Hi everyone,
A couple of good news.
First, now mod_wasm and its dependency wasm_runtime are successfully built as
part of a new test in Travis CI:
https://app.travis-ci.com/github/apache/httpd/jobs/591640483
The changes have been added to the open PR #335:
https://github.com/apache/httpd/pull
On 11/22/22 4:24 PM, Sandeep 1. Maurya (EXT-NSB) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the update...
> If OpenSSL3.0 is not planned does it mean then HTTPD 2.4.x will extend
> support for OpenSSL 1.1.1. on EL8 beyond below timelines.
This has nothing to do with EL8. We don't deliver OpenSSL. httpd has
@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: FW: Support for OpenSSL 3.0 in HTTPD
On 11/22/22 1:02 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 3:46 AM Sandeep 1. Maurya (EXT-NSB)
> wrote:
>> As per OpenSSL release strategy "Version 1.1.1 will be supported
>> until 2023-09-11 (LTS)". Will
On 11/22/22 1:02 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 3:46 AM Sandeep 1. Maurya (EXT-NSB)
> wrote:
>> As per OpenSSL release strategy "Version 1.1.1 will be supported until
>> 2023-09-11 (LTS)". Will HTTPD extend the support for OpenSSL 1.1.1 on EL8
>> beyond this timeline or the
On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 3:46 AM Sandeep 1. Maurya (EXT-NSB)
wrote:
> As per OpenSSL release strategy "Version 1.1.1 will be supported until
> 2023-09-11 (LTS)". Will HTTPD extend the support for OpenSSL 1.1.1 on EL8
> beyond this timeline or there any plan to update to OpenSSL 3.0
Sounds like a
Dear Team,
As per OpenSSL release strategy "Version 1.1.1 will be supported until
2023-09-11 (LTS)". Will HTTPD extend the support for OpenSSL 1.1.1 on EL8
beyond this timeline or there any plan to update to OpenSSL 3.0
Thanks and Regards
Sandeep Maurya
Hi!
News: http://signlanguageforbaby.com/qyib/page.php
toki...@aol.com
@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: FW: [PATCH ASF bugzilla# 55897]prefork_mpm patch with SO_REUSEPORT
support
Dear all,
I just want to ping on both of these two patches to see if there is anything we
can do to help them get accepted.
Your feedbacks and comments are very much appreciated.
Thanks,
Yingqi Lu
From
@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: FW: [PATCH ASF bugzilla# 55897]prefork_mpm patch with SO_REUSEPORT
support
Dear all,
Based on the feedback we received, we modified this patch. Here is the most
recent version. We also modified the Bugzilla database(Bugzilla# 55897 for
SO_REUSEPORT patch; Bugzilla
AM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: FW: [PATCH ASF bugzilla# 55897]prefork_mpm patch with SO_REUSEPORT
support
On Tuesday 04 of March 2014, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> For the configure-time check for 3.9 kernel: I think we'd also use
> AC_TRY_COMPILE at configure time to confi
On Tuesday 04 of March 2014, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> For the configure-time check for 3.9 kernel: I think we'd also use
> AC_TRY_COMPILE at configure time to confirm that the SO_REUSEPORT
> definition is available, and not enable it if the system includes doesn't
> define it. (Does that cause a pro
Hi Jeff,
Thanks very much for your time reviewing the patch! We will modify the patch
according to your comments and repost it here.
Thanks,
Yingqi
From: Jeff Trawick [mailto:traw...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2014 10:08 AM
To: Apache HTTP Server Development List
Subject: Re: FW
d put "APLOGNO()" and
don't add reminders in comments
* this doesn't seem portable: "int free_slots[MAX_SPAWN_RATE/num_buckets];"
and so on
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Yingqi
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Lu, Yingqi
> *Sent:* Monday, February 24, 20
:37 AM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: FW: [PATCH ASF bugzilla# 55897]prefork_mpm patch with SO_REUSEPORT
support
Thanks very much, Jeff!
