I'm reviewing this... I'm mostly investigating whether
the check for keepalive!=1 before calling ap_set_keepalive
in ap_send_http_header and ap_send_error_response is
too ap_die() specific. It seems to me that
ap_set_keepalive should be smarter internally about
double or more calls per request.
patches (except for the original one which
makes that safety external) and I've been so busy the last
few weeks that I just threw that in as a quick and dirty solution.
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http
*/
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order
will lose both and deserve neither - T.Jefferson
it.
--
Nick Kew
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order
will lose both and deserve neither
Personally, I think that if Roy said that it would
cause non-compliance then, unless he changed his mind,
that's good enough for me to veto any change that
would add Set-Cookie.
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL
+APACHE_FAST_OUTPUT($modpath_current/Makefile)
AC_MSG_RESULT(added $withval)
],
[ AC_MSG_RESULT(no extra modules)
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
A society
On Sep 2, 2004, at 11:25 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
Do we want to include the experimental MPMs in the 2.2 GA Branch?
Currently the MPMs in server/mpm/experimental are:
- leader
- perchild
- threadpool
My personal feeling is to *not* include them in the 2.2 branch at this
time. If any of the
hadn't stayed there, I
doubt if work would have been done on them to allow them to
graduate :)
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
A society that will trade a little liberty
I've noticed that if you build httpd normally (with DSO capability)
and then use apxs to try to build mod_cache, then when you try
to run the server you get:
mod_cache.so: symbol __floatdidf: referenced symbol not found
This is due to the fact that the required math functions to do some
date
Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, 7 Sep 2004 09:10:45 -0400, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've noticed that if you build httpd normally (with DSO capability)
and then use apxs to try to build mod_cache, then when you try
to run the server you get:
mod_cache.so: symbol
True, but this is one that I'm hitting a lot, especially
with the increase in cache development going on...
And this is the only bundled module that I've hit this on
when httpd is build normally.
Joe Orton wrote:
On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 10:03:39AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Jeff Trawick
was simply
hoping to make mod_cache more ignorant and less-dependent
on how httpd was built.
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
A society that will trade a little liberty
I'd like to propose a 1.3.32 release with a TR either late this
week or early next.
There's enough changes to warrant it I think. In the meantime,
if people could test HEAD, that would be great! Especially
those hit by the mod_dav/mod_frontpage problems that
surfaced with 1.3.31.
On Sep 7, 2004, at 2:20 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 01:00:40PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
True, but this is one that I'm hitting a lot, especially
with the increase in cache development going on...
Then fix your build environment, or work out how the httpd build system
can
it doesn't have to be mod_cache
and it doesn't have to be built with apxs
it just has to be built as a DSO with gcc, and it can reference
libgcc.a symbols that weren't included in httpd and/or weren't
exported by httpd
True 'nuff... I was simply trying to indicate a quick
and dirty way to recreate
Of course, assuming any dependencies do exist, doing
a full build in an environment where justlibgcc.a
exists will cause the required functions to be statically
linked in, so you avoid the external library (.so)
dependency... Still need to build mod_cache though
inline with httpd...
By the by, I
, people don't look for 1.3 patches in the 2.0 STATUS file
and vice-versa :)
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order
There is a STATUS file in the 1.3 tree.
Geoffrey Young wrote:
André Malo wrote:
* Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In general, people don't look for 1.3 patches in the 2.0 STATUS file
and vice-versa :)
As far as I can see, the current way to make changes is 2.1 - 2.0
=?ISO-8859-15?Q?Andr=E9?= Malo wrote:
* Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In general, people don't look for 1.3 patches in the 2.0 STATUS file
and vice-versa :)
As far as I can see, the current way to make changes is 2.1 - 2.0 - 1.3.
So it makes sense for me to look into 2.0
!
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order
will lose both and deserve neither - T.Jefferson
Please review STATUS for Apache 1.3.32-dev HEAD. I'd like
to release soon. There are 3 proposed patches for
inclusion noted, 2 of which we need 1.3 patch files
for.
or it will be fixed soon.
