Re: Lua detection autoconf mess (was: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30)

On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 11:46 AM, Joe Orton wrote: > On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 09:23:50PM +0100, Yann Ylavic wrote: >> Though this is the "else" (legacy) branch. >> >> $ pkg-config --list-all |grep ^lua > ... >> lua51 Lua - Lua language engine >> lua52

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30

All; With the release issues identified during validation, we will call this vote CLOSED with the statement that 2.4.30 is not suitable for public release. I apologise for the clerical error in not noting this sooner. On 2018/02/19 14:54:35, wrote: > Hi, all; > >Please find below the p

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30

It likely makes sense to CLOSE this vote with the result that 2.4.30 is not being released... > On Feb 19, 2018, at 9:54 AM, drugg...@primary.net wrote: > > Hi, all; >Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ >

Re: Lua detection autoconf mess (was: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30)

On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 09:23:50PM +0100, Yann Ylavic wrote: > Though this is the "else" (legacy) branch. > > $ pkg-config --list-all |grep ^lua ... > lua51 Lua - Lua language engine > lua52 Lua - Lua language engine > lua5.2

Re: Lua detection autoconf mess (was: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30)

On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 9:10 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 6:56 PM, Joe Orton wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 10:04:30AM -0600, William A Rowe Jr wrote: >>> Correct, as I said this may not be a regression, as it continues to locate >>> /use/lib64 files. >>> >>> Modern ld is t

Re: Lua detection autoconf mess (was: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30)

On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 6:56 PM, Joe Orton wrote: > On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 10:04:30AM -0600, William A Rowe Jr wrote: >> Correct, as I said this may not be a regression, as it continues to locate >> /use/lib64 files. >> >> Modern ld is tolerant on linux at least when not in -Wall more. Other arch

Re: Lua detection autoconf mess (was: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30)

On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 2:17 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: > Hm, it work for me on Centos 6 and 7. What lua packages have you installed? > I only have the 64 bit versions installed. Do you have 32 bit versions > installed as well? The delta between the first attempt after installing lua-devel.i686 b

Re: Lua detection autoconf mess (was: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30)

On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 10:04:30AM -0600, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > Correct, as I said this may not be a regression, as it continues to locate > /use/lib64 files. > > Modern ld is tolerant on linux at least when not in -Wall more. Other archs > may not be so kind. r1825147 works for me on Fedora

Re: Lua detection autoconf mess (was: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30)

Correct, as I said this may not be a regression, as it continues to locate /use/lib64 files. Modern ld is tolerant on linux at least when not in -Wall more. Other archs may not be so kind. On Feb 23, 2018 09:15, "Eric Covener" wrote: >> Do you end up with an -L/usr/lib for the module in your

Re: Lua detection autoconf mess (was: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30)

>> Do you end up with an -L/usr/lib for the module in your CentOS example? >> Did it happen to pick up the lib64 path? Or no lib path at all? > > /usr/src/apache/httpd-2.4.x/srclib/apr/libtool --silent --mode=link gcc > -std=gnu99 -pthread -Wall -O2 -g -o > mod_lua.la -rpath /usr/src/apa

Re: Lua detection autoconf mess (was: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30)

On 02/23/2018 03:43 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 2:17 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: >> Hm, it work for me on Centos 6 and 7. What lua packages have you installed? >> I only have the 64 bit versions installed. Do you have 32 bit versions >> installed as well? >> >> On 02/22

Re: Lua detection autoconf mess (was: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30)

On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 2:17 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: > Hm, it work for me on Centos 6 and 7. What lua packages have you installed? > I only have the 64 bit versions installed. Do you have 32 bit versions > installed as well? > > On 02/22/2018 10:54 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: >> This wasn't pr

Re: Lua detection autoconf mess (was: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30)

Hm, it work for me on Centos 6 and 7. What lua packages have you installed? I only have the 64 bit versions installed. Do you have 32 bit versions installed as well? On 02/22/2018 10:54 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > This wasn't pretty; candidate 2.4.30 build on current fedora... > > /path/build

Lua detection autoconf mess (was: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30)

