On Aug 13, 2007, at 1:08 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Just a FYI: I'm planning on doing a TR of 2.0.61 tomorrow (Aug 13);
It's a retag of 2.0.60 (plus the version bump, 'natch), and a reroll
with the singular exception of bundling APR 0.9.12, instead of
0.9.14.
The tarballs and related files for 2.0.60 have been
removed from testing...
Depending on the speed in which APR 0.9.15, we may
go ahead with a fully combined 1.3/2.0/2.2 release
(as originally planned) or release 1.3/2.2 earlier
than 2.0...
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 08:02:53 -0400
Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Depending on the speed in which APR 0.9.15, we may
go ahead with a fully combined 1.3/2.0/2.2 release
(as originally planned)
Rushed schedules lead to more bugs ...
or release 1.3/2.2 earlier
than 2.0...
Hello,
view from a small commercial vendor:
[ ]httpd-2.2.5
dropped into custom buildsystem for proprietary solution; passed
integrety check, compilation, regression tests, application testing plus
manual inspection without so much as a burp.
Best regards,
Andreas
--
flatline IT
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Nick Kew
Gesendet: Montag, 13. August 2007 14:54
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.5, 2.0.60 1.3.38 release
candidate tarballs for review
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 08:02:53 -0400
Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 13, 2007, at 9:06 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Nick Kew
Gesendet: Montag, 13. August 2007 14:54
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.5, 2.0.60 1.3.38 release
candidate tarballs for review
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 08:02:53
On Aug 10, 2007, at 4:49 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Available for your testing pleasure, 3, count 'em, 3
Apache HTTP Server release candidate tarballs, located,
Good PGP signatures on all. Good MD5 hashes on all, although you
seem to have used md5 for 1.3 and md5sum for the others, resulting
On Aug 13, 2007, at 11:46 AM, Sander Temme wrote:
On Aug 10, 2007, at 4:49 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Available for your testing pleasure, 3, count 'em, 3
Apache HTTP Server release candidate tarballs, located,
Good PGP signatures on all. Good MD5 hashes on all, although you
seem to have
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Also, all the way through 1.3.37 the 1.3 drop has been available in
.tar.gz and .tar.Z compressed format, never in .tar.bz2.
By design and on purpose, I dropped .Z in favor of bz2...
I wanted similar distros available.
When this came up last time, we decided to retain
On Aug 13, 2007, at 1:37 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Also, all the way through 1.3.37 the 1.3 drop has been available in
.tar.gz and .tar.Z compressed format, never in .tar.bz2.
By design and on purpose, I dropped .Z in favor of bz2...
I wanted similar distros
Sorry for the cross post but this involves both
projects: If we (APR) decide that a 0.9.15 this
week makes sense, then I'm willing to hold off releasing
all 3 versions of httpd until then... If 0.9.15
will instead be pushed out until whenever, then
1.3 and 2.2 will go out this week no matter
On Aug 10, 2007, at 4:49 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
[ ]httpd-2.2.5
2.2.5 Prefork is now running on issues.apache.org, running Ubuntu
Dapper, and holding up nicely:
http://issues.apache.org/server-status
Not that we expected otherwise. (:
S.
--
Sander Temme
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP
On Aug 13, 2007, at 4:59 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Aug 13, 2007, at 1:08 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Just a FYI: I'm planning on doing a TR of 2.0.61 tomorrow (Aug 13);
It's a retag of 2.0.60 (plus the version bump, 'natch), and a reroll
with the singular exception
On Aug 13, 2007, at 11:37 AM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
It is mostly the same people, regardless. Bill could tag 0.9.15
and start a release vote on APR while Jim rebuilds 2.0.x based
on that tag and starts another release vote here. That way, lazy
folks like me can test both at once.
+1
S.
Sander Temme wrote:
On Aug 13, 2007, at 11:37 AM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
It is mostly the same people, regardless. Bill could tag 0.9.15
and start a release vote on APR while Jim rebuilds 2.0.x based
on that tag and starts another release vote here. That way, lazy
folks like me can test
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Sander Temme wrote:
On Aug 13, 2007, at 11:37 AM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
It is mostly the same people, regardless. Bill could tag 0.9.15
and start a release vote on APR while Jim rebuilds 2.0.x based
on that tag and starts another release vote here.
16 matches
Mail list logo