Any current status on it?
Fixed in 1.3.31-dev and in 1.3.32 which will be tagged this week
and likely released early next week.
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http
If you haven't already, please grab 1.3.32-dev HEAD and
test it out. I'd like some additional good feedback
before I commit to a TR. As such, I'd like to
impose a on-hold policy for any more code commits.
--
===
Jim Jagielski
On Sep 7, 2006, at 10:49 AM, Garrett Rooney wrote:
On 9/7/06, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Topic for discussion: Add the FCGI proxy module to
the 2.2.x distro?
... On the other hand I doubt anyone will do so without it being in
a release branch ;-)
My thoughts exactly, hence me
On Sep 7, 2006, at 12:39 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Topic for discussion: Add the FCGI proxy module to
the 2.2.x distro?
I personally would like to get the local-process spawning done
first, or has everyone pretty much given up on ever doing that?
I think the energy
There is a lot of confusion where the users think that
simply adding the stickysession param to the http worker
attribute *adds* the required sticky session info (cookie).
I'm looking into adding functionality that actually
does that and therefore avoiding this large and common
misconception.
Paul Querna wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
There is a lot of confusion where the users think that
simply adding the stickysession param to the http worker
attribute *adds* the required sticky session info (cookie).
I'm looking into adding functionality that actually
does
Paul Querna wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Paul Querna wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
There is a lot of confusion where the users think that
simply adding the stickysession param to the http worker
attribute *adds* the required sticky session info (cookie).
I'm looking into adding
On Sep 25, 2006, at 8:54 AM, Garrett Rooney wrote:
On 9/25/06, snacktime [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have very little C programming experience, but I've decided to
tackle adding another load balancing method to mod_proxy_balancer.
The reason for a new lbmethod is to have something that works
Yeah, some sort of locking/mutexing should
really be available. mod_jk has simple
locking, but the default is not to lock, iirc.
FWIW, there seemed to be an initial feeling from
people that Yeah, this is a good idea and then
it kind of degraded into a Nah, it's stupid; It's
too hard to do it completely; We can already do
this now by adding all these other config
directives so I decided not to waste my time
on it right now.
On Sep 29, 2006, at 3:53 AM, Mathias Herberts wrote:
Hi,
I am in the process of evaluating Apache 2.2 using mod_proxy_balancer
and mod_proxy_ajp as a replacement for our good old 1.3/mod_jk setup
as a front-end to Tomcat 5.5.
I found several problems during this process.
...
I have other
you described
as 'disabled'? IMO 'disabled' means 'never use, not startable', and
'stopped' means 'don't use in this state, startable via admin interface'.
That aligns with my definitions...
--
===
Jim Jagielski
On Sep 30, 2006, at 7:04 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: mturk
Date: Sat Sep 30 04:04:46 2006
New Revision: 451580
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=451580
Log:
Add alternative is_socket_connected implementation.
It works on win32 and linux for sure, so that's why
I put it
.
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
If you can dodge a wrench, you can dodge a ball.
Jim Jagielski wrote:
rules for C should mean we abandon standard C idioms...
shouldn't
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com
I don't feel strongly enough about all on one line vs assignment on
one and test on another to really push one over the other, however.
But that comma method is an abomination ;)
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL
On Oct 2, 2006, at 4:45 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 09/30/2006 01:04 PM, wrote:
Author: mturk
Date: Sat Sep 30 04:04:46 2006
New Revision: 451580
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=451580
Log:
Add alternative is_socket_connected implementation.
It works on win32 and linux for
On Oct 5, 2006, at 5:07 AM, Mathias Herberts wrote:
The second modification is the ability to have a value of 0 for
'loadfactor' thus allowing to have workers which will only handle
session bound requests. This also allows to configure a behaviour
similar to the one that was possible with
On Oct 5, 2006, at 5:07 AM, Mathias Herberts wrote:
The first patch (ajp.patch) modifies the behaviour of mod_proxy,
introducing two config parameters.