Thanks,
Lucy
From: Jeff Trawick [mailto:traw...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 10:36 AM
To: Apache HTTP Server Development List
Subject: Re
Hi Jeff,
I am just checking if you got chance to check this?
Thanks,
Lucy
From: Lu, Yingqi
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 10:37 AM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: FW: [PATCH ASF bugzilla# 55897]prefork_mpm patch with SO_REUSEPORT
support
Thanks very much, Jeff!
Thanks,
Lucy
From
Thanks very much, Jeff!
Thanks,
Lucy
From: Jeff Trawick [mailto:traw...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 10:36 AM
To: Apache HTTP Server Development List
Subject: Re: FW: [PATCH ASF bugzilla# 55897]prefork_mpm patch with SO_REUSEPORT
support
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Lu
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Lu, Yingqi wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>>
>>
>> I just want to ping again on this patch to gather your feedback and
>> comments. Please refer to the messages below for patch details.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Yin
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Lu, Yingqi wrote:
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> I just want to ping again on this patch to gather your feedback and
> comments. Please refer to the messages below for patch details.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Yingqi
>
Hi Yinqqi,
I'm sorry that nobody has responded yet. I'll try
Hi All,
I just want to ping again on this patch to gather your feedback and comments.
Please refer to the messages below for patch details.
Thanks,
Yingqi
From: Lu, Yingqi
Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 11:13 AM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH ASF bugzilla# 55897]prefork_mpm patch
All,
I sent some information/an announcement to us...@httpd.apache.org, and was
advised to forward it here. So here goes...
Sincerely,
Rob Mattson
Please consider the environment - do you really need to print this email?
-Original Message-
From: Jorge Schrauwen [mailto:jorge.schrau...@
Hi,
enquiries wrote:
Hello
Is there any reason why we keep getting these emails?
The reason is simply that someone in your organization subscribed to
this mailing list. If you do not like getting the emails, you may
unsubscribe and then ask the person in question to use a personal email
ad
Hello
Is there any reason why we keep getting these emails?
Thanks
Mark Pilling
Advice Service Manager
British Lung Foundation
Orleans House
Edmund St
Liverpool L3 9NG
Tel: 08458 505020
Fax: 0151 224 7779
-Original Message-
From: Perry Smith [mailto:pedz...@gmail.com]
Sent: 23 Januar
Graham Leggett wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
IMHO, that's the difference between having a dialog and having something
in hand to comment on. With the .0-alpha tarball, people could make a
specific comment, such as [T +10 days from now]...
Am I right in understanding that it remains poss
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
IMHO, that's the difference between having a dialog and having something
in hand to comment on. With the .0-alpha tarball, people could make a
specific comment, such as [T +10 days from now]...
Am I right in understanding that it remains possible to make changes to
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Nick Kew wrote:
Paul Querna wrote:
Hi dev@,
FYI, I intend to roll 2.3.0-alpha, our first release from trunk in
about 3 years, on Saturday December 6th.
How about starting the process not with a roll, but with a proposed
software configuration and feature set?
IMH
Nick Kew wrote:
> Paul Querna wrote:
>> Hi dev@,
>>
>> FYI, I intend to roll 2.3.0-alpha, our first release from trunk in
>> about 3 years, on Saturday December 6th.
>
> How about starting the process not with a roll, but with a proposed
> software configuration and feature set?
IMHO, that's the
Not sure what happened to this yesterday ... reposting.
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 17:32:50 +
From: Nick Kew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: Intent to Roll 2.3.0-alpha
Paul Querna wrote:
> Hi dev@,
>
> FYI, I intend to roll 2.3.0-alpha, our fi
Hi Jeff,
Thanks for your reply.
The httpd.exe of Apache web server has two processes running in windows.
When we kill the parent httpd.exe the child httpd.exe is still running and
listening to the web request. I don't want this.
