Jason Kissinger wrote:
Ian,
Were you able to verify our test results?
sorry ..
I've been out of my office for a while.
I'll have a look as soon as I get back in.
--Ian
-Jason
Ian Holsman wrote:
Jess M. Holle wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 11:54 AM
. Holle wrote:
Subject:
RE: Apache 1.3.x and 2.0.x Performance Issue
From:
Clay Webster [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:
Tue, 27 Aug 2002 13:49:15 -0700
To:
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jess,
Were IIS
At 11:54 AM 8/29/2002, Jess M. Holle wrote:
Jason Kissinger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) responded:
Windows clients hitting Solaris servers does not exhibit this problem.
Only Solaris clients hitting Windows servers. I'm unsure if other UN*X
have this problem, Linux and Windows does not. And Solaris
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 11:54 AM 8/29/2002, Jess M. Holle wrote:
Jason Kissinger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) responded:
Windows clients hitting Solaris servers does not exhibit this
problem. Only Solaris clients hitting Windows servers. I'm unsure
if other UN*X have this problem, Linux
Note:
wget was used in all measurements.
Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
It would be nice if the client used was somehting like 'ab' - which comes
with apache ran at 1-100 concurrency; or something like fetch, curl or
wget to make the client identical on all platforms.
Dw
On Tue, 27 Aug
PROTECTED]
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/new-httpd/post?protectID=125212253105056135218149051077181241248144166046039109074
*Date:* Thu Aug 29, 2002 12:22 pm
*Subject:* Re: Apache 1.3.x and 2.0.x Performance Issue
At 11:54 AM 8/29/2002, Jess M. Holle wrote:
Jason Kissinger ([EMAIL PROTECTED
Jess M. Holle wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 11:54 AM 8/29/2002, Jess M. Holle wrote:
Jason Kissinger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) responded:
Windows clients hitting Solaris servers does not exhibit this
problem. Only Solaris clients hitting Windows servers. I'm unsure
if other UN*X
Ian Holsman wrote:
Jess M. Holle wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 11:54 AM 8/29/2002, Jess M. Holle wrote:
Jason Kissinger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) responded:
Windows clients hitting Solaris servers does not exhibit this
problem. Only Solaris clients hitting Windows servers. I'm
At 04:07 PM 8/29/2002, you wrote:
client: SunOS 5.8 Generic_108528-15 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Blade-1000
test1: wget http://w2k/8mbfile == 80KB/s
test2: wget http://w2k/webapp/8mbfile == 1MB/s
client: Linux 2.4.18-3smp
test1: wget http://w2k/8mbfile == 8MB/s
test2: wget http://w2k/webapp/8mbfile
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 05:46:11PM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
I'm really beginning to suspect a borked sendfile implementation. Suggest
that you try disabling sendfile on solaris and repeat the test.
Solaris 8 doesn't have sendfile (sendfilev). I think Solaris 9 as
well as really
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002, Jess M. Holle wrote:
* recent Apache 1.3.x on Windows:
o client on Solaris (8): 80K/sec
o client on Linux or Windows: 8MB/sec
* recent Apache 2.0.x on Windows:
o client on Solaris (8): 120K/sec
o client on Linux or
It would be nice if the client used was somehting like 'ab' - which comes
with apache ran at 1-100 concurrency; or something like fetch, curl or
wget to make the client identical on all platforms.
Dw
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002, Jess M. Holle wrote:
Ian Holsman wrote:
Jess M. Holle wrote:
Both Apache 1.3.x and 2.0.x suffer a severe perfomance issue when the server
is on Windows and the client is Solaris (and perhaps others).
Before you stop reading this as simply "we know Windows does not perform
well", I should point out that this does not occur when the client is Windows
or
Jess M. Holle wrote:
Both Apache 1.3.x and 2.0.x suffer a severe perfomance issue when the
server is on Windows and the client is Solaris (and perhaps others).
Before you stop reading this as simply we know Windows does not perform
well, I should point out that this does not occur when
Ian Holsman wrote:
Jess M. Holle
wrote:
Both Apache 1.3.x and 2.0.x suffer a severe perfomance
issue when the server is on Windows and the client is Solaris (and perhaps
others).
Before you stop reading this as simply "we know Windows does not perform
well", I should point out that
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 4:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Apache 1.3.x and 2.0.x Performance Issue
Ian Holsman wrote:
Jess M. Holle wrote:
Both Apache 1.3.x and 2.0.x suffer a severe perfomance issue when the server is on
Windows and the client is Solaris (and perhaps
27, 2002 4:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Apache 1.3.x and 2.0.x Performance Issue
Ian Holsman wrote:
Jess M. Holle wrote:
Both Apache 1.3.x and 2.0.x suffer a severe perfomance issue when the server is on
Windows and the client is Solaris (and perhaps others).
Before you stop
17 matches
Mail list logo