The first new parameter is 'forceclose' which can have values 'On' or
'Off'. The default config for a worker is 'Off'. If this parameter is
.
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
If you can dodge a wrench, you can dodge a ball.
even
if they have query args, with a few lines of code to check some
envvar.
If actually needed ( :) ) +1 on concept
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
If you can
of the message */
int server_side;
};
It's standard procedure to add additional struct elements
to the END, for backwards binary compatibility.
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http
Joshua Slive wrote:
Two doc comments:
1. You should mention the default lockfile name if it is omitted in
the arguments.
+1
2. You probably don't mean SSL Module above.
:) Hasty cut and paste :)
--
===
Jim
Sounds good.
On a related note, our practice with mod_jk is to route only *.jsp,
/servlet/*, and a few other URL patterns to Tomcat and let Apache
handle
everything else. We also want to support load balancing with sticky
sessions, of course.
That combination is pretty easy and
. Avoiding full-blown regex in ProxyPass allows
for nice pattern matching (globbing) without the overhead of
a full regex engine... fast fast fast should be the name of
the game.
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED
this...
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
If you can dodge a wrench, you can dodge a ball.
Looking over CHANGES and STATUS, I think we should
start thinking about a 2.2.4 release. Comments?
I offer to be RM.
Mladen Turk wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Looking over CHANGES and STATUS, I think we should
start thinking about a 2.2.4 release. Comments?
I would like to propose the backport of proxy alternate
is_socket_connected. This is IMHO very crucial
for AJP to work. Without
Mladen Turk wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
I know that Bill is looking at a release of APR and
that alternate method would, I think, be better
implemented in APR than directly in httpd...
Sure it can be done, but in that case it would require at
least a minor version bump.
I have
In any case, I don't see a backport in STATUS so it's
all academic anyway ;)
Mladen Turk wrote:
Anyhow, mod_jk works on all the platforms with the
exact code like a charm ;)
With my non-devil's-advocate hat on, the code itself is
pretty basic Steven's anyway...
--
===
Jim Jagielski
On Nov 8, 2006, at 1:47 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 12:27:31PM -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Looking over CHANGES and STATUS, I think we should
start thinking about a 2.2.4 release. Comments?
I would like to propose the backport
that will SIGSEGV on Unix for an fd
FD_SETSIZE. There is no excuse to at least not use apr_poll()
Do I detect the leanings of a potential veto for the
impl in httpd-trunk??
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED
that the fd must be 0 ;)
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
If you can dodge a wrench, you can dodge a ball.
active (both user and developer)
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
If you can dodge a wrench, you can dodge a ball.
On Oct 31, 2006, at 9:58 AM, Jess Holle wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Sounds good.
On a related note, our practice with mod_jk is to route only *.jsp,
/servlet/*, and a few other URL patterns to Tomcat and let
Apache handle
everything else. We also want to support load balancing
I've rec'd a report via private email that
2.2.3 and mod_proxy are not correctly
flushing EOS when streaming...
1.) When an IE browser requests a page, the server starts serving
real-time data as chunks.
2.) The response header has a Transfer-Encoding of chunked. Each
chunk
is
Jim Jagielski wrote:
I can't recreate this nor can I find anything matching
it in Bugzilla.
Oops... looks like PR 37514 and 40920
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com
/index.html
And we would then import mod_wombat under:
hhttps://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/mod_wombat
+1
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
If you can dodge a wrench
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW: Autoflush (even in trunk) does not work (See PR 19954).
I've reopened that PR and added a +1 to the patch. So feel
free to commit to trunk (CTR)
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL
I'd still like to push a 2.2.4 out, say VERY early in Dec.