I want to modify this in such a way that if I kill the parent htt
Learn more about Chase Paymentech Solutions,LLC payment processing services at
www.chasepaymentech.com.
THIS MESSAGE IS CONFIDENTIAL. This e-mail message and any attachments are
proprietary and confidential information intended only for the use of the
recipient(s) named above. If you are
From: "Michael Vergoz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 2:38 PM
Subject: merging server config bug ?
Hi
I must embark a pointer (different) in each server_rec to allow to
differentiate the server env.
I thus use the callback create_server_config which return a pointer whic
On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 01:45:32PM -0500, Eric Covener wrote:
> Echoing the interest check... Attaching similiar patches for 2.0 and
> trunk ( separate versions only to accomodate diff)
Looks good based on a desk review. Thanks, I'll try to get to them
soon.
--
Colm MacCárthaigh
On 1/15/06, R, Rajesh (STSD) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I was wondering why mod_cgid had not implemented Rlimit* commands.
> it is used in mod_cgi though. May be we can apply it for mod_cgid too.
>
>
> I got it working by applying the included patch.,(on 2.0.54) Is it
> something mod_cgid can s
Please respond,
I was wondering why mod_cgid had not implemented Rlimit* commands.
it is used in mod_cgi though. May be we can apply it for mod_cgid too.
I got it working by applying the included patch.,(on 2.0.54) Is it
something mod_cgid can support right now or are there any known
vulnerab
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Querna" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 12:24 PM
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Branch 2.1.x on May 13
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
This has somewhat turned into the real question, What are the show
stoppers for a 2.2 GA Branch?
If you believ
I have created a bug report on this http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/long_list.cgi?buglist=34266
From: Krishnamurthy,
Srinivasamurthy
Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005
6:10 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: balancer ignores query
string ...
I am pretty sure this is a bug,
enky_naganathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : samedi 2 avril 2005 02:42
À : dev@httpd.apache.org
Objet : Re: Fw: apr_shm_create
I had the same issue. It appears to be bug in apr_shm_create in
Apache 2.0. The bug is hard to characterize. The first time i start
it would fail. (My filename was bas
I had the same issue. It appears to be bug in apr_shm_create in
Apache 2.0. The bug is hard to characterize. The first time i start
it would fail. (My filename was based on pid of the httpd process.
Then i would stop apache & restart retaining the old shmem file, it
would work. If i cleanup th
I had the same issue. It appears to be bug in apr_shm_create in
Apache 2.0. The bug is hard to characterize. The first time i start
it would fail. (My filename was based on pid of the httpd process.
Then i would stop apache & restart retaining the old shmem file, it
would work. If i cleanup th
On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 12:52:00PM -0700, Wayne S. Frazee wrote:
> On Monday 13 December 2004 11:26, TAYLOR, TIM (CONTRACTOR) wrote:
> > Wayne,
> > have you looked into the SSLOptions +FakeBasicAuth directive?
> >
>
> Fakeauth allows the transfer of the DN to use as a basic name, which is fine,
On Monday 13 December 2004 11:26, TAYLOR, TIM (CONTRACTOR) wrote:
> Wayne,
> have you looked into the SSLOptions +FakeBasicAuth directive?
>
Fakeauth allows the transfer of the DN to use as a basic name, which is fine,
however the problem I am having is more along the lines of verifying the
in
Wayne,
have you looked into the SSLOptions +FakeBasicAuth directive?
regards,
tt
317-510-5987
-Original Message-
From: Wayne S. Frazee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 13, 2004 12:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Auth LDAP Authentication of Client SSL
I am interest
This commit message bounced because it exceeded the mailer daemon's size
limit.
Here's the list of changed files. You can see the details of the diffs via the
link below.
Brian
Author: brianp
Date: Fri Nov 26 23:28:04 2004
New Revision: 106690
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=rev&rev=1066
I took a look at the worker and prefork mpms and it seems that
make_child registers the just_die function for SIGTERM for child
processes. Now just_die does try to do a gracefull shutdown by calling
clean_child_exit, but what happens if clean_child_exit gets called
twice?
