15 can be found
at the usual place:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.15 GA.
[X] +1: Good to go
VC9/12 and various Windows flavors.
T
-1
just rebuilt my httpd rpm with the
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/httpd-2.4.15.tar.bz2 on my testserver
and all vhosts are coming with a 404 page and nothing in the errorlog
first i thought it's a https problem cause by a self signed wildcard
certificate, but the same after remove the m
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 6:50 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.15 GA.
>
> [X] +1: Good to go
No regression, with event and worker, included apr-1.5.2 and apr-util-1.5.4.
Tested systems:
* Debian 8 - 64bit,
* Debian 7 - 64bit,
* Debian 6 - 64b
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.15 can be found
> at the usual place:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.15 GA.
>
>
[X] +1: Good to go
Test suite p
> On Jun 19, 2015, at 10:50 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.15 can be found
> at the usual place:
>
>http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.15 GA.
>
> [ ] +1: Good to go
> [ ] +0: meh
On 20/06/2015 02:50, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.15 GA.
using included apr 1.5.2 and apr-util 1.5.4 and with mysql (mariadb)
+1 Slackware 13.1 -> 14.1
> PS: Hopefully, 3rd time's the charm!
:)
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> [ ] +1: Good to go
+1 AIX/xlc/PPC64 100% pass
The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.15 can be found
at the usual place:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.15 GA.
[ ] +1: Good to go
[ ] +0: meh
[ ] -1: Danger Will Robinson. And why.
Vote will last the normal 72 hr
39 matches
Mail list logo