There are some backports awaiting just 1 single vote
to be approved, and others which look VERY worthwhile
to be in this version. Let's all take some time and
look over them ;)
Joe Orton wrote:
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 05:36:55PM -, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Author: jim
Date: Tue Nov 28 09:36:45 2006
New Revision: 480135
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=480135
Log:
Apply patch for PR 41056 (19954) to fix chunk
filter. Now flushes work
On Nov 28, 2006, at 12:08 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
I'd still like to push a 2.2.4 out, say VERY early in Dec.
There are some backports awaiting just 1 single vote
to be approved, and others which look VERY worthwhile
to be in this version. Let's all take some time and
look
On Nov 28, 2006, at 1:09 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Joe Orton wrote:
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 05:36:55PM -, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Author: jim
Date: Tue Nov 28 09:36:45 2006
New Revision: 480135
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=480135
Log:
Apply patch for PR 41056 (19954
On Dec 5, 2006, at 7:23 AM, Joe Orton wrote:
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 06:39:30AM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
A lot of opinions were offered back in August. Some were negative
but
I don't see anything that looks like a veto.
(http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-dev/200608.mbox/%
.
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
If you can dodge a wrench, you can dodge a ball.
for such users.
Can he install mod_security?
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
If you can dodge a wrench, you can dodge a ball.
Jorge Schrauwen wrote:
On 12/6/06, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joe Orton wrote:
The motivation given by the submitter was that he pays per byte served,
it seems entirely reasonable to allow the Server header to be disabled
for such users.
Can he install
.
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
If you can dodge a wrench, you can dodge a ball.
On Dec 8, 2006, at 8:07 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jim
Date: Fri Dec 8 05:07:14 2006
New Revision: 483980
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=483980
Log:
Merge r442758 from trunk:
PR 31759 (mutated) - reported by Jo Rhett
Don't return apr_status_t error value from input
different question though. At least
now we have the option to do something.
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
If you can dodge a wrench, you can dodge a ball.
.
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
If you can dodge a wrench, you can dodge a ball.
You mean removing the mod_proxy usage of scoreboard space
to a simple shared memory segment?
I thought the whole idea was to abstract out the
scoreboard so that it was easier for people to add
and remove tables from the scoreboard... the so-called
generic scoreboard.
I don't really see the
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
I'd still like to push a 2.2.4 out, say VERY early in Dec.
There are some backports awaiting just 1 single vote
to be approved, and others which look VERY worthwhile
to be in this version. Let's all take some time and
look over them
didn't come as
fast as expected :)
But tell you what, if you want to do a 2.2.4 Sun/Mon
then I'll do 2.2.5 mid-Jan (assuming there's enough for
a release)...
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On 12/15/06, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I see your point 100% though... I really hoped that we would
have had a 2.2.4 out sooner, but the votes didn't come as
fast as expected :)
What votes? I haven't seen any votes for 2.2.4. -- justin
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
But tell you what, if you want to do a 2.2.4 Sun/Mon
then I'll do 2.2.5 mid-Jan (assuming there's enough for
a release)...
That sounds like a deal, late Sun or early Mon depending on the localized
family crises :)
I would have
Nick Kew wrote:
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 16:44:33 -0500 (EST)
Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On 12/15/06, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I see your point 100% though... I really hoped that we would
have had a 2.2.4 out sooner
!
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
If you can dodge a wrench, you can dodge a ball.
vote +1 by inspection, but I can't test...
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
If you can dodge a wrench, you can dodge a ball.
. If we need it can we simply ignore an APR_INCOMPLETE return code on all
platforms
and only bail out if ((rv != APR_INCOMPLETE) (rv != APR_SUCCESS))
+1 also on documenting this.
--
===
Jim Jagielski
On Jan 6, 2007, at 2:41 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ will soon (within the hour, upon
resync)
contain the following tarballs for approval
httpd-2.2.4.tar.bz2 [.asc|.md5]
httpd-2.2.4.tar.gz [.asc|.md5]
httpd-2.2.4-win32-src.zip [.asc|.md5]
+/-1
[ ]
loathe to do that. Let 2.2.4 live, and pick up 2.2.5 soon.