Hopefully I'm just readin
Yes, it works. I thought I tried with double quotes. My mistake.
Thanks,
Chou
> -Original Message-
> From: Brad Nicholes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, July 16, 2004 3:59 PM
> To: MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino); [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: FW: Bug
through to [EMAIL PROTECTED] list]
-Madhu
-Original Message-
From: Tair-Shian Chou [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2004 3:10 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: FW: Bug in AuthLDAPURL?
Hi Graham,
I did try that and it did not work.
Thanks,
Chou
>
[Forwarding on behalf of Tair-Shian Chou who has problems getting his
mail through to [EMAIL PROTECTED] list]
-Madhu
-Original Message-
From: Tair-Shian Chou [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2004 3:10 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: FW: Bug in AuthLDA
Another mail..
-Madhu
>-Original Message-
>From: CHOU,TAIR-SHIAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1)
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Friday, June 11, 2004 7:05 PM
>To: Mathihalli, Madhusudan
>Subject: FW: util_ldap [Bug 29217] - Remove references to
>calloc() and free()
>
&g
I'm forwarding on behalf of my collegue (as his mails are not reaching
the list)
-Madhu
>-Original Message-
>From: CHOU,TAIR-SHIAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1)
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Friday, June 11, 2004 7:04 PM
>To: Mathihalli, Madhusudan
>Subject: F
'
> Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; Ghanta, Bose
> Subject: FW: OpenSSL modifications from Stratus
>
> Hi,
>
> It is sent on March 23. It is in the queue at openssl-dev archive mailing
> list. "Patches for Stratus VOS" dated 3-23-2004.
> We would appre
Mathihalli, Madhusudan wrote:
Somehow the message just went to Sander !
-Madhu
-Original Message-
From: Mathihalli, Madhusudan
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2004 11:01 AM
To: 'Sander Striker'
Subject: RE: SEGV in allocator_free
-Original Message-
From: Sander Striker [mailto:[EMA
Somehow the message just went to Sander !
-Madhu
>-Original Message-
>From: Mathihalli, Madhusudan
>Sent: Friday, March 19, 2004 11:01 AM
>To: 'Sander Striker'
>Subject: RE: SEGV in allocator_free
>
>
>
>
>>-Original Message-
>>From: Sander Striker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[SNI
Nedelcho Stanev wrote:
sending this twice, since i did'n get this in mail list.
may be there are some problem
mailing list is probable VERY slow, thanks to all the worms
to clean up your shared memory, try looking at ipcs and ipcrm.
you need to remove the shared memory segments from ther via ipcr
sending this twice, since i did'n get this in mail
list.
may be there are some problem ?
- Original Message -
From: Nedelcho Stanev
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2003 2:43 PM
Subject: apr_shm_create
Hello All,
i have this problem when i use shared memory with
A
> From: Cliff Woolley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, July 06, 2003 4:40 AM
> On Sat, 5 Jul 2003, Joshua Slive wrote:
>
> > One possible thing we could do is simply remove the sample proxy config
> > from our default httpd.conf. These samples make it too easy for people to
> > activate
On Sat, 5 Jul 2003, Joshua Slive wrote:
> One possible thing we could do is simply remove the sample proxy config
> from our default httpd.conf. These samples make it too easy for people to
> activate a proxy without securing it properly.
+1
--Cliff
André Malo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> * Joshua Slive wrote:
>
> [spam via proxy]
> > One possible thing we could do is simply remove the sample
> proxy config
> > from our default httpd.conf. These samples make it too
> easy for people to
> > activate a proxy without securing it proper
riginal Message -
From: "Joshua Slive" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2003 7:44 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: Spam postings via Apache to postfix on the same host
>
> On Sat, 5 Jul 2003, David Reid wrote:
> > > 203.98.177.
