I still stand by "Apache Server Framework" as the best choice.
I like this a lot too!
(Or either Apache World Dominitation Project j/k)
--
~Jorge
Well I'm on vacation so thats why I don't reply much.
But i do agree that it does more than just just HTTP.
this will be even more true if mod_ftp gets out of incubator.
So I'm not really for the HTTP in de name.
On 8/10/06, Colm MacCarthaigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at
Paul Querna wrote:
>
> I still stand by "Apache Server Framework" as the best choice. The ASF'S
> ASF is the ultimate way to deliver data from a server :)
:) ++1
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 12:26:23PM -0700, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>>> Pretty darned quiet - either "it's summer" or nobody feels like
>>> joining the fray when Roy and Will go at it?
>> Well, Paul's talk in San Diego got me thinking. We'
e, nd, sctemme, maxime
Apache niq (implicit)
Pretty darned quiet - either "it's summer" or nobody feels like
joining the fray
when Roy and Will go at it?
In any case, although I don't disagree with niq that almost
everyone knows this
as 'Apache', that is
Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 12:26:23PM -0700, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>> Pretty darned quiet - either "it's summer" or nobody feels like
>> joining the fray when Roy and Will go at it?
>
> Well, Paul's talk in San Diego got me thinking. We're not really "just"
> about HT
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 12:26:23PM -0700, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Pretty darned quiet - either "it's summer" or nobody feels like
> joining the fray when Roy and Will go at it?
Well, Paul's talk in San Diego got me thinking. We're not really "just"
about HTTP any more, it's a misnomer. We're
On 08/10/2006 09:26 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>
>>Roy would prefer we determine the active consensus. Please vote for what
>>you believe is the principal, proper name of the product we create from
>>the sources located in the http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/h
sctemme, maxime
> Apache niq (implicit)
Pretty darned quiet - either "it's summer" or nobody feels like joining the fray
when Roy and Will go at it?
In any case, although I don't disagree with niq that almost everyone knows this
as 'Apache', that isn&#x
[ ] httpd
[ ] Apache httpd
[ ] Apache httpd Server
[ ] Apache HTTP Server
[X] Other: Apache Server
I went for Apache Server,
As of now it can do more than just http requests.
Look at the mod_ftpd for examle (not the one in incubator!!)
So Apache Server seems good to me... and this al
Hi,
As most of the things I had to say on this topic have been said
already, let's just vote :
> [ ] httpd
> [ ] Apache httpd
> [ ] Apache httpd Server
> [X] Apache HTTP Server
> [ ] Other:
Regards,
- Maxime
--
Maxime Petazzoni (http://www.bulix.org)
-- gone crazy,
iam A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, July 29, 2006 21:54
Subject: Re: [Vote] product name - for shipping versions
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
[ ] httpd
[ ] Apache httpd
[ ] Apache httpd Server
[X] Apache HTTP Server
[ ] Other:
- Original Message - From: "William A. Rowe, Jr."
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, July 29, 2006 21:54
Subject: Re: [Vote] product name - for shipping versions
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
[ ] httpd
[ ] Apache httpd
[ ] Apache httpd Server
[X] Ap
On Saturday 29 July 2006 21:28, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Steffen wrote:
> > I opt for: Apache Web Server
>
> The vote thread asks for feedback on -shipping- versions, that is,
> the names we use today.
The only word we have today that qualifies as a name is Apache.
Adding stop words to that
Steffen wrote:
> I opt for: Apache Web Server
The vote thread asks for feedback on -shipping- versions, that is,
the names we use today. This could be one of the suggestions on the
-other- thread discussing what the 'next version' will be called.
aturday, July 29, 2006 21:54
Subject: Re: [Vote] product name - for shipping versions
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
[ ] httpd
[ ] Apache httpd
[ ] Apache httpd Server
[X] Apache HTTP Server
[ ] Other:
On Jul 29, 2006, at 11:54 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
[ ] httpd
[ ] Apache httpd
[ ] Apache httpd Server
[X] Apache HTTP Server
[ ] Other:
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.temme.net/sander/
PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>
> [ ] httpd
> [ ] Apache httpd
> [ ] Apache httpd Server
> [X] Apache HTTP Server
> [ ] Other:
* William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> > Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> >> I tried to yesterday, but it is nigh impossible without a single
> >> unique word to search for. Maybe we should just hold another vote.