I'm looking at a 2.2.5 likely the end of Jan/start of Feb...
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
If you can
mod_ftp is a protocol module for Apache 2.x which
adds in RFC-compliant FTP as a supported protocol
for httpd.
Work has been done in getting mod_ftp ported to the
Apache 2.x build environment, compatibility with
later versions of APR (for httpd 2.2.x) and other
improvements. It's time for
On Jan 17, 2007, at 3:30 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
mod_ftp is a protocol module for Apache 2.x which
adds in RFC-compliant FTP as a supported protocol
for httpd.
Work has been done in getting mod_ftp ported to the
Apache 2.x build environment, compatibility with
later versions of APR
We did it with Y2K so +1...
I've been seeing a *huge* increase in these questions
as well.
On Jan 24, 2007, at 5:28 PM, Victor J. Orlikowski wrote:
Long time, no speak on my behalf. I hope to be changing that soon.
So - to de-cloak:
I've been getting some questions (from my new employer) on
On Jan 24, 2007, at 6:43 PM, Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 05:28:49PM -0500, Victor J. Orlikowski wrote:
I've been getting some questions (from my new employer) on the
impact of the upcoming Daylight Saving Time issues for the httpd.
My natural response was: There are
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
If you can dodge a wrench, you can dodge a ball.
rec'd 3 this morning (yours, Garretts and Martins) and
filed them already.
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
If you can dodge a wrench, you can dodge a ball.
On Feb 6, 2007, at 8:10 AM, Joe Orton wrote:
On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 08:46:01PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: rpluem
Date: Mon Feb 5 12:46:01 2007
New Revision: 503863
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=503863
Log:
* Add missing Changelog entry for PR41056 / PR 19954.
I don't know what's happening with my emails, but they
appear to be getting dropped left and right.
I had responded to Joe's email, saying that I must be
misunderstanding his concern, but I haven't seen that
make it's way through yet.
If I'm understanding it correctly, what we should be
doing
On Feb 6, 2007, at 3:07 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 02/06/2007 06:26 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I don't know what's happening with my emails, but they
appear to be getting dropped left and right.
I had responded to Joe's email, saying that I must be
misunderstanding his concern, but I
On Feb 9, 2007, at 1:15 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
I will allow for 24 hours for anyone to raise objections
and then inform the Incubator and start the graduation
process.
Ping?
I mostly bring this up because the reports are due
On Feb 14, 2007, at 2:33 AM, Paul Querna wrote:
- Promote and include a external-process communication method in the
core. This could be used to communicate with PHP, a JVM, Ruby or many
other things that do not wish to be run inside a highly-threaded and
async core. The place for large
On Feb 14, 2007, at 2:32 AM, Paul Querna wrote:
I believe the httpd project is ready for a push towards the next major
version.
- Async IO will not work in the core without committing more evil
hacks,
that will make the code harder to understand and follow.
- Async IO will not work
On Feb 14, 2007, at 10:45 AM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On 2/13/07, Paul Querna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Rewrite how Brigades, Buckets and filters work. Possibly
replace them
with other models. I haven't been able to personally consolidate my
thoughts on how to 'fix' filters, but I am
On Feb 14, 2007, at 3:28 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
It's always been small groups ;-) But we are loathe to drop the
'barrier
to entry' of demonstrating that the new coder is 'cluefull'. This
is a
server platform, rife with the security issues that go along with
that.
We need
Since the last report in November, we have seen 2 software
releases:
o httpd 2.2.4
o mod_python 3.3.1
2 new codebases are making their way into the project;
mod_ftp has been accepted for graduation from the Incubator
(this will also be reported in the Incubator report
next month) and the
On Feb 20, 2007, at 4:36 AM, Marc Stern wrote:
How could we use mod_proxy for outgoing connections from another
module ?
Is there any simple way ?
Is there any standard (I mean documented) way, or would it rely on
internals only ? In the latter case, we would have to recode
everything
101 - 200 of 4498 matches
Mail list logo