* Joshua Slive wrote:
[spam via proxy]
> One possible thing we could do is simply remove the sample proxy config
> from our default httpd.conf. These samples make it too easy for people to
> activate a proxy without securing it properly.
+1! Since proxying is not the primary purpose of the httpd
On Sat, 5 Jul 2003, David Reid wrote:
> > 203.98.177.86 - - [24/Jun/2003:12:33:27 +0200] "POST
> > http://xx.xx.xx.xx:25/ HTTP/1.1" 200 208
Yes, it's an apache configuration problem. They set "ProxyRequests On"
without properly securing their proxy server. This means they can be
abused for ton
Fun.
- Original Message -
From: "Info iNetD" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2003 7:34 PM
Subject: Spam postings via Apache to postfix on the same host
>
> Hello,
>
> Hello,
>
> I have found out on two different machines that somebody is posting s
Rahul Kohli wrote:
1) If the 2.0.45 header files will be backwards compatible with apache 2.0.43.
Here is how we would state it:
Build your module for 2.0.43 and it will work with 2.0 releases >= 2.0.43.
There is no promise that your module will load into an older Apache, and
you may rely on c
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FW: httpd.exp for Apache 2.0.43
Rahul Kohli wrote:
> I was able to resolve the shmmat error by exporting the environment variable EXTSHM.
>
> Please suggest me how can I make my library compatible to later versions as well.
> Right now I
>hav
Rahul Kohli wrote:
Regarding the function ap_custom_response() , for this we have added our own
>implementation that is specific to apache 2.0 on AIX.
Don't call it that!
You shouldn't use the ap_ or apr_ or apu_ prefixes at all for your
symbols, much less implement a function/method with the s
3 5:47 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FW: httpd.exp for Apache 2.0.43
Rahul Kohli wrote:
> I was able to resolve the shmmat error by exporting the environment variable EXTSHM.
>
> Please suggest me how can I make my library compatible to later versions as well.
> Right now I
Rahul Kohli wrote:
I was able to resolve the shmmat error by exporting the environment variable EXTSHM.
Please suggest me how can I make my library compatible to later versions as well. Right now I
>have made a change to remove -G and -brtl option and using apr.exp ,
aprutil.exp.exp.
The link
-bE:my_lib.exp
But how can I make this work on 2.0.45 version and later. Kindly suggest.
> Rahul Kohli
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Trawick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 4:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FW: httpd.exp for Apache 2.0.43
Rahul Kohli wr
Rahul Kohli wrote:
We are able to load the library by importing symbols from apr.exp and aprutil.exp and
>removing the -G option.
There's an issue with that for you to be aware of...
Build with Apache < 2.0.45, and apr.exp and aprutil.exp specify that the
names of apr and aprutil are libapr.so
ome system parameter or some patch need to be
applied to resolve this issue.