This wasn't pretty; candidate 2.4.30 build on current fedora... /path/build/libtool --silent --mode=link gcc -g -O2 -pthread -L/path/lib -o mod_lua.la -rpath /path/modules -module -avoid-version lua_apr.lo lua_config.lo mod_lua.lo lua_request.lo lua_vmprep.lo lua_dbd.lo lua_passwd.lo -L/usr

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30

Wow! Nice work! > Am 21.02.2018 um 21:34 schrieb Rainer Jung : > > Am 19.02.2018 um 15:54 schrieb drugg...@primary.net: >> Hi, all; >>Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ >> I would like to call a VOTE over the next fe

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30

Am 19.02.2018 um 15:54 schrieb drugg...@primary.net: Hi, all;    Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate tarball as 2.4.30: [ ] +1: It’s not jus

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30

Am 19.02.2018 um 15:54 schrieb drugg...@primary.net: Hi, all;    Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate tarball as 2.4.30: [ ] +1: It’s not jus

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30

On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 6:06 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > -1: I think with the release process hiccups and the Win issues > noted in the "Current branche 2.4.30-dev issues" thread, > we will need a 2.4.31. Additionally, there are some > backports in STATUS that could also be folded in. Very sensibl

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30

s/(#define\s+AP_SERVER_DEVBUILD_BOOLEAN\s+)\d/${1}1/g; >>>> >>>> if(/(#define\s+AP_SERVER_PATCHLEVEL_NUMBER\s+)(\d+)$/){ >>>> $new = $2 + 1; >>>> $_ = "${1}${new}\n"; >>>> } >>>> ' includ

RE: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30

> -Original Message- > From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:j...@jagunet.com] > Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2018 6:10 AM > To: dev@httpd.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30 > > Another thing that helps is providing some heads-up > that a T&R will a

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30

/ap_release.h?view=markup#l47 >> >> It makes sense that the tag comes from a specific commit where the variable >> was flipped... Should I adjust the script and retry? >> >> -- >> Daniel Ruggeri >> >> From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:j...@jagunet.com] >>

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30

-1: I think with the release process hiccups and the Win issues noted in the "Current branche 2.4.30-dev issues" thread, we will need a 2.4.31. Additionally, there are some backports in STATUS that could also be folded in. > On Feb 19, 2018, at 9:54 AM, drugg...@primary.net wrote: > > Hi, all; >

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30

gt; http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/tags/2.4.30/include/ap_release.h?view=markup#l47 > > It makes sense that the tag comes from a specific commit where the variable > was flipped... Should I adjust the script and retry? > > -- > Daniel Ruggeri > > From: Jim J

RE: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30

flipped... Should I adjust the script and retry? -- Daniel Ruggeri From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:j...@jagunet.com] Sent: Monday, February 19, 2018 9:46 AM To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30 Hmmm... I'm not seeing the patch where AP_SERVER_DEVBUILD_BOOLEAN in

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30

> On Feb 19, 2018, at 10:47 AM, Graham Leggett wrote: > > On 19 Feb 2018, at 5:45 PM, Jim Jagielski > wrote: > >> Hmmm... I'm not seeing the patch where AP_SERVER_DEVBUILD_BOOLEAN >> in ap_release.h is set to 0 >> >> How does your release process work? What we've alw

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30

On 19 Feb 2018, at 5:45 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > Hmmm... I'm not seeing the patch where AP_SERVER_DEVBUILD_BOOLEAN > in ap_release.h is set to 0 > > How does your release process work? What we've always > done is make the req changes to the branch and then copy > from that branch to the tag. S

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30

Hmmm... I'm not seeing the patch where AP_SERVER_DEVBUILD_BOOLEAN in ap_release.h is set to 0 How does your release process work? What we've always done is make the req changes to the branch and then copy from that branch to the tag. So the tag itself must refer to a specific SVN number on the htt

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30

> Am 19.02.2018 um 15:54 schrieb : > > Hi, all; >Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > > I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate > tarball as 2.4.30: > > [ ] +1: It’s not jus

[VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30

Hi, all; Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate tarball as 2.4.30: [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! [ ] +0: Let's have a talk