> >
> > It's hellish to search for, yes. The topic is raised every
I don't think I'm eligible to vote but I would point out that in the
third name the 'd' in 'httpd' is redundant if you append 'Server'.
On Sat, 2006-29-07 at 13:54 -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> [ ] httpd
> [ ] Apache httpd
> [ ] Apache httpd Server
> [ ] Apache HTTP Server
> [ ] O
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Roy T. Fielding wrote:
>
>> I tried to yesterday, but it is nigh impossible without a single unique
>> word to search for. Maybe we should just hold another vote.
>
> It's hellish to search for, yes. The topic is raised every once in a while
> and nobody stops to s
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
>
> I agree, though if we change it we may as well go to apache-server-2.4.x
> given the noise about protocol-independence.
+1 and I've changed -this- thread subject to discuss what the name is right now.
>>> Only recently did people start changing the text to remove httpd
* Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Apache HTTP Server is (mostly) a web server.
>
> Let's call it 'parker'
Good call.
Did you know, that 'nd' is short for
n.d. parker
:-)
Apache HTTP Server is (mostly) a web server.
Let's call it 'parker'
(I'll let the Spider Man fans explain it... :) )
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
"If you can
Fair point you have there...
As long as the new name isn't some way to hard to rememebr abrivation :)
AMPES ;) Apache Multi Protocal Extenable Sever j/k
On 7/29/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I wouldn't push the "Apache" thing.
Truth is... a letter could show up at any mo
Jorge Schrauwen wrote:
> Let me sugest:
>
> :: Nahche ::
> Nahche (Na-ai-che, `mischievous,' `meddlesome.'-George Wrattan). An
> Apache warrior, a member of the Chiricahua band. He is the second son
> of the celebrated Cochise, and as hereditary chief succeeded his elder
> brother, Tazi, on the de
I wouldn't push the "Apache" thing.
Truth is... a letter could show up at any moment from lawyers
of the Apache Nation regarding the name usage.
Might even be way overdue.
I wouldn't "go there" and draw attention to the issue at all.
Yours...
Kevin Kiley
In a message dated 7/28/2006 3:
Nick Kew wrote:
> Isn't the whole problem the lack of a proper product name that
> we or anyone can identify with (other than "Apache")?
>
> With that in mind, how about something more distinctive and
> less ineffably lame than anything like "httpd" or &
On Friday 28 July 2006 22:59, Jorge Schrauwen wrote:
> Let me sugest:
> :: Nahche ::
>
> Nahche (Na-ai-che, `mischievous,' `meddlesome.'-George Wrattan). An
> Apache warrior, a member of the Chiricahua band. He is the second son
> of the celebrated Cochise, and as hereditary chief succeeded his eld
ar.gz
> httpd-2.0.59-win32-src.zip
> httpd-2.0.59.tar.gz
> httpd-2.2.3-win32-src.zip
> httpd-2.2.3.tar.gz
>
> and the NOTICE files are tied to the source tree (httpd).
Isn't the whole problem the lack of a proper product name that
we or anyone can identif
ce tree (httpd).
Isn't the whole problem the lack of a proper product name that
we or anyone can identify with (other than "Apache")?
With that in mind, how about something more distinctive and
less ineffably lame than anything like "httpd" or "web server"?
For
On Jul 28, 2006, at 12:32 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
From this perspective and for clarity, while we are on the subject,
perhaps
apache-httpd-X would be the appropriate package names, and
seems that
would be consistent with how most many ASF projects are
distributing their
tarballs
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
>
> It is the name of the product containing a whole bunch of source code
> and many binaries, one of which is sometimes called httpd. The tarballs
> are called httpd. The legal notices will be called httpd, and the links
> to the artifacts will be called httpd. The only
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
>
> People discuss what to put in the Announcement text on every release,
> but the only discussion I've seen about our product name was Paul's
> suggestion we change it to &quo
On Jul 27, 2006, at 1:36 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
That line is for the product name, not the project name.
And - I understood that our product is the Apache HTTP Server,
not httpd.
At least that's been the consensus in the docs project for the
last
35 matches
Mail list logo