Thanks,
> Rahul Kohli
-Original Message-
From: Rahul Kohli
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 2:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: FW: httpd.exp for Apache 2.0.43
S
June 03, 2003 12:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FW: httpd.exp for Apache 2.0.43
Rahul Kohli wrote:
> Stas,
>
> As per your suggestion I removed -bE , -G option and added -brtl instead
> but
still the issue remains the same
>
> The new com
Rahul Kohli wrote:
Stas,
As per your suggestion I removed -bE , -G option and added -brtl instead
but
still the issue remains the same
The new command is as mentioned below:
/usr/vacpp/bin/makeC++SharedLib_r -p 0 -bnoipath
../../Rosette30/unix/lib/aix-xlC_r/libbtunicode.so -b
M:SRE -brtl -berok -
-blibpath:/usr/lib/threads:/usr/ibmcxx/lib:/usr/lib:/lib
-s -bI:apache/httpd/2.0.43/aix43/server/httpd.exp
Thanks,
> Rahul Kohli
-Original Message-
From: Stas Bekman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 10:43 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
awick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 6:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FW: httpd.exp for Apache 2.0.43
Stas Bekman wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
Stas Bekman wrote:
the only part I've heard about where run-time linking doesn't always
work is when two piece
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 6:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FW: httpd.exp for Apache 2.0.43
Stas Bekman wrote:
> Jeff Trawick wrote:
>
>> Stas Bekman wrote:
>>
>> the only part I've heard about where run-time linking doesn't always
&
Stas Bekman wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
Stas Bekman wrote:
the only part I've heard about where run-time linking doesn't always
work is when two pieces of code implement the same symbol, since there
is a flat namespace... traditional AIX dynamic linking is two-level
namespace, where for each sy
Jeff Trawick wrote:
Stas Bekman wrote:
When I've ported mod_perl 2.0 build to AIX, I have resorted to just
using -berok (which is one of the flags enabled by -G). -G itself
didn't quite work, I don't remember why. However I was told that it
depends on which compiler is used, I've heard that thi
Stas Bekman wrote:
When I've ported mod_perl 2.0 build to AIX, I have resorted to just
using -berok (which is one of the flags enabled by -G). -G itself didn't
quite work, I don't remember why. However I was told that it depends on
which compiler is used, I've heard that this postpone-symbol-re
Jeff Trawick wrote:
Run-time linking on AIX isn't a set of libraries to link with; it is
instead a particular mode of resolving symbols with shared libraries
that doesn't use hard-coded paths such as those specified in httpd.exp,
apr.exp, and aprutil.exp.
Instead of telling the linker to look
Rahul Kohli wrote:
I am facing the same type of problem mentioned by you. Originally I was
>running my application on Apache 1.3.26 & i was using httpd.exp.
I assume you have ported your application to Apache 2 API? You can get
the same symptom by trying to load a module written for Apache 1.3.
Rahul Kohli wrote:
Thanks Jeff.
I am facing the same type of problem mentioned by you. Originally I was running my application on Apache 1.3.26 & i was using httpd.exp. It was working fine. apachectl start started the server properly & our library was loaded.
Now we are switching to apache 2.0.4
Thanks Jeff.
I am facing the same type of problem mentioned by you. Originally I was running my
application on Apache 1.3.26 & i was using httpd.exp. It was working fine. apachectl
start started the server properly & our library was loaded.
Now we are switching to apache 2.0.43 and facing error
Ben Laurie wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
my suggestion on apache-modules was to set c->aborted in the
pre-connection hook, presumably after passing the descriptor
successfully to another process
ap_lingering_close() doesn't perform the shutdown() if c->aborted
Icky! Presumably the nice thing to do
Jeff Trawick wrote:
>> While this is probably a bad idea, I bet that if you could trick
>> ap_lingering_close() not to close your socket when the connection is
>> closed, you might be able to get away with this.
>>
>> The relevent line in server/connection.c:214 is:
>>
>> apr_socket_t *csd = ap_ge
On Fri, 30 May 2003, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
> I'm getting _TONS_ of those, can I please ask you kindly to wait at
> least 24 hours between copying files onto www.apache.org/dist/httpd and
> announcing it to people? Nagoya is rsyncing every six hours, but even then a
> lot of people are complain
While this is probably a bad idea, I bet that if you could trick
ap_lingering_close() not to close your socket when the connection is
closed, you might be able to get away with this.
The relevent line in server/connection.c:214 is:
apr_socket_t *csd = ap_get_module_config(c->conn_config, &core_
--On Friday, May 30, 2003 8:38 AM + Atli Thorbjornsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I use pre_connection to access the socket from Apache and, on certain
requests, hand it off to another process. Only problem is Apache seems to
call shutdown() on sockets once it is done with a request w
--On Friday, May 30, 2003 1:56 PM +0200 André Malo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Pier Fumagalli wrote:
I'm getting _TONS_ of those, can I please ask you kindly to wait at
least 24 hours between copying files onto www.apache.org/dist/httpd and
announcing it to people? Nagoya is rsyncing every s
Hello,
I use pre_connection to access the socket from Apache and, on certain
requests, hand it off to another process. Only problem is Apache seems to
call shutdown() on sockets once it is done with a request which ultimately
kills the socket. That makes perfect sense but is there anyway I
* Pier Fumagalli wrote:
> I'm getting _TONS_ of those, can I please ask you kindly to wait at
> least 24 hours between copying files onto www.apache.org/dist/httpd and
> announcing it to people? Nagoya is rsyncing every six hours, but even then a
> lot of people are complaining because the fil
Folks,
I'm getting _TONS_ of those, can I please ask you kindly to wait at
least 24 hours between copying files onto www.apache.org/dist/httpd and
announcing it to people? Nagoya is rsyncing every six hours, but even then a
lot of people are complaining because the files can't be downloaded.
The following message came into the moderation queue for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bringing to this list for any followup past my own.
Patrick: yes, we *do* intend to continue maintenance for 1.3. There will
probably continue to be some minor feature work, but 1.3 is mostly about
maintenance [including se
Got a ton of those lately... It's proably because
http://nagoya.apache.org/mirror/httpd/binaries/win32/
Advertises that the last stable version is 2.0.43, while in the files we
have 2.0.44...
Pier
-- Forwarded Message
From: "Daniel Trifonov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTE
-- Forwarded Message ---
From: David Axmark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Paul Querna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: 20 Feb 2003 01:01:03 +0100
Subject: Re: libmysqlclient && Re: mod_authn_mysql
Sorry about the late answer. Got a cold and a bad email back log :-(
We are willing to state in o
Sander,
This patch is needed in 2.0.44 to fix a compile break. I have already committed
it to 2.0 and 2.1
Bill
stoddard2003/01/08 11:22:29
Modified:os/win32 Tag: APACHE_2_0_BRANCH ap_regkey.c util_win32.c
Log:
Fix compile break on Windows due to apr/include/arch/win32/* filename re
Unless I'm missing something, this patch would make the
proxy vulnerable to a DoS. An attacker could cause the
httpd to buffer an arbitrarily large amount of data simply
by sending an arbitrarily large request body, right?
Brian
On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 15:55, Bill Stoddard wrote:
> Any objections
> "Bill Stoddard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Any objections to porting this to 2.0?
> >
> > Bill
> >
> > jerenkrantz2002/12/08 21:37:27
> >
> > Modified:.CHANGES
> >modules/proxy proxy_http.c
> > Log:
> > Rewrite how proxy sends its request to allow
Jeff Trawick wrote:
"Bill Stoddard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Any objections to porting this to 2.0?
Bill
jerenkrantz2002/12/08 21:37:27
Modified:.CHANGES
modules/proxy proxy_http.c
Log:
Rewrite how proxy sends its request to allow input bodies to morph
"Bill Stoddard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Any objections to porting this to 2.0?
>
> Bill
>
> jerenkrantz2002/12/08 21:37:27
>
> Modified:.CHANGES
>modules/proxy proxy_http.c
> Log:
> Rewrite how proxy sends its request to allow input bodies to morph th
Any objections to porting this to 2.0?
Bill
jerenkrantz2002/12/08 21:37:27
Modified:.CHANGES
modules/proxy proxy_http.c
Log:
Rewrite how proxy sends its request to allow input bodies to morph the request
bodies. Previously, if an input filter changed the r
On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> Subject: Re: FW: Older version of apache2
>
> So you suggest initially populating old/ and then symlinking the
> now-current version in the main download directory at the old/
> target, instead? It would still initially download the
> From: Roy T. Fielding [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 26 November 2002 22:28
>> So you suggest initially populating old/ and then symlinking the
>> now-current version in the main download directory at the old/
>> target, instead? It would still initially download the package
>> twice, and t
1 - 100 of 212 matches
Mail list logo
